Wheat Waffles rating skills wrong?

[wisemen]

I’ve noticed how Wheat Waffles rates other men, and it don’t makes sense. He sometimes gives too high rating and sometimes too low. Why? Can he not see it from women’s perspective?
I’ll give you some example:

Hamza: 6/10 “he will do very well in a club environment”
True rating: 5/10 and he will not do well in a club environment in Europe. Women will think he’s a rapist and run. His best chances is to find a girl at university.

The Tinder experiment guy: 6/10
True rating: 5/10. No surprise he did not well on tinder. Looks average. For women probably 4/10 because he’s looking so boring.

Men’s Maxxing: 8/10 “The chad” in the tinder experiment. Is that a joke?
True rating: 6/10 a normie who have fully looksmaxxed. He’s probably 5/10 for some women as he’s coming off as a “try hard” flexing muscles and using mascara.

Jacked and stacked: 6/10
True rating: 5/10 he looks like a nerd who looksmaxxed at almost full capacity. He doesn’t measure up to black men standard, and women can find so much better alternative among black men.

John Anthony: 3/10
True rating: 5/10 I actually think he’s a normie. He somehow is the same level as Hamza, but wins because he’s white, very tall, looks trustworthy and exotic at the same time. He’s not coming off as a “try hard” and I actually think he will win over men’s Maxxing. Yes, he doesn’t have a pretty face.. but not too bad from women’s perspective

The man himself: 6/10
True rating: 5/10. In reality probably from women’s perspective 4/10 because he’s ginger and looks like a kid. Even though Wheatley in the photo teaching how to sexually stimulate women with his finger, he’s skills doesn’t help him much.

Do you agree about my conclusion? Why do wheat waffles do like this?

 

[Deleted member 24712]

I’ve noticed how Wheat Waffles rates other men, and it don’t makes sense. He sometimes gives too high rating and sometimes too low. Why? Can he not see it from women’s perspective?
I’ll give you some example:
View attachment 2074351
Hamza: 6/10 “he will do very well in a club environment”
True rating: 5/10 and he will not do well in a club environment in Europe. Women will think he’s a rapist and run. His best chances is to find a girl at university.
View attachment 2074356
The Tinder experiment guy: 6/10
True rating: 5/10. No surprise he did not well on tinder. Looks average. For women probably 4/10 because he’s looking so boring.
View attachment 2074357
Men’s Maxxing: 8/10 “The chad” in the tinder experiment. Is that a joke?
True rating: 6/10 a normie who have fully looksmaxxed. He’s probably 5/10 for some women as he’s coming off as a “try hard” flexing muscles and using mascara.
View attachment 2074361
Jacked and stacked: 6/10
True rating: 5/10 he looks like a nerd who looksmaxxed at almost full capacity. He doesn’t measure up to black men standard, and women can find so much better alternative among black men.
View attachment 2074362
John Anthony: 3/10
True rating: 5/10 I actually think he’s a normie. He somehow is the same level as Hamza, but wins because he’s white, very tall, looks trustworthy and exotic at the same time. He’s not coming off as a “try hard” and I actually think he will win over men’s Maxxing. Yes, he doesn’t have a pretty face.. but not too bad from women’s perspective
View attachment 2074363
The man himself: 6/10
True rating: 5/10. In reality probably from women’s perspective 4/10 because he’s ginger and looks like a kid. Even though Wheatley in the photo teaching how to sexually stimulate women with his finger, he’s skills doesn’t help him much.

Do you agree about my conclusion? Why do wheat waffles do like this?

being honest is not good for business.

 

[Deleted member 14693]

Your ratings are worse.

JFL at calling John Anthony trustworthy looking

 

[wisemen]

Your ratings are worse.

JFL at calling John Anthony trustworthy looking

Why are they worse? What’s the true rating? Remember I do this from women’s perspective.

 

[wisemen]

being honest is not good for business.

But rating John Anthony that low isn’t good for business either?

