What’s an ideal split for aesthetics

cutecel6095

cutecel6095

Iron
Joined
Jun 28, 2026
Posts
42
Reputation
20
I don’t workout and since gym is worth it since my bidelt isn’t terrible i might as well try it, so what is ideal split for aesthetics?
 
It's a genetic game
It is but that doesn’t mean i can’t make the most of my genetics, giving up entirely is extremely low iq (determined mostly by genetics too but whatever) and i should do whatever i can to maximize my looks, that is what the forums for anyways lol
 
But maybe start of with ppl if you have no experience upper lower is for more experienced
I am in relatively good shape from sports and have worked out for about a month before if that changes anything, i doubt it but im guessing it would help me avoid getting extremely fatigued as quick as someone who’s never worked out before
 
I am in relatively good shape from sports and have worked out for about a month before if that changes anything, i doubt it but im guessing it would help me avoid getting extremely fatigued as quick as someone who’s never worked out before
It’s more of a knowing what you’re doing thing with the experience I’m talking abt if you train ppl for 2-3 months you’ll get to know your body better and know wich exercises to do and wich to avoid ykwim
 
It is but that doesn’t mean i can’t make the most of my genetics, giving up entirely is extremely low iq (determined mostly by genetics too but whatever) and i should do whatever i can to maximize my looks, that is what the forums for anyways lol
I understand your question. No split is guaranteed to make you look a certain way. Sure you can prioritize arms or legs and make your physique disproportionate but in regards to aesthetics it's all genetics. David Laid has one of the most aesthetic physiques but did mainly powerlifting while Zyzz did hypertrophy training
 
I understand your question. No split is guaranteed to make you look a certain way. Sure you can prioritize arms or legs and make your physique disproportionate but in regards to aesthetics it's all genetics. David Laid has one of the most aesthetic physiques but did mainly powerlifting while Zyzz did hypertrophy training
Yea fair enough point but i still feel like it’s better than just no effort at all
 
I understand your question. No split is guaranteed to make you look a certain way. Sure you can prioritize arms or legs and make your physique disproportionate but in regards to aesthetics it's all genetics. David Laid has one of the most aesthetic physiques but did mainly powerlifting while Zyzz did hypertrophy training
bitches are dumb

only guys care about that

as long as you are muscular thats literally 95% of it
 
It’s more of a knowing what you’re doing thing with the experience I’m talking abt if you train ppl for 2-3 months you’ll get to know your body better and know wich exercises to do and wich to avoid ykwim
Ahhh i see that makes more sense, i assumed it was more of a fatigue thing rather than anything else, thx for the help again bro
 
  • +1
Reactions: Kahoas
bitches are dumb

only guys care about that

as long as you are muscular thats literally 95% of it
Counteract my argument if you're so sure you're right lol? If you had the smallest sense of what you were talking about you wouldn't be spewing shit out of your mouth. Claiming anyone on 500 test will grow aesthetic physiques and genetics don't matter is literal an imbecile thought pattern
 
great, a anecdotal example

doesnt apply for 99% of guys please stop coping retard
Literally replied within 10 seconds of your post dude, do you want me to name you a list of influencers who has disappointing physiques compared to their stack? Will that make the stick come out your rectum bhai
 
Counteract my argument if you're so sure you're right lol? If you had the smallest sense of what you were talking about you wouldn't be spewing shit out of your mouth. Claiming anyone on 500 test will grow aesthetic physiques and genetics don't matter is literal an imbecile thought pattern
your literally thinking in the lens of a man “aesthetic physique” dude girls will be fine with big biceps and like abs you dont need an aesthetic physique all you need is ANY physique

we arent trying to win bodybuilding shows


wouldnt you agree that more muscle is better than less muscle in EVERY SINGLE CASE??
 
  • +1
Reactions: CanadianAutist
your literally thinking in the lens of a man “aesthetic physique” dude girls will be fine with big biceps and like abs you dont need an aesthetic physique all you need is ANY physique
That isn't what OP asked for though? So what's your reasoning for commenting?
 
your literally thinking in the lens of a man “aesthetic physique” dude girls will be fine with big biceps and like abs you dont need an aesthetic physique all you need is ANY physique

we arent trying to win bodybuilding shows


wouldnt you agree that more muscle is better than less muscle in EVERY SINGLE CASE??
I agree, but, not what the guy wants to know
 
  • +1
Reactions: yushmaxx
That isn't what OP asked for though? So what's your reasoning for commenting?
when OP says aesthetics you can read that as “getting girls”, the motto of this site is literally “aesthetics matter” and i fucking promise you that the aesthetics you are concerned about arent the aesthetics 99% of org users care about or the aesthetics the tagline is talking about


actually OP can you just answer

@cutecel6095
 
when OP says aesthetics you can read that as “getting girls”, the motto of this site is literally “aesthetics matter” and i fucking promise you that the aesthetics you are concerned about arent the aesthetics 99% of org users care about


actually OP can you just answer
Bruh YOU are not OP, stop trying to invade his mind with YOUR OWN interpretation of what he posted. You can clearly tell that this isn't what he is referring to, depending on your iq ofc
 
