whats my ipd?

[adry]

 

[Orka]

View attachment 4373251

Can't measure your IPD mate, that's a measurment, not a ratio,
you can't make measurments off an image without a ruler or object next to you with known dimensions

 

[adry]

Can't measure your IPD mate, that's a measurment, not a ratio,
you can't make measurments off an image without a ruler or object next to you with known dimensions

its undistorted pic

 

[Orka]

its undistorted pic

you fucking marshmallow its still not measurable

how am I meant to give you a measurment in centimeters from an image?

 

[adry]

Can't measure your IPD mate, that's a measurment, not a ratio,
you can't make measurments off an image without a ruler or object next to you with known dimensions

my bad i was talking about esr

 

[adry]

you fucking marshmallow its still not measurable

how am I meant to give you a measurment in centimeters from an image?

ur right

 

[Orka]

my bad i was talking about esr

Too far apart, now mark this reply as a solution by clicking the checkmark on the right

 

[adry]

View attachment 4373260
View attachment 4373261

Too far apart, now mark this reply as a solution by clicking the checkmark on the right

do u think i can get to mtn with this esr?

 

[d4iwik]

View attachment 4373260
View attachment 4373261

Too far apart, now mark this reply as a solution by clicking the checkmark on the right

how do u calculate it in pc??

 

[LTNUser]

View attachment 4373260
View attachment 4373261

Too far apart, now mark this reply as a solution by clicking the checkmark on the right

How much is that in millimetres?

 

[LTNUser]

how do u calculate it in pc??

Ther are face measurement apps/sites for that

 

[Orka]

how do u calculate it in pc??

I use figma, you can use any program where you can use lines

Line 1 [ Number in pixels ] Center of eye to other center of eye

Line 2 [ Number in pixels ] zygo 2 zygo

Line 1 divided by Line 2 = esr

 

[Orka]

How much is that in millimetres?

I can't tell you the mm from a photo as there's nothing relative to it, nothing to compare to, I can't give a centimeter measurment from pixels.

 

[d4iwik]

I use figma, you can use any program where you can use linesView attachment 4373266
Line 1 [ Number in pixels ] Center of eye to other center of eye
View attachment 4373268
Line 2 [ Number in pixels ] zygo 2 zygo

Line 1 divided by Line 2 = esr

thanks bro
is figma good for low end pcs?

 

[Orka]

thanks bro
is figma good for low end pcs?

yes, its a design app for mockups which I use for work and it runs on my pc fine lol

 

[d4iwik]

Ther are face measurement apps/sites for that

i only know gimp and photoshop

 

[VampyrMaxx]

Can't measure your IPD mate, that's a measurment, not a ratio,
you can't make measurments off an image without a ruler or object next to you with known dimensions

Its around 67-68mm; wide set

 

[d4iwik]

yes, its a design app for mockups which I use for work and it runs on my pc fine lol

i got i3-2nd gen gng

 

[Orka]

Its around 67-68mm; wide set

wtf are you talking about

That's not how measurments work

How big is this apple in centimeters? You can't tell, because you have nothing to compare it to.

It could be a gigantic apple, or a tiny one. Who knows.

There's a reason ratios are more commonly used.

 

[Orka]

i got i3-2nd gen gng

dawg its an image app

you'll be fine, if you want you can just use this instead

Sketchpad - Draw, Create, Share!

Sketchpad: Free online drawing application for all ages. Create digital artwork to share online and export to popular image formats JPEG, PNG, SVG, and PDF.

sketchpad.app

 

[LTNUser]

Its around 67-68mm; wide set

Nah,it can't be

My IPD is 67 mm and it surely is not wide set

 

[d4iwik]

wtf are you talking about

That's not how measurments work

View attachment 4373287

How big is this apple in centimeters? You can't tell, because you have nothing to compare it to.

It could be a gigantic apple, or a tiny one. Who knows.

There's a reason ratios are more commonly used.

fr we need smth to compare it with like a scale or smth

 

[d4iwik]

dawg its an image app

you'll be fine, if you want you can just use this instead

Sketchpad - Draw, Create, Share!

Sketchpad: Free online drawing application for all ages. Create digital artwork to share online and export to popular image formats JPEG, PNG, SVG, and PDF.

sketchpad.app

love u bhai

 

[d4iwik]

Nah,it can't be
View attachment 4373293
My IPD is 67 mm and it surely is not wide set

yes as zygos play a big role too

 

[LTNUser]

yes as zygos play a big role too

Does my eye area look good enough?

