Gebirgscel
horsedickpilled
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2019
- Posts
- 2,483
- Reputation
- 2,228
myostatin = everything (for gymcels)
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
I've seen the yk11 myostatin inhibitor condemned on this site with no expansion on the statement. Structurally similar to DHT, but does it really carry the same costs and drawbacks? I wouldn't expect too many people to have experience because I presume no one needs it until they're maxxed out and let's be honest, probably <.5% of users here are body maxxed. I'm still open ears thoughmyostatin = everything (for gymcels)
I thought about myostatin genesI've seen the yk11 myostatin inhibitor condemned on this site with no expansion on the statement. Structurally similar to DHT, but does it really carry the same costs and drawbacks? I wouldn't expect too many people to have experience because I presume no one needs it until they're maxxed out and let's be honest, probably <.5% of users here are body maxxed. I'm still open ears though
dont insult me like that bitchI won’t argue with u further. FatJattMofo tier iq
The most gifted natties can reach a level where some un-gifted roid users can never reach.
You are the guy that claims he gained 20 kg of raw muscle in one year as a natty.95% of this forum is completely retarded when it comes to training and fitness
View attachment 155754
View attachment 155758
natty achieveable physiques. just saying
Even a trenned up ronnie couldnt do thatYou are the guy that claims he gained 20 kg of raw muscle in one year as a natty.
jflcel at you
What do you consider normal height?at normal height
Ronnie used tren though didn't he?Even a trenned up ronnie couldnt do that
olivier richters the dutch giant guy gained 80kg in span of few years. u need to realise things scale up heavilyWhat do you consider normal height?
Ronnie used tren though didn't he?
He is 200 cm+ though but still
Ronnie did whatever it took to make all kindsa gainsWhat do you consider normal height?
Ronnie used tren though didn't he?
He is 200 cm+ though but still
JFL at anyone thinking kinobody's physique is attainable without ever touching gear.Kinobody is fucking so smart. He might've ran a cycle back in 2014-2016. But I'm pretty sure he's focusing on building lean muscle w/o any anabolics.
It's attainable for some people without ever touching gear.JFL at anyone thinking kinobody's physique is attainable without ever touching gear.
Nah thoIt's attainable for some people without ever touching gear.
It's not impossible for everyone to achieve his physique naturally. Probably no one will. But some people have the capacity to. I'm not even saying Kinobody himself is natty or not. I'm just saying it's not impossible for everyone to achieve his physique without steroids.Nah tho
It's not impossible for everyone to achieve his physique naturally. Probably no one will. But some people have the capacity to. I'm not even saying Kinobody himself is natty or not. I'm just saying it's not impossible for everyone to achieve his physique without steroids.
Hes natty with good geneticsNah tho
Uhh is that not 7 year old "little hercules", the kid who was given steroids by his father and benched 210 at the time..?It's not impossible for everyone to achieve his physique naturally. Probably no one will. But some people have the capacity to. I'm not even saying Kinobody himself is natty or not. I'm just saying it's not impossible for everyone to achieve his physique without steroids.
View attachment 156581
This is natty. He could've achieved Kinobody's physique if he put his mind to it.
7 year old, not eating tonnes, not training heavy, not injecting steroids.
Look into the genetics.
could be a myostatin deficiencyUhh is that not 7 year old "little hercules", the kid who was given steroids by his father and benched 210 at the time..?
Tainted with tren i seeAlso Yoel Romero was busted, but then they said one of his supplements was tainted, but come on, he's fucking 42yo, look at him, no way he's clean.
![]()
![]()
![]()
Lol no when hebgrew up he lost it all they were feeding the kid winstrol at very small doses winstrol was by the way used in childrencould be a myostatin deficiency
We're talking 0.01% of peopleIt's attainable for some people without ever touching gear.
All the retarded kids here posting pictures of obvious roiders and calling them natties with average genetics is a text book example of why I keep ranting about this forum being full of fucking kids. So much fucking cringe.
Listen dudes, I can understand why discovering the truth about "natty" lifting is shocking. I was also demoralized after finding out about it. But I'm telling you: THERE LITERALLY IS NO SUCH THING AS GETTING A GOOD BODY WITHOUT ROIDS. Sure, you can look "in shape" without roids, but without roids and great genetics you will NEVER look good enough so that people can actually tell that you lift. You have no idea how badly you have been brainwashed. Some years ago I use to know this recreational athlete who did 10x the exercise of the average person and also lifted at the gym. He still just looked like a normal person albeit a bit more in shape. Body transformations aren't possible without roids.
typical .co line of thought - if it doesn't bring me to chad level alone, there is no point in doing it. My stance - if it gives me even e 0.2 PSL boost without costing me much money (I have time), then you fuckin bet I'm doing it. Go back to your autistic political rants, defeatist oldie.
