Why didn’t humans evolve a “subhumanity detector” that rejects zygotes with bad genes?

[thecel]

Scenario A: Male population: 100 90 subhumans 10 Chads Female population: 100 99 desirable by men 1 deformed

Scenario B: Male population: 10 All Chads Female population: 100 99 desirable by men 1 deformed

---

The amounts of sex had in both scenarios are roughly the same. Since women only want Chads, there's no biological reason to have so many weak, genetically inferior males around. Females carrying these male fetuses and raising them is nothing but a waste of time; these subhuman males do jack shit for the species.

Y'all know how, in sexual reproduction the sperm fertilizes the egg and the genes get mixed up and recombine and stuff like that? Why isn't there a way for the female reproductive system to reject a zygote if it happens to have XY chromozomes and be utterly subhuman, weak, and useless for the advancement of the species?

---

UPDATE: A zygote is the cell you get when a sperm cell fertilizes an egg cell. Genetic recombination has already taken place. You can tell from this zygote whether the future baby will be subhuman or Chad.

 

[AcneScars]

The mother’s genetics matter too and I’m proof of it, my dad is 5’9 Chadpreet and my mom is 4’10 Becky and I turned out 5’5

 

[thecel]

The mother’s genetics matter too and I’m proof of it, my dad is 5’9 Chadpreet and my mom is 4’10 Becky and I turned out 5’5

Yeah, but if the resulting zygote is subhuman male, the mother's body should simply deny gestation

 

[Chadeep]

The mother’s genetics matter too and I’m proof of it, my dad is 5’9 Chadpreet and my mom is 4’10 Becky and I turned out 5’5

Brutal My Mom and Dad Both 5'3 and 5'6 Meanwhile I'm 6ft.

 

[Ocelot]

well if we didn't evolve such a thing, clearly there's no biological mechanism or at least an "affordable" one that does such a thing.

but the whole genetics/evolution thing is an absolute brainfuck once you get deep into it

 

[john2]

The mother’s genetics matter too and I’m proof of it, my dad is 5’9 Chadpreet and my mom is 4’10 Becky and I turned out 5’5

From what I have seen environment and nutrition plays a huge role in this too.
My dad is 5'10", mother's 5'2", I turned out 186 cm (I am above 18 yo).

Scenario A: Male population: 100 90 subhumans 10 Chads Female population: 100 99 desirable by men 1 deformed

Scenario B: Male population: 10 All Chads Female population: 100 99 desirable by men 1 deformed

---

The amounts of offspring created in both scenarios are roughly the same. Since women only want Chads, there's no biological reason to have so many weak, genetically inferior males around. Females carrying these male fetuses and raising them is nothing but a waste of time; these subhuman males do jack shit for the species.

Y'all know how, in sexual reproduction the sperm fertilizes the egg and the genes get mixed up and recombine and stuff like that? Why isn't there a way for the female reproductive system to reject a zygote if it happens to have XY chromozomes and be utterly subhuman, weak, and useless for the advancement of the species?

If such a thing actually existed then the human population would have been no more than 70 million or so.

 

[Albeacho]

The mother’s genetics matter too and I’m proof of it, my dad is 5’9 Chadpreet and my mom is 4’10 Becky and I turned out 5’5

Why do you have an Iranian flag in your bio?

 

[Albeacho]

Brutal My Mom and Dad Both 5'3 and 5'6 Meanwhile I'm 6ft.

Either you can’t measure your self for shit and consider 5’9 or less to be 6 feet or your dad is a cuck.

 

[thecel]

If such a thing actually existed then the human population would have been no more than 70 million or so.

How?

Ofc the population would be smaller because all the subhuman males don't exist jfl, but it wouldn't be 70 million low. See this:

The amounts of sex had in both scenarios is roughly the same.

(I edited the original post)

 

[Chadeep]

Either you can’t measure your self for shit and consider 5’9 or less to be 6 feet or your dad is a cuck.

