What the fuck is wrong with Cocainecowboy?

[Cody]

according to his experiences, he did

Very subjective to assess himself when you spend that much

But if you said it was noticeable and worth it i'll take it that he did move up a bracket

 

[Deleted member 2227]

It's over, stop coping.

 

[Deleted member 2933]

Lol you aren’t ever going to stop spamming that thread are you

And what did you mean this isn’t a Looksmaxing forum? What is it then? An Incel who wants to complain about @cocainecowboy forever forum? If you think he’s wrong then why should his opinion matter to you? Does he have banning power or something lmao

A forum where only 0,1% of the user base have even had a small surgery cant be a looksmaxxing forum, i can count in my hands ppl who got under the knife from here. The rest are just taking vitamins and coping with muh eppley

 

[Deleted member 2486]

I think this is flat out wrong because osteotomies have a far more limited range of capabilities than implants or fillers; if he means osteotomies are less likely for you to get an overdone look, then sure? But that’s not addressing which one can provide more drastic aesthetic improvement

aesthetics is the pursuit of balance and harmony, not "drastic" fake outcomes

 

[Golden Glass]

aesthetics is the pursuit of balance and harmony, not "drastic" fake outcomes

This is actually a good example of what I mean by you having silly takes and how it surprises me people would get mad over them: You’re splitting hairs here. I qualified the term drastic immediately with the term AESTHETIC, yet you read that as “drastic fake outcomes”... implying any drastic outcomes are tied together with the quality of looking fake, when I made clear I meant drastic AESTHETIC outcomes, which would HAVE to look NOT fake in the first place in order to be AESTHETIC.


I’m adding the entire statement in full to show how much of a silly take @cocainecowboy ‘s response was, and how it’s entirely missing the point of the added qualifier AESTHETIC to the term DRASTIC , in order for him to try to package together the qualifier FAKE to the term DRASTIC

It seems like he’s implying that implants and fillers=doll-maxxing and he thinks osteotomies are a better way of achieving aesthetics results.

I think this is flat out wrong because osteotomies have a far more limited range of capabilities than implants or fillers; if he means osteotomies are less likely for you to get an overdone look, then sure? But that’s not addressing which one can provide more drastic aesthetic improvement, and here, unless you need functional change as well, implants and fillers are unparalleled, and an overdone look with implants and fillers isn’t some sort of packaged deal, it all depends on what you get.

 

[chadpreetinthemaking]

 

[Golden Glass]

A forum where only 0,1% of the user base have even had a small surgery cant be a looksmaxxing forum, i can count in my hands ppl who got under the knife from here. The rest are just taking vitamins and coping with muh eppley

Lol here’s an analogy I’m sure you’ll be able to grasp:
A forum arguing about politics with zero people in it being politicians, is still a politics forum.

 

[Deleted member 2933]

Lol here’s an analogy I’m sure you’ll be able to grasp:
A forum arguing about politics with zero people in it being politicians, is still a politics forum.

Different shi

Lol here’s an analogy I’m sure you’ll be able to grasp:
A forum arguing about politics with zero people in it being politicians, is still a politics forum.

To get into politics u depends of others, to looksmax u depends only on your wish, absolutely different shit.

 

[Golden Glass]

Different shi

If your brain can’t understand the basic logical utility of analogies, then I’m sorry my friend. Believe it’s not a Looksmaxing forum all you want, if it makes you feel better.

 

[Deleted member 2933]

If your brain can’t understand the basic logical utility of analogies, then I’m sorry my friend. Believe it’s not a Looksmaxing forum all you want, if it makes you feel better.

You r low iq if u compare something which u neec to rely on others to get and something u need to only rely on yourself.

 

[Golden Glass]

You r low iq if u compare something which u neec to rely on others to get and something u need to only rely on yourself.

I don’t mean this as an insult, but is English your first language?

 

[Deleted member 2933]

I don’t mean this as an insult, but is English your first language?

Just stop replying and remain ugly for more 10 years.

 

[Golden Glass]

Just stop replying and remain ugly for more 10 years.