 

[d4iwik]

i

Does my eye area look good enough?

t looks god but tiring asf

 

[VampyrMaxx]

wtf are you talking about

That's not how measurments work

View attachment 4373287

How big is this apple in centimeters? You can't tell, because you have nothing to compare it to.

It could be a gigantic apple, or a tiny one. Who knows.

There's a reason ratios are more commonly used.

Ratios are a psyop and ive been dealing with measurements for a while now.

Every human eyeball diameter is 24mm wide.

GTFIH Test Your IPD

**The ICD and IPD were moved relatively one to one, which doesn't mimic reality due to differences in the ethmoid, sphenoid and overall bone structure. Sometimes they don't move one to one** Perfect; 65mm IPD w/ 33mm ICD Close Set Eyes 63.54mm IPD 62.1mm IPD 60.64mm IPD 59.2mm IPD...

looksmax.org

RATIOS DEBUNKED GTFIH; BEAUTY EXPLAINED

In this thread I will prove that ratios do not matter for attractiveness, and that only features/measurements matter for attractiveness. Some people might say water is wet, but a decent proportion of Looksmax doesn't understand these concepts. If anybody can logically disprove the logic within...

looksmax.org

 

[d4iwik]

c

Does my eye area look good enough?

an u come in dms to rate me??

 

[VampyrMaxx]

Nah,it can't be
View attachment 4373293
My IPD is 67 mm and it surely is not wide set

Its not

Ratios are a psyop and ive been dealing with measurements for a while now.

Every human eyeball diameter is 24mm wide.

GTFIH Test Your IPD

**The ICD and IPD were moved relatively one to one, which doesn't mimic reality due to differences in the ethmoid, sphenoid and overall bone structure. Sometimes they don't move one to one** Perfect; 65mm IPD w/ 33mm ICD Close Set Eyes 63.54mm IPD 62.1mm IPD 60.64mm IPD 59.2mm IPD...

looksmax.org

RATIOS DEBUNKED GTFIH; BEAUTY EXPLAINED

In this thread I will prove that ratios do not matter for attractiveness, and that only features/measurements matter for attractiveness. Some people might say water is wet, but a decent proportion of Looksmax doesn't understand these concepts. If anybody can logically disprove the logic within...

looksmax.org

 

[d4iwik]

Ratios are a psyop and ive been dealing with measurements for a while now.

Every human eyeball diameter is 24mm wide.

GTFIH Test Your IPD

**The ICD and IPD were moved relatively one to one, which doesn't mimic reality due to differences in the ethmoid, sphenoid and overall bone structure. Sometimes they don't move one to one** Perfect; 65mm IPD w/ 33mm ICD Close Set Eyes 63.54mm IPD 62.1mm IPD 60.64mm IPD 59.2mm IPD...

looksmax.org

RATIOS DEBUNKED GTFIH; BEAUTY EXPLAINED

In this thread I will prove that ratios do not matter for attractiveness, and that only features/measurements matter for attractiveness. Some people might say water is wet, but a decent proportion of Looksmax doesn't understand these concepts. If anybody can logically disprove the logic within...

looksmax.org

not every
and u need smth to compare it with

 

[LTNUser]

Its not

Wdym it's not
It depends on your bizgyomatic width like the other guy said
I got it measured from a specialist

 

[d4iwik]

Wdym it's not
It depends on your bizgyomatic width like the other guy said
I got it measured from a specialist

pm me bhai i cant

 

[VampyrMaxx]

not every
and u need smth to compare it with

YEs not every ratio; only the ones that affect the extracranial function would be important.

For example a jaw 80 percent of the face is not good, even if it looks good on its own

 

[d4iwik]

YEs not every ratio; only the ones that affect the extracranial function would be important.

For example a jaw 80 percent of the face is not good, even if it looks good on its own

no jaw of 80% looks good

 

[Orka]

Ratios are a psyop and ive been dealing with measurements for a while now.

Every human eyeball diameter is 24mm wide.

GTFIH Test Your IPD

**The ICD and IPD were moved relatively one to one, which doesn't mimic reality due to differences in the ethmoid, sphenoid and overall bone structure. Sometimes they don't move one to one** Perfect; 65mm IPD w/ 33mm ICD Close Set Eyes 63.54mm IPD 62.1mm IPD 60.64mm IPD 59.2mm IPD...

looksmax.org

RATIOS DEBUNKED GTFIH; BEAUTY EXPLAINED

In this thread I will prove that ratios do not matter for attractiveness, and that only features/measurements matter for attractiveness. Some people might say water is wet, but a decent proportion of Looksmax doesn't understand these concepts. If anybody can logically disprove the logic within...

looksmax.org

Good job disproving yourself, well done.

