White and White Ethnic Term

[Deleted member 83081]

White ethnic is a term for white people of non-British origin. This term is common in the US.

In the UK, the equivalent is 'Other White'.

This is because British people and British descendants (American, Canadian, Australian) are whiter than other whites.
Pale white in other words.

White: Scottish, Irish, English, Welsh, Cornish, Manx, Scots-Irish

White Ethnic: Dutch, German, Scandinavian, French, Polish, Bulgarian, Russian, Italian etc.

 

[Tyler x Durden]

What was the point of making this post?

 

[Richard Cheese]

White ethnic is a term for white people of non-British origin. This term is common in the US.

In the UK, the equivalent is 'Other White'.

This is because British people and British descendants (American, Canadian, Australian) are whiter than other whites.
Pale white in other words.

View attachment 3093504View attachment 3093505

White: Scottish, Irish, English, Welsh, Cornish, Manx, Scots-Irish

White Ethnic: Dutch, German, Scandinavian, French, Polish, Bulgarian, Russian, Italian etc.

 

[Beastimmung]

Scandinavians are whiter then brits tough from what I've seen

 

[Deleted member 83081]

Scandinavians are whiter then brits tough from what I've seen

No not.

British Isles types

Scandinavians

Brits are whiter.

 

[sportsmogger]

100% British(Manx/Irish)

vs

100% Swedish

Stop pls @byvw

In terms of skin color yes Brits might be paler but thats it

 

[Shahnameh]

What was the point of making this post?

Autistic Info Dumping

 

[try2beme]

White ethnic is a term for white people of non-British origin. This term is common in the US.

In the UK, the equivalent is 'Other White'.

This is because British people and British descendants (American, Canadian, Australian) are whiter than other whites.
Pale white in other words.

View attachment 3093504View attachment 3093505

White: Scottish, Irish, English, Welsh, Cornish, Manx, Scots-Irish

White Ethnic: Dutch, German, Scandinavian, French, Polish, Bulgarian, Russian, Italian etc.

Nobody agrees with you in real life

 

[Deleted member 83081]

100% British(Manx/Irish)
View attachment 3139798View attachment 3139808

vs

100% Swedish
View attachment 3139806

Stop pls @byvw

In terms of skin color yes Brits might be paler but thats it

I posted the average faces dumbass. But you are cherry picking LMAO. The lighting is also misleading in these photos.

The average Swede is not as pale as the average British.

Average British Isles descendant

Average Scandinavian/German

Simple.

 

[sportsmogger]

I posted the average faces dumbass. But you are cherry picking LMAO. The lighting is also misleading in these photos.

The average Swede is not as pale as the average British.

Average British Isles descendant

View attachment 3140489View attachment 3140490

Average Scandinavian/German

View attachment 3140491View attachment 3140492View attachment 3140493

Simple.

literally no difference in skin color, but i do agree that nordics are a bit more tan, probably cause of their yamnaya dna

 

[Deleted member 83081]

100% British(Manx/Irish)
View attachment 3139798View attachment 3139808

vs

100% Swedish
View attachment 3139806

Stop pls @byvw

In terms of skin color yes Brits might be paler but thats it

She is not that pale btw. Lighting fraud.

 

[Deleted member 83081]

View attachment 3140500View attachment 3140502
View attachment 3140501 View attachment 3140503

literally no difference in skin color, but i do agree that nordics are a bit more tan, probably cause of their yamnaya dna

You are blind then if you can't tell the color difference

 

[sportsmogger]

also i hope you know these phenos can pop up in british people

and these can appear in nordics

the anglo pheno is legit the core pheno for the netherlands

also i know a north atlantid swedish girl irl

 

[Deleted member 75224]

This is not how the term is used in the US.

White ethnics are like Italians/greek/persians/castizas/lebanese/armenians.

 

[sportsmogger]

She is not that pale btw. Lighting fraud.

