What people dont understand about height vs face

[~Pyro]

IN MOST FACE VS HEIGHT DISCUSSIONS I HAVE NEVER SEEN THIS POINT BEING DISCUSSED.

The way face and height matter to women is the same way face and body matter to men.
Physical attractiveness is a combination of both body and face.

LIKE HOW MOST MEN SEE TITS AND ASS IS THE SAME WAY WOMEN SEE HEIGHT AND FRAME. "MOST SOCIAL MEDIA BADDIES" OR ATTRACTIVE FEMALES YOU SEE DOWN THE STREET ARE THE LTBS WITH A GOOD BODY.

"TALL UGLY OR HANDSOME SHORT" IS THE SAME AS "BIG TITS/ASS UGLY OR STACY BUT NO TITS/ASS"

MOST GUYS WOULD CHOOSE BIG TITS/ASS OVER A FACE CARD, MAYBE ITS EASY TO SAY OTHERWISE OVER A SCREEN BUT IRL 99% OF MEN WOULD CHOOSE A WOMEN WITH A GREAT BODY.

MOST GUYS WOULD TURN THEIR HEADS ON THE STREET FOR A GOOD BODY, NOT SO MUCH FOR A FACE.

YOU WOULD MOST LIKELY BE TURNED ON BY SEEING A GOOD BODY OVER A GOOD FACE.

Same thinking process extends to a man's height and frame. So stop trying to cope around with a face.

Your face would get you far, but only so far, but the effect of being a manlet will always remain.
Blame a womens standards and Hypergamy. But the real culprit is the human biology itself. If a women likes tall, she's hypergamous, and when you watch porn with big tits then it all male harmones...Stop coping....

"WHY DO WOMEN WANT A FOOT OF HEIGHT DIFFERENCE" "THEY ARE SO SHORT THEMSELVES, WHY DO THEY WANT A TALLER MAN ???"

A 6'4 ltn would always overshadow a short/average Chad, the same way a ltb with a big ass/tits would overshadow a flatboard stacy (In most scenerios, like clubs for example. Most men would prefer a caked up wife)

SO DO YOU WANT TO KNOW IF YOU ARE GOOD ENOUGH AS A 5'7 CL? JUST ASK YOURSELF, WOULD YOU MARRY A FLAT LOOKSMATCH OF YOURSELF, OR AN UGLY FOID WITH A MODEL LIKE BODY.
just like height indicates good genetics, big tits/ass also indicates good genetics.

Biology tells us to mate with the genetically blessed.

Your Height is your Tits, and your frame is your ass. You are unfuckable if you have none.

 

[hyperandrogenic]

good post

 

[gson1]

worth reading

 

[Acquiescence]

Just have it all theorem

 

[~Pyro]

Just have it all theorem

It dont think you need to have all, but the way people downplay height when comparing it to face isnt really realistic. Your face cannot overshadow height all that much

 

[WilhelmThyWizard]

99% of men will choose ass & breasts over face card is because its insanely common for a girl to have a fat ass or vumpklituious breasts(1 in 3 foids) a pretty face is rare, being tall is also extemely rare.
Light yourself on Fire Grey
99% percent of men dont ever get the choice to hit models unlike Me.\

Youv lost your way grey, youv fallen to the pieths of hells.

 

[~Pyro]

99% of men will choose ass & breasts over face card is because its insanely common for a girl to have a fat ass or vumpklituious breasts(1 in 3 foids) a pretty face is rare, being tall is also extemely rare.
Light yourself on Fire Grey
99% percent of men dont ever get the choice to hit models unlike Me.\

Youv lost your way grey, youv fallen to the pieths of hells.

I am not talking about simply just any ass or boobs, I'm talking about big big tits and ass, you know what im talking about, not your average body.

Being tall isnt as rare as you think. Yes a face card is rare, but that doesnt change the fact that height plays a BIG impact aswelll, like i explained in the post. Despite a face card being more rare...

 

[mulattocel]

Most devastating nuke was realizing muscles were NOT the male equivalent of ass and tiddies

It was height the whole time

 

[~Pyro]

Most devastating nuke was realizing muscles were NOT the male equivalent of ass and tiddies

It was height the whole time

Yes, just like height indicates good genetics, big tits/ass also indicates good genetics.

Biology tells us to mate with the genetically blessed.

 

[mulattocel]

Yes, just like height indicates good genetics, big tits/ass also indicates good genetics.

Biology tells us to mate with the genetically blessed.