I guess you not understanding English well struck a nerve? I’m sorry I really didn’t mean for that; you don’t get to choose what language you’re taught as a child :/

 

[Deleted member 2486]

This is actually a good example of what I mean by you having silly takes and how it surprises me people would get mad over them: You’re splitting hairs here. I qualified the term drastic immediately with the term AESTHETIC, yet you read that as “drastic fake outcomes”... implying any drastic outcomes are tied together with the quality of looking fake, when I made clear I meant drastic AESTHETIC outcomes, which would HAVE to look NOT fake in the first place in order to be AESTHETIC.


I’m adding the entire statement in full to show how much of a silly take @cocainecowboy ‘s response was, and how it’s entirely missing the point of the added qualifier AESTHETIC to the term DRASTIC , in order for him to try to package together the qualifier FAKE to the term DRASTIC

lmfao at these typing. how you type is pseudointellectual 101, like you have a 10 inch dildo up your ass at all times. "muhh term, muhh wording"

i obviously didnt mean to imply that LITERALLY every drastic outcome is fake looking, but MOST that i've seen here dont look natural and harmonious (that are within the realm of "drastic")

 

[Bewusst]

Never heard of her

 

[Golden Glass]

lmfao at these typing. how you type is pseudointellectual 101, like you have a 10 inch dildo up your ass at all times. "muhh term, muhh wording"

i obviously didnt mean to imply that LITERALLY every drastic outcome is fake looking, but MOST that i've seen here dont look natural and harmonious (that are within the realm of "drastic")

If you want me to speak more like an internet bro who blatantly misses the point of anything he’s responding to, as you have been doing and continue to do so just now, just give me some pointers.

Absolutely no one should disagree with your reply that MOST drastic outcomes are fake looking and unharmonius, but this is just another pointless silly take you make in order to keep trying to argue. You literally don’t disagree with anything I said and added nothing of value in your replies to me thus far, yet get asspained when I point this out because of the way I wrote it lol.

 

[Sal123]

This motherfucker downplays any improvement,I do not understand why he is here,this is a forum dedicated to making things better,yet all he says is you cannot do them better,fuck you @cocainecowboy

Yo pm me I’ll give u a realistic rate

lmfao at these typing. how you type is pseudointellectual 101, like you have a 10 inch dildo up your ass at all times. "muhh term, muhh wording"

i obviously didnt mean to imply that LITERALLY every drastic outcome is fake looking, but MOST that i've seen here dont look natural and harmonious (that are within the realm of "drastic")

Do I look good tho be honest

 

[Deleted member 2486]

If you want me to speak more like an internet bro who blatantly misses the point of anything he’s responding to, as you have been doing and continue to do so just now, just give me some pointers.

Absolutely no one should disagree with your reply that MOST drastic outcomes are fake looking and unharmonius, but this is just another pointless silly take you make in order to keep trying to argue. You literally don’t disagree with anything I said and added nothing of value in your replies to me thus far, yet get asspained when I point this out because of the way I wrote it lol.

lol i dont care to bring value to you. you talk as if i care about how you interpret what i say. ill keep ignoring your reddit tier cuckoldry wording yes. i dont care to address every single word u write or represent in a way you like or you enjoy

 

[Golden Glass]

lol i dont care to bring value to you. you talk as if i care about how you interpret what i say. ill keep ignoring your reddit tier cuckoldry wording yes. i dont care to address every single word u write or represent in a way you like or you enjoy

Big words make me angry.
— @cocainecowboy

 

[Deleted member 2486]

Big words make me angry.
— @cocainecowboy

"angry" would imply i care the slightest bit about you

 

[LordNorwood]

Fun thread

 

[Golden Glass]

"angry" would imply i care the slightest bit about you

What happened to not caring about what words imply? I thought that was reddit-tier pseudointellectual cuckoldry? Or do you only say that when it’s pointed out on your own statements?

But fair enough
A more apt term would be Asspained

The basic theme of our back and forth on this thread so far is as follows:

•A statement is made.

•You decide to reply, misunderstanding the statement.

•A response is made to your reply, pointing out the misunderstanding and pointlessness of your reply.

•You get asspained

 

[Deleted member 2486]

What happened to not caring about what words imply? I thought that was reddit-tier pseudointellectual cuckoldry? Or do you only say that when it’s pointed out on your own statements?

But fair enough
A more apt term would be Asspained

The basic theme of our back and forth on this thread so far is as follows:

•A statement is made.

•You decide to reply, misunderstanding the statement.