Bruh YOU are not OP, stop trying to invade his mind with YOUR OWN interpretation of what he posted. You can clearly tell that this isn't what he is referring to, depending on your iq ofc
@cutecel6095 what do you mean by aesthetics? in the lens of pro bodybuilding or general aesthetics for getting girls? thanks
 
@cutecel6095 what do you mean by aesthetics? in the lens of pro bodybuilding or general aesthetics for getting girls? thanks
I never mentioned pro bodybuilders except for David Laid but he's a looksmaxxing exception:ROFLMAO: Do you think i want him looking like CBUM? I already explained to OP what i meant
 
@cutecel6095 what do you mean by aesthetics? in the lens of pro bodybuilding or general aesthetics for getting girls? thanks
general aesthetics for getting girls, i don’t wanna do gym bro cope and become some disgusting mass monster
 
I don’t workout and since gym is worth it since my bidelt isn’t terrible i might as well try it, so what is ideal split for aesthetics?
a 2 day on 1 day off split.
for example push full body pull fullbody
on push fb day train side delts first
on pull fb day train lat or bicep first
 
  • +1
Reactions: cutecel6095
general aesthetics for getting girls, i don’t wanna do gym bro cope and become some disgusting mass monster
@Qeiea Do you concede?
Dude lost the argument and proceeded to go on my profile to cope :/
 
@Qeiea Do you concede?
Dude lost the argument and proceeded to go on my profile to cope :/
Do i concede?:feelshah: I never said anything about not attracting girls, being huge or anything about pro bodybuilding. Dude is building his own arguments from his imagination and coping to feel victorious:lul::lul::lul: This is laughable little fella
 
Do i concede?:feelshah: I never said anything about not attracting girls, being huge or anything about pro bodybuilding. Dude is building his own arguments from his imagination and coping to feel victorious:lul::lul::lul: This is laughable little fella
IMG 7181

what part of my interpretation was wrong? what part didn’t you agree with?
what WAS he referring to?

he obviously wasnt talking about aesthetics in the “ideal physique” sense.
its okay to be wrong, look through my posts i’ve admitted ive been wrong many times
 
View attachment 5596497
what part of my interpretation was wrong? what part didn’t you agree with?
what WAS he referring to?

he obviously wasnt talking about aesthetics in the “ideal physique” sense.
its okay to be wrong, look through my posts i’ve admitted ive been wrong many times
Omg dude you keep coming back. OP very clearly stated in his post from the beginning that he was looking for a split to get an aesthetic physique. Why do you think I meant pro-level bodybuilders and not ACTUAL aesthetic physiques which are praised in the forum (even named them:feelsuhh:). This is what i mean by delusional thoughts.
 
Omg dude you keep coming back. OP very clearly stated in his post from the beginning that he was looking for a split to get an aesthetic physique. Why do you think I meant pro-level bodybuilders and not ACTUAL aesthetic physiques which are praised in the forum (even named them:feelsuhh:). This is what i mean by delusional thoughts.
MY interpretation of aesthetic: “a physique that gets girls”

HIS interpretation of aesthetic: “general aesthetics for getting girls”

what YOU said: “you are trying to invade his post with your own interpretation of what he posted”
(all 3 are quotes)
but, both of our interpretations were the SAME, so wouldnt you be wrong?

i literally cannot explain how you were wrong in more simple terms…
IMG 7182

I cannot stress this enough, its some of the best advice ive ever gotten, its okay to be wrong.
 
MY interpretation of aesthetic: “a physique that gets girls”

HIS interpretation of aesthetic: “general aesthetics for getting girls”

what YOU said: “you are trying to invade his post with your own interpretation of what he posted”
(all 3 are quotes)
but, both of our interpretations were the SAME, so wouldnt you be wrong?

i literally cannot explain how you were wrong in more simple terms…
View attachment 5596513
You were non-stop tagging OP for validation. I can't do ss because i'm on a work pc but if you scroll up you can tell that this whole discussion stemmed from YOU claiming 99% of people who take test will grow aesthetic, which is wrong.
 
You were non-stop tagging OP for validation. I can't do ss because i'm on a work pc but if you scroll up you can tell that this whole discussion stemmed from YOU claiming 99% of people who take test will grow aesthetic, which is wrong.
great job ignoring the obvious point i made last post and redirecting the argument to something different , ill just take that as a win since you refuse to acknowledge it

Use your brain, we already agreed that we are going off of OPS definition of aesthetic which is “physique that gets girls”

And by that definition yes 99% of guys who take steroids will look better to girls than before they took them, as they will have increased muscle mass.
 

Similar threads

iregreteverything33
Replies
13
Views
117
plastik1912
plastik1912
LKira
Replies
2
Views
33
Sustanon
Sustanon
theoba
Replies
2
Views
45
Mark272
Mark272
ad5m
Replies
0
Views
24
ad5m
ad5m
3009407
Replies
0
Views
26
3009407
3009407

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top