Fucking brootal for me being 5’8 and only attracted to big ass

 

[~Pyro]

Fucking brootal for me being 5’8 and only attracted to big ass

Same, I'm 5'9, which is the male average, but still short.

 

[~Pyro]

bump

 

[Bipolar2Cel]

No way 6 foot 4 LTN would mog an average height Chad other than in height, but the Chad would be the one raking in most pussy. Extreme height just guarantees you won't be incel, like 6 foot 3+ guys can never be incel no matter how ugly the rest of them are.

Also add hair to male's "tits & ass", I think hair is one of the most important things too, more than "just don't be bald". Quality, thickness, length matters extremely as fuck too than just hairline. Same way women envy women with extra coarse and extra dense thick hair as fuck.

BTW stuff like limb length also matters a lot I think, it is not just men that value long legs in women, women rate men a lot based on this too as part of your "frame" I think. Heard several women say short legs/limbs is unattractive as fuck no matter what the rest of the guy looks like. Really tall guy with narrow frame and short legs would get even more mogged by average height Chad with long limbs.

Edit: Once you pass average-ish or 6 foot in height face just takes over and dominates completely IMO.

 

[RiceChigga]

IN MOST FACE VS HEIGHT DISCUSSIONS I HAVE NEVER SEEN THIS POINT BEING DISCUSSED.

The way face and height matter to women is the same way face and body matter to men.
Physical attractiveness is a combination of both body and face.

LIKE HOW MOST MEN SEE TITS AND ASS IS THE SAME WAY WOMEN SEE HEIGHT AND FRAME. "MOST SOCIAL MEDIA BADDIES" OR ATTRACTIVE FEMALES YOU SEE DOWN THE STREET ARE THE LTBS WITH A GOOD BODY.

"TALL UGLY OR HANDSOME SHORT" IS THE SAME AS "BIG TITS/ASS UGLY OR STACY BUT NO TITS/ASS"

MOST GUYS WOULD CHOOSE BIG TITS/ASS OVER A FACE CARD, MAYBE ITS EASY TO SAY OTHERWISE OVER A SCREEN BUT IRL 99% OF MEN WOULD CHOOSE A WOMEN WITH A GREAT BODY.

MOST GUYS WOULD TURN THEIR HEADS ON THE STREET FOR A GOOD BODY, NOT SO MUCH FOR A FACE.

YOU WOULD MOST LIKELY BE TURNED ON BY SEEING A GOOD BODY OVER A GOOD FACE.

Same thinking process extends to a man's height and frame. So stop trying to cope around with a face.

Your face would get you far, but only so far, but the effect of being a manlet will always remain.
Blame a womens standards and Hypergamy. But the real culprit is the human biology itself. If a women likes tall, she's hypergamous, and when you watch porn with big tits then it all male harmones...Stop coping....

"WHY DO WOMEN WANT A FOOT OF HEIGHT DIFFERENCE" "THEY ARE SO SHORT THEMSELVES, WHY DO THEY WANT A TALLER MAN ???"

A 6'4 ltn would always overshadow a short/average Chad, the same way a ltb with a big ass/tits would overshadow a flatboard stacy (In most scenerios, like clubs for example. Most men would prefer a caked up wife)

SO DO YOU WANT TO KNOW IF YOU ARE GOOD ENOUGH AS A 5'7 CL? JUST ASK YOURSELF, WOULD YOU MARRY A FLAT LOOKSMATCH OF YOURSELF, OR AN UGLY FOID WITH A MODEL LIKE BODY.
just like height indicates good genetics, big tits/ass also indicates good genetics.

Biology tells us to mate with the genetically blessed.

Your Height is your Tits, and your frame is your ass. You are unfuckable if you have none.

w da fuh gng, u glazing height too much bro, shi ain't that bad if u hav the facecard, wdym that a 6'4 ltn would overshadow an average chad? shi doesn't happen or at least in my life it was never like this

 

[~Pyro]

w da fuh gng, u glazing height too much bro, shi ain't that bad if u hav the facecard, wdym that a 6'4 ltn would overshadow an average chad? shi doesn't happen or at least in my life it was never like this

Average chad and tall ltn would both do good.

Just that when you put them next to each other most women would easily choose the taller one. Next to each other the taller guy will overshadow him.

Just like if you put a flat stacy next to a caked out ltb, most women would choose the caked out one.

Both would obv do good, but think about what happens when u compare them

 

[truecel_KHHV]

IN MOST FACE VS HEIGHT DISCUSSIONS I HAVE NEVER SEEN THIS POINT BEING DISCUSSED.

