![thereallegend](/data/avatars/l/14/14189.jpg?1718594169)
thereallegend
Primal Blackpill
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2021
- Posts
- 23,004
- Reputation
- 27,166
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
I truly don't think he understands how harsh women areenough with the dumbass wheat waffle, he can't rate obviously
I agree with WW rating here more. 5 is too low i think, he's above average, around 5.5/10. But later in vid where he said that this dude can easily ascend to 7 is hilariousWomen are a lot harsher
View attachment 1557527
He just rated the Tinder Swindler a 6/10 facially
View attachment 1557536
I think a more proper rating is 5/10. Yes it's only a difference of 1 pt decile. But in the dating market, the difference between MTN and HTN is clearly noticeable.
The Tinder Swindler lives in NYC which is hypergamy capital.Women aren't nearly as harsh IRL as they are on dating apps and social media. Afaik he rates based on IRL potential, so okcupid chart wouldn't apply. 5.5-6 seems accurate for him IRL
That asian oldcel is definitely not a 5 though
I agree with a 4, but he's still above average when it comes to asians.View attachment 1557545
He rated the lead squid game actor a 5/10 facially. I mean he's doing well for his age, but I'd think 4/10 is more accurate to how women would treat him.
No, not really my point is that I don't think women would rate those men as highly as WW does
eyeme is utter dog shit, 90% of people get rated in the 4.5-5.5 range and girls get massively overratedNo, not really my point is that I don't think women would rate those men as highly as WW does
But you shouldn't get rated by men right? So ur rating doesn't mean anything.No, not really my point is that I don't think women would rate those men as highly as WW does
Yeah I don't put much stock in the male and guest ratings.eyeme is utter dog shit, 90% of people get rated in the 4.5-5.5 range and girls get massively overrated
View attachment 1557581
eyeme is utter dog shit, 90% of people get rated in the 4.5-5.5 range and girls get massively overrated
View attachment 1557581
My eyeme account got 6.3 by females, but they were in disagreement a lot. I got women rating me a 2 and others rating me an 8. It averaged out to 6.3Yeah I don't put much stock in the male and guest ratings.
I've been rated by 38 female accounts there with an avg of 5.6
My last photofeeler photo got 5.8 rated by 40 women.
Goes to show normies have elasticity in the perception of their attractiveness.My eyeme account got 6.3 by females, but they were in disagreement a lot. I got women rating me a 2 and others rating me an 8. It averaged out to 6.3
23 ratings by females. (6.3)Goes to show normies have elasticity in the perception of their attractiveness.
Hence, why niches and "types" is legit for normies.
How many verified female ratings did you get?
No it's not cope.23 ratings by females. (6.3)
58 ratings by males (6)
283 ratings by guests (6.1) lol
I think it's cope though, I think I look average as fuck.
If I was a 6, I would get approached by women and asked for my instagram/snapchat, etc. This never happened. So I think I am normieNo it's not cope.
If you're a 6, you should be able to get with Beckies on at least a semi regular basis.
Bruh I saw myself on there once and i never even posted on there
6 is still in the normie range.If I was a 6, I would get approached by women and asked for my instagram/snapchat, etc. This never happened. So I think I am normie
Here we go with Preston and Hexum
Put the Tinder Swindler's face on photofeeler and eyeme.Alot of you guys are dumb af subhumans and think you need to he a god to be a 6/10. We have done tinder experiments where a 6/10 guy was a dude with nice coloring and hair. Some of you need to face the reality that you look like shit and stop projecting
ye niggas are just projecting because they're struggling and think they're above average, they're always overrating themselves or are curry. In reality girls find htn's attractive.Alot of you guys are dumb af subhumans and think you need to he a god to be a 6/10. We have done tinder experiments where a 6/10 guy was a dude with nice coloring and hair. Some of you need to face the reality that you look like shit and stop projecting
Jfl that's not me. I swear it's not me. That's the first thing I saw when I opened that site Lmao.Here with go with Preston and Hexum
View attachment 1557611
100% you would suck him off dead stop if he asked you to
This is like mewbrah but on different levels lmao
@VicMackey @StrangerDanger @volcelfatcel @Biiyo03
in your opinion, what looks level do you need for average Beckys to lust over you?Women IRL will tolerate normies but will never lust for them.
Do you think photofeeler is accurate if the rating was done by women?Yeah I don't put much stock in the male and guest ratings.
I've been rated by 38 female accounts there with an avg of 5.6
My last photofeeler photo got 5.8 rated by 40 women.
ye, girls find htn's attractive. niggas here are just overrate themselves or are just curry.
