
Thief
Gold
- Joined
- May 29, 2025
- Posts
- 904
- Reputation
- 3,144
Mirin' bringing up intellect to haul in the rep
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
I said like 2 times I think I got retarded in those last few years bromensa norway if u get below 140+ iq on that ur retarded bud sorry to say
im gonna do it right now for u if i get below u u can insult meI said like 2 times I think I got retarded in those last few years bro![]()
well good job you are alomost at the level of my threadsalmost 100 replies in less than 15 mins jfl
“The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligent are full of doubt.”I’m awake dawg trust
Money rules the world
I am nothing
We all are a part of the universe
A fraction experiencing the singularity
True but i still think it's grounded on a couple of things for example free will if you don't have it can you be held morally responsible?Or consciousness if moral concern requires experience what do we do with AI or animals if their consciousness is debatablemorality shapes everyday life and with change of morality, Society has always changed radicaly. Its the answer to our problems and everything else is honestly just related, or doesnt matter at all.
Anyone canbeAPPEAR high IQ these days because of LLMs/AI, and it's only going to increase. Everyone will have their personal AI assistant, sooner rather than later, which will greatly surpass human intelligence, and we'll be able to outsource our critical thinking to it.
i am cocksure“The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligent are full of doubt.”
— Bertrand Russell
True but i still think it's grounded on a couple of things for example free will if you don't have it can you be held morally responsible?Or consciousness if moral concern requires experience what do we do with AI or animals if their consciousness is debatable
Not being low-IQ is more important than being high IQ.Well a better question is whether high IQ is even necessary to live a good life maybe having such high IQ isn’t that necessary of a trait
you can never know if free will is real, you cant ever prove or disprove it. Best way to go is assume it is, and decide based on that. If free will isnt real, Everything is predetermined anyway and you will do as you should, Philosophy about what literally shapes man as what it is and has a giant impact on our species should be priority. Doomer philosophy that only promotes nihilism isnt needed anywhere.True but i still think it's grounded on a couple of things for example free will if you don't have it can you be held morally responsible?Or consciousness if moral concern requires experience what do we do with AI or animals if their consciousness is debatable
Also you are so adamant that I didn’t know anything before you knew a thing about me“The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligent are full of doubt.”
— Bertrand Russell
Cocksure is a great word honestlyi am cocksure
the magnus carlsen of .org
High iq correlates with depressionWell a better question is whether high IQ is even necessary to live a good life maybe having such high IQ isn’t that necessary of a trait
What ive read tells me enough.Also you are so adamant that I didn’t know anything before you knew a thing about mewanna talk about cocksure
So I think that proves the fact that you can be at least average or a bit above average like me to be fine in life but I think I need better brain function and actually trying hard things.Not being low-IQ is more important than being high IQ.
The incapacity to perceive logical inconsistencies, or make proper decisions, or assess situations aptly increases the probability of everything that is bad to happen to you (lower socioeconomic status (class), premature death, unstable romantic relationships, humiliation, etc.)
u ragebaiting broWhat ive read tells me enough.
„Money rules the world“u ragebaiting broI mog u btw
ViolationOf the people not mentioned here
@Duke Archer types like 5 words and somehow makes it profound half the time
@SecularIslamist has interesting and funny threads
@2414763h for being sentient with a 5 cm cranium
I created this with ChatGPT to expedite response time:you can never know if free will is real, you cant ever prove or disprove it.
Thank you bhaiOf the people not mentioned here
@Duke Archer types like 5 words and somehow makes it profound half the time
@SecularIslamist has interesting and funny threads
@2414763h for being sentient with a 5 cm cranium
Like ive said before debating over something so pointless isnt in my interest either. I believe in free will and think its retarded to not do so, but still believe, it cant really be proven.I created this with ChatGPT to expedite response time:
I once read Christopher Langan's CTMU paper—a metaphysical "theory of everything" articulated by someone whose IQ reportedly exceeds 190.
In his Cognitive-Theoretic Model of the Universe (CTMU), Langan posits that free will logically must exist because reality, by its very definition, encompasses all that is real. Consequently, there can be no external framework or laws governing reality itself; if there were, such a framework would exist "outside" of reality and thus would not be real—an inherent contradiction.
Therefore, reality cannot be subject to external causal constraints or deterministic laws imposed from beyond itself. Furthermore, reality also cannot be purely acausal (random), since absolute randomness would preclude structured, coherent existence altogether. Thus, reality must inherently possess self-causation or self-determinacy, meaning it recursively defines, generates, and governs itself through internal rules and processes.