View attachment 3140512

ever heard of makeup lol

shes not wearing any makeup in this pic

plus its taken outside so no lighting fraud, shes pale as fuck

 

[Deleted member 83081]

also i hope you know these phenos can pop up in british people
View attachment 3140511

and these can appear in nordics
View attachment 3140513

the anglo pheno is legit the core pheno for the netherlands

also i know a north atlantid swedish girl irl

Wrong. Anglo pheno is not the core pheno of Netherlands but the Frisia. In the Netherlands, other Nordic and Celtic Nordic types are most common. Anglosaxons are most common in the Anglosphere.

North Atlantid Map (light yellow areas matter)

Probably, the Swedish girl you're talking about is not North Atlantid. Not every combination of dark hair and light eyes is North Atlantid.

 

[Deleted member 83081]

This is not how the term is used in the US.

White ethnics are like Italians/greek/persians/castizas/lebanese/armenians.

Everything except British Isles descendant is White ethnic. French, Polish etc. It doesn't matter.

 

[Deleted member 75224]

Everything except British Isles descendant is White ethnic. French, Polish etc. It doesn't matter.

What century are you in lmao. This isn’t 1780

 

[sportsmogger]

Wrong. Anglo pheno is not the core pheno of Netherlands but the Frisia. In the Netherlands, other Nordic and Celtic Nordic types are most common. Anglosaxons are most common in the Anglosphere.

North Atlantid Map (light yellow areas matter)

View attachment 3140525

Probably, the Swedish girl you're talking about is not North Atlantid. Not every combination of dark hair and light eyes is North Atlantid.

shes def north atlantid, she got a narrow tall skull just like that reference pic, just admit that it can pop up in europeans sporadically, theres even italians and spaniards with north atlantid pheno

also frisia is in the netherlands my guy, wym, the core pheno in the netherlands is either anglo saxon or faelid

 

[Deleted member 83081]

shes def north atlantid, she got a narrow tall skull just like that reference pic, just admit that it can pop up in europeans sporadically, theres even italians and spaniards with north atlantid pheno

also frisia is in the netherlands my guy, wym, the core pheno in the netherlands is either anglo saxon or faelid

Anglo-Saxon is common in Frisia, but not in the Netherlands. What's hard to understand about this.

 

[sportsmogger]

Anglo-Saxon is common in Frisia, but not in the Netherlands. What's hard to understand about this.

its common throughout the netherlands, its literally the core pheno there

Most common today in East England, but also Frisia (Netherlands), North-West Germany, West Denmark, and parts of Northern France and Ireland.

plus the map has the entire netherlands region in yellow

 

[Deleted member 83081]

its common throughout the netherlands, its literally the core pheno there

Most common today in East England, but also Frisia (Netherlands), North-West Germany, West Denmark, and parts of Northern France and Ireland.

View attachment 3140574

plus the map has the entire netherlands region in yellow

It is not the core pheno of Netherlands but of Frisia (Not the whole Netherlands.) Is it hard to understand?

In total population US, UK, Australia etc have the most Anglosaxon people.

I doubt that the Anglo-Saxon percentage in the Netherlands will even exceed five percent.

The shores of continental Europe is also light yellow due to historic Anglosaxon migration. Not because these places have high concentration.

 

[sportsmogger]

It is not the core pheno of Netherlands but of Frisia (Not the whole Netherlands.) Is it hard to understand?

In total population US, UK, Australia etc have the most Anglosaxon people.

I doubt that the Anglo-Saxon percentage in the Netherlands will even exceed five percent.

The shores of continental Europe is also light yellow due to historic Anglosaxon migration. Not because these places have high concentration.

so whats the core pheno in the netherlands then lol, because to me its faelid and anglo saxon, maybe some alpinoid here and there

 

[boxface34]

The true whites are the people in Europe that are the genetically furthest from any kind of non white ethnics, so certainly not meds or balkan niggers, but not brits or other west/central euros either. The true whites would be Baltics whites for sure.