 

[St.TikTokcel]

I’ve noticed how Wheat Waffles rates other men, and it don’t makes sense. He sometimes gives too high rating and sometimes too low. Why? Can he not see it from women’s perspective?
I’ll give you some example:
View attachment 2074351
Hamza: 6/10 “he will do very well in a club environment”
True rating: 5/10 and he will not do well in a club environment in Europe. Women will think he’s a rapist and run. His best chances is to find a girl at university.
View attachment 2074356
The Tinder experiment guy: 6/10
True rating: 5/10. No surprise he did not well on tinder. Looks average. For women probably 4/10 because he’s looking so boring.
View attachment 2074357
Men’s Maxxing: 8/10 “The chad” in the tinder experiment. Is that a joke?
True rating: 6/10 a normie who have fully looksmaxxed. He’s probably 5/10 for some women as he’s coming off as a “try hard” flexing muscles and using mascara.
View attachment 2074361
Jacked and stacked: 6/10
True rating: 5/10 he looks like a nerd who looksmaxxed at almost full capacity. He doesn’t measure up to black men standard, and women can find so much better alternative among black men.
View attachment 2074362
John Anthony: 3/10
True rating: 5/10 I actually think he’s a normie. He somehow is the same level as Hamza, but wins because he’s white, very tall, looks trustworthy and exotic at the same time. He’s not coming off as a “try hard” and I actually think he will win over men’s Maxxing. Yes, he doesn’t have a pretty face.. but not too bad from women’s perspective
View attachment 2074363
The man himself: 6/10
True rating: 5/10. In reality probably from women’s perspective 4/10 because he’s ginger and looks like a kid. Even though Wheatley in the photo teaching how to sexually stimulate women with his finger, he’s skills doesn’t help him much.

Do you agree about my conclusion? Why do wheat waffles do like this?

Posts145Reputation44

 

[wisemen]

Posts145Reputation44

Trophy points: 1

 

[Makeyousit]

I’ve noticed how Wheat Waffles rates other men, and it don’t makes sense. He sometimes gives too high rating and sometimes too low. Why? Can he not see it from women’s perspective?
I’ll give you some example:
View attachment 2074351
Hamza: 6/10 “he will do very well in a club environment”
True rating: 5/10 and he will not do well in a club environment in Europe. Women will think he’s a rapist and run. His best chances is to find a girl at university.
View attachment 2074356
The Tinder experiment guy: 6/10
True rating: 5/10. No surprise he did not well on tinder. Looks average. For women probably 4/10 because he’s looking so boring.
View attachment 2074357
Men’s Maxxing: 8/10 “The chad” in the tinder experiment. Is that a joke?
True rating: 6/10 a normie who have fully looksmaxxed. He’s probably 5/10 for some women as he’s coming off as a “try hard” flexing muscles and using mascara.
View attachment 2074361
Jacked and stacked: 6/10
True rating: 5/10 he looks like a nerd who looksmaxxed at almost full capacity. He doesn’t measure up to black men standard, and women can find so much better alternative among black men.
View attachment 2074362
John Anthony: 3/10
True rating: 5/10 I actually think he’s a normie. He somehow is the same level as Hamza, but wins because he’s white, very tall, looks trustworthy and exotic at the same time. He’s not coming off as a “try hard” and I actually think he will win over men’s Maxxing. Yes, he doesn’t have a pretty face.. but not too bad from women’s perspective
View attachment 2074363
The man himself: 6/10
True rating: 5/10. In reality probably from women’s perspective 4/10 because he’s ginger and looks like a kid. Even though Wheatley in the photo teaching how to sexually stimulate women with his finger, he’s skills doesn’t help him much.

Do you agree about my conclusion? Why do wheat waffles do like this?

Hamzas a 4/10 face tops

The cringe john anthony lifestyle is spot on 3/10


oP stfu you curry cunt

 

[wisemen]

Hamzas a 4/10 face tops

The cringe john anthony lifestyle is spot on 3/10


oP stfu you curry cunt

Agree about Hamza.

I’m European

 

[wisemen]

Your ratings are worse.

JFL at calling John Anthony trustworthy looking

 

[Deleted member 24712]

But rating John Anthony that low isn’t good for business either?

