케이제이
Master
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2024
- Posts
- 1,663
- Reputation
- 2,213
I want to know who this great mind is
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
I’m asking it, Am I not, bitchboy?Is this a serious question?
im half korean i cant read koreanthoughI want to know who this great mind is
Sorry to hearim half korean
@160cmcurryI want to know who this great mind is
Ok interesting, finally a serious answerTechnically the first notable blackpiller would be Charles Darwin and Alfred Russel Wallace since they proposed natural selection
The term blackpill was popularized by a man named Paragon on a blog called Omega Virgin RevoltOk interesting, finally a serious answer
The premise of the question makes no sense... blackpill is the conclusion everyone with a brain reaches in early childhood. Regarding who coined the term, there isn't any known user, though it emerged in the early 2010s on the psl forums. It was likely just some joke made about a blue or redpiller that organically evolved from thereI’m asking it, Am I not, bitchboy?
@Clavicularits the BP CEO
Actually blake p. ill the fifthbuhla ckp ill the fifth

The blackpill was originally proposed as a contrast to the traditional bluepill and redpill, which valued either personality or money/status over everything else for romantic success. The blackpill, however, argued that looks were overwhelmingly the predominant factor in determining romantic success. It was later expanded to include general genetic determinism, but that wasn't part of it initially. While you could argue that the first self-proclaimed blackpillers weren't actually blackpilled, given the current definition of the word, that doesn't mean anyone who believes in genetic determinism is blackpilled. I feel like saying that they were the first blackpillers is equally unreasonable, as we only know that they fulfilled one of the criteria, which was the same criterion considered sufficient to disregard those who only advocated lookism. If only one "criterion" is needed, then there would 100% have been someone before Darwin and Wallace, considering that lookism is easily observable unless you're retarded.Technically the first notable blackpiller would be Charles Darwin and Alfred Russel Wallace since they proposed natural selection
i dont think this is trueblackpill is the conclusion everyone with a brain reaches in early childhood
MeI want to know who this great mind is
disclaimer: i am not very educated on the topic i just know superficial stuffThe blackpill was originally proposed as a contrast to the traditional bluepill and redpill, which valued either personality or money/status over everything else for romantic success. The blackpill, however, argued that looks were overwhelmingly the predominant factor in determining romantic success. It was later expanded to include general genetic determinism, but that wasn't part of it initially. While you could argue that the first self-proclaimed blackpillers weren't actually blackpilled, given the current definition of the word, that doesn't mean anyone who believes in genetic determinism is blackpilled. I feel like saying that they were the first blackpillers is equally unreasonable, as we only know that they fulfilled one of the criteria, which was the same criterion considered sufficient to disregard those who only advocated lookism. If only one "criterion" is needed, then there would 100% have been someone before Darwin and Wallace, considering that lookism is easily observable unless you're retarded.
@shedontluv-U @fedecope thoughts?
but if i’m not mistaken the blackpill didnt only talk about romantic success, but overall life quality and treatment from othersmeI want to know who this great mind is