The way face and height matter to women is the same way face and body matter to men.
Physical attractiveness is a combination of both body and face.

LIKE HOW MOST MEN SEE TITS AND ASS IS THE SAME WAY WOMEN SEE HEIGHT AND FRAME. "MOST SOCIAL MEDIA BADDIES" OR ATTRACTIVE FEMALES YOU SEE DOWN THE STREET ARE THE LTBS WITH A GOOD BODY.

"TALL UGLY OR HANDSOME SHORT" IS THE SAME AS "BIG TITS/ASS UGLY OR STACY BUT NO TITS/ASS"

MOST GUYS WOULD CHOOSE BIG TITS/ASS OVER A FACE CARD, MAYBE ITS EASY TO SAY OTHERWISE OVER A SCREEN BUT IRL 99% OF MEN WOULD CHOOSE A WOMEN WITH A GREAT BODY.

MOST GUYS WOULD TURN THEIR HEADS ON THE STREET FOR A GOOD BODY, NOT SO MUCH FOR A FACE.

YOU WOULD MOST LIKELY BE TURNED ON BY SEEING A GOOD BODY OVER A GOOD FACE.

Same thinking process extends to a man's height and frame. So stop trying to cope around with a face.

Your face would get you far, but only so far, but the effect of being a manlet will always remain.
Blame a womens standards and Hypergamy. But the real culprit is the human biology itself. If a women likes tall, she's hypergamous, and when you watch porn with big tits then it all male harmones...Stop coping....

"WHY DO WOMEN WANT A FOOT OF HEIGHT DIFFERENCE" "THEY ARE SO SHORT THEMSELVES, WHY DO THEY WANT A TALLER MAN ???"

A 6'4 ltn would always overshadow a short/average Chad, the same way a ltb with a big ass/tits would overshadow a flatboard stacy (In most scenerios, like clubs for example. Most men would prefer a caked up wife)

SO DO YOU WANT TO KNOW IF YOU ARE GOOD ENOUGH AS A 5'7 CL? JUST ASK YOURSELF, WOULD YOU MARRY A FLAT LOOKSMATCH OF YOURSELF, OR AN UGLY FOID WITH A MODEL LIKE BODY.
just like height indicates good genetics, big tits/ass also indicates good genetics.

Biology tells us to mate with the genetically blessed.

Your Height is your Tits, and your frame is your ass. You are unfuckable if you have none.

Bump

 

[tymobat]

IN MOST FACE VS HEIGHT DISCUSSIONS I HAVE NEVER SEEN THIS POINT BEING DISCUSSED.

The way face and height matter to women is the same way face and body matter to men.
Physical attractiveness is a combination of both body and face.

LIKE HOW MOST MEN SEE TITS AND ASS IS THE SAME WAY WOMEN SEE HEIGHT AND FRAME. "MOST SOCIAL MEDIA BADDIES" OR ATTRACTIVE FEMALES YOU SEE DOWN THE STREET ARE THE LTBS WITH A GOOD BODY.

"TALL UGLY OR HANDSOME SHORT" IS THE SAME AS "BIG TITS/ASS UGLY OR STACY BUT NO TITS/ASS"

MOST GUYS WOULD CHOOSE BIG TITS/ASS OVER A FACE CARD, MAYBE ITS EASY TO SAY OTHERWISE OVER A SCREEN BUT IRL 99% OF MEN WOULD CHOOSE A WOMEN WITH A GREAT BODY.

MOST GUYS WOULD TURN THEIR HEADS ON THE STREET FOR A GOOD BODY, NOT SO MUCH FOR A FACE.

YOU WOULD MOST LIKELY BE TURNED ON BY SEEING A GOOD BODY OVER A GOOD FACE.

Same thinking process extends to a man's height and frame. So stop trying to cope around with a face.

Your face would get you far, but only so far, but the effect of being a manlet will always remain.
Blame a womens standards and Hypergamy. But the real culprit is the human biology itself. If a women likes tall, she's hypergamous, and when you watch porn with big tits then it all male harmones...Stop coping....

"WHY DO WOMEN WANT A FOOT OF HEIGHT DIFFERENCE" "THEY ARE SO SHORT THEMSELVES, WHY DO THEY WANT A TALLER MAN ???"