He'd never swallow either. @Preston would keep that shit in his mouth until he finally uses it to conceive a kid on his wedding nightHere with go with Preston and Hexum
View attachment 1557611
100% you would suck him off dead stop if he asked you to
6 IRL. 7 online.in your opinion, what looks level do you need for average Beckys to lust over you?
Yes.Do you think photofeeler is accurate if the rating was done by women?
how much do you rate him tho?Women aren't nearly as harsh IRL as they are on dating apps and social media. Afaik he rates based on IRL potential, so okcupid chart wouldn't apply. 5.5-6 seems accurate for him IRL
That asian oldcel is definitely not a 5 though
Out of respect for OP's orginal thread. I'll end the argument right here. Hexum still mogs thoHe'd never swallow either. @Preston would keep that shit in his mouth until he finally uses it to conceive a kid on his wedding night
Fuck that remimds me. My new bit is gonna be pinging @WontStopNorwooding and his ethereal squad in makinithappens threads to derail them everytimeOut of respect for OP's orginal thread. I'll end the argument right here. Hexum still mogs tho
we on some gangsta shitFuck that remimds me. My new bit is gonna be pinging @WontStopNorwooding and his ethereal squad in makinithappens threads to derail them everytime
The okcupid study is severely misleading as it only reveals data on the men of okcupid. Remember, this study was conducted over 10 years ago. This was back when most people weren't using online dating. The average man was meeting people in the real world. The only men who used okcupid back then were outcasts. Men that had no other option besides online dating. These men were often highly unattractive to begin with. The reason women were rated more evenly is because women could be attractive, but also shy and introverted. Shy and introverted men however are often just ugly and no one wants to be around them.Women are a lot harsher
View attachment 1557527
He just rated the Tinder Swindler a 6/10 facially
View attachment 1557536
I think a more proper rating is 5/10. Yes it's only a difference of 1 pt decile. But in the dating market, the difference between MTN and HTN is clearly noticeable.
Well, if you think photofeeler is accurate then it means that wheat waffles actually underrates men. I get 8+ on photofeeler when women rate me (40 votes), but wheat waffles rated me a 7. Proof below:6 IRL. 7 online.
Yes.
Might make a 'narcy .org indians' gangstas paradise tribute tbhwe on some gangsta shit
Bruh you ascended hard tooMight make a 'narcy .org indians' gangstas paradise tribute tbh
Can you link some studies and post some graphs?The okcupid study is severely misleading as it only reveals data on the men of okcupid. Remember, this study was conducted over 10 years ago. This was back when most people weren't using online dating. The average man was meeting people in the real world. The only men who used okcupid back then were outcasts. Men that had no other option besides online dating. These men were often highly unattractive to begin with. The reason women were rated more evenly is because women could be attractive, but also shy and introverted. Shy and introverted men however are often just ugly and no one wants to be around them.
If you look at speeding dating studies, the average man is rated 5/10. Clearly real world statistics tell you women find the average man average looking. You don't have to be top 1 percent to attract women.
We should stop relying on that study for anything. It's outdated and incredibly misleading
Photofeeler sucks tbh. Any normie csn get a good rating by smiling or taking a pic in decent lighting. While good looking people do score higher with worse photos its overall a pretty unreliable smv test.Well, if you think photofeeler is accurate then it means that wheat waffles actually underrates men. I get 8+ on photofeeler when women rate me (40 votes), but wheat waffles rated me a 7. Proof below:
View attachment 1557629View attachment 1557630
Interesting data point.Well, if you think photofeeler is accurate then it means that wheat waffles actually underrates men. I get 8+ on photofeeler when women rate me (40 votes), but wheat waffles rated me a 7. Proof below:
View attachment 1557629View attachment 1557630
He's rating SMV which includes height, frame, race, money/status.On a similar note. I also think tails is a bad rater. He rated this guy a 8.5
View attachment 1557634View attachment 1557635View attachment 1557636
None of the blackpill yters are good at rating. They all overrate by one point + overrate white guysOn a similar note. I also think tails is a bad rater. He rated this guy a 8.5
View attachment 1557634View attachment 1557635View attachment 1557636
Even then I don't think he's a 8.75. He's 6'2-3 with a bad frame. He has around 1 million subscribers which is still not enough status for 8.75. I think tails rated him high because he is a muh height coper and because of this pic. This pic with his gf. Pre selection biasHe's rating SMV which includes height, frame, race, money/status.
LooksmatchedEven then I don't think he's a 8.75. He's 6'2-3 with a bad frame. He has around 1 million subscribers which is still not enough status for 8.75. I think tails rated him high because he is a muh height coper and because of this pics. This pic with his gf. Pre selection bias
View attachment 1557643
6 or 7 psl or do you mean out of 10?6 IRL. 7 online.