Who are the genuinely "High IQ" people here?

I don’t think its that simple honestly. If you truly believe in something like a god which is above Nature and its laws. This really doesnt mean anything
Christopher langan does believe in God but his framework has it in a panpsychist view, aka god=reality.
The very structure of reality IS God.

Maybe you should check it out whenever you're bored and remember this, if you want.
 
  • +1
Reactions: chudltn


@ascension
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: CorinthianLOX, Mr_Bombo_mogs, gemerald and 3 others
Christopher langan does believe in God but his framework has it in a panpsychist view, aka god=reality.
The very structure of reality IS God.

Being honest this Concept is too mich
Ima be real that Concept is too much for my mind to grasp.
A all knowing god knows what gonna happen, meaning everything is predetermined no?
 
  • Hmm...
  • +1
Reactions: enchanted_elixir and 2414763h
Christopher Langan methodology behind the CTMU makes a compelling argument that it can be proven. He starts with defining reality as everything that exists and then also deduces what it must have to meet that definition. Free will or no free will should be able to be provable when deducing from this definition.

Think of it this way, if we define a chair as a "separate seat for one person, typically with a back and four legs.", then we can deduce the properties a chair needs to have, and we can prove whether those fundamental properties are possible within the definition of chair
He’s a retard pseud for 16 year old libertarians who think they can deduce reality from first principles. It comes down to epistemic haughtiness imo.
 
  • +1
Reactions: greycel, chudltn and 2414763h
That is still good.
I think right.
How does this site make you dumb? Unless you interact too much
i fell for the bonesmashing meme and am currently uneducated so that probably doesnt help either, my only brain training is happening on this site and if u look at off-topic there's not much brainfuel too be had
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: widdi and 2414763h
Has anyone ever done a street race?
 
  • JFL
Reactions: chudltn
i fell for the bonesmashing meme and am currently uneducated so that probably doesnt help either, my only brain training is happening on this site and if u look at off-topic there's not much brainfuel too be had
Unfortunate well I’m 17 and that score is better than me can’t lie
 
  • +1
Reactions: ReturnOfTheBO2Cel
Me and @looneyy_ have an iq of 120+
 
  • +1
Reactions: 2414763h and looneyy_
Unfortunate well I’m 17 and that score is better than me can’t lie
you'll be fine, just take ab reak from this site mostly haha, im just sad i used to be 140 iq mensa slayer now im just a low iq andy
 
  • +1
Reactions: 2414763h
you'll be fine, just take ab reak from this site mostly haha, im just sad i used to be 140 iq mensa slayer now im just a low iq andy
Low IQ is 128??
I’m finished as someone who is just barely above 100.

Edit: like about 107-110.
 
Last edited:
  • JFL
Reactions: Bars and ReturnOfTheBO2Cel
you'll be fine, just take ab reak from this site mostly haha, im just sad i used to be 140 iq mensa slayer now im just a low iq andy
you’ve always been low iq son don’t play it off @IliaTopuria
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: IliaTopuria, 2414763h and ReturnOfTheBO2Cel
you’ve always been low iq son don’t play it off @IliaTopuria
buddy just admitted to being 123 iq and if you scroll up u can infact see that my iq is 128, calm down g calm down
 
  • +1
Reactions: 2414763h
buddy just admitted to being 123 iq and if you scroll up u can infact see that my iq is 128, calm down g calm down
:geek:
keep coping son talk to me when you get ur iq on my level
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: 2414763h, chudltn and ReturnOfTheBO2Cel
Oh no, sadly i got a iq of 80

So i am not worthy enough 😔😔
 
  • Woah
Reactions: Thief
Low IQ is 128??
I’m finished as someone who is just barely above 100.

Edit: like about 107-110.
5% of the world's population has an IQ of 125+, so everyone here is most likely larping or using bs tests
 
  • +1
  • Ugh..
Reactions: mirinturbolowinhib, chudltn, Thief and 1 other person
5% of the world's population has an IQ of 125+, so everyone here is most likely larping or using bs tests
Can’t lie I’m fine being average IQ not a bad thing
 
  • +1
Reactions: Thief
  • Ugh..
  • +1
Reactions: mirinturbolowinhib and 2414763h
5% of the world's population has an IQ of 125+, so everyone here is most likely larping or using bs tests
dude my online iq test I took in 8 minutes told me im in the top 0.00001%!!!! Really must be a genius huh
 
  • JFL
Reactions: gemerald
dude my online iq test I took in 8 minutes told me im in the top 0.00001%!!!! Really must be a genius huh
i genuinely think its bait
 
  • Ugh..
Reactions: mirinturbolowinhib
Christopher Langan methodology behind the CTMU makes a compelling argument that it can be proven. He starts with defining reality as everything that exists and then also deduces what it must have to meet that definition. Free will or no free will should be able to be provable when deducing from this definition.

Think of it this way, if we define a chair as a "separate seat for one person, typically with a back and four legs.", then we can deduce the properties a chair needs to have, and we can prove whether those fundamental properties are possible within the definition of chair
I think Langan has just built that image of becoming the “IQ guy”

People overestimate him because verbal IQ is prioritised since it immediately highlights extent of capability (similar to :blackpill: surface-level) - thoughts/ideas contain too many variables + the perceived range of which can only be expressed in terms of actions (i.e words).. and he excels in this.
This being an example itself
But also like I said earlier, he forces himself to live up to being the “IQ guy”.. so he’s not guaranteed to be relatively superior than others (what IQ suggests), because others don’t see any benefit from using jargon + adding empty overcomplexities, that detract from the point
It’s clear he prioritises how he’s presented over what he contains ( :blackpill: )

This guy dismantled him well:


I don’t doubt he has a high IQ, around 150. I just think he’s full of himself + widely exaggerating the figure + hasn’t amounted to anything, so any sense of superiority he gets from his “claimed ceiling”, is limited by his shortcomings in other factors —> overall is barely above average (at least from society’s subjective frame)

Anyways, this is besides the point.. I explained why free will doesn’t exist in this post:

Btw, this guy likely had the highest IQ of all time:
1753404938236


This guy had the best God-given intuition of all time:
1753405260441


These two had some of the best minds (overall) of all time:
1753405468175
1753405491939
 
  • +1
Reactions: CorinthianLOX, LTNUser, gemerald and 1 other person
I think Langan has just built that image of becoming the “IQ guy”

People overestimate him because verbal IQ is prioritised since it immediately highlights extent of capability (similar to :blackpill: surface-level) - thoughts/ideas contain too many variables + the perceived range of which can only be expressed in terms of actions (i.e words).. and he excels in this.
This being an example itself
But also like I said earlier, he forces himself to live up to being the “IQ guy”.. so he’s not guaranteed to be relatively superior than others (what IQ suggests), because others don’t see any benefit from using jargon + adding empty overcomplexities, that detract from the point
It’s clear he prioritises how he’s presented over what he contains ( :blackpill: )

This guy dismantled him well:


I don’t doubt he has a high IQ, around 150. I just think he’s full of himself + widely exaggerating the figure + hasn’t amounted to anything, so any sense of superiority he gets from his “claimed ceiling”, is limited by his shortcomings in other factors —> overall is barely above average (at least from society’s subjective frame)

Anyways, this is besides the point.. I explained why free will doesn’t exist in this post:

Btw, this guy likely had the highest IQ of all time:
View attachment 3954937

This guy had the best God-given intuition of all time:
View attachment 3954945

These two had some of the best minds (overall) of all time:
View attachment 3954954 View attachment 3954955

Honorable mentions:
1753432937902
1753433094902
1753433117981
1753433051840
1753433142346
 
  • +1
Reactions: CorinthianLOX, LTNUser and greycel
What is the range that you would define as high iq?
 
Individuals I can have advanced conversations within topics like computational linguistics, formal language theory, theories of everything, mathematics, philosophy, history, cliodynamics, systems science, cognitive science, game theory, computer science and artificial intelligence, biology, classical and quantum physics, economics (behavioral and cognitive especially), sociology (honest, not woke), etc.

Disclaimer: This question should not be seen as me presupposing that I am a "High IQ" person, rather, that I seek to know who I can have advanced conversations with.
@InanimatePragmatist and @PrinceLuenLeoncur are the only high iq users I have come across
 
Myself, I used to post nothing but high-IQ threads and guides and theories and whatnot, greycels didn't care, nor did forum users, because I'm not friends with anyone here. They'd rather fall for racebaiting threads or make the same indian chad joke 100x

So I gave up, and now I just shitpost
I used to also but quit
 
Under this interpretation, free will emerges naturally as a manifestation of reality's intrinsic self-causation. Agents within this self-determined reality actively participate in shaping the universe's evolving structure and unfolding narrative, consistent with the CTMU's characterization of reality as a cognitive self-simulation or Self-Configuring Self-Processing Language (SCSPL).
Ive not read this so he might of already debunked this but randomness does exist
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: enchanted_elixir
M
Individuals I can have advanced conversations within topics like computational linguistics, formal language theory, theories of everything, mathematics, philosophy, history, cliodynamics, systems science, cognitive science, game theory, computer science and artificial intelligence, biology, classical and quantum physics, economics (behavioral and cognitive especially), sociology (honest, not woke), etc.

Disclaimer: This question should not be seen as me presupposing that I am a "High IQ" person, rather, that I seek to know who I can have advanced conversations with.
E
 
  • JFL
Reactions: LTNUser
@TheAncientMacedonia see that everyone recognizes how low IQ you are?
I mean he's a troll so his job is to troll every user
 
  • +1
Reactions: Panzram
@Abra is one
Individuals I can have advanced conversations within topics like computational linguistics, formal language theory, theories of everything, mathematics, philosophy, history, cliodynamics, systems science, cognitive science, game theory, computer science and artificial intelligence, biology, classical and quantum physics, economics (behavioral and cognitive especially), sociology (honest, not woke), etc.

Disclaimer: This question should not be seen as me presupposing that I am a "High IQ" person, rather, that I seek to know who I can have advanced conversations with.
 
I'm actually high iq tho, believe it or not
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: iblamexyz and existingandliving
Individuals I can have advanced conversations within topics like computational linguistics, formal language theory, theories of everything, mathematics, philosophy, history, cliodynamics, systems science, cognitive science, game theory, computer science and artificial intelligence, biology, classical and quantum physics, economics (behavioral and cognitive especially), sociology (honest, not woke), etc.

Disclaimer: This question should not be seen as me presupposing that I am a "High IQ" person, rather, that I seek to know who I can have advanced conversations with.
Me I got 131 iq on mensa( even though the the process of measuring iq itself is inaccurate and there are a lot of things that are left from these iq tests, id say ireas about alot of the things you listed. So i might be “high iq“)
 
Christopher langan does believe in God but his framework has it in a panpsychist view, aka god=reality.
The very structure of reality IS God.

Maybe you should check it out whenever you're bored and remember this, if you want.
Btw Christopher langan is a fraud and it's statistically impossible to have the iq score that he claims he does.
 

Similar threads

ascension
Replies
24
Views
296
JohnBaza
JohnBaza
Jué
Replies
55
Views
524
karmacita901
karmacita901
_MVP_
Replies
1
Views
193
talcel
talcel
Sloppyseconds
Replies
11
Views
1K
davidlaidisme67
davidlaidisme67

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top