A 6'4 ltn would always overshadow a short/average Chad, the same way a ltb with a big ass/tits would overshadow a flatboard stacy (In most scenerios, like clubs for example. Most men would prefer a caked up wife)

SO DO YOU WANT TO KNOW IF YOU ARE GOOD ENOUGH AS A 5'7 CL? JUST ASK YOURSELF, WOULD YOU MARRY A FLAT LOOKSMATCH OF YOURSELF, OR AN UGLY FOID WITH A MODEL LIKE BODY.
just like height indicates good genetics, big tits/ass also indicates good genetics.

Biology tells us to mate with the genetically blessed.

Your Height is your Tits, and your frame is your ass. You are unfuckable if you have none.

realisticly true

 

[~Pyro]

No way 6 foot 4 LTN would mog an average height Chad other than in height, but the Chad would be the one raking in most pussy. Extreme height just guarantees you won't be incel, like 6 foot 3+ guys can never be incel no matter how ugly the rest of them are.

Also add hair to male's "tits & ass", I think hair is one of the most important things too, more than "just don't be bald". Quality, thickness, length matters extremely as fuck too than just hairline. Same way women envy women with extra coarse and extra dense thick hair as fuck.

BTW stuff like limb length also matters a lot I think, it is not just men that value long legs in women, women rate men a lot based on this too as part of your "frame" I think. Heard several women say short legs/limbs is unattractive as fuck no matter what the rest of the guy looks like. Really tall guy with narrow frame and short legs would get even more mogged by average height Chad with long limbs.

Edit: Once you pass average-ish or 6 foot in height face just takes over and dominates completely IMO.

Both would get pussy, but the taller one would get more.

At the club who do you think will get most dick? caked up ltb or a flat stacy? Be honest to yourself.

Yes hairline matters, but i think tits and ass is most comparable to frame and height. You can still be attractive if your bald and tall.

About the long leg, yeah that matters but not so much tbh, msot femals wouldnt look at your proportions or legs, they'd look at face and height, if they check out then long legs dont matter as much

"Really tall guy with narrow frame and short legs would get even more mogged by average height Chad with long limbs." is absolute bullshit, you are giving proportions way too much credit, a tall guy with bad frame would still do good.

Yeah I agree, once you are average ish face card boosts you up alot. Same arguement as how normal tits/ass with a good face

But Im trying to show how much height and frame matter, and how you cannot completely neglect them when you compare them to the importance of face.

To some height will matter to some, the face will.

Just like some men would prefer face, some would prefer tits and ass.

 

[RiceChigga]

Average chad and tall ltn would both do good.

Just that when you put them next to each other most women would easily choose the taller one. Next to each other the taller guy will overshadow him.

Just like if you put a flat stacy next to a caked out ltb, most women would choose the caked out one.

Both would obv do good, but think about what happens when u compare them

Bro with all the respect, ur comparison ain't that great, in terms of girls it's not being caked or not, it's the bones and proportion that matters since a girl can be caked up but with hip dips, of which is a huge downgrade, if ur average height then u'll be fine with a facecard in contrast to the 6'4 ltn.
At least from my perspective due to one real scenario, got a friend whose 6'3, lmtn, in a club and he was going crazy with approaching girls, but sadly he didn't get even one girls ig.
But i respect ur theory tho

 

[~Pyro]

Bro with all the respect, ur comparison ain't that great, in terms of girls it's not being caked or not, it's the bones and proportion that matters if ur average height.
At least from my perspective due to one real scenario, got a friend whose 6'3, lmtn, in a club and he was going crazy with approaching girls, but sadly he didn't get even one girls ig.
But i respect ur theory tho

Pal I'm not saying height>face always, what I'm trying to say is that the question isnt all that simple and its very subjective, and that height and frame can be compared to boobs and ass. So when people want to compare they should also use that analogy and see it from a females perspective.

Height is also very relative, what if everyone there at the club was 6 foot ish and tall? he wouldnt stand out...its not such a simple forward answer.

 

[Bipolar2Cel]

Both would get pussy, but the taller one would get more.

At the club who do you think will get most dick? caked up ltb or a flat stacy? Be honest to yourself.

Yes hairline matters, but i think tits and ass is most comparable to frame and height. You can still be attractive if your bald and tall.

About the long leg, yeah that matters but not so much tbh, msot femals wouldnt look at your proportions or legs, they'd look at face and height, if they check out then long legs dont matter as much

"Really tall guy with narrow frame and short legs would get even more mogged by average height Chad with long limbs." is absolute bullshit, you are giving proportions way too much credit, a tall guy with bad frame would still do good.

