Whats your political stance

[BR32]

I'm a leftist

 

[SkinjobCatastrophe]

no one needs to be on a dualistic spectrum, ideas are not limited to that. The Roman republic, in their wisdom, had no political parties and operated with a huge range of policies and ideas. There is now remarkably little difference in the “right” and “left” at least as I experience it here in america. They all do almost nothing for the important issues, while picking one or two controversial issues to argue over but never enact any change

 

[Canthus]

Politics is jester

 

[BR32]

no one needs to be on a dualistic spectrum, ideas are not limited to that. The Roman republic, in their wisdom, had no political parties and operated with a huge range of policies and ideas. There is now remarkably little difference in the “right” and “left” at least as I experience it here in america. They all do almost nothing for the important issues, while picking one or two controversial issues to argue over but never enact any change

It's because the left in this context is just liberalism which is a worthless ideology.

As long as you're operating in a capitalist system there will be no meaningful change.

 

[RetaRetaReta]

Note down all the central & left voters. These are all the ethnics and pajeets larping as white people

 

[looksovernt]

The left believe in equality, and by trying to make thing “fairer” by giving more opportunities to a certain demographic, that could be social-economic or even racially, is inherently contradictory to their beliefs as that action in itself is unfair. I bet you’re a pro DEI, mug.

DEI makes people DIE.

No I do not get my political beliefs from Reddit lol, Infact this exact discussion was touched upon by the guy in my pfp, Jonathon Bowden, look him up, his book is great.

Supporting disadvantaged groups to reduce structural barriers has nothing contradictory, it levels the playing field without enforcing identical outcomes

Calling that "inherently unfair" is just misrepresenting leftist principles

I am not even left wing you're just too retarded to understand the ideology you claim to understand

 

[looksovernt]

Note down all the central & left voters. These are all the ethnics and pajeets larping as white people

wait until you discover latinx white supremacists

 

[Endoplasmic82]

I am anti socialist and anti large government, I would call myself libertarian with a couple views that maybe dont agree (such as I am anti abortion)

Supporting disadvantaged groups to reduce structural barriers has nothing contradictory, it levels the playing field without enforcing identical outcomes

Calling that "inherently unfair" is just misrepresenting leftist principles

I am not even left wing you're just too retarded to understand the ideology you claim to understand

What I’m saying is, giving more attention to one group, in this case those who are disadvantaged, is inherently unequal as they’re receiving unequal treatment.

That could be as measly as giving work experience opportunities to the working class more freely than those from a middle class background, as the middle class tend to have more opportunities, so yes it “makes things more equal” but that’s because of equity, and equity is not equal. So in their eyes to achieve “equality” you must be unequal, even though there will always be some level of inequality. This could even be LOOKS, the way you speak and height, unconscious biases. And if you’re too focused on being “unbiased” it makes you biased because you’re trying hard not to see biased, which sways your way of thinking.

My whole point was the clear distinction between the left and the right and the reality and acceptance of inequality, and how it will always exist. You are the retarded one, regurgitating the same thing, whilst contradicting yourself.

Tell me a way to achieve this “equality” aka levelled playing fields without doing something inequal. Of course those in better economic households and social standings will have more opportunities, and that is mostly due to the work put in by someone in their bloodline. To remove that “privilege”, which was built due to someone in your bloodline’s success (in which they succeeded with the intention of having a better quality of life for themselves and their descendants), is unequal and goes against the fundamentals that the left align with.

Let’s say your delusional beliefs were implemented, and people became even more punished for success, to “level the playing fields” why would people try and succeed, they may aswell just be bums and make no effort to succeed for their descendants, as they will receive the same opportunities as someone who has worked their ass off in hopes of giving their child more opportunities. That will lead to stagnation. You say you aren’t a lefty but you’re sounding like a commie from where I’m standing (joke, but you do sound lefty).

 

[IHATEINDIANS]

What I’m saying is, giving more attention to one group, in this case those who are disadvantaged, is inherently unequal as they’re receiving unequal treatment.

That could be as measly as giving work experience opportunities to the working class more freely than those from a middle class background, as the middle class tend to have more opportunities, so yes it “makes things more equal” but that’s because of equity, and equity is not equal. So in their eyes to achieve “equality” you must be unequal, even though there will always be some level of inequality. This could even be LOOKS, the way you speak and height, unconscious biases. And if you’re too focused on being “unbiased” it makes you biased because you’re trying hard not to see biased, which sways your way of thinking.

My whole point was the clear distinction between the left and the right and the reality and acceptance of inequality, and how it will always exist. You are the retarded one, regurgitating the same thing, whilst contradicting yourself.

