D
Deleted member 12217
Luminary
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2021
- Posts
- 9,638
- Reputation
- 11,865
It kind of goes against the good genes theory
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
I don’t think That chads could solve high physics math even if they tried. Those habits usually form way earlier in childhood where Lookism is that presentThey have to be good at something to be liked by normies unlike chads
No. I’m talking about actual insane high iq ppl like EinsteinYour confusing intelligence with education
Well he was average looking not really uglyNo. I’m talking about actual insane high iq ppl like Einstein
Lundgren also, above average face Insane height/ body/ IQ, became a millionaire and fucked a lot of girls on his youth, and is probably doing that nowWell he was average looking not really ugly
So the changes of someone being very high iq and gl are smaller then average looks and high IQ
All I see are htns/beckies at best.![]()
50 Sexy Scientists
www-businessinsider-com.cdn.ampproject.org
these people are so insanely rare, they usually look averageNo. I’m talking about actual insane high iq ppl like Einstein
That's cause really attractive people are rareAll I see are htns/beckies at best.
To normies they are thoThat's cause really attractive people are rare
Genes or environmentAlso good genes theory is %100 true compare European people with other races you know, higher iq higher masculinity taller and even bigger dicks than most of the other races
yes. But good genes theory mean the insanely good looking people should also be the insanely smart ones.That's cause really attractive people are rare
They don’t have a larger brain lolLarger brain takes up more cholesterol therefore less resources for the body to develop especially with our low fat diets these days.
When this list was made, normies basically selected above avg looking scientist cause their mind had the idea that scientists are usually below avg looking ( in overall population )To normies they are tho
I get called hot irl but I am objectively htn at best
Isaac Newton has a peanut sized brain, caveman had bigger brains tooLarger brain takes up more cholesterol therefore less resources for the body to develop especially with our low fat diets these days.
No. You have chad tier forward growthTo normies they are tho
I get called hot irl but I am objectively htn at best
No forward growth for my potato nose and horsefaceNo. You have chad tier forward growth
Yeah low classes are usually uglier than mid class or high class. The question is why it fails at the very top.It isn't true
Plenty of low class people that are ugly + low iq
Most of them if not all of themIt isn't true
Plenty of low class people that are ugly + low iq
Good looking people get so many job offers with minimum qualifications, they don't need to stemaxx unless it's their passion which lets be honest, is a cope most of the time. Normie scientist often tell people they love doing science but it's a gigacope. If someone gave them 1 billion dollars , a group of hot girls and a yacht. 100% of them would leave wageslave science research to enjoy lifeGenes or environment
yes. But good genes theory mean the insanely good looking people should also be the insanely smart ones.
CopeGood looking people get so many job offers with minimum qualifications, they don't need to stemaxx unless it's their passion which lets be honest, is a cope.Normie scientist tell people they love doing science but it's a cope. If someone gave them 1 billion dollar, a hot group of girls and a yacht. 100% of them would leave wageslave science research to enjoy life
I think iq has nothing to do with looks unless you have a syndrome like downs etc. Heck even crouzons or treacher collins can have a normal iqIt isn't true
Plenty of low class people that are ugly + low iq
Get rhinoplastyNo forward growth for my potato nose and horseface![]()
I don’t think That chads could solve high physics math even if they tried. Those habits usually form way earlier in childhood where Lookism is that present
There seems to be a sweet spot in intelligence for attractive people, maybe like 110-120? So above the average but certainly not genius levelIt kind of goes against the good genes theory
They have to be good at something to be liked by normies unlike chads
Maybe it means that high intelligence doesn’t mean good genes as it’s somewhat a defect which Causes non NT behavior?There seems to be a sweet spot in intelligence for attractive people, maybe like 110-120? So above the average but certainly not genius level
Many law, finance, business and other chaddy major students are probably around that
If we go higher than that we get to STEM territory which is full of unattractive, non neurotypical people
Maybe it means that high intelligence doesn’t mean good genes as it’s somewhat a defect which Causes non NT behavior?
I came to the same conclusion