Yeah I agree, once you are average ish face card boosts you up alot. Same arguement as how normal tits/ass with a good face

But Im trying to show how much height and frame matter, and how you cannot completely neglect them when you compare them to the importance of face.

To some height will matter to some, the face will.

Just like some men would prefer face, some would prefer tits and ass.

Never seen ugly tall guys swim in pussy like THAT, shorter Chad or prettyboy that is average height plus would mog them as fuck from what I've seen and experienced lol. They will also mog them somewhat extremely on dating apps. Height matters but gets mogged by face extremely once average plus height. Extra height benefits really start drastically capping out around 6 foot 1 - 6 foot 2, can still give a boost but once at those heights face and everything else starts mattering far more.

 

[RiceChigga]

Pal I'm not saying height>face always, what I'm trying to say is that the question isnt all that simple and its very subjective, and that height and frame can be compared to boobs and ass. So when people want to compare they should also use that analogy and see it from a females perspective.

Height is also very relative, what if everyone there at the club was 6 foot ish and tall? he wouldnt stand out...its not such a simple forward answer.

frame and height can't be a comparison to boobs and ass, diff things even tho it does increases attraction. If everyone was 6foot and ltn, a chad would stand out even more.

 

[Bipolar2Cel]

Bro with all the respect, ur comparison ain't that great, in terms of girls it's not being caked or not, it's the bones and proportion that matters since a girl can be caked up but with hip dips, of which is a huge downgrade, if ur average height then u'll be fine with a facecard in contrast to the 6'4 ltn.
At least from my perspective due to one real scenario, got a friend whose 6'3, lmtn, in a club and he was going crazy with approaching girls, but sadly he didn't get even one girls ig.
But i respect ur theory tho

I agree. I am "only" 6 foot 2 but had even super freakish tall ugly guys feel jealous and insecure as hell around me because of my face. What is funny is that I respect their height and feel heightmogged by them actually lmfao but never felt like they had a chance over me for overall foid attention whatsoever. I mean I don't feel insecure around them just more like "damn, I feel short/average". Also we have all seen even short prettyboys swim in female attention IRL, that is also why it is a common insult because men have since time immemorial seen how much face matters over other masculine attributes.

 

[hellostarbucks]

 

[Lorean]

Very good post

 

[~Pyro]

I agree. I am "only" 6 foot 2 but had even super freakish tall ugly guys feel jealous and insecure as hell around me because of my face. What is funny is that I respect their height and feel heightmogged by them actually lmfao but never felt like they had a chance over me for overall foid attention whatsoever. I mean I don't feel insecure around them just more like "damn, I feel short/average". Also we have all seen even short prettyboys swim in female attention IRL, that is also why it is a common insult because men have since time immemorial seen how much face matters over other masculine attributes.

6'2 is the perfect height, not everyone prefers BIG BIG BIG TITS. If you arent larping then you're only agreeing to my post

Yes short/average pretty boys do well. Of course they do, of course even the flatest stacies get a modelling carrier.

But thats not the point im trying to make, saying that short chads do well and tall uglys dont just because you know "a tall friend" there are outliers of course.

But the point im trying to make is that height helps, it really does, in a whole different way than the face. Just like seeing a pretty girls face and seeing her big tits creates different feels in a man, it does the same for a woman. Such an effect cannot be ignored, and in that respect a taller guy next to a shorter one will always overshadow him.

 

[~Pyro]

frame and height can't be a comparison to boobs and ass, diff things even tho it does increases attraction. If everyone was 6foot and ltn, a chad would stand out even more.

Frame and height can be most definitely be compared to boobs and ass, stop coping please.

"If everyone was 6foot and ltn, a chad would stand out even more." Yes but not everyone is a 6ft and an ltn. You need to understand that first.

 

[rsj]

IN MOST FACE VS HEIGHT DISCUSSIONS I HAVE NEVER SEEN THIS POINT BEING DISCUSSED.

The way face and height matter to women is the same way face and body matter to men.
Physical attractiveness is a combination of both body and face.

LIKE HOW MOST MEN SEE TITS AND ASS IS THE SAME WAY WOMEN SEE HEIGHT AND FRAME. "MOST SOCIAL MEDIA BADDIES" OR ATTRACTIVE FEMALES YOU SEE DOWN THE STREET ARE THE LTBS WITH A GOOD BODY.

