Why do Christians accuse others of paedophilia when marry got pregnant at 12 years old

Alot of their prophets married kids

Isaac
David
Their god himself had a thing for minors

Bro everytime you try to make an argument it goes terribly wrong
You have 0 evidence for Rebekah (She was feeding camels and carrying galons of water on her own and you would imply she is 3)
and please tell me how Mical was a child while 1 Samuel 19 and 2 Samuel 6 exist.


Don't forget...

Quran — Surah 65:4 (At-Talaq)​

“And those who no longer expect menstruation among your women — if you doubt, then their waiting period is three months, and [also for] those who have not yet menstruated. And for those who are pregnant, their term is until they give birth. And whoever fears Allah — He will make for him of his matter ease.”
 
  • +1
Reactions: CloudyCuck and coastal
he is not anathematized as a formal heretic but isnt considered a holy father or saint. and even if he was, i think it should be obvious that an opinion of one saint doesnt dictate what Christians believe.

what does is the ecumenical councils, which formally condemned child marriage and sex, for example councils of Elvira, Ancyra, Neocaesarea and Nicea 1

Aquinas was great, one of the best (and I'm a Catholic so for me he is a Saint)
But that doesn't mean that everything he said was dogmatic and people tend to misunderstand that.
God bless him and God bless the Church Fathers.
 
  • +1
Reactions: coastal
Aquinas was great, one of the best
But that doesn't mean that everything he said was dogmatic and people tend to misunderstand that.
God bless him and God bless the Church Fathers.
i do agree, he was a great father. God bless all of them, may God crown them with the crown of life in heaven:kumaPls:
 
  • +1
Reactions: Lyndon
that is correct, but im not Catholic so it holds zero weight to me. now what?
he set 12 because of mary big bro

scholars takes his words at face value when they made the consensus of marry age being 12-14
 
If your title is sincere...?

I guess you're referring to how we trash muslims???

It's because there's a high likelihood that Mary, ignoring the virgin birth and lifelong virginity for a second, would have at least looked sexually dimorphic; if Joseph was aroused by her, that's not pedo.

Muhammad, on the other hand, went for a 9 y/o.

All the way.

I've never seen a dimorphic 9 y/o - they look indistinguishable from little boys...

Hence, pedo.
actually criteria for aisha's marriage was her ability to memorize things and teach people, 3 years of marriage and nothing happened until then also she was engaged prior to marrying the prophet there ya go. No point in causing religious wars on here
 
he set 12 because of mary big bro
yea and he was wrong?

scholars takes his words at face value when they made the consensus of marry age being 12-14
idgaf what "scholars" say, we have no evidence for any of those claims and it's just speculation. there's also lots of people who say she was 16 or even 18, but all them have epistemological symmetry so at the end of the day it's just speculation
 
Bro everytime you try to make an argument it goes terribly wrong
You have 0 evidence for Rebekah (She was feeding and carrying galons of water on her own and you would imply she is 3)
SARAH WAS 90 WHEN ABRAHAM WAS 100
-GENESIS 17:17


ABRAHAM WAS 100 WHEN ISAAC WAS BORN, SARAH WAS 90
-GENESIS 21:5


SARAH DIED AT 127 WHEN REBEKAH BORN
-GENESIS 23:1-2


ISAAC WAS 40 WHEN HE MARRIED REBEKAH
-GENESIS 25:20


SARAH WAS 90 WHEN ISAAC WAS BORN
ISAAC WAS 37 WHEN SARAH DIED
ISAAC WAS 40 WHEN HE MARRIED REBEKAH
GENESIS 25:20


REBEKAH BORN WHEN
SARAH DIED
GENESIS 23:1-2




40 - 37 = 3
Don't forget...