Dnrd

 

[kranerman23123]

I’ve noticed how Wheat Waffles rates other men, and it don’t makes sense. He sometimes gives too high rating and sometimes too low. Why? Can he not see it from women’s perspective?
I’ll give you some example:
View attachment 2074351
Hamza: 6/10 “he will do very well in a club environment”
True rating: 5/10 and he will not do well in a club environment in Europe. Women will think he’s a rapist and run. His best chances is to find a girl at university.
View attachment 2074356
The Tinder experiment guy: 6/10
True rating: 5/10. No surprise he did not well on tinder. Looks average. For women probably 4/10 because he’s looking so boring.
View attachment 2074357
Men’s Maxxing: 8/10 “The chad” in the tinder experiment. Is that a joke?
True rating: 6/10 a normie who have fully looksmaxxed. He’s probably 5/10 for some women as he’s coming off as a “try hard” flexing muscles and using mascara.
View attachment 2074361
Jacked and stacked: 6/10
True rating: 5/10 he looks like a nerd who looksmaxxed at almost full capacity. He doesn’t measure up to black men standard, and women can find so much better alternative among black men.
View attachment 2074362
John Anthony: 3/10
True rating: 5/10 I actually think he’s a normie. He somehow is the same level as Hamza, but wins because he’s white, very tall, looks trustworthy and exotic at the same time. He’s not coming off as a “try hard” and I actually think he will win over men’s Maxxing. Yes, he doesn’t have a pretty face.. but not too bad from women’s perspective
View attachment 2074363
The man himself: 6/10
True rating: 5/10. In reality probably from women’s perspective 4/10 because he’s ginger and looks like a kid. Even though Wheatley in the photo teaching how to sexually stimulate women with his finger, he’s skills doesn’t help him much.

Do you agree about my conclusion? Why do wheat waffles do like this?

He looks like a total virgin nerd and hes a terrible face for the blackpill because people will take one look at him and realize he has never had a sexually charged conversation with a woman and looks like a actual prepubescent teenager. Gerbert and Chadpill are much better talking heads for blackpill. Needs to be someone who is actually chadlite+ who actually has experienced the true nature of women and cant be laughed off as incels. I've noticed people are MUCH more likely to have a decent respectful debate about blackpill when its with a chad blackpiller.

 

[wisemen]

He looks like a total virgin nerd and hes a terrible face for the blackpill because people will take one look at him and realize he has never had a sexually charged conversation with a woman and looks like a actual prepubescent teenager. Gerbert and Chadpill are much better talking heads for blackpill. Needs to be someone who is actually chadlite+ who actually has experienced the true nature of women and cant be laughed off as incels. I've noticed people are MUCH more likely to have a decent respectful debate about blackpill when its with a chad blackpiller.

Who’s Gerbert?

Chadpill is a chadlite

 

[Graham]

I'd say Waffles and Tattoo man are both pretty average looking personally, Hamza and "average tinder guy" I'd say slightly above average (with Hamza getting a nice halo from having a nice body). The other two guys I'd say are pretty good looking. So I'd expect Hamza and the other two good looking guys to do fairly well with women.

 

[spark]

I’ve noticed how Wheat Waffles rates other men, and it don’t makes sense. He sometimes gives too high rating and sometimes too low. Why? Can he not see it from women’s perspective?
I’ll give you some example:
View attachment 2074351
Hamza: 6/10 “he will do very well in a club environment”
True rating: 5/10 and he will not do well in a club environment in Europe. Women will think he’s a rapist and run. His best chances is to find a girl at university.
View attachment 2074356
The Tinder experiment guy: 6/10
True rating: 5/10. No surprise he did not well on tinder. Looks average. For women probably 4/10 because he’s looking so boring.
View attachment 2074357
Men’s Maxxing: 8/10 “The chad” in the tinder experiment. Is that a joke?
True rating: 6/10 a normie who have fully looksmaxxed. He’s probably 5/10 for some women as he’s coming off as a “try hard” flexing muscles and using mascara.
View attachment 2074361
Jacked and stacked: 6/10
True rating: 5/10 he looks like a nerd who looksmaxxed at almost full capacity. He doesn’t measure up to black men standard, and women can find so much better alternative among black men.
View attachment 2074362
John Anthony: 3/10
True rating: 5/10 I actually think he’s a normie. He somehow is the same level as Hamza, but wins because he’s white, very tall, looks trustworthy and exotic at the same time. He’s not coming off as a “try hard” and I actually think he will win over men’s Maxxing. Yes, he doesn’t have a pretty face.. but not too bad from women’s perspective
View attachment 2074363
The man himself: 6/10
True rating: 5/10. In reality probably from women’s perspective 4/10 because he’s ginger and looks like a kid. Even though Wheatley in the photo teaching how to sexually stimulate women with his finger, he’s skills doesn’t help him much.