"TALL UGLY OR HANDSOME SHORT" IS THE SAME AS "BIG TITS/ASS UGLY OR STACY BUT NO TITS/ASS"

MOST GUYS WOULD CHOOSE BIG TITS/ASS OVER A FACE CARD, MAYBE ITS EASY TO SAY OTHERWISE OVER A SCREEN BUT IRL 99% OF MEN WOULD CHOOSE A WOMEN WITH A GREAT BODY.

MOST GUYS WOULD TURN THEIR HEADS ON THE STREET FOR A GOOD BODY, NOT SO MUCH FOR A FACE.

YOU WOULD MOST LIKELY BE TURNED ON BY SEEING A GOOD BODY OVER A GOOD FACE.

Same thinking process extends to a man's height and frame. So stop trying to cope around with a face.

Your face would get you far, but only so far, but the effect of being a manlet will always remain.
Blame a womens standards and Hypergamy. But the real culprit is the human biology itself. If a women likes tall, she's hypergamous, and when you watch porn with big tits then it all male harmones...Stop coping....

"WHY DO WOMEN WANT A FOOT OF HEIGHT DIFFERENCE" "THEY ARE SO SHORT THEMSELVES, WHY DO THEY WANT A TALLER MAN ???"

A 6'4 ltn would always overshadow a short/average Chad, the same way a ltb with a big ass/tits would overshadow a flatboard stacy (In most scenerios, like clubs for example. Most men would prefer a caked up wife)

SO DO YOU WANT TO KNOW IF YOU ARE GOOD ENOUGH AS A 5'7 CL? JUST ASK YOURSELF, WOULD YOU MARRY A FLAT LOOKSMATCH OF YOURSELF, OR AN UGLY FOID WITH A MODEL LIKE BODY.
just like height indicates good genetics, big tits/ass also indicates good genetics.

Biology tells us to mate with the genetically blessed.

Your Height is your Tits, and your frame is your ass. You are unfuckable if you have none.

Damn bro

 

[AryanTrvecel]

IN MOST FACE VS HEIGHT DISCUSSIONS I HAVE NEVER SEEN THIS POINT BEING DISCUSSED.

The way face and height matter to women is the same way face and body matter to men.
Physical attractiveness is a combination of both body and face.

LIKE HOW MOST MEN SEE TITS AND ASS IS THE SAME WAY WOMEN SEE HEIGHT AND FRAME. "MOST SOCIAL MEDIA BADDIES" OR ATTRACTIVE FEMALES YOU SEE DOWN THE STREET ARE THE LTBS WITH A GOOD BODY.

"TALL UGLY OR HANDSOME SHORT" IS THE SAME AS "BIG TITS/ASS UGLY OR STACY BUT NO TITS/ASS"

MOST GUYS WOULD CHOOSE BIG TITS/ASS OVER A FACE CARD, MAYBE ITS EASY TO SAY OTHERWISE OVER A SCREEN BUT IRL 99% OF MEN WOULD CHOOSE A WOMEN WITH A GREAT BODY.

MOST GUYS WOULD TURN THEIR HEADS ON THE STREET FOR A GOOD BODY, NOT SO MUCH FOR A FACE.

YOU WOULD MOST LIKELY BE TURNED ON BY SEEING A GOOD BODY OVER A GOOD FACE.

Same thinking process extends to a man's height and frame. So stop trying to cope around with a face.

Your face would get you far, but only so far, but the effect of being a manlet will always remain.
Blame a womens standards and Hypergamy. But the real culprit is the human biology itself. If a women likes tall, she's hypergamous, and when you watch porn with big tits then it all male harmones...Stop coping....

"WHY DO WOMEN WANT A FOOT OF HEIGHT DIFFERENCE" "THEY ARE SO SHORT THEMSELVES, WHY DO THEY WANT A TALLER MAN ???"

A 6'4 ltn would always overshadow a short/average Chad, the same way a ltb with a big ass/tits would overshadow a flatboard stacy (In most scenerios, like clubs for example. Most men would prefer a caked up wife)

SO DO YOU WANT TO KNOW IF YOU ARE GOOD ENOUGH AS A 5'7 CL? JUST ASK YOURSELF, WOULD YOU MARRY A FLAT LOOKSMATCH OF YOURSELF, OR AN UGLY FOID WITH A MODEL LIKE BODY.
just like height indicates good genetics, big tits/ass also indicates good genetics.

Biology tells us to mate with the genetically blessed.

Your Height is your Tits, and your frame is your ass. You are unfuckable if you have none.

Then I have no tits ass or face

 

[~Pyro]

Then I have no tits ass or face

Me too, most of men

 

[~Pyro]

bump