LefortCandidate
fake hobbies for tinder
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2025
- Posts
- 1,302
- Reputation
- 2,011
Genuine question brehs
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
they say 12-14No evidence
U actually make decent pointGenuine question brehs
Who says thatthey say 12-14
Who says that
She wasn't 12 bro wtf, she was 14-16 and according to Christian beliefs wasn't impregnanted
she didnt, there's zero evidence for this claim. it's just muslim made bs
No evidence
she didnt, there's zero evidence for this claim. it's just muslim made bs
Who says that
this scholar says 12-14 (time stamped)She wasn't 12 bro wtf, she was 14-16 and according to Christian beliefs wasn't impregnanted
the scholar consensus is 12-14Thanks for proving his point.... bhai
correct, guesses and estimates. and according to Church tradition and writings of saints she was taken from the temple after puberty, so she was likely 15-18 or so, which a completely normal age to marry during 1st century.
the scholar consensus is 12-14
see the video above
this scholar says 12-14 (time stamped)
wrongcorrect, guesses and estimates. and according to Church tradition and writings of saints she was taken from the temple after puberty, so she was likely 15-18 or so, which a completely normal age to marry during 1st century.
also all the church fathers, saints and Jesus Christ Himself always said that sex with children is one of the worst sins and it's the official position of the Church to this day
thats a video of 2 manlets yapping about their guesses
as google told you, there is no evidence for this claim.
ah breh these are credible scholars in the christian cimmunitythats a video of 2 manlets yapping about their guesses
as google told you, there is no evidence for this claim.
If your title is sincere...?Genuine question brehs
"MANY SCHOLARS SUGGEST SHE WAS LIKELY 14-16"
There's only 2 sources :
-the Protoevangelium of James reported that she was 16 years old when she became pregnant with Jesus
-History of Joseph the Carpenter claimed she was 14 years old.
correct, they're heretics and not credible by any meansah breh these are credible scholars in the christian cimmunity
12 yo aren't dimorphic brehIf your title is sincere...?
I guess you're referring to how we trash muslims???
It's because there's a high likelihood that Mary, ignoring the virgin birth and lifelong virginity for a second, would have at least looked sexually dimorphic; if Joseph was aroused by her, that's not pedo.
Muhammad, on the other hand, went for a 9 y/o.
All the way.
I've never seen a dimorphic 9 y/o - they look indistinguishable from little boys...
Hence, pedo.
Even if she was pregnant at this age i dont rly see the issue considering it was a miracle birth that had nothing to do with sexual relations or anything
Because she was forced to carry a baby . Thats The bad partThats why I asked him, even if we concede that is 12 there is no way pedophilia is involved
She remained virgin her whole life and she was in fact sinless untouched
And Joseph didn't even move a single finger, he acted like a father figure for Jesus and the protector of Mary, nothing more
Thats why I asked him, even if we concede that is 12 there is no way pedophilia is involved
She remained virgin her whole life and she was in fact sinless untouched
And Joseph didn't even move a single finger, he acted like a father figure for Jesus and the protector of Mary, nothing more
12 yo cannot consent breh@LefortCandidate Even if she was 12 : How is it pedophilia when she gave birth as a VIRGIN
Never heard of either of themah breh these are credible scholars in the christian cimmunity
People throw around the word pedo far too loosely its like the 90s satanic panic at this pointThats why I asked him, even if we concede that is 12 there is no way pedophilia is involved
She remained virgin her whole life and she was in fact sinless untouched
And Joseph didn't even move a single finger, he acted like a father figure for Jesus and the protector of Mary, nothing more
If your title is sincere...?
I guess you're referring to how we trash muslims???
It's because there's a high likelihood that Mary, ignoring the virgin birth and lifelong virginity for a second, would have at least looked sexually dimorphic; if Joseph was aroused by her, that's not pedo.
Muhammad, on the other hand, went for a 9 y/o.
All the way.
I've never seen a dimorphic 9 y/o - they look indistinguishable from little boys...
Hence, pedo.
Disagree, they can be...12 yo aren't dimorphic breh
No evidence she got pregnant at 12
Never heard of either of them
The only legitimate voice in the Christian community is the church
tommy aquinas also set age of marriage at 12 brehscorrect, they're heretics and not credible by any means
That has to be ragebait12 yo cannot consent breh
Proof? Nature made them able to get pregnant so why shouldnt they?12 yo cannot consent breh
ive never seen a dimorphic 12 yo brehDisagree, they can be...
That's a statement of fact.
Everyone here has seen with their own eyes.
Now, less likely to be dimorphic vs. 14?
Of course. No argument.
Plus.
Virgin birth. That's a big deal.
In fact, a lifelong virgin.
That's a hella big deal.
There's also a big distinction I forgot.tommy aquinas also set age of marriage at 12 brehs
is he heretic ?
if i drug you and inject you with my semen and you get pregnantThat has to be ragebait
You're fucking low IQ
SHE DIDN'T HAVE TO CONSENT BECAUSE NO ONE HAD SEXUAL INTERCOURSE WITH HER, AS SHE IS A VIRGIN. THAT'S IN HER NAME BRO
tommy aquinas also set age of marriage at 12 brehs
is he heretic ?
Thomas also didnt say that Mary had gone through the conception at twelveThe only legitimate voice in the Christian community is the church
Because she was forced to carry a baby . Thats The bad part
i am not muslim big broThere's also a big distinction I forgot.
Typing fast cause I wanna get food.
Muhammads life is sunnah; it's the perfect example for muslims to live.
No one in the Christian theology sets and example of fucking minors as perfection.
Big fookin difference...
Ciao, off for munch
Not Analogousif i drug you and inject you with my semen and you get pregnant
would this be okay BECAUSE I DIDN4T TECHNICHALLY PUT MY DICK INSIDE YOU ?
he is not anathematized as a formal heretic but isnt considered a holy father or saint. and even if he was, i think it should be obvious that an opinion of one saint doesnt dictate what Christians believe.tommy aquinas also set age of marriage at 12 brehs
is he heretic ?
David & Issac arent Prophets nor seen as Prophets in the Christian view.Alot of their prophets married kids
Isaac
David
Their god himself had a thing for minors
Reddit is Muslim.
,,Saar muhammad have sex saar"David & Issac arent Prophets nor seen as Prophets in the Christian eyes.
Plus, theres no evidence or either of their marriages being Consummated ( Sex ) Unlike Muhammed
it is big broNot Analogous
he is a father and reputable scholar of the catohlic churchhe is not anathematized as a formal heretic but isnt considered a holy father or saint. and even if he was, i think it should be obvious that an opinion of one saint doesnt dictate what Christians believe.
what does is the ecumenical councils, which formally condemned child marriage and sex, for example councils of Elvira, Ancyra, Neocaesarea and Nicea 1