Who are the genuinely "High IQ" people here?

[Thief]

Mirin' bringing up intellect to haul in the rep

 

[Arbuscular]

mensa norway if u get below 140+ iq on that ur retarded bud sorry to say

I said like 2 times I think I got retarded in those last few years bro

 

[ReturnOfTheBO2Cel]

I said like 2 times I think I got retarded in those last few years bro

im gonna do it right now for u if i get below u u can insult me

 

[_MVP_]

ur all löw iq

önly i am high

 

[Thief]

ur all löw iq

önly i am high

I made a depiction of you but you changed your Yugioh pfp

 

[nosemaxxing]

almost 100 replies in less than 15 mins jfl

well good job you are alomost at the level of my threads

Avi/pfp Megathread

this thread serves as a continuation of @BrendioEEE s thread about avis, post funny avis of users for easy access when they are gonna delete. it's for future generations of .org users to see how good our avis were here are some: @Proex @superpsycho @idkmanimao @ahavik

looksmax.org

man dies from fucking a chair [my favorite old thread]

old legend @Proex s best thread. (animelover) shame link doesn't work anymore :fuk: btw the full video showing gore has been lost to history, its only this snippet left, sadly. @VohnnyBoy @fashioncel

looksmax.org

The biggest abused dog tiktokcel to date

@TYLER IN NARRATOR let me remind you the guy in question joined 13 days ago: and the nigga already has whole forum hating him. so let me start, the guy so far made 0 valuable threads, every single one of them are shitposts. also the guy gets ignorepilled a lot by the forum so he...

looksmax.org

 

[Gargantuan]

Anyone can be high IQ these days because of LLMs/AI, and it's only going to increase. Everyone will have their personal AI assistant, sooner rather than later, which will greatly surpass human intelligence, and we'll be able to outsource our critical thinking to it.

The difference between someone who is 100 IQ and someone 130 IQ is extremely substantial, even a 1-sigma difference is quite significant.
However, there's virtually no difference between 1000 IQ and 1030 IQ when superintelligence enters the equation and elevates all levels.

 

[chudltn]

I’m awake dawg trust
Money rules the world
I am nothing
We all are a part of the universe
A fraction experiencing the singularity

“The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligent are full of doubt.”


— Bertrand Russell

 

[unsureaboutallthis]

“A wise man knows he knows nothing”
Okay buddy

 

[VV62]

morality shapes everyday life and with change of morality, Society has always changed radicaly. Its the answer to our problems and everything else is honestly just related, or doesnt matter at all.

True but i still think it's grounded on a couple of things for example free will if you don't have it can you be held morally responsible?Or consciousness if moral concern requires experience what do we do with AI or animals if their consciousness is debatable

 

[2414763h]

Well a better question is whether high IQ is even necessary to live a good life maybe having such high IQ isn’t that necessary of a trait

 

[enchanted_elixir]

Anyone can be APPEAR high IQ these days because of LLMs/AI, and it's only going to increase. Everyone will have their personal AI assistant, sooner rather than later, which will greatly surpass human intelligence, and we'll be able to outsource our critical thinking to it.

 

[_MVP_]

“The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligent are full of doubt.”


— Bertrand Russell

i am cocksure

the magnus carlsen of .org

 

[mirinturbolowinhib]

Me

 

[unsureaboutallthis]

True but i still think it's grounded on a couple of things for example free will if you don't have it can you be held morally responsible?Or consciousness if moral concern requires experience what do we do with AI or animals if their consciousness is debatable

this is what compatibility between free will and determinism solves

 

[enchanted_elixir]

Well a better question is whether high IQ is even necessary to live a good life maybe having such high IQ isn’t that necessary of a trait

Not being low-IQ is more important than being high IQ.

The incapacity to perceive logical inconsistencies, or make proper decisions, or assess situations aptly increases the probability of everything that is bad to happen to you (lower socioeconomic status (class), premature death, unstable romantic relationships, humiliation, prime target for scams and other similar forms of predation, etc.)

 

[chudltn]

True but i still think it's grounded on a couple of things for example free will if you don't have it can you be held morally responsible?Or consciousness if moral concern requires experience what do we do with AI or animals if their consciousness is debatable

you can never know if free will is real, you cant ever prove or disprove it. Best way to go is assume it is, and decide based on that. If free will isnt real, Everything is predetermined anyway and you will do as you should, Philosophy about what literally shapes man as what it is and has a giant impact on our species should be priority. Doomer philosophy that only promotes nihilism isnt needed anywhere.

 

[unsureaboutallthis]

“The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligent are full of doubt.”


— Bertrand Russell

Also you are so adamant that I didn’t know anything before you knew a thing about me wanna talk about cocksure

 

[chudltn]

i am cocksure

the magnus carlsen of .org

Cocksure is a great word honestly

 

[chrishell]

@greycel

 

[unsureaboutallthis]

Well a better question is whether high IQ is even necessary to live a good life maybe having such high IQ isn’t that necessary of a trait

High iq correlates with depression
Idk sometimes I think it’d be chill to be retarded

 

[chudltn]

Also you are so adamant that I didn’t know anything before you knew a thing about me wanna talk about cocksure

What ive read tells me enough.

