What’s the percentage of men (overall) that LTR and marry a sub-6.5 roastie?

[Xangsane]

Title, including chads and truecels.

Like here, most people were expected to marry an MTB roastie with an "average" body count:

CLICK HERE TO GET A HYPER-ACCURATE PREDICTION OF YOUR WIFE'S APPEARANCE, BODY, DATING HISTORY AND BODY COUNT

@Sub0 Go onto this link, enter your date of birth, time of birth and city of birth onto the calculator (do not give this information on this thread please), and post the D1 AND D9 CHARTS ONLY. If you don't know your time of birth just but 12:00. https://aaps.space/type-of-spouse/...

looksmax.org

for many users, as most are predicted to end up with a MTB wife that's used goods

Most users are predicted to settle with used up MTBs: https://looksmax.org/threads/click-here-to-get-a-hyper-accurate-prediction-of-your-wifes-appearance-body-dating-history-and-body-count.880951/

looksmax.org

Most common wife prediction:

• MTB
• Around the same age
• Slightly weathered appearance
• Had a "few deeply transformative relationships that didn't last"

 

[Xangsane]

0

 

[Deleted member 21661]

Title, including chads and truecels.

Like here, most people were expected to marry an MTB roastie:

CLICK HERE TO GET A HYPER-ACCURATE PREDICTION OF YOUR WIFE'S APPEARANCE, BODY, DATING HISTORY AND BODY COUNT

@Sub0 Go onto this link, enter your date of birth, time of birth and city of birth onto the calculator (do not give this information on this thread please), and post the D1 AND D9 CHARTS ONLY. If you don't know your time of birth just but 12:00. https://aaps.space/type-of-spouse/...

looksmax.org

Were my results one of the best looks wise?

 

[Xangsane]

Were my results one of the best looks wise?

Yes.

 

[Xangsane]

@apemaxxed

Most common wife prediction:

• MTB
• Around the same age
• Slightly weathered appearance
• Had a "few deeply transformative relationships that didn't last"

 

[Deleted member 21661]

@apemaxxed

Most common wife prediction:

• MTB
• Around the same age
• Slightly weathered appearance
• Had a "few deeply transformative relationships that didn't last"

Mine was young HTB with little sexual experience right? Mogs
What was yours?

 

[ReadBooksEveryday]

Its a huge number incel

 

[Xangsane]

Its a huge number incel

why

Mine was young HTB with little sexual experience right? Mogs
What was yours?

"classically attractive HTB, timeless pheno, that you meet through family or friends"

 

[Deleted member 21661]

Its a huge number incel

Cope
AI said @Xangsane and me will marry HQNP stacies
You can cope tho

 

[Xangsane]

Cope
AI said @Xangsane and me will marry HQNP stacies
You can cope tho

Some users were very disappointed

I tried it on foids too, so I tried it on my fiancee and some of her foid friends

Most of them got average looking men, but hers mogged

 

[Xangsane]

Title, including chads and truecels.

Like here, most people were expected to marry an MTB roastie with an "average" body count:

CLICK HERE TO GET A HYPER-ACCURATE PREDICTION OF YOUR WIFE'S APPEARANCE, BODY, DATING HISTORY AND BODY COUNT

@Sub0 Go onto this link, enter your date of birth, time of birth and city of birth onto the calculator (do not give this information on this thread please), and post the D1 AND D9 CHARTS ONLY. If you don't know your time of birth just but 12:00. https://aaps.space/type-of-spouse/...

looksmax.org

for many users, as most are predicted to end up with a MTB wife that's used goods

Most users are predicted to settle with used up MTBs: https://looksmax.org/threads/click-here-to-get-a-hyper-accurate-prediction-of-your-wifes-appearance-body-dating-history-and-body-count.880951/

looksmax.org

Most common wife prediction:

• MTB
• Around the same age
• Slightly weathered appearance
• Had a "few deeply transformative relationships that didn't last"

@Emeraldglass @Gengar

 

[NewOneXY]

Even Chads marry used up Roasties

Finding a 18 year old virgin is like a unicorn

 

[Xangsane]

Even Chads marry used up Roasties

Finding a 18 year old virgin is like a unicorn

What about stacies?