This is the whitest race of Europe (baltic 55% steppe dna)

Brits are whiter than meds but certainly not the whitest, many brits have ethnic traits similar to the one you would find in middle east such as thick eyebrows, dark wavy hairs and such.

 

[Deleted member 83081]

so whats the core pheno in the netherlands then lol, because to me its faelid and anglo saxon, maybe some alpinoid here and there

Faelid, Keltic Nordid and Hallstatt is the most common in Netherlands.

 

[sportsmogger]

Faelid, Keltic Nordid and Hallstatt is the most common in Netherlands.

isnt keltic nordid pale lol

 

[Deleted member 83081]

The true whites are the people in Europe that are the genetically furthest from any kind of non white ethnics, so certainly not meds or balkan niggers, but not brits or other west/central euros either. The true whites would be Baltics whites for sure.

This is the whitest race of Europe (baltic 55% steppe dna) View attachment 3140602


Brits are whiter than meds but certainly not the whitest, many brits have ethnic traits similar to the one you would find in middle east such as thick eyebrows, dark wavy hairs and such.

Being pale or white is not about being furthest from ethnics. That is not how it works. LMAO.

Being white or pale is just about your skin color. Light hair is not common in Brits like Scandinavians or Baltics. However pale skin is most commonly found in Brits.

 

[Deleted member 83081]

isnt keltic nordid pale lol

More pale compared to continental types. But not as pale as Isles types.

 

[sportsmogger]

More pale compared to continental types. But not as pale as Isles types.

bro loves his anglos

if i was ethnic who do i marry for whitest kids

 

[Deleted member 83485]

In the UK, the equivalent is 'Other White'.

This is because British people and British descendants (American, Canadian, Australian) are whiter than other whites.
Pale white in other words.

no, this is because the UK is originally a british people country
Brits are "white ethnics" in other countries. I bet Brits are white ethnics in Germany, Poland and so on

 

[Deleted member 83485]

@Imretarded? @Debetro what do you think about this one guys

 

[Imretarded?]

@Imretarded? @Debetro what do you think about this one guys

He's making shit up. 'white ethnic' is not a term in the USA to describe non WASP whites, let alone common.

Also how tf are English whiter than Swedish or Norwegians, they have lighter eyes and hair. And I'm seeing no actually convincing argument made by OP to prove brits have more pale skin. Also I live next to many British types and English are not as pale as he claims, it's common for them to have type two or three fitzpatrick type skin. The only ones who are truly PALE are Irish and Scottish and they are not Anglo Saxon, for example me and my dad can not tan, it can only burn and Im significantly more pale than basically 99% of British. The only people who are close in paleness are celtic types or nordics who have an almost golden skin tone compared to the disgusting red pheomelanin infested skin of anglos



Again OP is just some retarded anglo supremacist racist who just makes shit up and expects people to believe him. I live around British types, you can't fool me.

On a genetic level East Europeans and plenty of NW euros (scandinavians) are genetically further away from negros and asiatics compared to Anglo Saxons.


Actually Every Slav is more white than any Anglo when it comes to proximity to negros. So I don't want to hear this 'whiter' nonsense.

And I see no

 

[Deleted member 83485]

He's making shit up. 'white ethnic' is not a term in the USA to describe non WASP whites, let alone common.

Also how tf are English whiter than Swedish or Norwegians, they have lighter eyes and hair. And I'm seeing no actually convincing argument made by OP to prove brits have more pale skin. Also I live next to many British types and English are not as pale as he claims, it's common for them to have type two or three fitzpatrick type skin. The only ones who are truly PALE are Irish and Scottish and they are not Anglo Saxon, for example me and my dad can not tan, it can only burn and Im significantly more pale than basically 99% of British. The only people who are close in paleness are celtic types or nordics who have an almost golden skin tone compared to the disgusting red pheomelanin infested skin of anglos
View attachment 3173089
View attachment 3173090

I think Celts are the most pale, and "white" by his logic, but they are ginger mostly.

