
Xangsane
squishy squishy!
- Joined
- Jun 11, 2021
- Posts
- 160,299
- Reputation
- 139,228
Title. Won't post pics for now.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Why?White is right
White is right@anoright @anon56 Why tanned white European skin?
I remember me comparing my skin with a white guy who was tanned (I had slightly darker skin than him as I was slightly tanned) when everyone came back from the summer break. His skin quality was far worse than mine (looked drier, crispier and more leathery).
Anything else?White is right
White is rightAnything else?
White is right
OK, but what about ethnic or multiracial skin that is the EXACT same colour as tanned white skin? Only difference is that our skin quality is superior to yours.Tanned skin is a status halo in of itself in the contemporary world. It signals that you have the resources to care about something purely superficial.
Kind of like how pale skin was seen as high class for most of history because it implied staying inside protected from the Sun instead of working on the fields like a peasant
Generally ethnics/multiracials have better skin quality than whites.if skin quality is the same I would choose white skin cause obviously that comes with white features that are considered more attractive
It was around this colour:I remember me comparing my skin with a white guy who was tanned (I had ever-so slightly darker skin than him as I was slightly tanned) when everyone came back from the summer break. His skin quality was far worse than mine (looked drier, crispier and more leathery).
But what about for men (looksmaxxing)?Light skin in general is better aesthetically, but I like a bit of tinged skin even on women depending on the phenotype. And not only ethnics genitals and nipples darken, even 100% whites can darken in those areas, it's just a natural change that comes with puberty
I think olive skin is ideal for men. You can have olive skin naturally without even getting sun, just gotta eat rightBut what about for men (looksmaxxing)?
It cant be the exact same, even if it has the same darkness, the undertones are differentOK, but what about ethnic or multiracial skin that is the EXACT same colour as tanned white skin? Only difference is that our skin quality is superior to yours.
Is this it? @Prettyboy @anoright @Maesthetics=KingI think olive skin is ideal for men. You can have olive skin naturally without even getting sun, just gotta eat right
Tanned White European skin. Because even if we‘re pale, we look healthy, we have rosy skin and no hyperpigmentations around eyes, mouth, ellbows like Arabs, Iranians, Indians or E. Asians which bleach themselves, but asshole and armpits are still dark af. I have seen the most palest Indian or Chink, they always have dark genitals, dark knuckels or ellbows. They have yellowish-greenish-greyish undertones. Niggas invented Brightening Filters to camouflage their undertones. Jfl
Tanned skin is a status halo in of itself in the contemporary world. It signals that you have the resources to care about something purely superficial.
Kind of like how pale skin was seen as high class for most of history because it implied staying inside protected from the Sun instead of working on the fields like a peasant
Light skin in general is better aesthetically, but I like a bit of tinged skin even on women depending on the phenotype. And not only ethnics genitals and nipples darken, even 100% whites can darken in those areas, it's just a natural change that comes with puberty
if skin quality is the same I would choose white skin cause obviously that comes with white features that are considered more attractive
OK, now which set is better:White is right
There's no third option
no lol i meant type 3 on fritzpatrick scaleThere's no third option
Why?oh
no lol i meant type 3 on fritzpatrick scale
Is this it? @Prettyboy @anoright @Maesthetics=King
This is my untanned skin, taken in the winter/early spring:
View attachment 2182669View attachment 2182679View attachment 2182680View attachment 2182686View attachment 2182687View attachment 2182688View attachment 2182691View attachment 2182676View attachment 2182692View attachment 2182671View attachment 2182674View attachment 2182677View attachment 2182694View attachment 2182673View attachment 2182682
im not sure, but i think type 3, or maybe 2Why?
What type is this?
How is this a 2? I hardly, hardly burn or peel.im not sure, but i think type 3, or maybe 2
I consider myself to be a Fitzpatrick 3.5, maybe 4im not sure, but i think type 3, or maybe 2
oh true, could possibly be in between 2 and 3 idkHow is this a 2? I hardly, hardly burn or peel.
yeah same sometimes i look like 2 and sometimes i look like 4I consider myself to be a Fitzpatrick 3.5, maybe 4
To qualify as a 2 or light 3 you need to burn and peel. I consider myself to have a type 3 in appearance, but behaves more like a 4.oh true, could possibly be in between 2 and 3 idk
It all depends on how your skin reacts to the sun as well as colour.yeah same sometimes i look like 2 and sometimes i look like 4
No problem, in that case what would you have voted for?Shouldve made the poll, untanned ethnic skin that is lighter than tanned white skin
Is this olive?Olive skin mogs
Is this it? @Prettyboy @anoright @Maesthetics=King
This is my untanned skin, taken in the winter/early spring:
View attachment 2182669View attachment 2182679View attachment 2182680View attachment 2182686View attachment 2182687View attachment 2182688View attachment 2182691View attachment 2182676View attachment 2182692View attachment 2182671View attachment 2182674View attachment 2182677View attachment 2182694View attachment 2182673View attachment 2182682
How does this compareView attachment 2182732this is what mine looks like, im fitzpatrick 3 with dark blonde hair and green eyes
Looks a lil darker, this is like 3.5How does this compare
View attachment 2182742
About me:im not sure, but i think type 3, or maybe 2
It's possible that the person falls under Fitzpatrick Skin Type IV as they have moderately pigmented skin that can tan easily but may also burn if not protected from the sun.
Fitzpatrick Skin Type IV is typically characterized by moderately pigmented skin with a warm undertone, often belonging to people of Mediterranean, Middle Eastern, or Latin American descent. People with this skin type can tan easily and rarely get sunburned.
I consider myself a 3.5, maybe a 4, IDK.Looks a lil darker, this is like 3.5
It's possible that the person falls under Fitzpatrick Skin Type IV as they have moderately pigmented skin that can tan easily but may also burn if not protected from the sun.Fitzpatrick Skin Type IV is typically characterized by moderately pigmented skin with a warm undertone, often belonging to people of Mediterranean, Middle Eastern, or Latin American descent. People with this skin type can tan easily and rarely get sunburned.
ethnic skin for sure. Pale ethnic skin is underrated on hereNo problem, in that case what would you have voted for?
SFcels would say "muh undertones are shit".ethnic skin for sure. Pale ethnic skin is underrated on here
Thats cope. I think Pale northeastern asian skin looks really good.SFcels would say "muh undertones are shit".
it is squishy!!! @WayneSarcosuhus @cloUder @marauder @WallenbergThats cope. I think Pale northeastern asian skin looks really good.