Set 1: 115px = 24mm wide (apparently EVERY humans eyeball width:

with his previous measurment of 292.5px of IPD (used to calculate his ESR), his IPD would be 61mm

Spoiler: Calculations

115 px = 24 mm

So:

1 px = 24 / 115 mm
292.5 px = 292.5 × (24 / 115)

Calculate:

24 / 115 ≈ 0.20869565 mm per px
292.5 × 0.20869565 ≈ 61.0 mm

Set 2

I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and say some of the eyeball isn't visible, or goes into the canthus and is hidden, then it would be 56.1mm

Spoiler: Calculations

125.5 px = 24 mm

So:

1 px = 24 / 125.5 mm
292.5 px = 292.5 × (24 / 125.5)

Compute:

24 / 125.5 ≈ 0.191716 mm per px
292.5 × 0.191716 ≈ 56.1 mm

Its around 67-68mm; wide set

Meaning your estimate is completely off, and would actually imply his eyes are close set (???)

also jfl at your gpt-written thread

The shorter one literally encourages people to eyeball a measurment, again, NOT POSSIBLE.

I'm not even INTO analysis or ratings and already know you're completely incorrect, @BigBallsLarry rating professional, what the fuck is he talking about?

Your thread about "disproving" ratios was practically saying "if you have good measurments, you'll look good"... like no shit bro?? but ratios are an easier way of measuring stuff, and covers much more
@Insomnia I saw you said "good thread" on his gpt written thread.

 

[VampyrMaxx]

Wdym it's not
It depends on your bizgyomatic width like the other guy said
I got it measured from a specialist

ESR = IPD / BZW

The ESR (Eye Separation Ratio) is often interpreted as a way to gauge how wide-set or close-set someone's eyes appear. But that's completely misguided.


Ratios like this essentially describe how the measurement of one feature influences the perception of another. In the case of ESR, it's suggesting that the apparent width of the interpupillary distance (IPD) is shaped by the bizygomatic width (BZW, or cheekbone width).


This is akin to claiming that the visual appearance of one object is altered by the presence or size of another nearby object—which isn't accurate at all. The reason? The human eyeball is a fixed size: about 24mm wide in nearly everyone. This constant allows us to derive actual measurements from any visual input, because every ratio ultimately boils down to absolute measurements when viewed through that 24mm lens. For instance, dividing the IPD by the 24mm eyeball width converts it directly into a tangible measurement. As a result, true harmony would require an ideal, optimal value for that measurement, not a relative ratio.

In my analyzation what determines if the eyes look close or far set is the actual distance between the eyes and inner canthuses, not the ESR.

My proof is the following.

Jordan Barrett has .42 ESR but his eyes don't look close set because his eyes are the proper distance from each other, but his face is too wide, which we can objectively see. This is what causes the .42 ESR.

On the other hand, someone like Jared Padelecki has an ESR of .45, but his eyes are farther apart than average, but his skull is also huge. He looks wide set despite having .45.

 

[VampyrMaxx]

also jfl at your gpt-written thread

im reading through real quick; this just caught my eye.

My wording is really bad so I use GPT to rephrase it in a way that people can understand.

the logic is entirely mine though, and I came up with this theory after 1000s of hours of facial analysis.

@RealSurgerymax even says a 65mm IPD with 33mm ICD is the best, which is what I've been trying to tell people the entire time.

 

[Orka]

im reading through real quick; this just caught my eye.

My wording is really bad so I use GPT to rephrase it in a way that people can understand.

the logic is entirely mine though, and I came up with this theory after 1000s of hours of facial analysis.

@RealSurgerymax even says a 65mm IPD with 33mm ICD is the best, which is what I've been trying to tell people the entire time.

"1000s of hours of facial analysis" my ass

Obviously there's ideal measurements, wtf does that even prove

 

[Insomnia]

Your thread about "disproving" ratios was practically saying "if you have good measurments, you'll look good"... like no shit bro?? but ratios are an easier way of measuring stuff, and covers much more
@Insomnia I saw you said "good thread" on his gpt written thread.

I didn’t even notice it was a gpt thread to be fair. I thought those were actual measurements and gave a vague idea of what X mm ipd would look like.

Your replies are higher effort than people’s threads mirin

 

[BigBallsLarry]

Good job disproving yourself, well done.