Again OP is just some retarded anglo supremacist racist who just makes shit up and expects people to believe him. I live around British types, you can't fool me.

On a genetic level East Europeans and plenty of NW euros (scandinavians) are genetically further away from negros and asiatics compared to Anglo Saxons.
View attachment 3173051

Actually Every Slav is more white than any Anglo when it comes to proximity to negros. So I don't want to hear this 'whiter' nonsense.

And I see no

JFL at anglos BTW, they are definitely not a superior nationality like @byvw is trying to make people believe
In fact, the Anglo-Saxons are a flawed and evil nation with a slavish mentality
The Anglo-Saxon political culture was generated by the extremely bad climate of England and the centuries-old slavery of the indigenous population under the yoke of foreign, foreign-speaking and foreign conquerors. If Russia got rid of the Mongol yoke with an armed hand and formed its political culture on the ruins of the Horde, then the British did not know the cleansing fire of Kulikov Field. Dozens of generations of Englishmen grew up in ethnic slavery to the Normans: there was no retaliation for the Normans, and no one received repentance from them. Hence, scattered by the Anglo-Saxon political culture around the world, this is a nihilistic concept, contempt for the ethnic.
England is a two–layered state, similar to a building whose walls stood on the foundation of a former building. The power of the Normans in England was based solely on a crude and foreign military force. By the 1080s, the indigenous Anglo-Saxon nobility had been completely destroyed as a social stratum and replaced by foreign chivalry. At the same time, the people, as an ethnic slave, remained.His language was ousted from the sphere of government, and the Norman dialect of French became the language of administration and communication of the dominant social strata. For about three hundred years, the Anglo-Norman dialect dominated the country and had a great influence on the formation of the modern English language
The national power structure of the Anglo-Saxons (Ten) disappeared and a fascist, in fact, a new ruling stratum of "migrant lords" with full power over peasants of a different nationality was formed. Hence the English tradition of total mercenary activity began: the British did not have their own country, therefore there was nowhere to take high patriotic feelings. No one perceived them as people at all. They were controlled like animals –with a whip and a piece of sugar. If they couldn't be forced to do something, they were lured with a coin. This formed the basis of the English version of the coming capitalism, brutal and at the same time extremely corrupt.

In many ways, this is why English political culture is pathologically false. In other political cultures, the name and content of the processes usually coincide. For example, the Tsar gave Russia a rather limited electoral law – but only because he was going to ACTUALLY COMPLY with this law. The Tsar had workers, peasants, petty bourgeoisie, and journalists in the State Duma who spoiled his blood.

It did not cost the Anglo-Saxons anything and it is not worth proclaiming unlimited democracy, while introducing total tyranny. There is no problem for them to declare the most general and democratic elections, because there is no problem to simulate the electoral procedure and put in parliament some of the government's detractors, allegedly "popularly elected".

Falsehood helps the Anglo–Saxon tradition to portray itself as the "light of democracy", because if you do not intend to fulfill promises in advance, then you are free to give out any, the most beautiful and vivid promises. It is possible to proclaim the fullest freedoms and introduce the most democratic laws, if we are not talking about their ACTUAL implementation.

After all, for some reason, people who are always loyal to the government sit in the English "free" parliament or the even more "free" American Congress, and English or American jury trials have never justified their counterparts Vera Zasulich.

In the "bloody despotism", as the Anglophiles say, in Russia corporal punishment finally disappeared as a measure of criminal punishment, already in 1904

actually, you can go on like this for a long time, but I'm too lazy to write anymore

 

[Imretarded?]

I think Celts are the most pale, and "white" by his logic, but they are ginger mostly.

