Why 5ar inhibitors might be worth it <18? Need your thoughts

[Fleisch]

Wassup,

I was still thinking. Yes, ofcourse at 16/17 u won't be having A lot of hairloss, and androgenetic alopeatia is low.

But since it gets stronger over time
Would it be effective to shut this system down partly as soon as possible be more ideal for remaining healthy, thick and strong hair?

Ofc some sides appear when younger. But i could see no reason why prevention of minutirisation would be bad at any age.

Lets even say u were 18-20, just for sake of argument ( You dont have any hairloss yet)
I couldd't tell u a single argument for why it would NOT be good to start taking FIN
Since I just take it for prevention & keeping thick hair, *17 and on Fin* with 0 sides yet

 

[Giorgio]

Would it be effective to shut this system down partly as soon as possible be more ideal for remaining healthy, thick and strong hair?

no u fucking idiot, if you disable your DHT you won't develop secondary sexual characteristics, like jaw width/mass, deep voice, dick size...
in puberty, you want to DHTmaxx actually, even if you were to get some hairloss it would be worth it, only start blocking DHT after like 22 or so, or when you're sure you're completely developed

 

[qwertynineofive]

16/17 is very different to 18/20. I'm super pro 5ar inhibition but dht is required for penile growth during puberty. I would wait until at least 18, I started just after my 20th birthday

 

[Fleisch]

no u fucking idiot, if you disable your DHT you won't develop secondary sexual characteristics, like jaw width/mass, deep voice, dick size...
in puberty, you want to DHTmaxx actually, even if you were to get some hairloss it would be worth it, only start blocking DHT after like 22 or so, or when you're sure you're completely developed

Ok lets just ignore this. This is utterly stupid and you just dont know how the development works lmao, With <18 i dont mean 10 years old, as i said, i meant 16-17.

 

[Giorgio]

Ok lets just ignore this. This is utterly stupid and you just dont know how the development works lmao, With <18 i dont mean 10 years old, as i said, i meant 16-17.

many still develop secondary characteristics and still masculinize even into their late teens and early 20s

 

[PharmaPhaggot]

Wassup,

I was still thinking. Yes, ofcourse at 16/17 u won't be having A lot of hairloss, and androgenetic alopeatia is low.

But since it gets stronger over time
Would it be effective to shut this system down partly as soon as possible be more ideal for remaining healthy, thick and strong hair?

Ofc some sides appear when younger. But i could see no reason why prevention of minutirisation would be bad at any age.

Lets even say u were 18-20, just for sake of argument ( You dont have any hairloss yet)
I couldd't tell u a single argument for why it would NOT be good to start taking FIN
Since I just take it for prevention & keeping thick hair, *17 and on Fin* with 0 sides yet

No reason benefit in doing so, youre always able to nuke it and save your hair

And youre leaving dick gains on the table

 

[Fleisch]

No reason benefit in doing so, youre always able to nuke it and save your hair

And youre leaving dick gains on the table

Minutirization will still happen, dick is 99% done near 16, and the rest of the growth after 16 is not depends on DHT anymore, it has already been proven that Test takes over at that age for growth

 

[PharmaPhaggot]

Minutirization will still happen,

No, u less you got death tiee gwnwtics in which case you can just ru for a year or 2

dick is 99% done near 16

Sure but even if youre just missing out on half an inch youve just lost half an inch for 0 benefit

and the rest of the growth after 16 is not depends on DHT anymore, it has already been proven that Test takes over at that age for growth

Proven where? That would make zero sense since both of their mechanisms as androgens remains the exact same at all times