Set 1: 115px = 24mm wide (apparently EVERY humans eyeball width:
View attachment 4373328
with his previous measurment of 292.5px of IPD (used to calculate his ESR), his IPD would be 61mm

Spoiler: Calculations

115 px = 24 mm

So:

1 px = 24 / 115 mm
292.5 px = 292.5 × (24 / 115)

Calculate:

24 / 115 ≈ 0.20869565 mm per px
292.5 × 0.20869565 ≈ 61.0 mm

Set 2
View attachment 4373334
I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and say some of the eyeball isn't visible, or goes into the canthus and is hidden, then it would be 56.1mm

Spoiler: Calculations

125.5 px = 24 mm

So:

1 px = 24 / 125.5 mm
292.5 px = 292.5 × (24 / 125.5)

Compute:

24 / 125.5 ≈ 0.191716 mm per px
292.5 × 0.191716 ≈ 56.1 mm

Meaning your estimate is completely off, and would actually imply his eyes are close set (???)

also jfl at your gpt-written thread
View attachment 4373338

The shorter one literally encourages people to eyeball a measurment, again, NOT POSSIBLE.

I'm not even INTO analysis or ratings and already know you're completely incorrect, @BigBallsLarry rating professional, what the fuck is he talking about?

Your thread about "disproving" ratios was practically saying "if you have good measurments, you'll look good"... like no shit bro?? but ratios are an easier way of measuring stuff, and covers much more
@Insomnia I saw you said "good thread" on his gpt written thread.

The easiest way to measure eyes is knowing that a male iris is usually on average 12mm

if you measure the iris in pixel length then measure the other things and plug the px numbers into chatgpt you can get an accurate measurement in MM

ofc it'll differ from iris to iris but the difference is ~1-2mm which doesn't matter

measuring from the eyeball width is completely unreliable because the way the skin covers the eye is different in every human

 

[Orka]

The easiest way to measure eyes is knowing that a male iris is usually on average 12mm

if you measure the iris in pixel length then measure the other things and plug the px numbers into chatgpt you can get an accurate measurement in MM

ofc it'll differ from iris to iris but the difference is ~1-2mm which doesn't matter

measuring from the eyeball width is completely unreliable because the way the skin covers the eye is different in every human

If 45.5 px = 12 mm, then:

1 px = 12 / 45.5 mm
292.5 px = 292.5 × (12 / 45.5)

Compute:

12 / 45.5 ≈ 0.263736 mm per px
292.5 × 0.263736 ≈ 77.2 mm

292.5 px ≈ 77.2 mm

@adry measure your fucking ipd so we can settle this, go get a ruler and take another photo with it next to your face

 

[VampyrMaxx]

"1000s of hours of facial analysis" my ass

Obviously there's ideal measurements, wtf does that even prove

It proves that features are analyzed on their own instead of being compared to each other.

When a girl opens up your pants she doesnt say "I really like your dick length to width ratio" , she says "your dick is so long and girthy" which means she's analyzing the features on their own rather than comparing them to each other.

 

[BigBallsLarry]

View attachment 4373396
View attachment 4373398
If 45.5 px = 12 mm, then:

1 px = 12 / 45.5 mm
292.5 px = 292.5 × (12 / 45.5)

Compute:

12 / 45.5 ≈ 0.263736 mm per px
292.5 × 0.263736 ≈ 77.2 mm

292.5 px ≈ 77.2 mm

@adry measure your fucking ipd so we can settle this, go get a ruler and take another photo with it next to your face

This is exactly why ratios are better lol

 

[VampyrMaxx]

View attachment 4373396
View attachment 4373398
If 45.5 px = 12 mm, then:

1 px = 12 / 45.5 mm
292.5 px = 292.5 × (12 / 45.5)

Compute:

12 / 45.5 ≈ 0.263736 mm per px
292.5 × 0.263736 ≈ 77.2 mm

292.5 px ≈ 77.2 mm

@adry measure your fucking ipd so we can settle this, go get a ruler and take another photo with it next to your face

do you fucking u8nderstand how big 77mm is???????????

@AscendingHero do you have any way to explain this easier

 

[VampyrMaxx]

The easiest way to measure eyes is knowing that a male iris is usually on average 12mm

if you measure the iris in pixel length then measure the other things and plug the px numbers into chatgpt you can get an accurate measurement in MM

ofc it'll differ from iris to iris but the difference is ~1-2mm which doesn't matter

measuring from the eyeball width is completely unreliable because the way the skin covers the eye is different in every human

yes but the iris method is an unreliable method due to the lens distortion; ipd is much better you can measure with a pupilometer

 

[Orka]

This is exactly why ratios are better lol

Literally what I've been saying

It proves that features are analyzed on their own instead of being compared to each other.