Do you agree about my conclusion? Why do wheat waffles do like this?

If you think Hamza who is 6'1 and muscular has the same SMV as the recessed ginger Wheat then it's you who doesn't know how to rate.

 

[Samiscool234]

nah hamzas a 6/10 for sure, he looks pretty good. and wheat waffles and john anthony are 4/10s

 

[wisemen]

nah hamzas a 6/10 for sure, he looks pretty good. and wheat waffles and john anthony are 4/10s

No he’s not. Not in Northern Europe at least. Maybe in Mexico/Colombia

 

[wisemen]

If you think Hamza who is 6'1 and muscular has the same SMV as the recessed ginger Wheat then it's you who doesn't know how to rate.

I think they would do similar in Northern Europe.

 

[Deleted member 22191]

I’ve noticed how Wheat Waffles rates other men, and it don’t makes sense. He sometimes gives too high rating and sometimes too low. Why? Can he not see it from women’s perspective?
I’ll give you some example:
View attachment 2074351
Hamza: 6/10 “he will do very well in a club environment”
True rating: 5/10 and he will not do well in a club environment in Europe. Women will think he’s a rapist and run. His best chances is to find a girl at university.
View attachment 2074356
The Tinder experiment guy: 6/10
True rating: 5/10. No surprise he did not well on tinder. Looks average. For women probably 4/10 because he’s looking so boring.
View attachment 2074357
Men’s Maxxing: 8/10 “The chad” in the tinder experiment. Is that a joke?
True rating: 6/10 a normie who have fully looksmaxxed. He’s probably 5/10 for some women as he’s coming off as a “try hard” flexing muscles and using mascara.
View attachment 2074361
Jacked and stacked: 6/10
True rating: 5/10 he looks like a nerd who looksmaxxed at almost full capacity. He doesn’t measure up to black men standard, and women can find so much better alternative among black men.
View attachment 2074362
John Anthony: 3/10
True rating: 5/10 I actually think he’s a normie. He somehow is the same level as Hamza, but wins because he’s white, very tall, looks trustworthy and exotic at the same time. He’s not coming off as a “try hard” and I actually think he will win over men’s Maxxing. Yes, he doesn’t have a pretty face.. but not too bad from women’s perspective
View attachment 2074363
The man himself: 6/10
True rating: 5/10. In reality probably from women’s perspective 4/10 because he’s ginger and looks like a kid. Even though Wheatley in the photo teaching how to sexually stimulate women with his finger, he’s skills doesn’t help him much.

Do you agree about my conclusion? Why do wheat waffles do like this?

the tattoo dude is trying too hard

 

[wisemen]

I'd say Waffles and Tattoo man are both pretty average looking personally, Hamza and "average tinder guy" I'd say slightly above average (with Hamza getting a nice halo from having a nice body). The other two guys I'd say are pretty good looking. So I'd expect Hamza and the other two good looking guys to do fairly well with women.

Not in Northern Europe..
sure he have a nice body, but the face doesn’t measure up for that. In many parts of the world, girls sadly think of a immigrant rapist

 

[wisemen]

the tattoo dude is trying too hard

Wheat is not?