That's little Hercules lmao, his dad put him on gear since young
that's not what he says at all, jfl
the only one brainwashed, is you. im so sorry man for your terrible truecel genetics, gotta move onAll the retarded kids here posting pictures of obvious roiders and calling them natties with average genetics is a text book example of why I keep ranting about this forum being full of fucking kids. So much fucking cringe.
Listen dudes, I can understand why discovering the truth about "natty" lifting is shocking. I was also demoralized after finding out about it. But I'm telling you: THERE LITERALLY IS NO SUCH THING AS GETTING A GOOD BODY WITHOUT ROIDS. Sure, you can look "in shape" without roids, but without roids and great genetics you will NEVER look good enough so that people can actually tell that you lift. You have no idea how badly you have been brainwashed. Some years ago I use to know this recreational athlete who did 10x the exercise of the average person and also lifted at the gym. He still just looked like a normal person albeit a bit more in shape. Body transformations aren't possible without roids.
That's little Hercules lmao, his dad put him on gear since young
My chadlite friend 100 % natty but he's natural T is 950 ng/DL
Trains hard AF sometimes 2 times day , amazing genes
i disagree, i think youve taken it too far hereAll the retarded kids here posting pictures of obvious roiders and calling them natties with average genetics is a text book example of why I keep ranting about this forum being full of fucking kids. So much fucking cringe.
Listen dudes, I can understand why discovering the truth about "natty" lifting is shocking. I was also demoralized after finding out about it. But I'm telling you: THERE LITERALLY IS NO SUCH THING AS GETTING A GOOD BODY WITHOUT ROIDS. Sure, you can look "in shape" without roids, but without roids and great genetics you will NEVER look good enough so that people can actually tell that you lift. You have no idea how badly you have been brainwashed. Some years ago I use to know this recreational athlete who did 10x the exercise of the average person and also lifted at the gym. He still just looked like a normal person albeit a bit more in shape. Body transformations aren't possible without roids.
No jflcelWait that picture is real??? I thought somebody just photoshoped some kid's head on a bodybuilder wtf
no troll 100 % serious here i swearWait that picture is real??? I thought somebody just photoshoped some kid's head on a bodybuilder wtf
Plz be a troll or else my earlier point is proven jfl.
I think looking good and big are 2 different things. You're big but smaller guy with better insertins would look better. You have decent frame thoughL
i disagree, i think youve taken it too far here
of course you can get a good body without roids and good genetics, it just takes much more time and you will never truly look insane
this was me pre cycle
View attachment 156644
now-
View attachment 156645
View attachment 156646
but yes you will never look as good as roiders even if they have shit work ethic and genetics
thats what I get from it, also "Body transformations aren't possible without roids." - it doesn't get any more fat/skinnyfat cope than that
There are roiders that look like shit tooMy point is that any roider would blow them out of the water. Yes they look better than most of the pop but that's a small achievement when they would get mogged to death by anyone on cycle. If you're looking to musclemaxx imo you gotta roid.
Looked better than him while i was nattu ffs my 16 yr old bro gymmaxing rn could look better than him in 3 yrs ezThis is the best you can hope for without roids if you have good genetics:
![]()
His physique isn't obtainable naturally even with good genetics. In fact even with roids you might not look like him with just average genetics. If you have good genetics you might look like the guy above. 95+% of people will never look anything like Scott or Omar.
males expected to take dangerous drugs so we can just be STANDARD while women oly requirement is to stay reasonabmy lean and yet complain about it .You don’t think Omar is natural lol? Been training for 10+ years and still doesn’t look that good and is 15% bodyfat..of course he’s natural.
Scooby admitted to TRT...
Omar is probably the WORST example you could have used...he’s probly the only one that isn’t on steroids
How bad are ur genetics man? LmaoWait that picture is real??? I thought somebody just photoshoped some kid's head on a bodybuilder wtf
Plz be a troll or else my earlier point is proven jfl.
Back then they had much higher testosterone levels on average than we do. For (((whatever reason))), testosterone has been decreasing year after year, decade after decade, so that now the """healthy""" range has been lowered to what a 78 year old man would have had in the 70s.If you wanna know what is possible without roids just look at photos of bodybuilders before roids were invented, then there's no question. yeah it's possible to achieve a little more nowadays with better knowledge of training effects.