•A response is made to your reply, pointing out the misunderstanding and pointlessness of your reply.

•You get asspained

i read the first 2 sentences then i legit stopped reading. use less words to get your point accross then ill consider reading your messages

 

[Golden Glass]

i read the first 2 sentences then i legit stopped reading. use less words to get your point accross then ill consider reading your messages

“Big words make me turn off computer”
— @cocainecowboy

 

[Deleted member 2486]

“Big words make me turn off computer”
— @cocainecowboy

i think im getting ur cortisol up bro. u seem too emotionally invested already

 

[diggbicc]

Fun thread

you are back boyo.

 

[Golden Glass]

i think im getting ur cortisol up bro. u seem too emotionally invested already

Sorry man cortisol sounds like a big word to me...stop being a pseudointellectual Reddit tier cuck.

 

[didntreadlol]

his avi is disgusting

 

[Deleted member 2486]

Sorry man cortisol sounds like a big word to me...stop being a pseudointellectual Reddit tier cuck.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cortisol here you go

 

[LordNorwood]

you are back boyo.

 

[diggbicc]

Sorry man cortisol sounds like a big word to me...stop being a pseudointellectual Reddit tier cuck.

Talking about me bro?

 

[Golden Glass]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cortisol here you go

Sarcasm - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

 

[Deleted member 2486]

Sarcasm - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

lmfao you didn't realise I realised it was a sarcams and 1-upped it?

 

[Golden Glass]

i read the first 2 sentences then i legit stopped reading. use less words to get your point accross then ill consider reading your messages

Lmao I just realized you’re by far the most active user on this forum, even though second place signed up 5 months before you did.

Yet you pretend to complain about not being able to read a 9 sentence reply

Just so you don’t have to respond

lmfao you didn't realise I realised it was a sarcams and 1-upped it?

No I’m sure you knew it was sarcasm, you make pointless statements but you’re no @SirGey with no English comprehension.

 

[Deleted member 2486]

Lmao I just realized you’re by far the most active user on this forum, even though second place signed up 5 months before you did.

Yet you pretend to complain about not being able to read a 9 sentence reply

Just so you don’t have to respond

if ur referring to timer, its inaccurately measuring. if you have tab running around ur comp its gonna keep counting ur time. im far from being most active, but im active yes

 

[Deleted member 1464]

Fucking retards.
Also I hate the cunt purely because out of all the highest post count users, he updoots my shit the least.

 

[Deleted member 2486]

 

[Golden Glass]

if ur referring to timer, its inaccurately measuring. if you have tab running around ur comp its gonna keep counting ur time. im far from being most active, but im active yes

Nice cope

 

[Deleted member 2486]

Nice cope

okay

 

[Deleted member 1464]

okay

It is a cope. You must refresh tab every hour

 

[TheMewingBBC]

if ur referring to timer, its inaccurately measuring. if you have tab running around ur comp its gonna keep counting ur time. im far from being most active, but im active yes

Lol if you don’t think everyone else leaves their tabs running. The time is over accounted, yes, but you’re still probably top 5 most active

Fucking retards.
Also I hate the cunt purely because out of all the highest post count users, he updoots my shit the least.

Legit fuck this cunt

 

[Deleted member 2486]

Lol if you don’t think everyone else leaves their tabs running. The time are over accounted, yes, but you’re still probably top 5 most active

the way the timer works is it registers in 1 hour blocks. if you visit the site even for 10 seconds, it creates a block for the given hour thats accounted on your account

so within a 10 hour period if you open the forum for 6 seconds 10 times in each hour, you'll have vistied the forum for 1 minute and have 10 hours added to your account. this is how it works. i browse the forum throughout the day from uni, gym, public transport and work and i would say im "actively" looking at the forum for ~2-3 hours at most

if you want to measure activity then do it by relative post count, of where im not even top 10 and if you break it down / monthly period probably not even top 20. if you know my nature, i frequently express my opinion on all things and i would say im actively making posts for the time im the site, therefore if I'd been "on all the time" there would be a strong correlation between my post count / month and my time active, but there is a strong discrepancy, so yeah go figure

 

[Deleted member 3990]

AVI halo

 