 

[Xangsane]

@ConfusedBolivian @Trilogy @horizontallytall

 

[NewOneXY]

What about stacies?

ah of course

Many Chads also marry used up Stacys

thats true

 

[ConfusedBolivian]

Imagine marrying a non virgin

 

[Trilogy]

@ConfusedBolivian @Trilogy @horizontallytall

 

[horizontallytall]

No other choice for low iq, poor , non manipulators @ConfusedBolivian

 

[Xangsane]

View attachment 2637779

SQUISHY SQUISHY!!!

 

[Xangsane]

No other choice for low iq, poor , non manipulators @ConfusedBolivian

Imagine marrying a non virgin

View attachment 2637779

Even Chads marry used up Roasties

Finding a 18 year old virgin is like a unicorn

Were my results one of the best looks wise?

Its a huge number incel

1. Men Marrying Average-Looking Women with Previous Relationships ("roasties"): In the blackpill view, a hefty chunk of men, let's say around 60-70%, might end up with these women. The thinking is, as women look for stability and realize they can't all snag top-tier guys, they "settle" for average Joes.
2. Men Marrying Highly Attractive Women ("Stacies/Stacylites"): This is seen as a privilege of the top dogs, the elite 20%. These men are perceived to have the looks, status, or charm to attract these women, who are considered the cream of the crop.
3. Men Described as 'Genetic Dead Ends': The blackpill lingo suggests a good 30% or so of men might fall into this category, essentially sidelined in the dating game. They're seen as unable to compete due to perceived shortcomings.
4. Geomaxxing/SEAmaxxing: This could apply to a smaller segment, maybe around 5-10% of men, who find the dating scene in their home turf brutal and look for better odds in places like Southeast Asia, where they might have an advantage due to economic or cultural factors.

These numbers are speculative, of course.

---

Let's profile the types of guys who typically end up with women in each of these categories, according to the blackpill lens:

1. Average-Looking Women with Previous Relationships ("roasties"): The typical guy here is Mr. Average – not at the top of the social hierarchy, but not at the bottom either. He's probably got a steady job, a decent personality, and is generally seen as a safe bet. He's the guy who values companionship and stability over chasing an idealized fantasy.
2. Highly Attractive Women ("Stacies/Stacylites"): Contrary to the blackpill's top 20% rule, in reality, these women often end up with a mix of guys. Sure, some are the classic Chads – good-looking, charismatic, maybe with a bit of an edge. But others are the successful, confident types or well-off oofie doofies who've got their life together. They might not be male model material, but they've got other qualities like intelligence, humor, and stability.
3. Men Described as 'Genetic Dead Ends': The blackpill would have you believe these guys are doomed to "LDAR" (lay down and rot). In real life, though, many of these guys do find partners. They're often the underdogs, the overlooked ones who might struggle with self-esteem or social skills. But many find someone who appreciates them for who they are beyond surface-level traits.
4. Geomaxxing/SEAmaxxing: These are the adventurers or the disillusioned. Often, they're average guys who haven't had much luck in their local dating scene and are looking for a place where they feel they have a comparative advantage. They might be drawn by the perceived lower standards or the exotic appeal of a different culture.

 

[HerpDerpson]

1. Men Marrying Average-Looking Women with Previous Relationships ("roasties"): In the blackpill view, a hefty chunk of men, let's say around 60-70%, might end up with these women. The thinking is, as women look for stability and realize they can't all snag top-tier guys, they "settle" for average Joes.
2. Men Marrying Highly Attractive Women ("Stacies/Stacylites"): This is seen as a privilege of the top dogs, the elite 20%. These men are perceived to have the looks, status, or charm to attract these women, who are considered the cream of the crop.
3. Men Described as 'Genetic Dead Ends': The blackpill lingo suggests a good 30% or so of men might fall into this category, essentially sidelined in the dating game. They're seen as unable to compete due to perceived shortcomings.
4. Geomaxxing/SEAmaxxing: This could apply to a smaller segment, maybe around 5-10% of men, who find the dating scene in their home turf brutal and look for better odds in places like Southeast Asia, where they might have an advantage due to economic or cultural factors.