 

[Graham]

Not in Northern Europe..
sure he have a nice body, but the face doesn’t measure up for that. In many parts of the world, girls sadly think of a immigrant rapist

Idk, I could easily be wrong, he looks average facially to me (I'm in the UK, we're kinda ugly here xD)

 

[wisemen]

Idk, I could easily be wrong, he looks average facially to me (I'm in the UK, we're kinda ugly here xD)

I’m very sure in Scandinavia, Central Europe, and maybe even Eastern Europe.

 

[Doesn'tNeedSurgery]

I’ve noticed how Wheat Waffles rates other men, and it don’t makes sense. He sometimes gives too high rating and sometimes too low. Why? Can he not see it from women’s perspective?
I’ll give you some example:
View attachment 2074351
Hamza: 6/10 “he will do very well in a club environment”
True rating: 5/10 and he will not do well in a club environment in Europe. Women will think he’s a rapist and run. His best chances is to find a girl at university.
View attachment 2074356
The Tinder experiment guy: 6/10
True rating: 5/10. No surprise he did not well on tinder. Looks average. For women probably 4/10 because he’s looking so boring.
View attachment 2074357
Men’s Maxxing: 8/10 “The chad” in the tinder experiment. Is that a joke?
True rating: 6/10 a normie who have fully looksmaxxed. He’s probably 5/10 for some women as he’s coming off as a “try hard” flexing muscles and using mascara.
View attachment 2074361
Jacked and stacked: 6/10
True rating: 5/10 he looks like a nerd who looksmaxxed at almost full capacity. He doesn’t measure up to black men standard, and women can find so much better alternative among black men.
View attachment 2074362
John Anthony: 3/10
True rating: 5/10 I actually think he’s a normie. He somehow is the same level as Hamza, but wins because he’s white, very tall, looks trustworthy and exotic at the same time. He’s not coming off as a “try hard” and I actually think he will win over men’s Maxxing. Yes, he doesn’t have a pretty face.. but not too bad from women’s perspective
View attachment 2074363
The man himself: 6/10
True rating: 5/10. In reality probably from women’s perspective 4/10 because he’s ginger and looks like a kid. Even though Wheatley in the photo teaching how to sexually stimulate women with his finger, he’s skills doesn’t help him much.

Do you agree about my conclusion? Why do wheat waffles do like this?

Bro I swear you're the dumbest motherfucker on the forum.

 

[wisemen]

Bro I swear you're the dumbest motherfucker on the forum.

Bro I swear you’re uglier than me and not near as much experience from women as I have

 

[Doesn'tNeedSurgery]

Bro I swear you’re uglier than me and not near as much experience from women as I have

Bro you took Hamza, a deep voiced, muscular, 6'2 guy who has been shown multiple times to be able to pull at least moderately attractive women on a frequent basis. No amount of ethnic tax brings him down to the level of a 5'9 pasty redheaded loser who posts niche content on the internet.

 

[wisemen]

Bro you took Hamza, a deep voiced, muscular, 6'2 guy who has been shown multiple times to be able to pull at least moderately attractive women on a frequent basis. No amount of ethnic tax brings him down to the level of a 5'9 pasty redheaded loser who posts niche content on the internet.

What’s your point? I’m also deep voiced, 6’3 but skinny fat, and I have a lot of women approach me! And all that with a normie face (6/10), the same as Hamza is rated. And I win over Hamza easily. This face rating system is so wrong.

 

[Doesn'tNeedSurgery]

What’s your point? I’m also deep voiced, 6’3 but skinny fat, and I have a lot of women approach me! And all that with a normie face (6/10), the same as Hamza is rated. And I win over Hamza easily. This face rating system is so wrong.

You literally sidestepped my entire arguement and focused on something else entirely. Fuck outta here with your strawman fallacy garbage. The whole point of what I said was that you put Hamza and wheatwaffles in the same category when clearly hamza is significantly better looking.

 

[wisemen]

You literally sidestepped my entire arguement and focused on something else entirely. Fuck outta here with your strawman fallacy garbage. The whole point of what I said was that you put Hamza and wheatwaffles in the same category when clearly hamza is significantly better looking.

