D
Deleted member 60975
Master
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2024
- Posts
- 1,650
- Reputation
- 1,179
I had a German girl lose interest in me when she saw my dick soft (I’m a grower) she didn’t say it but I know it
PseudoMaxxer
Money.
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2023
- Posts
- 19,241
- Reputation
- 23,835
Milosz
Member of the Black Hebrew Movement (BHM)
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2022
- Posts
- 1,694
- Reputation
- 2,955
1 inch
northern mogger
Look down on earth and see the seeds you have sown
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2023
- Posts
- 7,719
- Reputation
- 8,678
17.9, 0,1cm behind finland
Willmogulater
I love titties
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2022
- Posts
- 17,627
- Reputation
- 16,449
Mine is coward it hides when soft
D
Deleted member 38235
Kraken
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2023
- Posts
- 4,410
- Reputation
- 3,716
9inches among healthy zoomers
Beetlejuice
Kraken
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2020
- Posts
- 25,255
- Reputation
- 34,486
Low
Results: The mean flaccid length in group A (8.60 cm) and group B (9.22 cm) was significantly different. The mean erect length in group A (14.48 cm) and group B (14.18 cm) was not significantly different. The mean flaccid width at the base was significantly different between group A (3.08 cm) and group B (2.87cm), but the mean flaccid width at the glans was not (group A, 3.02 cm; group B, 3.01 cm). The mean erect width at the base (group A, 3.95 cm; group B, 3.50 cm) and the erect width of the glans (group A, 3.49 cm; group B, 3.32 cm) were significantly different.
Results: The mean flaccid length in group A (8.60 cm) and group B (9.22 cm) was significantly different. The mean erect length in group A (14.48 cm) and group B (14.18 cm) was not significantly different. The mean flaccid width at the base was significantly different between group A (3.08 cm) and group B (2.87cm), but the mean flaccid width at the glans was not (group A, 3.02 cm; group B, 3.01 cm). The mean erect width at the base (group A, 3.95 cm; group B, 3.50 cm) and the erect width of the glans (group A, 3.49 cm; group B, 3.32 cm) were significantly different.
