n9wiff
BDD 6/6 (Brahminboss dethronement day)
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2023
- Posts
- 4,085
- Reputation
- 4,612
eye area is such an important and most interesting feature of the face imo.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
what about guy 1?
what are their PSLs/ratings?maesthetic. Dimorphism is there but not enough to be aggresive like 2 or ogreish in any way.
5-6. eye area difference.what about guy 1?
I have no experience in PSL ratings nor do I know how towhat are their PSLs/ratings?
gotcha. what about mouth and lower third?5-6. eye area difference.
no problem, what about out of 10?I have no experience in PSL ratings nor do I know how to
Watereye area is such an important and most interesting feature of the face imo.
They have similar jaw sizes and projections tbh. Differences in perspective I think are just attributed to the lighting and difference in image dimensions. No.1 has a wider face and looks less angular but I believe this is due to the fact that the lighting is different and no.1 is literally wider. Neck is also at a different angle which is throwing the perception off. No.1 has a longer philtrum which is ironic because a longer philtrum is typically an androgenic feature. I would still rank No.1 as a more feminine face compared to no.2 just because a longer philtrum is NOT exclusive to a male and isn't a sign of androgenic development as something like the eye area and hair growth pattern differences. No.1 has a smaller, less filled lips but they wouldn't make much of a difference imo if the two features on both men were switched because both lips aren't too "thin" nor "plump" to effect the face too much. Both sizes are just nice and have minimal effects because both faces have much more robust features.gotcha. what about mouth and lower third?
No.1no problem, what about out of 10?
He's gathering data on what humans find attractive then he'll make chad robots to take over humanityCan Xangsane be banned for being an AI and not an actual human being? @Jason Voorhees @Michael Myers
14-23 year olds will probably go for #1I'm testing a theory since someone on here says "slightly less GL men have more appeal than giga GL men especially if masc"
I do! Forgot so so sorrywhy didn’t you tag me?
do you not care about my opinion
Why14-23 year olds will probably go for #1
What’s their psl difference? How masc is 2 compared to 125-40 will go for #2 because they are looking for someone more masculine
Thats what i’ve learned
1st one is a nigger he looks like a man from a 1980 movie@hasba1feuj why 2
Y1st one is a nigger he looks like a man from a 1980 movie
Has female appeal because of the soft featuresWhy
What’s their psl difference? How masc is 2 compared to 1
2 looks more dangerous than 1 but 1 looks more appealing thats why i was listing the ages of women who would go for eachWhy
What’s their psl difference? How masc is 2 compared to 1
What soft featuresHas female appeal because of the soft features
Y2 looks more dangerous than 1
More fem features or lower psl and more approachable?but 1 looks more appealing thats why i was listing the ages of women who would go for each
Eyes specificallyWhat soft features
Y
More fem features or lower psl and more approachable?
Why 1 ova 21. People here know nothing as usual.
Y him1 ofc
FairsEyes specifically
I wouldnt say it lowers or boosts PSl its all about facial harmony
You voted 21. People here know nothing as usual.
So psl wise what’s this and are they Chad chadlite or htn?They have similar jaw sizes and projections tbh. Differences in perspective I think are just attributed to the lighting and difference in image dimensions. No.1 has a wider face and looks less angular but I believe this is due to the fact that the lighting is different and no.1 is literally wider. Neck is also at a different angle which is throwing the perception off. No.1 has a longer philtrum which is ironic because a longer philtrum is typically an androgenic feature. I would still rank No.1 as a more feminine face compared to no.2 just because a longer philtrum is NOT exclusive to a male and isn't a sign of androgenic development as something like the eye area and hair growth pattern differences. No.1 has a smaller, less filled lips but they wouldn't make much of a difference imo if the two features on both men were switched because both lips aren't too "thin" nor "plump" to effect the face too much. Both sizes are just nice and have minimal effects because both faces have much more robust features.
I think the only main divisive factors are the tightness of orbital area and the nose. No.2 has a more projected straighter nose it seems. No.2 also has tighter orbitals and thicker eyebrows. The nose perception could be altered by the shadows making it seem stornger than no.1 but undoubtedly the eybrows on no.2 breaks the chances of no.2 becoming a pretty boy because the eyebrows are so much stronger and postively tilted. Giving that subtle aggresive tone to the ey area.