It was wheat waffles himself who rated Hamza the same as himself (6/10). If you read my post, I even said that wheat in reality according to women probably is more like 4/10, and Hamza I gave 5/10. And that’s accurate. He is a normie.
Wheat is not even that ugly, he actually have decent facial feautures. The problem is he’s a ginger and look like a kid.

 

[Samiscool234]

It was wheat waffles himself who rated Hamza the same as himself (6/10). If you read my post, I even said that wheat in reality according to women probably is more like 4/10, and Hamza I gave 5/10. And that’s accurate. He is a normie.
Wheat is not even that ugly, he actually have decent facial feautures. The problem is he’s a ginger and look like a kid.

nah dawg i saw a vid of girls rating blackpillers' faces and hamza got 6s and even a couple of 7s. ww got 4s on average tho. so ur right about ww but hamzas def got a lot of appeal, he just looks good, even though hes a deathnic. and btw being ginger isnt a failo, im ginger and im like chadlite/htn. his issue is the fact that his eyebrows are blonde.

 

[wisemen]

nah dawg i saw a vid of girls rating blackpillers' faces and hamza got 6s and even a couple of 7s. ww got 4s on average tho. so ur right about ww but hamzas def got a lot of appeal, he just looks good, even though hes a deathnic. and btw being ginger isnt a failo, im ginger and im like chadlite/htn. his issue is the fact that his eyebrows are blonde.

But girls are not honest..
I suspect Hamza have accounts here seriously. Most women I Europe would agree about my rating.

And have you women approaching you?

 

[Samiscool234]

But girls are not honest..
I suspect Hamza have accounts here seriously. Most women I Europe would agree about my rating.

And have you women approaching you?

your wrong but whatevs brah
also i dont have people approach me but thats probably because im a bit of a recluse and dont do social things like clubbing or have friends. but i do get quite a few looks from women, e.g. remember a couple days ago this girl kept staring at me in the gym like 10 different times. and when i looked back at her shed kinda giggle and look away. stuff like that

 

[wisemen]

your wrong but whatevs brah
also i dont have people approach me but thats probably because im a bit of a recluse and dont do social things like clubbing or have friends. but i do get quite a few looks from women, e.g. remember a couple days ago this girl kept staring at me in the gym like 10 different times. and when i looked back at her shed kinda giggle and look away. stuff like that

That means nothing..
I mean like girls asking about you specifically and add you on social media and stuff.

 

[Patient A]

6 or 5

 

[wisemen]

6 or 5

John Anthony 6? The rest 5?

 

[blatonslatt]

u rated wheat waffles the same as hamza lol

 

[wisemen]

u rated wheat waffles the same as hamza lol

WW have better facial feautures than Hamza

 

[wisemen]

You literally sidestepped my entire arguement and focused on something else entirely. Fuck outta here with your strawman fallacy garbage. The whole point of what I said was that you put Hamza and wheatwaffles in the same category when clearly hamza is significantly better looking.

Even John Anthony which you rated 3/10 gets better feedback from women than Hamza.

 

[Doesn'tNeedSurgery]

Even John Anthony which you rated 3/10 gets better feedback from women than Hamza.
View attachment 2076063View attachment 2076064

You're putting words in my mouth I literally NEVER said that. The only thing I said is that Hamza is more attractive than wheat waffles. Once again another fallacious strawman argument where you argue against a point I NEVER made. You're literally a schizo arguing with yourself. I won't be replying after this.

 

[wisemen]

You're putting words in my mouth I literally NEVER said that. The only thing I said is that Hamza is more attractive than wheat waffles. Once again another fallacious strawman argument where you argue against a point I NEVER made. You're literally a schizo arguing with yourself. I won't be replying after this.

No I’m not, have no psychological problems.
And what’s John Anthony’s rating?