Additionally, reality exhibits self-similarity across all scales, implying that the same underlying principles of self-determinacy apply uniformly at every level of existence—from quantum phenomena to biological systems, cognitive processes, and cosmic structures. Each scale embodies the recursive logic of reality, reinforcing its self-consistent, fractal-like nature.
Under this interpretation, free will emerges naturally as a manifestation of reality's intrinsic self-causation. Agents within this self-determined reality actively participate in shaping the universe's evolving structure and unfolding narrative, consistent with the CTMU's characterization of reality as a cognitive self-simulation or Self-Configuring Self-Processing Language (SCSPL).
Reference:
Christopher Langan - CTMU Paper (PDF)
That's all i am going to say. I'm not sticking around for a free-will debate.
I got violatedThank you bhai![]()
Not to be that guy butMUH IM MORE HIGH IQ
NOOOO IM MORE HIGH IQ
NO BRO MUH IM MORE ESOTERIC THAN YOU
I READ NIETZSCHEEEEE BRO IM SO SMART TRUST
NO BRO PHYSICS AND SHIT QUANTAM RANDOMNESS WE HAVEEE FREE WILL![]()
Not to be that guy but
Evola > Nietzsche
correlation=/=causationHigh iq correlates with depression
Idk sometimes I think it’d be chill to be retarded
Nietzsche was close, he had the right ideas. But his Übermensch fantasy is retarded. Evola is much more than facism yk. Great guyNietzsche is a retard in most parts
evola never read tbh something about fascism sounds kinda boring
I said like 2 times I think I got retarded in those last few years bro![]()
@PrinceLeoncur or whateverIndividuals I can have advanced conversations within topics like computational linguistics, formal language theory, theories of everything, mathematics, philosophy, history, cliodynamics, systems science, cognitive science, game theory, computer science and artificial intelligence, biology, classical and quantum physics, economics (behavioral and cognitive especially), sociology (honest, not woke), etc.
Disclaimer: This question should not be seen as me presupposing that I am a "High IQ" person, rather, that I seek to know who I can have advanced conversations with.
@PrinceLuenLeoncurIndividuals I can have advanced conversations within topics like computational linguistics, formal language theory, theories of everything, mathematics, philosophy, history, cliodynamics, systems science, cognitive science, game theory, computer science and artificial intelligence, biology, classical and quantum physics, economics (behavioral and cognitive especially), sociology (honest, not woke), etc.
Disclaimer: This question should not be seen as me presupposing that I am a "High IQ" person, rather, that I seek to know who I can have advanced conversations with.
Never read him maybe i will do in the future but im busy rn reading SpinozaNietzsche was close, he had the right ideas. But his Übermensch fantasy is retarded. Evola is much more than facism yk. Great guy
I think we need to leave this site tbhView attachment 3954885
used to get 140, this site has infact made me retarded
Nietzsche still had a big cultural impact, in germany where im from. Hes quoted alot, probably without people knowing its a Nietzsche Quote but yeahNietzsche is a retard in most parts
evola never read tbh something about fascism sounds kinda boring
Christopher Langan methodology behind the CTMU makes a compelling argument that it can be proven. He starts with defining reality as everything that exists and then also deduces what it must have to meet that definition. Free will or no free will should be able to be provable when deducing from this definition.it cant really be proven.
I truly believe evola had answers and a revolution based on his philosophy would in the long run, benefit us all. Im don’t agree with him on nationalism thoughNever read him maybe i will do in the future but im busy rn reading Spinoza
I read him I have the german pdf of beyond good and evil and Zarathustra since im also from germanyNietzsche still had a big cultural impact, in germany where im from. Hes quoted alot, probably without people knowing its a Nietzsche Quote but yeah
I don’t think its that simple honestly. If you truly believe in something like a god which is above Nature and its laws. This really doesnt mean anythingChristopher Langan methodology behind the CTMU makes a compelling argument that it can be proven. He starts with defining reality as everything that exists and then also deduces what it must have to meet that definition. Free will or no free will should be able to be provable when deducing from this definition.
Think of it this way, if we define a chair as a "separate seat for one person, typically with a back and four legs.", then we can deduce the properties a chair needs to have, and we can prove whether those fundamental properties are possible within the definition of chair
Was mich nicht umbringt, macht mich stärker.I read him I have the german pdf of beyond good and evil and Zarathustra since im also from germany
Best quote from him tbh are still the one with the butterfly and cockroach
and will to power is also fine