These numbers are speculative, of course.

---

Let's profile the types of guys who typically end up with women in each of these categories, according to the blackpill lens:

1. Average-Looking Women with Previous Relationships ("roasties"): The typical guy here is Mr. Average – not at the top of the social hierarchy, but not at the bottom either. He's probably got a steady job, a decent personality, and is generally seen as a safe bet. He's the guy who values companionship and stability over chasing an idealized fantasy.
2. Highly Attractive Women ("Stacies/Stacylites"): Contrary to the blackpill's top 20% rule, in reality, these women often end up with a mix of guys. Sure, some are the classic Chads – good-looking, charismatic, maybe with a bit of an edge. But others are the successful, confident types or well-off oofie doofies who've got their life together. They might not be male model material, but they've got other qualities like intelligence, humor, and stability.
3. Men Described as 'Genetic Dead Ends': The blackpill would have you believe these guys are doomed to "LDAR" (lay down and rot). In real life, though, many of these guys do find partners. They're often the underdogs, the overlooked ones who might struggle with self-esteem or social skills. But many find someone who appreciates them for who they are beyond surface-level traits.
4. Geomaxxing/SEAmaxxing: These are the adventurers or the disillusioned. Often, they're average guys who haven't had much luck in their local dating scene and are looking for a place where they feel they have a comparative advantage. They might be drawn by the perceived lower standards or the exotic appeal of a different culture.

Holy bluepill. Imagine some poor sod reading that trite and expecting to be "appreciated for who he is beyound surface level traits".

 

[Xangsane]

Holy bluepill. Imagine some poor sod reading that trite and expecting to be "appreciated for who he is being surface level traits".

Yeah I'd ignore that part jfl.

 

[Xangsane]

@smallman

 

[Xangsane]

@delonregen why so low

 

[Deleted member 30037]

@delonregen why so low

There aren't even that many roasties out there so how can it be anything higher than 40/50% , it can't

 

[Xangsane]

There aren't even that many roasties out there so how can it be anything higher than 40/50% , it can't

I meant an average-looking MTB who has been in a few relationships or situationships.

 

[Deleted member 30037]

I meant an average-looking MTB who has been in a few relationships or situationships.

Yeah that would be higher then but that's a very specific question lol

 

[Xangsane]

Yeah that would be higher then but that's a very specific question lol

What do you think?

1. Men Marrying Average-Looking Women with Previous Relationships ("roasties"): In the blackpill view, a hefty chunk of men, let's say around 60-70%, might end up with these women. The thinking is, as women look for stability and realize they can't all snag top-tier guys, they "settle" for average Joes.
2. Men Marrying Highly Attractive Women ("Stacies/Stacylites"): This is seen as a privilege of the top dogs, the elite 20%. These men are perceived to have the looks, status, or charm to attract these women, who are considered the cream of the crop.
3. Men Described as 'Genetic Dead Ends': The blackpill lingo suggests a good 30% or so of men might fall into this category, essentially sidelined in the dating game. They're seen as unable to compete due to perceived shortcomings.
4. Geomaxxing/SEAmaxxing: This could apply to a smaller segment, maybe around 5-10% of men, who find the dating scene in their home turf brutal and look for better odds in places like Southeast Asia, where they might have an advantage due to economic or cultural factors.

These numbers are speculative, of course.