[Golden Glass]

the way the timer works is it registers in 1 hour blocks. if you visit the site even for 10 seconds, it creates a block for the given hour thats accounted on your account

so within a 10 hour period if you open the forum for 6 seconds 10 times in each hour, you'll have vistied the forum for 1 minute and have 10 hours added to your account. this is how it works. i browse the forum throughout the day from uni, gym, public transport and work and i would say im "actively" looking at the forum for ~2-3 hours at most

if you want to measure activity then do it by relative post count, of where im not even top 10 and if you break it down / monthly period probably not even top 20. if you know my nature, i frequently express my opinion on all things and i would say im actively making posts for the time im the site, therefore if I'd been "on all the time" there would be a strong correlation between my post count / month and my time active, but there is a strong discrepancy, so yeah go figure

i read the first 2 sentences then i legit stopped reading. use less words to get your point accross then ill consider reading your messages

Nice Cope

 

[Deleted member 2486]

^

still keeps barking for me, i must've touched on some nerves

 

[Golden Glass]

^

still keeps barking for me, i must've touched on some nerves

Nice Cope.

If you hit a nerve it must’ve been in my funny bone because after this back and forth I can’t help but find it hilarious anyone would take you seriously enough to get upset about your opinions on Looksmaxing.

Literally the only “good quality” thing I’ve seen you do is say “Implants can make you look overdone and fake” JFL

 

[TheMewingBBC]

the way the timer works is it registers in 1 hour blocks. if you visit the site even for 10 seconds, it creates a block for the given hour thats accounted on your account

so within a 10 hour period if you open the forum for 6 seconds 10 times in each hour, you'll have vistied the forum for 1 minute and have 10 hours added to your account. this is how it works. i browse the forum throughout the day from uni, gym, public transport and work and i would say im "actively" looking at the forum for ~2-3 hours at most

if you want to measure activity then do it by relative post count, of where im not even top 10 and if you break it down / monthly period probably not even top 20. if you know my nature, i frequently express my opinion on all things and i would say im actively making posts for the time im the site, therefore if I'd been "on all the time" there would be a strong correlation between my post count / month and my time active, but there is a strong discrepancy, so yeah go figure

High Evolutionary Cope
This is you right now viewing this thread while washing your ass crack

Spoiler

jk. Didn’t read tho

 

[Deleted member 2486]

Nice Cope.

If you hit a nerve it must’ve been in my funny bone because after this back and forth I can’t help but find it hilarious anyone would take you seriously enough to get upset about your opinions on Looksmaxing.

Literally the only “good quality” thing I’ve seen you do is say “can make you look overdone and fake” JFL

nah bro i legit live in head of half the forum. they keep making threads of me all the time and crying for me. not just you but a lot of people

so it seems i seem to be hitting nerve spots left and right

 

[turkproducer]

the way the timer works is it registers in 1 hour blocks. if you visit the site even for 10 seconds, it creates a block for the given hour thats accounted on your account

so within a 10 hour period if you open the forum for 6 seconds 10 times in each hour, you'll have vistied the forum for 1 minute and have 10 hours added to your account. this is how it works. i browse the forum throughout the day from uni, gym, public transport and work and i would say im "actively" looking at the forum for ~2-3 hours at most

if you want to measure activity then do it by relative post count, of where im not even top 10 and if you break it down / monthly period probably not even top 20. if you know my nature, i frequently express my opinion on all things and i would say im actively making posts for the time im the site, therefore if I'd been "on all the time" there would be a strong correlation between my post count / month and my time active, but there is a strong discrepancy, so yeah go figure

How did u know this

 

[LordNorwood]

the way the timer works is it registers in 1 hour blocks. if you visit the site even for 10 seconds, it creates a block for the given hour thats accounted on your account

so within a 10 hour period if you open the forum for 6 seconds 10 times in each hour, you'll have vistied the forum for 1 minute and have 10 hours added to your account. this is how it works. i browse the forum throughout the day from uni, gym, public transport and work and i would say im "actively" looking at the forum for ~2-3 hours at most

if you want to measure activity then do it by relative post count, of where im not even top 10 and if you break it down / monthly period probably not even top 20. if you know my nature, i frequently express my opinion on all things and i would say im actively making posts for the time im the site, therefore if I'd been "on all the time" there would be a strong correlation between my post count / month and my time active, but there is a strong discrepancy, so yeah go figure

Damn you use the site quite a bit more than I assumed tbh, lifefuel or blackpill?