 

[2414763h]

Not being low-IQ is more important than being high IQ.

The incapacity to perceive logical inconsistencies, or make proper decisions, or assess situations aptly increases the probability of everything that is bad to happen to you (lower socioeconomic status (class), premature death, unstable romantic relationships, humiliation, etc.)

So I think that proves the fact that you can be at least average or a bit above average like me to be fine in life but I think I need better brain function and actually trying hard things.

 

[unsureaboutallthis]

What ive read tells me enough.

u ragebaiting bro I mog u btw

 

[chudltn]

u ragebaiting bro I mog u btw

„Money rules the world“

B-but I mog you saar

 

[unsureaboutallthis]

 

[widdi]

Of the people not mentioned here

@Duke Archer types like 5 words and somehow makes it profound half the time

@SecularIslamist has interesting and funny threads

@2414763h for being sentient with a 5 cm cranium

 

[_MVP_]

Hackers breach intelligence website used by CIA

Unidentified hackers recently compromised a major intelligence website used by the CIA and other agencies for submitting details of sensitive contracts, according to the National Reconnaissance Office, the spy satellite service that runs the site.

www.washingtontimes.com

 

[2414763h]

Of the people not mentioned here

@Duke Archer types like 5 words and somehow makes it profound half the time

@SecularIslamist has interesting and funny threads

@2414763h for being sentient with a 5 cm cranium

Violation

 

[enchanted_elixir]

you can never know if free will is real, you cant ever prove or disprove it.

I created this with ChatGPT to expedite response time:

---

I once read Christopher Langan's CTMU paper—a metaphysical "theory of everything" articulated by someone whose IQ reportedly exceeds 190.

In his Cognitive-Theoretic Model of the Universe (CTMU), Langan posits that free will logically must exist because reality, by its very definition, encompasses all that is real. Consequently, there can be no external framework or laws governing reality itself; if there were, such a framework would exist "outside" of reality and thus would not be real—an inherent contradiction.


Therefore, reality cannot be subject to external causal constraints or deterministic laws imposed from beyond itself. Furthermore, reality also cannot be purely acausal (random), since absolute randomness would preclude structured, coherent existence altogether. Thus, reality must inherently possess self-causation or self-determinacy, meaning it recursively defines, generates, and governs itself through internal rules and processes.


Additionally, reality exhibits self-similarity across all scales, implying that the same underlying principles of self-determinacy apply uniformly at every level of existence—from quantum phenomena to biological systems, cognitive processes, and cosmic structures. Each scale embodies the recursive logic of reality, reinforcing its self-consistent, fractal-like nature.


Under this interpretation, free will emerges naturally as a manifestation of reality's intrinsic self-causation. Agents within this self-determined reality actively participate in shaping the universe's evolving structure and unfolding narrative, consistent with the CTMU's characterization of reality as a cognitive self-simulation or Self-Configuring Self-Processing Language (SCSPL).


Reference:
Christopher Langan - CTMU Paper (PDF)

That's all i am going to say. I'm not sticking around for a free-will debate.

 

[SecularIslamist]

Of the people not mentioned here

@Duke Archer types like 5 words and somehow makes it profound half the time

@SecularIslamist has interesting and funny threads

@2414763h for being sentient with a 5 cm cranium

Thank you bhai

 

[Mainlander]

MUH IM MORE HIGH IQ

NOOOO IM MORE HIGH IQ

NO BRO MUH IM MORE ESOTERIC THAN YOU

I READ NIETZSCHEEEEE BRO IM SO SMART TRUST

NO BRO PHYSICS AND SHIT QUANTAM RANDOMNESS WE HAVEEE FREE WILL

 

[chudltn]

I created this with ChatGPT to expedite response time:

---

I once read Christopher Langan's CTMU paper—a metaphysical "theory of everything" articulated by someone whose IQ reportedly exceeds 190.

In his Cognitive-Theoretic Model of the Universe (CTMU), Langan posits that free will logically must exist because reality, by its very definition, encompasses all that is real. Consequently, there can be no external framework or laws governing reality itself; if there were, such a framework would exist "outside" of reality and thus would not be real—an inherent contradiction.


Therefore, reality cannot be subject to external causal constraints or deterministic laws imposed from beyond itself. Furthermore, reality also cannot be purely acausal (random), since absolute randomness would preclude structured, coherent existence altogether. Thus, reality must inherently possess self-causation or self-determinacy, meaning it recursively defines, generates, and governs itself through internal rules and processes.


Additionally, reality exhibits self-similarity across all scales, implying that the same underlying principles of self-determinacy apply uniformly at every level of existence—from quantum phenomena to biological systems, cognitive processes, and cosmic structures. Each scale embodies the recursive logic of reality, reinforcing its self-consistent, fractal-like nature.


Under this interpretation, free will emerges naturally as a manifestation of reality's intrinsic self-causation. Agents within this self-determined reality actively participate in shaping the universe's evolving structure and unfolding narrative, consistent with the CTMU's characterization of reality as a cognitive self-simulation or Self-Configuring Self-Processing Language (SCSPL).