No.1
Eye Area = 7/10
Nose = 7/10
Lips = 9/10
Jaw/Lower third = 7/10
Final rating : 7.5
No.2
Eye Area = 7/10
Nose = 8/10
Lips = 9/10
Jaw/Lower third = 8/10
Final rating : 8
Reasoning for nose difference : No.2 has a less bulbous tip from what I can see so I can safely say he has more aesthetic projection from the side as well.
Reasoning for difference in lower third rating = Jaw just looks leaner, dk how to describe
YThe same
Y
Why 11. People here know nothing as usual.
Pat meAre u freky vroh
Thoughts?Getting jacked will increase sex appeal but also make you more intimidating/less approachable
Everybody who has packed on muscle knows this is the truth. Women simply become more intimidated by your presence and overall you will be less approachable. And this is not to say that you should stay a lanklet, but when you're skinny you are way friendlier in the eyes of women. You should...looksmax.orgWho is more likely to be rotting in a 9-5 wagecage after uni?
Inspired by https://looksmax.org/threads/fucking-a-stacy-becomes-1000x-more-difficult-after-21.1029563/ @forevergymcellinglooksmax.orgSimple way to judge sex appeal
I remember reading somebody here saying if you imagine someone dominantly fucking a woman and it feels brutal, he has high sex appeal. It seemed gay when I read it about it but when I think about it now its true. Imagine Chico or Barrett dominantly throatfucking a chick. JFL Now imagine someone...looksmax.orgDo first-born sons typically mog their youger brothers?
From your experiences, does the first born son usually mog/look better than their younger brothers? IMO the older brother is usually more ogre than the younger. He might look more masc but overall has worse features and has more outlier type of traits. Like he gets the more extreme traits for...looksmax.org
Pat Pat my favourite autistPat me
Although 1 has a more compact midface which may be considered an indicator of youth, and larger eyes which is a more feminine trait and also another potential indicator of youth, 2's features are a lot more striking and model-esque which is something most women "born in 2002 or after" would not only prefer but also expect in an attractive face now.Y
Why 1
Pat me
Thoughts?
Y1 has more appeal
PAT PAT!Pat Pat my favourite autist
What do you rate them and what makes 2 look more modelesque?Although 1 has a more compact midface which may be considered an indicator of youth, and larger eyes which is a more feminine trait and also another potential indicator of youth, 2's features are a lot more striking and model-esque which is something most women "born in 2002 or after" would not only prefer but also expect in an attractive face now.
The combo of thick lips [feminine trait] with a strong jaw and brows creates a nice contrast which almost mirrors your own.
Taking another look, despite 1's greater potential for a more youthful appearance, 2 actually seems to have better "youthful" looking skin though this could also just be an effect created by his darker colouring idk.
1 htn - potential low chadliteWhat do you rate them and what makes 2 look more modelesque?
Not necessarily, he just has a mix of some femine traits combined with more masc/dom features in the same vein as the fem/masc contrast I've mentioned in your face before.Wait so guy 2 looks a lot like me?
PSL wise first one would be chadlite and second would be chad because no.2 has fuller lips, darker eyebrows, more dimorphism etc.So psl wise what’s this and are they Chad chadlite or htn?
1’s failos?PSL wise first one would be chadlite and second would be chad because no.2 has fuller lips, darker eyebrows, more dimorphism etc.
Nose not as sharply projected from the picture + looking wide faced and higher bf% is keeping him from Chad. Irregular jaw.1’s failos?
What about collagenNose not as sharply projected from the picture + looking wide faced and higher bf% is keeping him from Chad. Irregular jaw.
Can't tell with these pics but I'd assume no.2 has more just because of how his skin looksWhat about collagen
Lifefuel I look really similar to 2, but sharper eyes and worse nose/eyebrow thickness
LarpLifefuel I look really similar to 2, but sharper eyes and worse nose/eyebrow thickness
DM me I'm not showing my face, but I'll send you my eye area and you can tell I look similar to this dudeLarp
What’s your rating and pheno
okay!DM me I'm not showing my face, but I'll send you my eye area and you can tell I look similar to this dude
I look like a shit version of this guy and not softmaxxed
parity in looksY
Any you’re leaning towards?