---

Let's profile the types of guys who typically end up with women in each of these categories, according to the blackpill lens:

1. Average-Looking Women with Previous Relationships ("roasties"): The typical guy here is Mr. Average – not at the top of the social hierarchy, but not at the bottom either. He's probably got a steady job, a decent personality, and is generally seen as a safe bet. He's the guy who values companionship and stability over chasing an idealized fantasy.
2. Highly Attractive Women ("Stacies/Stacylites"): Contrary to the blackpill's top 20% rule, in reality, these women often end up with a mix of guys. Sure, some are the classic Chads – good-looking, charismatic, maybe with a bit of an edge. But others are the successful, confident types or well-off oofie doofies who've got their life together. They might not be male model material, but they've got other qualities like intelligence, humor, and stability.
3. Men Described as 'Genetic Dead Ends': The blackpill would have you believe these guys are doomed to "LDAR" (lay down and rot). In real life, though, many of these guys do find partners. They're often the underdogs, the overlooked ones who might struggle with self-esteem or social skills. But many find someone who appreciates them for who they are beyond surface-level traits.
4. Geomaxxing/SEAmaxxing: These are the adventurers or the disillusioned. Often, they're average guys who haven't had much luck in their local dating scene and are looking for a place where they feel they have a comparative advantage. They might be drawn by the perceived lower standards or the exotic appeal of a different culture.

 

[Deleted member 30037]

What do you think?

I think if you're talking 30+ year old women then yeah it would be lik 80% maybe higher but if it's 20s then way lower

 

[Xangsane]

I think if you're talking 30+ year old women then yeah it would be lik 80% maybe higher but if it's 20s then way lower

Yeah any age of MTB or below woman who is a non-virgin or max body count of 2-3.

 

[Deleted member 30037]

Yeah any age of MTB or below woman who is a non-virgin or max body count of 2-3.

After 25 (for women) the % starts to go up quickly, as you said before they panic and settle for whatever, they know they need children and realise the top 10% of men won't commit to them (generally speaking)

 

[Xangsane]

After 25 (for women) the % starts to go up quickly, as you said before they panic and settle for whatever, they know they need children and realise the top 10% of men won't commit to them (generally speaking)

Thoughts on this?

Here's a rough breakdown of the types of men women end up marrying, and the profiles of these women:

1. Marrying a Hot (Strong HTN+) Man: This is likely a smaller percentage, perhaps around 10-20%. The women who snag these guys are often quite attractive themselves, aligning with the idea of 'looks matching'. They might also have strong social skills, be in good physical shape, and present themselves well.
2. Marrying a Betabuxxer (Average Looking or Below Man with a Stable Job): This could be the most common scenario, maybe around 40-50%. These women might range from average to above-average in attractiveness. They prioritize stability, security, and perhaps a family-oriented lifestyle over raw physical attraction. They might be pragmatic about their dating choices, focusing on long-term security over short-term passion.
3. Becoming Cat Women (Remaining Single): Perhaps around 10-15% of women might end up in this category. These women could be highly independent, career-focused, or they may have very high standards that are not easily met. This group might also include those who have become disillusioned with relationships or prefer a solitary lifestyle.
4. Marrying a Rich, Average-Looking, Upper-Class Man: Let's say around 20-30%. These women are often very strategic in their approach to relationships. They may place a high value on social status, financial security, and the lifestyle that comes with it. They might be attractive, but they’re more focused on securing a comfortable and affluent lifestyle than on finding a physically attractive partner.

In the blackpilled view, these scenarios are heavily influenced by factors like physical attractiveness, socio-economic status, and strategic decision-making in relationships.

---

In the blackpilled perspective, the phenomenon of most "Stacies" (highly attractive women) marrying men from category 4 (rich, average-looking, upper-class men) rather than category 1 (hot, strong HTN+ men) can be explained through a few key ideas:

1. Hypergamy and Social Status: The blackpill often emphasizes hypergamy, where women are believed to seek out partners of higher social or economic status. A rich, average-looking man offers stability, security, and a high social standing, which are highly valued in this viewpoint.
2. Long-Term Security Over Short-Term Attraction: While a hot, strong HTN+ man might offer immediate physical attraction, the blackpill suggests that women, especially those deemed as "Stacies", will prioritize long-term security and comfort. An upper-class man, even if average-looking, is perceived as a better provider for long-term needs, like raising a family and maintaining a high standard of living.
3. The Limited Pool of Attractive, High-Status Men: The blackpill also acknowledges a practical limitation - there aren't enough men who are both incredibly attractive (HTN+) and rich/upper-class. Therefore, Stacies might opt for the more available option that still meets a high standard in terms of resources and status.
4. Strategic Mating Choices: From a blackpill perspective, Stacies are seen as making highly strategic mating choices. They might find a rich, average-looking man to be a better overall package, offering both the resources and the willingness to commit, which might not always be the case with highly attractive men.
5. Balancing the Dating Market Dynamics: In this view, attractive men (HTN+) might be more inclined towards non-committal relationships, given their high desirability. Therefore, Stacies might choose rich, average-looking men for a more stable, committed partnership.

---


In the blackpill view, the idea that highly attractive men (HTN+) often end up with high-tier Beckies (HTBs) or entry-level Stacylites, rather than top-tier Stacies, can be explained by a few key concepts:

1. Perceived Compatibility and Effort: Highly attractive men might find that high-tier Beckies or entry-level Stacylites are more approachable and require less effort to maintain a relationship with. These women might be seen as more appreciative and less demanding compared to top-tier Stacies.
2. Avoidance of Competition and Drama: Top-tier Stacies, due to their high desirability, might attract a lot of attention and competition from other high-status men. HTN+ men might prefer to avoid this competition and potential drama by choosing partners who are attractive but not at the pinnacle of societal beauty standards.
3. Relationship Dynamics: HTBs or entry-level Stacylites might offer a more balanced dynamic in the relationship. These women could be perceived as more loyal, less likely to stray, and more invested in the relationship, compared to top-tier Stacies who have more options.
4. Availability and Numbers Game: Simply put, there are more HTBs and entry-level Stacylites available than top-tier Stacies. This greater availability increases the likelihood of HTN+ men pairing up with them.
5. Personal Preferences and Individual Variability: Even within the blackpill framework, it's acknowledged that personal preferences play a role. Some HTN+ men might genuinely prefer the company of HTBs or entry-level Stacylites, finding them more compatible in terms of personality, interests, or life goals.

@Aloha @HerpDerpson @ConfusedBolivian @apemaxxed

 

[Xangsane]

Thoughts on this?

Here's a rough breakdown of the types of men women end up marrying, and the profiles of these women:

1. Marrying a Hot (Strong HTN+) Man: This is likely a smaller percentage, perhaps around 10-20%. The women who snag these guys are often quite attractive themselves, aligning with the idea of 'looks matching'. They might also have strong social skills, be in good physical shape, and present themselves well.
2. Marrying a Betabuxxer (Average Looking or Below Man with a Stable Job): This could be the most common scenario, maybe around 40-50%. These women might range from average to above-average in attractiveness. They prioritize stability, security, and perhaps a family-oriented lifestyle over raw physical attraction. They might be pragmatic about their dating choices, focusing on long-term security over short-term passion.
3. Becoming Cat Women (Remaining Single): Perhaps around 10-15% of women might end up in this category. These women could be highly independent, career-focused, or they may have very high standards that are not easily met. This group might also include those who have become disillusioned with relationships or prefer a solitary lifestyle.
4. Marrying a Rich, Average-Looking, Upper-Class Man: Let's say around 20-30%. These women are often very strategic in their approach to relationships. They may place a high value on social status, financial security, and the lifestyle that comes with it. They might be attractive, but they’re more focused on securing a comfortable and affluent lifestyle than on finding a physically attractive partner.

In the blackpilled view, these scenarios are heavily influenced by factors like physical attractiveness, socio-economic status, and strategic decision-making in relationships.