Tell me a way to achieve this “equality” aka levelled playing fields without doing something inequal. Of course those in better economic households and social standings will have more opportunities, and that is mostly due to the work put in by someone in their bloodline. To remove that “privilege”, which was built due to someone in your bloodline’s success (in which they succeeded with the intention of having a better quality of life for themselves and their descendants), is unequal and goes against the fundamentals that the left align with.

Let’s say your delusional beliefs were implemented, and people became even more punished for success, to “level the playing fields” why would people try and succeed, they may aswell just be bums and make no effort to succeed for their descendants, as they will receive the same opportunities as someone who has worked their ass off in hopes of giving their child more opportunities. That will lead to stagnation. You say you aren’t a lefty but you’re sounding like a commie from where I’m standing (joke, but you do sound lefty).

Did you not understand what my comment said? I said I am ANTI socialist, I agree with everything you said.

 

[Endoplasmic82]

Did you not understand what my comment said? I said I am ANTI socialist, I agree with everything you said.

I was replying to the other guy,

I was going to reply to you but deleted my comment and you was still attached to my reply lol.

But anyways, the other guy is a goof who probably gets his political beliefs from his blue haired English literature “teacher”, aka indoctrinator lol

 

[NoExit]

the i dont care stance

 

[Joeseminate]

Centre from Equatorial Guinea

 

[Endoplasmic82]

the i dont care stance

The “I like to watch” stance

 

[Endoplasmic82]

Centre from Equatorial Guinea

Fag, you need to be EXTREMELY HARD RIGHT!!!!!!

 

[looksovernt]

What I’m saying is, giving more attention to one group, in this case those who are disadvantaged, is inherently unequal as they’re receiving unequal treatment.

That could be as measly as giving work experience opportunities to the working class more freely than those from a middle class background, as the middle class tend to have more opportunities, so yes it “makes things more equal” but that’s because of equity, and equity is not equal. So in their eyes to achieve “equality” you must be unequal, even though there will always be some level of inequality. This could even be LOOKS, the way you speak and height, unconscious biases. And if you’re too focused on being “unbiased” it makes you biased because you’re trying hard not to see biased, which sways your way of thinking.

My whole point was the clear distinction between the left and the right and the reality and acceptance of inequality, and how it will always exist. You are the retarded one, regurgitating the same thing, whilst contradicting yourself.

Tell me a way to achieve this “equality” aka levelled playing fields without doing something inequal. Of course those in better economic households and social standings will have more opportunities, and that is mostly due to the work put in by someone in their bloodline. To remove that “privilege”, which was built due to someone in your bloodline’s success (in which they succeeded with the intention of having a better quality of life for themselves and their descendants), is unequal and goes against the fundamentals that the left align with.

Let’s say your delusional beliefs were implemented, and people became even more punished for success, to “level the playing fields” why would people try and succeed, they may aswell just be bums and make no effort to succeed for their descendants, as they will receive the same opportunities as someone who has worked their ass off in hopes of giving their child more opportunities. That will lead to stagnation. You say you aren’t a lefty but you’re sounding like a commie from where I’m standing (joke, but you do sound lefty).

How retarded do you have to be to not understand that I am not a leftist

You wrote all that shit for nothing, didn't read anything beyond the 1st line, you're more retarded than me buddy

 

[1SIS]

wow a serious thread with almost 300 views and 2 pages of responses. im on a @Jason Voorhees level run

 

[itssoover0457]

i used to be slightly left leaning now i just don’t care anymore

 

[looksovernt]

But anyways, the other guy is a goof who probably gets his political beliefs from his blue haired English literature “teacher”, aka indoctrinator lol

 

[Endoplasmic82]

View attachment 4527530

View attachment 4527530

The one thing you attacked me on, what no my arguement, but the little petty response I put at the end, a mirroring one to “you get yours from TikTok”. And you’re assuming I’m dumb for doing so, such a faggot retard.

Plus I’m not maga

 

[looksovernt]

The one thing you attacked me on, what no my arguement, but the little petty response I put at the end, a mirroring one to “you get yours from TikTok”. And you’re assuming I’m dumb for doing so, such a faggot retard.

Do you consider "I was replying to the other guy,

I was going to reply to you but deleted my comment and you was still attached to my reply lol."

to be an argument?

Plus I’m not maga

spiritually

 

[Endoplasmic82]

Do you consider "I was replying to the other guy,

I was going to reply to you but deleted my comment and you was still attached to my reply lol."

to be an argument?



spiritually

Dnr, you obviously do not want to talk about the thread’s topic, so this discussion is over

 

[looksovernt]

Dnr, you obviously do not want to talk about the thread’s topic, so this discussion is over

 

[H@rry]

anti-establishment anarchist

 

[Endoplasmic82]

View attachment 4527552

 

[trump]

nazism is left wing

What ahahaha

 

[looksovernt]

What ahahaha

Economically

 

[BrrBrrPatapimTralle]

Far right
mongolia but only genetically