JFL at anglos BTW, they are definitely not a superior nationality like @byvw is trying to make people believe
In fact, the Anglo-Saxons are a flawed and evil nation with a slavish mentality
The Anglo-Saxon political culture was generated by the extremely bad climate of England and the centuries-old slavery of the indigenous population under the yoke of foreign, foreign-speaking and foreign conquerors. If Russia got rid of the Mongol yoke with an armed hand and formed its political culture on the ruins of the Horde, then the British did not know the cleansing fire of Kulikov Field. Dozens of generations of Englishmen grew up in ethnic slavery to the Normans: there was no retaliation for the Normans, and no one received repentance from them. Hence, scattered by the Anglo-Saxon political culture around the world, this is a nihilistic concept, contempt for the ethnic.
England is a two–layered state, similar to a building whose walls stood on the foundation of a former building. The power of the Normans in England was based solely on a crude and foreign military force. By the 1080s, the indigenous Anglo-Saxon nobility had been completely destroyed as a social stratum and replaced by foreign chivalry. At the same time, the people, as an ethnic slave, remained.His language was ousted from the sphere of government, and the Norman dialect of French became the language of administration and communication of the dominant social strata. For about three hundred years, the Anglo-Norman dialect dominated the country and had a great influence on the formation of the modern English language
The national power structure of the Anglo-Saxons (Ten) disappeared and a fascist, in fact, a new ruling stratum of "migrant lords" with full power over peasants of a different nationality was formed. Hence the English tradition of total mercenary activity began: the British did not have their own country, therefore there was nowhere to take high patriotic feelings. No one perceived them as people at all. They were controlled like animals –with a whip and a piece of sugar. If they couldn't be forced to do something, they were lured with a coin. This formed the basis of the English version of the coming capitalism, brutal and at the same time extremely corrupt.

In many ways, this is why English political culture is pathologically false. In other political cultures, the name and content of the processes usually coincide. For example, the Tsar gave Russia a rather limited electoral law – but only because he was going to ACTUALLY COMPLY with this law. The Tsar had workers, peasants, petty bourgeoisie, and journalists in the State Duma who spoiled his blood.

It did not cost the Anglo-Saxons anything and it is not worth proclaiming unlimited democracy, while introducing total tyranny. There is no problem for them to declare the most general and democratic elections, because there is no problem to simulate the electoral procedure and put in parliament some of the government's detractors, allegedly "popularly elected".

Falsehood helps the Anglo–Saxon tradition to portray itself as the "light of democracy", because if you do not intend to fulfill promises in advance, then you are free to give out any, the most beautiful and vivid promises. It is possible to proclaim the fullest freedoms and introduce the most democratic laws, if we are not talking about their ACTUAL implementation.

After all, for some reason, people who are always loyal to the government sit in the English "free" parliament or the even more "free" American Congress, and English or American jury trials have never justified their counterparts Vera Zasulich.

In the "bloody despotism", as the Anglophiles say, in Russia corporal punishment finally disappeared as a measure of criminal punishment, already in 1904

actually, you can go on like this for a long time, but I'm too lazy to write anymore

Yeah Anglos are submissive dogs. They're just like India where Dravidians (Anglos) have been totally dominated for all time by a genetically distinct upper class.

England has some of the lowest levels of social mobility on earth, there isn't much connection between the masses and the upper caste who are basically just French and German (thanks to German nobles constantly fucking every royal in europe).

 

[Deleted member 83485]

Yeah Anglos are submissive dogs. They're just like India where Dravidians (Anglos) have been totally dominated for all time by a genetically distinct upper class.

England has some of the lowest levels of social mobility on earth, there isn't much connection between the masses and the upper caste who are basically just French and German (thanks to German nobles constantly fucking every royal in europe).