---

In the blackpilled perspective, the phenomenon of most "Stacies" (highly attractive women) marrying men from category 4 (rich, average-looking, upper-class men) rather than category 1 (hot, strong HTN+ men) can be explained through a few key ideas:

1. Hypergamy and Social Status: The blackpill often emphasizes hypergamy, where women are believed to seek out partners of higher social or economic status. A rich, average-looking man offers stability, security, and a high social standing, which are highly valued in this viewpoint.
2. Long-Term Security Over Short-Term Attraction: While a hot, strong HTN+ man might offer immediate physical attraction, the blackpill suggests that women, especially those deemed as "Stacies", will prioritize long-term security and comfort. An upper-class man, even if average-looking, is perceived as a better provider for long-term needs, like raising a family and maintaining a high standard of living.
3. The Limited Pool of Attractive, High-Status Men: The blackpill also acknowledges a practical limitation - there aren't enough men who are both incredibly attractive (HTN+) and rich/upper-class. Therefore, Stacies might opt for the more available option that still meets a high standard in terms of resources and status.
4. Strategic Mating Choices: From a blackpill perspective, Stacies are seen as making highly strategic mating choices. They might find a rich, average-looking man to be a better overall package, offering both the resources and the willingness to commit, which might not always be the case with highly attractive men.
5. Balancing the Dating Market Dynamics: In this view, attractive men (HTN+) might be more inclined towards non-committal relationships, given their high desirability. Therefore, Stacies might choose rich, average-looking men for a more stable, committed partnership.

---


In the blackpill view, the idea that highly attractive men (HTN+) often end up with high-tier Beckies (HTBs) or entry-level Stacylites, rather than top-tier Stacies, can be explained by a few key concepts:

1. Perceived Compatibility and Effort: Highly attractive men might find that high-tier Beckies or entry-level Stacylites are more approachable and require less effort to maintain a relationship with. These women might be seen as more appreciative and less demanding compared to top-tier Stacies.
2. Avoidance of Competition and Drama: Top-tier Stacies, due to their high desirability, might attract a lot of attention and competition from other high-status men. HTN+ men might prefer to avoid this competition and potential drama by choosing partners who are attractive but not at the pinnacle of societal beauty standards.
3. Relationship Dynamics: HTBs or entry-level Stacylites might offer a more balanced dynamic in the relationship. These women could be perceived as more loyal, less likely to stray, and more invested in the relationship, compared to top-tier Stacies who have more options.
4. Availability and Numbers Game: Simply put, there are more HTBs and entry-level Stacylites available than top-tier Stacies. This greater availability increases the likelihood of HTN+ men pairing up with them.
5. Personal Preferences and Individual Variability: Even within the blackpill framework, it's acknowledged that personal preferences play a role. Some HTN+ men might genuinely prefer the company of HTBs or entry-level Stacylites, finding them more compatible in terms of personality, interests, or life goals.

@Aloha @HerpDerpson @ConfusedBolivian @apemaxxed

@Aloha @apemaxxed @incelmogger

Delving into the world of Vedic astrology, especially its use in predicting marital outcomes, we're stepping into a domain that mixes ancient beliefs and modern interpretations. It's a field that's viewed with skepticism by many, yet it holds significant cultural importance for others.

1. Predictions for Men Marrying "Used up Roasties": In the context of Vedic astrology, these predictions might reflect certain astrological configurations or readings that suggest a tendency towards relationships with women who have more life and romantic experiences. It's intriguing that your readings consistently show this trend. This could be due to the interpretative lens applied or specific astrological criteria being emphasized in the readings.
2. Women's Predictions Leading to "Oofy Doofies": Similarly, if Vedic astrology readings are frequently pointing women towards stable, dependable men with secure jobs, it could indicate an emphasis on certain astrological aspects that prioritize stability and reliability over raw physical attractiveness or charisma. This might reflect traditional values embedded in the astrology system, where long-term security and compatibility are highly valued.

Let's break down what this might imply within the context of such astrological predictions:

1. Marrying a Hot Person (5-10%): If only a small percentage of your readings indicate marriages to highly attractive individuals, it suggests that Vedic astrology might be reflecting a more realistic or pragmatic view of relationships. In real life, not everyone ends up with a partner who is conventionally attractive by societal standards. This could imply that Vedic astrology places a greater emphasis on other qualities or karmic connections rather than just physical appearance.
2. Marrying a Genetic Dead End/Obese Femcel: The rarity of these outcomes in your readings could indicate that Vedic astrology tends to favor more balanced or moderate outcomes over extreme ones. In the real world, while such relationships do occur, they might not be the norm. It's also possible that the astrological criteria you're using are more aligned with traditional values, where extreme physical or personality traits (like those implied by "genetic dead end" or "obese femcel") are less likely to be highlighted.

