What’s the point of PSL-rating guys when the specimens aren’t even presented under standardized conditions?

[ISupportRaceMixing]

What’s even the point of rating guys when the conditions are all over the place?

1. Guys with major facial differences or disfigurement probably shouldn’t be forced into the usual brutal PSL scale. The framework was not designed for those cases, so the rating becomes meaningless.
2. Guys carrying enough body fat to obscure their facial structure should probably lean down first. Otherwise, you are mostly rating body-fat distribution rather than the underlying face.
3. No filters, AI edits, aggressive lighting tricks, or suspicious camera angles. Fraudmaxxing defeats the entire purpose.
4. Long hair can frame the face and conceal parts of the skull, jaw, or ears. For the cleanest comparison, short hair or a shaved head would reveal the underlying structure more clearly.
5. Fashion should not influence the score either. Use a plain, neutral setup with the neck and shoulders visible—no outfits, jewelry, or styling intended to boost the impression.
6. For the geneticists and sperm-bank scientists LARPing in the audience: provide a yearly photo time series from birth to the present. We apparently need the complete longitudinal dataset to separate genetics, development, puberty, ageing, body-fat changes, and temporary presentation effects.

So, the ideal “clean” PSL candidate would have an unedited face, visible facial structure, minimal hair concealment, neutral lighting, low enough body fat for the structure to be visible, and no fashion or posing advantages—plus a complete photographic archive for the phenotype researchers.

Basically: rate the underlying phenotype, not the presentation-maxxing package.

 

[LowTierBateman]

Lick my balls

 

[ISupportRaceMixing]

Lick my balls

Bro, just download Grindr.