Measured myself with a stadiometer. Dad grew up in a poor family without getting proper nutrition.

 

[AcneScars]

Yeah, but if the resulting zygote is subhuman male, the mother's body should simply deny gestation

How would you determine the subhumanity of a fetus at conception? Things like environment and diet matter a lot too

Why do you have an Iranian flag in your bio?

Cuz why not

 

[Albeacho]

Measured myself with a stadiometer. Dad grew up in a poor family without getting proper nutrition.

You lucked out tbh. my mother is 5’7.5 and my dad is 5’10. I’m currently only 6’1.

 

[thecel]

How would you determine the subhumanity of a fetus at conception? Things like environment and diet matter a lot too

Some subhumans are genetic subhumans. They can't be saved even with the best environment.

Some other subhumans are genetically normies but grew up with shit environment and poor diet.

The anti-subhumanity biological system just detects genetic subhumans. It won't get rid of ALL subhumanity, but it'll effectively remove the vast majority.

 

[Deleted member 11671]

evolution doesn't have a direction or intent, it just is

 

[Deleted member 6273]

The amount of sex had wouldn't be the same women are hypergamous by nature and men are competitive, the concept of good enough is alien it's all about getting the best.

Women don't necessarily want chads they want the best available option available, even if they are no chads they'll pick the next best option, and even if there are only chads they'll want gigachads.

 

[Chadeep]

You lucked out tbh. my mother is 5’7.5 and my dad is 5’10. I’m currently only 6’1.

Not Surprising tbh. My Mom Had potential to be tall. My Uncles and Grandfather from Maternal side are above 6ft.

 

[thecel]

The amount of sex had wouldn't be the same women are hypergamous by nature and men are competitive, the concept of good enough is alien it's all about getting the best.

Women don't necessarily want chads they want the best available option available, even if they are no chads they'll pick the next best option, and even if there are only chads they'll want gigachads.

Females have the same amount of sex regardless of the male population size, and this is precisely due to hypergamy.

Let's imagine a world with 100 women and an unknown number of men. All of these 100 women are hypergamous and want the #1 top Gigachad. But even Gigachad is bound by the laws of physics. He can't mate with all 100 women at once. So, when the #1 most attractive man is "occupied," the remaining women go for the #2 most attractive man, and so on and so forth. At the end, these 100 women could've won over the top 5, top 10, perhaps top 20 men.

If the male population in the scenario were 100, 200, 500, 1000, etc., it'd make no difference to the quantity of males that females try to get with. Maximal hypergamy means they always chase after the top #1 guy and go 1 rank down the list if that guy is unavailable.

You said "even if there are only chads they'll want gigachads," but that doesn't mean the amount of sex will be lower. Think about it like this: If you have a male population of 10 Chads, and then you add 1 Gigachad, would females then no longer want to have sex with the 10 Chads just because the Gigachad exists now? No, it doesn't make any sense.

 

[Deleted member 6273]

Getting rid of the most undesirable males won't lower the amount of sex women have. Yes, the average looks level will be higher and thus standards will rise, but humans all have a certain amount of horniness so people will have enough sex to satisfy their urges.

You said "even if there are only chads they'll want gigachads," but that doesn't mean the amount of sex will be lower. Think about it like this: If you have a male population of 10 Chads and add 1 Gigachad, would females then no longer want to have sex with the 10 Chads just because the Gigachad exists now? No, it doesn't make any sense.

It will attractiveness is always relative to average, women are attracted to the winners, very best nature has to offer, the concept of being good enough is alien. In actuality countries with more attractive men on average tend to have the highest incel rates.

It's not only true for humans but mammals in general, think about birds especially since many can't forcefully copulate (rape) so they develop more ridiculous characteristics to keep competing and the females keep picking the very top making the features more absurd and even evolutionarily detrimental.

