"White HTN pulls more than a black chad, black LTN pulls more than white HTN" These sentences do not make sense to me.

Hess

Hess

Corded Ware CHUD
Joined
Jan 23, 2023
Posts
5,375
Reputation
7,596
Are these rankings not suppose to be universal? and if we operate under the assumption that being ethnic or being white lowers your attractiveness should that not show in your ranking and demote you as well? don't get majority of these racebait threads ngl it seems like it would be far more coherent to argue that your ethnic group/whites/whatever is on average more average/ higher rate of htns or whatever
 
  • +1
Reactions: pleasevanity, Chadeep, Ahmed88 and 6 others
its universal and pure ethnic chads dont exist
the only ethnics that can be chads are those mixed with european dna
for example how can you be chad if you have a massively wide african nose
 
  • +1
Reactions: Chadeep, Divineincel and Hess
whites and niggers argue all day while meds get the girls
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: pleasevanity and Mogs Me
Black niggas be proud slaying bitches because of ugly bastard halo

IMG 8917
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: mtnuglyboy, elliottttt, pleasevanity and 5 others
because purely ethnic chads dont exist
the only ethnics that can be chads are those mixed with euro dna
for example how can you be chad if you have a massively wide african nose
I'm not rly arguing for or against this point my question is mainly abt the application of how people use the rankings in these debates, like how people will say a black ltn will pull more than a white htn, if I were arguing for these points in your position in the context of JBW it would just make more sense to say that blacks and ethnics are LTN-sub5 on average and whites are on average more attractive and in the ranges of mtn or htn more
 
  • +1
Reactions: 81xa
Black niggas be proud slaying bitches because of ugly bastard halo
ugly bastard and docile cuck are equally bad you gotta be the mafia beach slayer
 
  • +1
Reactions: Mogs Me
I'm not rly arguing for or against this point my question is mainly abt the application of how people use the rankings in these debates, like how people will say a black ltn will pull more than a white htn, if I were arguing for these points in your position in the context of JBW it would just make more sense to say that blacks and ethnics are LTN-sub5 on average and whites are on average more attractive and in the ranges of mtn or htn more
Yeah I think some have their own scales for each race. But universally it makes more sense to say they are sub5s or LTNs
 
  • +1
Reactions: Hess
Beauty should transcend race, a white LTN should be ranked in the same way a black LTN is, even if more girls would choose the white guy because of JBW
 
  • +1
Reactions: PrinceLuenLeoncur and Hess
its universal and pure ethnic chads dont exist
the only ethnics that can be chads are those mixed with european dna
for example how can you be chad if you have a massively wide african nose
Everyone is mixed with something at this point that’s just not giving anyone credit
 
its universal and pure ethnic chads dont exist
the only ethnics that can be chads are those mixed with european dna
for example how can you be chad if you have a massively wide african nose
Low IQ comment 👆
 
Are these rankings not suppose to be universal? and if we operate under the assumption that being ethnic or being white lowers your attractiveness should that not show in your ranking and demote you as well? don't get majority of these racebait threads ngl it seems like it would be far more coherent to argue that your ethnic group/whites/whatever is on average more average/ higher rate of htns or whatever
We dont do such statement the black male is superior wtv the attractiveness tier is
 

Similar threads

5'5.5 ropecel
Replies
19
Views
178
lacedwgenius2.0
lacedwgenius2.0
sync!
Replies
13
Views
80
jeremyy
jeremyy
inyerta
Replies
13
Views
114
rand anon
rand anon
BatemanNigga
Replies
1
Views
44
Aox Ofwar
Aox Ofwar

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top