IT'S FUCKING BRUTAL
The Norman conquest, having predetermined the entire future fate of England, formed a stable complex of a nation among the British, which for centuries fit into an unprespectful and uncomfortable state order for them on the rights of a "second-class" ethnic group. English, with its many hissing sounds, is the language of tsingi, the language of toothless people: climatic conditions and extreme poverty led to the fact that most people went without teeth for many centuries in a row, they fell out from poor nutrition and vitamin deficiency. Experienced English teachers advise practicing pronunciation, imagining that your mouth is full of porridge. But this pronunciation was formed not from porridge, but on the contrary, from its absence in the mouth for dozens of generations.
The British and Americans have always overestimated and overestimate their standard of living BTW, sometimes several times, in order to show off and conquer foreign peoples more successfully. Americans, for example, overestimate the level of monetization of relations in order to improve national consumption indicators, and add any shed or canopy to the "square meters of living space" column without any indication of the thickness of the walls. As a result, they get 90 sq. m. and brag to the whole world.
Today, English fanaticism has ceased to hide itself, the DOCTRINE has spilled out from all political sound–amplifying devices at once, it has spoken with thousands of voices - in Serbia, Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan.

 

[StuntmanMike]

What about Caucasians ?
For example

Khabib has fitzpatrick type 1?He is genetically more Proto Indo European than all euros but he is not european.

Is he white ?

 

[mathis]

White ethnic is a term for white people of non-British origin. This term is common in the US.

In the UK, the equivalent is 'Other White'.

This is because British people and British descendants (American, Canadian, Australian) are whiter than other whites.
Pale white in other words.

View attachment 3093504View attachment 3093505

White: Scottish, Irish, English, Welsh, Cornish, Manx, Scots-Irish

White Ethnic: Dutch, German, Scandinavian, French, Polish, Bulgarian, Russian, Italian etc.

British are sub5. who care

 

[Imretarded?]

IT'S FUCKING BRUTAL
The Norman conquest, having predetermined the entire future fate of England, formed a stable complex of a nation among the British, which for centuries fit into an unprespectful and uncomfortable state order for them on the rights of a "second-class" ethnic group. English, with its many hissing sounds, is the language of tsingi, the language of toothless people: climatic conditions and extreme poverty led to the fact that most people went without teeth for many centuries in a row, they fell out from poor nutrition and vitamin deficiency. Experienced English teachers advise practicing pronunciation, imagining that your mouth is full of porridge. But this pronunciation was formed not from porridge, but on the contrary, from its absence in the mouth for dozens of generations.
The British and Americans have always overestimated and overestimate their standard of living BTW, sometimes several times, in order to show off and conquer foreign peoples more successfully. Americans, for example, overestimate the level of monetization of relations in order to improve national consumption indicators, and add any shed or canopy to the "square meters of living space" column without any indication of the thickness of the walls. As a result, they get 90 sq. m. and brag to the whole world.
Today, English fanaticism has ceased to hide itself, the DOCTRINE has spilled out from all political sound–amplifying devices at once, it has spoken with thousands of voices - in Serbia, Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan.

It's over. In America, you can just punch the walls apart. They're made from shitty paper

Jfl at that part about porridge

imagine looking at this and thinking 'yum'


It's actually fucking over.

You honestly have to live in these places to understand, the people are stupid cattle who can't think for themselves and the city planning is as horrendous as it gets. It takes 30-40 minutes driving to buy groceries as you NEED a car.

There is nothing superior to be found here. Maybe there is a high rung of elites who possess striking mental abilities but the Germans consistently outmaneuvered the Brits and Americans and could do much with their comparably limited manpower and productive base against the english speaking world.

If America was colonized primarily by Germans, or swedes or Russians or something, the country would be twice as rich, have free healthcare and be 100 years more advanced. The country is truly blessed geographically, literally better than any country on earth by a gigantic margin and yet they're on path of self destructions from all the self inflicted degeneracies.

America has the resources to create their own utopia and yet they struggle to even be a first world country with countless 3rd world pockets everywhere internally. Im not talking about black areas, the poorest shitholes are populated by 'white trash' who are just anglo degenerates and they make up about half of the country.

 

[Deleted member 83081]

no, this is because the UK is originally a british people country
Brits are "white ethnics" in other countries. I bet Brits are white ethnics in Germany, Poland and so on

I posted the average faces dumbass. But you are cherry picking LMAO. The lighting is also misleading in these photos.

The average Swede is not as pale as the average British.