 

[thecel]

It will attractiveness is always relative to average, women are attracted to the winners, very best nature has to offer, the concept of being good enough is alien. In actuality countries with more attractive men on average tend to have the highest incel rates.

It's not only true for humans but mammals in general, think about birds especially since many can't forcefully copulate (rape) so they develop more ridiculous characteristics to keep competing and the females keep picking the very top making the features more absurd and even evolutionarily detrimental.
View attachment 1066693View attachment 1066696

How does it affect the amount of sex females have?

 

[Chadeep]

How does it affect the amount of sex females have?

Not all of them can lock down Chad. They settle with a Ugly Normie and have kids with him as he's easier to control and she has upper hand in relationship.

 

[thecel]

Not all of them can lock down Chad. They settle with a Ugly Normie and have kids with him as he's easier to control and she has upper hand in relationship.

So, would eliminating all the undesirable men from the population increase or decrease the total amount of sex had?

 

[Chadeep]

So, would eliminating all the undesirable men from the population increase or decrease the total amount of sex had?

They will have more sex with Chad's I think it would increase.

 

[Deleted member 6273]

How does it affect the amount of sex females have?

Yeah I get your point I hadn't seen the edit.

If you have a male population of 10 Chads and add 1 Gigachad, would females then no longer want to have sex with the 10 Chads just because the Gigachad exists now? No, it doesn't make any sense.

This is what I primarily disagree with. I'm saying women will want to have sex with the best that exists and will be more reluctant to have sex with the worst available (since women are hypergamous by nature) regardless of how good the worst option is. It's how nature works, that's why I talked about birds which have undergone and continue to undergo extreme sexual selection independent of how much more unique and better they look.

The gender imbalance will cause extreme competition for the few best of the best, I do agree that in this scenario even the no.10 ranked chad will probably get laid though not as frequently as you think. Women (females) in general have lower sex drives can suppress their sexual desires longer than men, they'll only go for the lower ranking males if the top ones are physically unattainable (which even in your second scenario they are attainable).

 

[Blackgymmax]

It will attractiveness is always relative to average, women are attracted to the winners, very best nature has to offer, the concept of being good enough is alien. In actuality countries with more attractive men on average tend to have the highest incel rates.

It's not only true for humans but mammals in general, think about birds especially since many can't forcefully copulate (rape) so they develop more ridiculous characteristics to keep competing and the females keep picking the very top making the features more absurd and even evolutionarily detrimental.
View attachment 1066693View attachment 1066696

This
Even if women could filter out subhuman genes,theyd just raise the bar.

 

[SkinjobCatastrophe]

Sexual attraction is just one element of selection. Humans select directly based on things like sexual attractiveness or social status, but also indirectly on things like survivorship, population movement, and a million other things. Physical attractiveness is so easy and plain for us to identify but other genetic traits are just as important for the species survival and reproduction and those are not always going to coincide with good looks

 

[Amnesia]

Stopped reading at evolution

 

[gaymidget]

1. No selection due to advanced civilization 2. women maybe be more desirable but they aren't necessarily genetically better (health, height, strength, bones). So when they get children, the kid can turn out to be subhuman or only average.
Also, genetic recombination can make 2 subhumans produce a chad and vice versa.

 

[thecel]

1. No selection due to advanced civilization 2. women maybe be more desirable but they aren't necessarily genetically better (health, height, strength, bones). So when they get children, the kid can turn out to be subhuman or only average.
Also, genetic recombination can make 2 subhumans produce a chad and vice versa.

A zygote is the cell you get when a sperm cell fertilizes an egg cell. Genetic recombination has already taken place. You can tell from this zygote whether the future baby will be subhuman or Chad.

 

[goat2x]

maybe that will happen in the future but few years ago it wasnt like this

im talking pre 1990 times

 

[Deleted member 9787]

i guess but we’re still animals

 

[Chad69]

Interesting

 

[Deleted member 8576]

Interesting