Aligning Vedic astrology spouse predictions with the blackpill perspective on relationships presents an interesting juxtaposition of two very different belief systems. Here's how they might line up:

1. Vedic Astrology Predictions for Average-Looking Women with Previous Relationships ("Used Up Roasties"): If Vedic astrology frequently predicts marriages with these women, it may overlap with the blackpill idea that many men end up with average-looking partners for reasons like stability and realistic expectations. This could align with a significant portion of men in the blackpill framework who are not at the top of the attractiveness hierarchy.
2. Vedic Astrology Predictions for Highly Attractive Women ("Stacies/Stacylites"): These predictions might be less common in Vedic astrology, reflecting the blackpill notion that only a select group of men (those who are highly attractive or have high status) end up with such women. This could align with the smaller percentage of men who, according to the blackpill, have the looks, status, or resources to attract these women.
3. Vedic Astrology Predictions for Rich, Average-Looking, Upper-Class Men: If Vedic astrology often predicts marriages with these men, it aligns well with the blackpill perspective that many women, including Stacies, seek long-term security and stability, which these men can provide.
4. Vedic Astrology Predictions for Remaining Single or "Becoming Cat Women": If this outcome is rare in Vedic astrology, it might not align perfectly with the blackpill viewpoint, which tends to be more cynical about the chances of finding a partner, especially for certain groups.
5. Vedic Astrology Predictions for Men Described as 'Genetic Dead Ends': If Vedic astrology rarely predicts that women end up with such men, this would align with the blackpill view that these men are less likely to be chosen for relationships or marriage.

Vedic astrology, with its focus on cosmic and karmic influences, offers a more mystical and fate-oriented perspective, while the blackpill ideology is rooted in a deterministic view of social hierarchies and physical attractiveness.

 

[Xangsane]

0

 

[Xangsane]

1. Men Marrying Average-Looking Women with Previous Relationships ("roasties"): In the blackpill view, a hefty chunk of men, let's say around 60-70%, might end up with these women. The thinking is, as women look for stability and realize they can't all snag top-tier guys, they "settle" for average Joes.
2. Men Marrying Highly Attractive Women ("Stacies/Stacylites"): This is seen as a privilege of the top dogs, the elite 20%. These men are perceived to have the looks, status, or charm to attract these women, who are considered the cream of the crop.
3. Men Described as 'Genetic Dead Ends': The blackpill lingo suggests a good 30% or so of men might fall into this category, essentially sidelined in the dating game. They're seen as unable to compete due to perceived shortcomings.
4. Geomaxxing/SEAmaxxing: This could apply to a smaller segment, maybe around 5-10% of men, who find the dating scene in their home turf brutal and look for better odds in places like Southeast Asia, where they might have an advantage due to economic or cultural factors.

These numbers are speculative, of course.

---

Let's profile the types of guys who typically end up with women in each of these categories, according to the blackpill lens:

1. Average-Looking Women with Previous Relationships ("roasties"): The typical guy here is Mr. Average – not at the top of the social hierarchy, but not at the bottom either. He's probably got a steady job, a decent personality, and is generally seen as a safe bet. He's the guy who values companionship and stability over chasing an idealized fantasy.
2. Highly Attractive Women ("Stacies/Stacylites"): Contrary to the blackpill's top 20% rule, in reality, these women often end up with a mix of guys. Sure, some are the classic Chads – good-looking, charismatic, maybe with a bit of an edge. But others are the successful, confident types or well-off oofie doofies who've got their life together. They might not be male model material, but they've got other qualities like intelligence, humor, and stability.
3. Men Described as 'Genetic Dead Ends': The blackpill would have you believe these guys are doomed to "LDAR" (lay down and rot). In real life, though, many of these guys do find partners. They're often the underdogs, the overlooked ones who might struggle with self-esteem or social skills. But many find someone who appreciates them for who they are beyond surface-level traits.
4. Geomaxxing/SEAmaxxing: These are the adventurers or the disillusioned. Often, they're average guys who haven't had much luck in their local dating scene and are looking for a place where they feel they have a comparative advantage. They might be drawn by the perceived lower standards or the exotic appeal of a different culture.