Average British Isles descendant

View attachment 3140489View attachment 3140490

Average Scandinavian/German

View attachment 3140491View attachment 3140492View attachment 3140493

Simple.

 

[Deleted member 83081]

He's making shit up. 'white ethnic' is not a term in the USA to describe non WASP whites, let alone common.

Also how tf are English whiter than Swedish or Norwegians, they have lighter eyes and hair. And I'm seeing no actually convincing argument made by OP to prove brits have more pale skin. Also I live next to many British types and English are not as pale as he claims, it's common for them to have type two or three fitzpatrick type skin. The only ones who are truly PALE are Irish and Scottish and they are not Anglo Saxon, for example me and my dad can not tan, it can only burn and Im significantly more pale than basically 99% of British. The only people who are close in paleness are celtic types or nordics who have an almost golden skin tone compared to the disgusting red pheomelanin infested skin of anglos
View attachment 3173089
View attachment 3173090

Again OP is just some retarded anglo supremacist racist who just makes shit up and expects people to believe him. I live around British types, you can't fool me.

On a genetic level East Europeans and plenty of NW euros (scandinavians) are genetically further away from negros and asiatics compared to Anglo Saxons.
View attachment 3173051

Actually Every Slav is more white than any Anglo when it comes to proximity to negros. So I don't want to hear this 'whiter' nonsense.

And I see no

LMAO. British Isles people are the furthest away from negroes or something due to having most mutations and extremes. I explained there. Keep coping boy.

Being white is about your skin color. Dark hair Scottish is more white than any Scandinavian or Baltics.

WASP/North Atlantid people are last step in the evolution of homo sapiens

no one you've posted is north atlantid.

looksmax.org

 

[Deleted member 83081]

What about Caucasians ?
For example

Khabib has fitzpatrick type 1?He is genetically more Proto Indo European than all euros but he is not european.

Is he white ?

He is light brown not white.

khabib - Google Zoeken

 

[sportsmogger]

He's making shit up. 'white ethnic' is not a term in the USA to describe non WASP whites, let alone common.

Also how tf are English whiter than Swedish or Norwegians, they have lighter eyes and hair. And I'm seeing no actually convincing argument made by OP to prove brits have more pale skin. Also I live next to many British types and English are not as pale as he claims, it's common for them to have type two or three fitzpatrick type skin. The only ones who are truly PALE are Irish and Scottish and they are not Anglo Saxon, for example me and my dad can not tan, it can only burn and Im significantly more pale than basically 99% of British. The only people who are close in paleness are celtic types or nordics who have an almost golden skin tone compared to the disgusting red pheomelanin infested skin of anglos
View attachment 3173089
View attachment 3173090

Again OP is just some retarded anglo supremacist racist who just makes shit up and expects people to believe him. I live around British types, you can't fool me.

On a genetic level East Europeans and plenty of NW euros (scandinavians) are genetically further away from negros and asiatics compared to Anglo Saxons.
View attachment 3173051

Actually Every Slav is more white than any Anglo when it comes to proximity to negros. So I don't want to hear this 'whiter' nonsense.

And I see no

Op isnt anglo

 

[sportsmogger]

What about Caucasians ?
For example

Khabib has fitzpatrick type 1?He is genetically more Proto Indo European than all euros but he is not european.

Is he white ?

Yamnayas were dark

 

[bourgeoizyzz]

Scandinavians are whiter then brits tough from what I've seen

every western european thinks they are the definition of white

in all honesty, it's probably france and norway

 

[StuntmanMike]

He is light brown not white.

khabib - Google Zoeken

He is not light brown for sure.

Yamnayas were dark

Not really.They had lightskin but dark hair and eyes.
White genes actually came from Anatolian farmers or EEF.Yamnaya men just fucked white globular amphora farmer women and created modern europeans

 

[sportsmogger]

He is not light brown for sure.