When a girl opens up your pants she doesnt say "I really like your dick length to width ratio" , she says "your dick is so long and girthy" which means she's analyzing the features on their own rather than comparing them to each other.

?????
Who the fuck says "I really like your [x] ratio", they just compliment it, that's a stupid comparison
If you have a pencil dick (Long, no girth) SHE WILL mention how its long, but not girthy. DIRECTLY COMPARING THE TWO!

do you fucking u8nderstand how big 77mm is???????????

@AscendingHero do you have any way to explain this easier

??????????????????????

I DO, THAT'S THE POINT, YOU CAN'T MEASURE MEASURMENTS FROM AN IMAGE YOU MARSHMALLOW.
IT'S NOT 77MM, NEITHER IS IT 61, OR IS IT 56

RATIOS ARE BETTER THAN MEASURMENTS FROM IMAGES, AND YOU FAILED TO CORRECTLY ANALYZE HIS YOURSELF

 

[VampyrMaxx]

Literally what I've been saying

?????
Who the fuck says "I really like your [x] ratio", they just compliment it, that's a stupid comparison
If you have a pencil dick (Long, no girth) SHE WILL mention how its long, but not girthy. DIRECTLY COMPARING THE TWO!

??????????????????????

I DO, THAT'S THE POINT, YOU CAN'T MEASURE MEASURMENTS FROM AN IMAGE YOU MARSHMALLOW.
IT'S NOT 77MM, NEITHER IS IT 61, OR IS IT 56

RATIOS ARE BETTER THAN MEASURMENTS FROM IMAGES, AND YOU FAILED TO CORRECTLY ANALYZE HIS YOURSELF

exactly she says his length is good not his girth; telling by the raw measurements.

and no i did not fail. your method is invalid i've tried it many times. you need to be able to tell by your eye when it comes to photos.

This is a 68mm IPD, which is very similar to OPs.

 

[Orka]

do you fucking u8nderstand how big 77mm is???????????

@AscendingHero do you have any way to explain this easier

@AscendingHero context here, I've been proving through online measurments that you cannot accurately measure something, and that ratios are more reliable

Vampyr claims measurments are better, gave a completely random estimate of OP's IPD, then I disproved him instantly by calculating the possible IPD's in MM using a pixel -> millimeter conversion, using average eyeball sizes and average pupil sizes as comparison.

I don't think his IPD is 77mm. But the fact that that's a result proves how stupid vampyr is to think you can get a measurment directly from an image.

wtf are you talking about

That's not how measurments work

View attachment 4373287

How big is this apple in centimeters? You can't tell, because you have nothing to compare it to.

It could be a gigantic apple, or a tiny one. Who knows.

There's a reason ratios are more commonly used.

^^^^

 

[Orka]

exactly she says his length is good not his girth; telling by the raw measurements.

....the measurments, compared, to eachother. Also known as..... a ratio.

and no i did not fail. your method is invalid i've tried it many times. you need to be able to tell by your eye when it comes to photos.

wtf are you talking about, you did fail, any attempt at recreating your absolutely RANDOM guess failed, I compared it to your insane statement that every human eyeball is 24mm, you failed at that. I compared it to larry's estimate that every iris is 12mm, he failed at that (you're included in that failure)

In no way, apart from an eyeball image guess, did you prove you're right, at all.

This is a 68mm IPD, which is very similar to OPs.

This is literally "trust me bro" logic

Drawing lines, calculating them VS just intuition

 

[VampyrMaxx]

....the measurments, compared, to eachother. Also known as..... a ratio.

wtf are you talking about, you did fail, any attempt at recreating your absolutely RANDOM guess failed, I compared it to your insane statement that every human eyeball is 24mm, you failed at that. I compared it to larry's estimate that every iris is 12mm, he failed at that (you're included in that failure)

In no way, apart from an eyeball image guess, did you prove you're right, at all.

This is literally "trust me bro" logic

Drawing lines, calculating them VS just intuition

your analysis is wrong, if OP gets it measured with a pupilometer or similar device, his IPD will be like how I mention above

It's not trust me bro; you still havent brought me evidence that one feature's size can affect the perception of another

In fact I gave you direct photo evidence and 2 threads explaining my logic, you will have to read it longer to fully grasp the idea of what im saying bhai