@Aloha @apemaxxed @incelmogger

Delving into the world of Vedic astrology, especially its use in predicting marital outcomes, we're stepping into a domain that mixes ancient beliefs and modern interpretations. It's a field that's viewed with skepticism by many, yet it holds significant cultural importance for others.

1. Predictions for Men Marrying "Used up Roasties": In the context of Vedic astrology, these predictions might reflect certain astrological configurations or readings that suggest a tendency towards relationships with women who have more life and romantic experiences. It's intriguing that your readings consistently show this trend. This could be due to the interpretative lens applied or specific astrological criteria being emphasized in the readings.
2. Women's Predictions Leading to "Oofy Doofies": Similarly, if Vedic astrology readings are frequently pointing women towards stable, dependable men with secure jobs, it could indicate an emphasis on certain astrological aspects that prioritize stability and reliability over raw physical attractiveness or charisma. This might reflect traditional values embedded in the astrology system, where long-term security and compatibility are highly valued.

Let's break down what this might imply within the context of such astrological predictions:

1. Marrying a Hot Person (5-10%): If only a small percentage of your readings indicate marriages to highly attractive individuals, it suggests that Vedic astrology might be reflecting a more realistic or pragmatic view of relationships. In real life, not everyone ends up with a partner who is conventionally attractive by societal standards. This could imply that Vedic astrology places a greater emphasis on other qualities or karmic connections rather than just physical appearance.
2. Marrying a Genetic Dead End/Obese Femcel: The rarity of these outcomes in your readings could indicate that Vedic astrology tends to favor more balanced or moderate outcomes over extreme ones. In the real world, while such relationships do occur, they might not be the norm. It's also possible that the astrological criteria you're using are more aligned with traditional values, where extreme physical or personality traits (like those implied by "genetic dead end" or "obese femcel") are less likely to be highlighted.

Aligning Vedic astrology spouse predictions with the blackpill perspective on relationships presents an interesting juxtaposition of two very different belief systems. Here's how they might line up:

1. Vedic Astrology Predictions for Average-Looking Women with Previous Relationships ("Used Up Roasties"): If Vedic astrology frequently predicts marriages with these women, it may overlap with the blackpill idea that many men end up with average-looking partners for reasons like stability and realistic expectations. This could align with a significant portion of men in the blackpill framework who are not at the top of the attractiveness hierarchy.
2. Vedic Astrology Predictions for Highly Attractive Women ("Stacies/Stacylites"): These predictions might be less common in Vedic astrology, reflecting the blackpill notion that only a select group of men (those who are highly attractive or have high status) end up with such women. This could align with the smaller percentage of men who, according to the blackpill, have the looks, status, or resources to attract these women.
3. Vedic Astrology Predictions for Rich, Average-Looking, Upper-Class Men: If Vedic astrology often predicts marriages with these men, it aligns well with the blackpill perspective that many women, including Stacies, seek long-term security and stability, which these men can provide.
4. Vedic Astrology Predictions for Remaining Single or "Becoming Cat Women": If this outcome is rare in Vedic astrology, it might not align perfectly with the blackpill viewpoint, which tends to be more cynical about the chances of finding a partner, especially for certain groups.
5. Vedic Astrology Predictions for Men Described as 'Genetic Dead Ends': If Vedic astrology rarely predicts that women end up with such men, this would align with the blackpill view that these men are less likely to be chosen for relationships or marriage.

Vedic astrology, with its focus on cosmic and karmic influences, offers a more mystical and fate-oriented perspective, while the blackpill ideology is rooted in a deterministic view of social hierarchies and physical attractiveness.

@Sprinkles