Not really.They had lightskin but dark hair and eyes.
White genes actually came from Anatolian farmers or EEF.Yamnaya men just fucked white globular amphora farmer women and created modern europeans

They had lightbrown/tanned skin not white skin

Yamnayas mixed with Globular Amphora and made Corded Ware, Corded Wares werent very light either

 

[Deleted member 83485]

It's over. In America, you can just punch the walls apart. They're made from shitty paper

Jfl at that part about porridge

imagine looking at this and thinking 'yum'
View attachment 3173201

It's actually fucking over.

at school, I studied German at one time and English at another. The teacher really advised us to practice pronunciation, imagining that you have porridge in your mouth, but we were not told why the British formed such a toothless pronunciation.
The porridge you showed would have seemed incredibly appetizing to the English conquered by the Normans

You honestly have to live in these places to understand, the people are stupid cattle who can't think for themselves and the city planning is as horrendous as it gets. It takes 30-40 minutes driving to buy groceries as you NEED a car.

I live in Russia and we have Pyaterochka on every street.
It's like this in every city/town

There is nothing superior to be found here. Maybe there is a high rung of elites who possess striking mental abilities but the Germans consistently outmaneuvered the Brits and Americans and could do much with their comparably limited manpower and productive base against the english speaking world.

The history of the United States as a country began with the struggle between the rebellious American colonies (founded by the British), who wanted independence, and Great Britain itself, which considered the territories its colonies. These fateful events began in 1775. Catherine II was already confidently sitting on the Russian throne at that time, and Russia, along with France and Great Britain, was one of the three dominant empires in the world.
So that's what I'm talking about, Russia played the major role in the formation of the American state and its achievement of political independence from the UK
At the initiative of Catherine II, the League of Armed Neutrality was created, which was joined by Sweden, Denmark, and the Netherlands. The US Congress also declared solidarity with the position of the Russian Empire and tried to get the North American states to join the League.
In the 1860s, when the civil war between the northern and southern states broke out in the United States, Russia sent two naval squadrons to the United States - the Atlantic and Pacific. This step prevented England and France from entering the civil war in the United States. Thus, the territorial integrity of the United States of America was preserved.
@byvw You hate Russia, even though your America owes its independence to Russia twice

If America was colonized primarily by Germans, or swedes or Russians or something, the country would be twice as rich, have free healthcare and be 100 years more advanced. The country is truly blessed geographically, literally better than any country on earth by a gigantic margin and yet they're on path of self destructions from all the self inflicted degeneracies.

100% true, the USA has an ideal geography and if America had been colonized by someone other than these extremely cruel, deceitful and malicious jerks, America would truly be great

America has the resources to create their own utopia and yet they struggle to even be a first world country with countless 3rd world pockets everywhere internally. Im not talking about black areas, the poorest shitholes are populated by 'white trash' who are just anglo degenerates and they make up about half of the country.

They do not want to put their country in order, they arrange wars on our continent (Eurasia) in order to maintain their global dominance, there are a lot of problems from this country. They gave the world only LGBT (banned in Russia), feminism, transvestites and other nonsense.

 

[Debetro]

What about Caucasians ?
For example

Khabib has fitzpatrick type 1?He is genetically more Proto Indo European than all euros but he is not european.

Is he white ?

That's Fitzpatrick type II. Type I is like gingers only. If you don't have a pink asshole I don't think you can claim type I.

@Imretarded?

 

[Imretarded?]

LMAO. British Isles people are the furthest away from negroes or something due to having most mutations and extremes. I explained there. Keep coping boy.

Being white is about your skin color. Dark hair Scottish is more white than any Scandinavian or Baltics.

WASP/North Atlantid people are last step in the evolution of homo sapiens

no one you've posted is north atlantid.

looksmax.org

>posts pictures of celebreties
>somehow proves a genetic claim

You're a fucking retard

 

[Imretarded?]

That's Fitzpatrick type II. Type I is like gingers only. If you don't have a pink asshole I don't think you can claim type I.

@Imretarded?

Isn't type one determined if you can tan or not?