D
Deleted member 14693
Kraken
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2021
- Posts
- 36,802
- Reputation
- 64,727
I hear a lot about Nietzsche here, is he worth reading?
Who else should you read, where to start etc.
Who else should you read, where to start etc.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
nietzsche today is not worth it todayI hear a lot about Nietzsche here, is he worth reading?
Who else should you read, where to start etc.
Just start out with a book that summarizes the thought of old and contemporary philosophy.
See what sits with you and then dive deeper into what you like and very important what you don’t like imo
Yeah a true man of wisdom.so basically just read the secret teachings of all ages by manly p hall then lol
for example, you would understand rousseau better if you can contrast his social contract with hobbes' absolutism, understand the significance of kant better if u know about the empiricists v rationalists, and understand marx better if u have prior knowledge about hegel who influenced himi would recommend getting a book like the history of western philosophy by bertrand russell, or some from the very short introductions series, all the philosophers build on the work of earlier philosophers so it helps to understand it as a tradition
Just start out with a book that summarizes the thought of old and contemporary philosophy.
See what sits with you and then dive deeper into what you like and very important what you don’t like imo
he is not objective
ideal for this purpose
he is not objective
so iam trying to read the philosophical investiagtions now for some time and but it needs alot attention that i cant reall afford right now because of universityaristotle, plato, locke, kant, epicurus, hume, bentham, hobbes, kierkegaard, wittgenstein (you won't understand shit), popper, quine, searle, b. russell, spinoza, carnap, frege, kripke, mill, democritus, t. aquinas, anselm of canterbury, hegel, schelling, fichte, heidegger, de saussure, habermas, althusser, h. l. a. hart, horkheimer, rousseau, montesquieu, husserl, feyerabend, kuhn, durkheim a. smith, mill, feuerbach, weber, baudrillard, pufendorf, radbruch, adorno and tarski would be a decent start
it's a solid breakdown
so iam trying to read the philosophical investiagtions now for some time and but it needs alot attention that i cant reall afford right now because of university
u can hear that nigga speak on youtube he met gladstone and leninRussell is quite interesting for sure. Especially his teachings in mathematics
He survived a plane crash because he was in the smoking section. Smoking saved his life as he said.u can hear that nigga speak on youtube he met gladstone and lenin
Yeah i know that why i didnt bought the tractatus.philosophical investigations are more important than his tractatus.
the guy is one of the most important intellectuals of the 20th century, along with einstein, bohr, turing and von neumann
Tractatus is garbage, his picture theory which his whole philosphy is built on is the idea that propositions can only refer to the world iconically by "picturing" it, which is retarded because he never considered the possibility of indexical or symbolic means of referring to the world. A basic study of semiotics and Wittgenstein would have realized it was inadmissible as a theory.Yeah i know that why i didnt bought the tractatus.
Because he distanced himself from it latter.
Great postTractatus is garbage, his picture theory which his whole philosphy is built on is the idea that propositions can only refer to the world iconically by "picturing" it, which is retarded because he never considered the possibility of indexical or symbolic means of referring to the world. A basic study of semiotics and Wittgenstein would have realized it was inadmissible as a theory.
Not to mention his terminology is undefined (wtf is an "object" in his sense?), there are no arguments in the book (you are just supposed to get why it's true due to his numbering means of organizing his ideas), and he openly states the book is self-refuting in the second last proposition (the book derives that it itself can't be said). Not to mention even being given his whole philosophy, with respect to ethics and aesthetics he merely refutes their a priori forms, and not their contingent forms, which pop up everywhere and even figure into natural science (see the practical sciences and modern scientific studies of beauty).
Nietzsche should be read... avoid stoics, unless you wanna adopt their metaphysical system wholesalenietzsche today is not worth it today
read stoics for useful adivce
seneca, epicetus and mark aurel
Another dumb commentif you're past your teenage years, you're too old for Nietzsche
Don't worry... the Croatian faggot who recommended Wittgenstein's philosophical investigations to you hasn't read it himselfso iam trying to read the philosophical investiagtions now for some time and but it needs alot attention that i cant reall afford right now because of university
@rl⠀ was this you too? how do you not get banned?avoid nietzche, schopenhauer and freud. basically worthless hacks
teenagers misinterpret him the most tho obviouslyif you're past your teenage years, you're too old for Nietzsche
@rl⠀ was this you too? how do you not get banned?
google "high iq"
36 waist144 wais iv
10 Best Greek Philosophy Books Everyone Should Study in Their Lifetime
- Meditations by Marcus Aurelius
- Letters from a Stoic by Seneca
- The Republic by Plato
- Five Dialogues by Plato
- The Symposium by Plato
- The Emperor's Handbook by Marcus Aurelius
- Poetics and Rhetoric by Aristotle
- The Last Days of Socrates by Plato
- The Art of Happiness by Epicurus
- The Basic Works of Aritstotle by Aristotle
You're about as brilliant as a bag of shiny rocks so I'm not surprised you disagreeAnother dumb comment
all the more reason to make a philosophy thread instead of whatever you do nowadays, complaining over the state of the forum etc.144 wais iv
all the more reason to make a philosophy thread instead of whatever you do nowadays, complaining over the state of the forum etc.
i mean, like, insights you gained since starting to read philosophy ig maybe? idktbhnglwhat fucking philosophy thread on this site? just check the thread of that paki @OGgoatslayer about his interpretation of my posts about the nature of the difference between medieval superstition and contemporary scientism. feels like trying to explain algebra to a rock.