 

[sam12344343]

nah dawg i saw a vid of girls rating blackpillers' faces and hamza got 6s and even a couple of 7s. ww got 4s on average tho. so ur right about ww but hamzas def got a lot of appeal, he just looks good, even though hes a deathnic. and btw being ginger isnt a failo, im ginger and im like chadlite/htn. his issue is the fact that his eyebrows are blonde.

your not chadlite i seen ur post

 

[applesrgreat]

I’ve noticed how Wheat Waffles rates other men, and it don’t makes sense. He sometimes gives too high rating and sometimes too low. Why? Can he not see it from women’s perspective?
I’ll give you some example:
View attachment 2074351
Hamza: 6/10 “he will do very well in a club environment”
True rating: 5/10 and he will not do well in a club environment in Europe. Women will think he’s a rapist and run. His best chances is to find a girl at university.
View attachment 2074356
The Tinder experiment guy: 6/10
True rating: 5/10. No surprise he did not well on tinder. Looks average. For women probably 4/10 because he’s looking so boring.
View attachment 2074357
Men’s Maxxing: 8/10 “The chad” in the tinder experiment. Is that a joke?
True rating: 6/10 a normie who have fully looksmaxxed. He’s probably 5/10 for some women as he’s coming off as a “try hard” flexing muscles and using mascara.
View attachment 2074361
Jacked and stacked: 6/10
True rating: 5/10 he looks like a nerd who looksmaxxed at almost full capacity. He doesn’t measure up to black men standard, and women can find so much better alternative among black men.
View attachment 2074362
John Anthony: 3/10
True rating: 5/10 I actually think he’s a normie. He somehow is the same level as Hamza, but wins because he’s white, very tall, looks trustworthy and exotic at the same time. He’s not coming off as a “try hard” and I actually think he will win over men’s Maxxing. Yes, he doesn’t have a pretty face.. but not too bad from women’s perspective
View attachment 2074363
The man himself: 6/10
True rating: 5/10. In reality probably from women’s perspective 4/10 because he’s ginger and looks like a kid. Even though Wheatley in the photo teaching how to sexually stimulate women with his finger, he’s skills doesn’t help him much.

Do you agree about my conclusion? Why do wheat waffles do like this?

how is mens maxxing a normie he was a normie who had chad potential so hes a chad not even a chadlite.

 

[hypernormie]

He looks like a total virgin nerd and hes a terrible face for the blackpill because people will take one look at him and realize he has never had a sexually charged conversation with a woman and looks like a actual prepubescent teenager. Gerbert and Chadpill are much better talking heads for blackpill. Needs to be someone who is actually chadlite+ who actually has experienced the true nature of women and cant be laughed off as incels. I've noticed people are MUCH more likely to have a decent respectful debate about blackpill when its with a chad blackpiller.

I talk about blackpill shit with the women I hook up with all the time and it’s funny because they have to listen and actually respond. A woman can’t retort that I’m some incel loser who doesn’t understand women when I just ejaculated in her mouth 30 minutes prior to the conversation.

 

[hypernormie]

Who’s Gerbert?

Chadpill is a chadlite

 

[N1666]

I’ve noticed how Wheat Waffles rates other men, and it don’t makes sense. He sometimes gives too high rating and sometimes too low. Why? Can he not see it from women’s perspective?
I’ll give you some example:
View attachment 2074351
Hamza: 6/10 “he will do very well in a club environment”
True rating: 5/10 and he will not do well in a club environment in Europe. Women will think he’s a rapist and run. His best chances is to find a girl at university.

Ur clearly saying this because ur white and have some sort of stigma against pakis like him, hamza would do well in a club environment and has even shown he does well.

 

[forevermirin]

Ur clearly saying this because ur white and have some sort of stigma against pakis like him, hamza would do well in a club environment and has even shown he does well.

idk about that tbh. hamza is barely above average even by indian standards.

 

[wisemen]

Ur clearly saying this because ur white and have some sort of stigma against pakis like him, hamza would do well in a club environment and has even shown he does well.

Not at all in Northern Europe. Maybe an older single mother. I’m not sure in other parts of the world. Maybe he’ll be successful in Africa?

 

[N1666]

Not at all in Northern Europe. Maybe an older single mother. I’m not sure in other parts of the world. Maybe he’ll be successful in Africa?

You need to leave ur basement and look at the real world for once

 

[wisemen]

You need to leave ur basement and look at the real world for once

I’m a house owner. But I guess you have no more arguments

 

[bleksandre]

As you can see, looks don’t matter