Reference:
Christopher Langan - CTMU Paper (PDF)

That's all i am going to say. I'm not sticking around for a free-will debate.

Like ive said before debating over something so pointless isnt in my interest either. I believe in free will and think its retarded to not do so, but still believe, it cant really be proven.

 

[2414763h]

Thank you bhai

I got violated

 

[chudltn]

MUH IM MORE HIGH IQ

NOOOO IM MORE HIGH IQ

NO BRO MUH IM MORE ESOTERIC THAN YOU

I READ NIETZSCHEEEEE BRO IM SO SMART TRUST

NO BRO PHYSICS AND SHIT QUANTAM RANDOMNESS WE HAVEEE FREE WILL

Not to be that guy but
Evola > Nietzsche

 

[Mainlander]

Not to be that guy but
Evola > Nietzsche

Nietzsche is a retard in most parts

evola never read tbh something about fascism sounds kinda boring

 

[crazyguy]

High iq correlates with depression
Idk sometimes I think it’d be chill to be retarded

correlation=/=causation

 

[chudltn]

Nietzsche is a retard in most parts

evola never read tbh something about fascism sounds kinda boring

Nietzsche was close, he had the right ideas. But his Übermensch fantasy is retarded. Evola is much more than facism yk. Great guy

 

[ReturnOfTheBO2Cel]

I said like 2 times I think I got retarded in those last few years bro

used to get 140, this site has infact made me retarded

 

[AbuSdanteet]

Individuals I can have advanced conversations within topics like computational linguistics, formal language theory, theories of everything, mathematics, philosophy, history, cliodynamics, systems science, cognitive science, game theory, computer science and artificial intelligence, biology, classical and quantum physics, economics (behavioral and cognitive especially), sociology (honest, not woke), etc.

Disclaimer: This question should not be seen as me presupposing that I am a "High IQ" person, rather, that I seek to know who I can have advanced conversations with.

@PrinceLeoncur or whatever

 

[AbuSdanteet]

Individuals I can have advanced conversations within topics like computational linguistics, formal language theory, theories of everything, mathematics, philosophy, history, cliodynamics, systems science, cognitive science, game theory, computer science and artificial intelligence, biology, classical and quantum physics, economics (behavioral and cognitive especially), sociology (honest, not woke), etc.

Disclaimer: This question should not be seen as me presupposing that I am a "High IQ" person, rather, that I seek to know who I can have advanced conversations with.

@PrinceLuenLeoncur

 

[Mainlander]

Nietzsche was close, he had the right ideas. But his Übermensch fantasy is retarded. Evola is much more than facism yk. Great guy

Never read him maybe i will do in the future but im busy rn reading Spinoza

 

[Arbuscular]

View attachment 3954885
used to get 140, this site has infact made me retarded

I think we need to leave this site tbh

 

[chudltn]

Nietzsche is a retard in most parts

evola never read tbh something about fascism sounds kinda boring

Nietzsche still had a big cultural impact, in germany where im from. Hes quoted alot, probably without people knowing its a Nietzsche Quote but yeah

 

[enchanted_elixir]

it cant really be proven.

Christopher Langan methodology behind the CTMU makes a compelling argument that it can be proven. He starts with defining reality as everything that exists and then also deduces what it must have to meet that definition. Free will or no free will should be able to be provable when deducing from this definition.

Think of it this way, if we define a chair as a "separate seat for one person, typically with a back and four legs.", then we can deduce the properties a chair needs to have, and we can prove whether those fundamental properties are possible within the definition of chair

 

[chudltn]

Never read him maybe i will do in the future but im busy rn reading Spinoza

I truly believe evola had answers and a revolution based on his philosophy would in the long run, benefit us all. Im don’t agree with him on nationalism though

 

[DarkTriadBeliever]

If I had the nerd emoji, you'd have gotten it for this post

 

[Mainlander]

Nietzsche still had a big cultural impact, in germany where im from. Hes quoted alot, probably without people knowing its a Nietzsche Quote but yeah

I read him I have the german pdf of beyond good and evil and Zarathustra since im also from germany

Best quote from him tbh are still the one with the butterfly and cockroach

and will to power is also fine

 

[chudltn]

Christopher Langan methodology behind the CTMU makes a compelling argument that it can be proven. He starts with defining reality as everything that exists and then also deduces what it must have to meet that definition. Free will or no free will should be able to be provable when deducing from this definition.

Think of it this way, if we define a chair as a "separate seat for one person, typically with a back and four legs.", then we can deduce the properties a chair needs to have, and we can prove whether those fundamental properties are possible within the definition of chair

I don’t think its that simple honestly. If you truly believe in something like a god which is above Nature and its laws. This really doesnt mean anything

 

[chudltn]

I read him I have the german pdf of beyond good and evil and Zarathustra since im also from germany

Best quote from him tbh are still the one with the butterfly and cockroach

and will to power is also fine

Was mich nicht umbringt, macht mich stärker.
Leider heutzutage oftmals in falschen Kontext genutzt, doch trotzdem von Nietzsche. Schon tausendmal in echt gehört. Bezweifle das irgendjemanden bewusst war das dies von Nietzsche stammte