"White HTN pulls more than a black chad, black LTN pulls more than white HTN" These sentences do not make sense to me.

[Hess]

Are these rankings not suppose to be universal? and if we operate under the assumption that being ethnic or being white lowers your attractiveness should that not show in your ranking and demote you as well? don't get majority of these racebait threads ngl it seems like it would be far more coherent to argue that your ethnic group/whites/whatever is on average more average/ higher rate of htns or whatever

 

[Eric_mxcl]

.

 

[81xa]

its universal and pure ethnic chads dont exist
the only ethnics that can be chads are those mixed with european dna
for example how can you be chad if you have a massively wide african nose

 

[au rêve]

whites and niggers argue all day while meds get the girls

 

[Mogs Me]

Black niggas be proud slaying bitches because of ugly bastard halo

 

[Hess]

because purely ethnic chads dont exist
the only ethnics that can be chads are those mixed with euro dna
for example how can you be chad if you have a massively wide african nose

I'm not rly arguing for or against this point my question is mainly abt the application of how people use the rankings in these debates, like how people will say a black ltn will pull more than a white htn, if I were arguing for these points in your position in the context of JBW it would just make more sense to say that blacks and ethnics are LTN-sub5 on average and whites are on average more attractive and in the ranges of mtn or htn more

 

[au rêve]

Black niggas be proud slaying bitches because of ugly bastard halo

ugly bastard and docile cuck are equally bad you gotta be the mafia beach slayer

 

[TheGreatDetective]

Black niggas be proud slaying bitches because of ugly bastard halo

View attachment 5234293

Did someone say ugly bastard halo

 

[Grainsludgelover]

whites and niggers argue all day while meds get the girls

the 5'4 medss

 

[au rêve]

the 5'4 medss

average height in med countries is 5'9

 

[81xa]

I'm not rly arguing for or against this point my question is mainly abt the application of how people use the rankings in these debates, like how people will say a black ltn will pull more than a white htn, if I were arguing for these points in your position in the context of JBW it would just make more sense to say that blacks and ethnics are LTN-sub5 on average and whites are on average more attractive and in the ranges of mtn or htn more

Yeah I think some have their own scales for each race. But universally it makes more sense to say they are sub5s or LTNs

 

[0_angularity_0]

Beauty should transcend race, a white LTN should be ranked in the same way a black LTN is, even if more girls would choose the white guy because of JBW

 

[ICXCLuvr]

its universal and pure ethnic chads dont exist
the only ethnics that can be chads are those mixed with european dna
for example how can you be chad if you have a massively wide african nose

Everyone is mixed with something at this point that’s just not giving anyone credit

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

its universal and pure ethnic chads dont exist
the only ethnics that can be chads are those mixed with european dna
for example how can you be chad if you have a massively wide african nose

Low IQ comment