Quran — Surah 65:4 (At-Talaq)​

Literally what is this supposed to prove? Do you really think everyone who doesn't menstruate is a child? Did your apebrain forget diseases like POCS and old age exist? This is getting ridiculous, bring me solid claims instead of ,,saar your claims get debunked hard saar"



Such a inferior christcuck skull, keep coping harder faggot, go follow your sky faggot who raped mary and got nailed so hard on the cross which you guys somehow worship, lmao
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: ghoulmania
nah age was only counted after turning 18 she was 30:lul:
 
  • JFL
Reactions: LefortCandidate
yea and he was wrong?


idgaf what "scholars" say, we have no evidence for any of those claims and it's just speculation. there's also lots of people who say she was 16 or even 18, but all them have epistemological symmetry so at the end of the day it's just speculation
scholar consensus is a big thing within christians big bro

the resurection is based on scholar consesus
 
  • +1
Reactions: Ahmed88
scholar consensus is a big thing within christians big bro
maybe with evangelical heretics, havent met a single real Christian who puts any value on what soma scholars said. not a argument

the resurection is based on scholar consesus
so it's based on the Gospels, 21 more sources outside of Christian writings outside of the Bible, lettres of Paul and martyrdom of believers. not on what some scholars say. how do you think people would believe in the resurrection in 40s AD when it just happened. there weren't any scholars back then lols:OkayuFukireta:
 
  • Ugh..
  • JFL
Reactions: LefortCandidate and Ahmed88
I’m not even any of these religions but if they try to say that’s Mary’s age of 12 is disputed they can’t even really come for Muslims as some say that Aisha age is disputed also
Idk tho
 
  • +1
Reactions: LefortCandidate
maybe with evangelical heretics, havent met a single real Christian who puts any value on what soma scholars said. not a argument


so it's based on the Gospels, 21 more sources outside of Christian writings outside of the Bible, lettres of Paul and martyrdom of believers. not on what some scholars say. how do you think people would believe in the resurrection in 40s AD when it just happened. there weren't any scholars back then lols:OkayuFukireta:
big bro did you know also there's other sources that contradict the resurection

and other sources in conflicts with each other if it was physical or spiritual

all of these make mass traansmission less credible

this why they have the scholar consensus where they pick the "credible" sources, if you refuse this you deny the resurection
 
  • JFL
Reactions: coastal
it is big bro

you can impregnates somebody indirectly like jesus did
For it to be analogous you'd have to conceive a child with a women completely indirectly
So no physical contact at all. No logically possible way for YOU to do this. Use your head champ
 
For it to be analogous you'd have to conceive a child with a women completely indirectly
So no physical contact at all. No logically possible way for YOU to do this. Use your head champ
big bro it wouldn't be an analogy if everything is similair

they have to share one thing in common which is not sticking your penis without consent

so my analogy applies here

2 cases where a girl gets pregnant without sex and without consent
 
big bro did you know also there's other sources that contradict the resurection

and other sources in conflicts with each other if it was physical or spiritual

all of these make mass traansmission less credible

this why they have the scholar consensus where they pick the "credible" sources, if you refuse this you deny the resurection
it also a thing among historians

jesus exsistence historically is debated

christians says, the consesnsus among historians is yes he was real

which isn't a bad thing
 
Can a Christian please answer this for me no ill intent I genuinely want to know

god impregnated Mary to give birth to himself?
Why couldn’t he just make Jesus how he made Adam with no father or mother
Or does he have to use another in the birth of christ
If that’s true doesn’t that make god not all powerful as he is relying on Mary
Well if Jesus was also in the womb was he not getting sustenance from his mother?
Would that mean Jesus Relied on Mary
 
  • +1
Reactions: coastal
Genuine question brehs
Source: the demon that larped to muhammad i assume.


Also this nigga still fucked a 9 year old
IMG 2805
:lul::lul:
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Lyndon
big bro did you know also there's other sources that contradict the resurection

and other sources in conflicts with each other if it was physical or spiritual

all of these make mass traansmission less credible
i wouldnt even try to make a historical argument for it, it would just be a TAG extrapolation into a reductio of opposing paradigms to show where they're incoherent

this why they have the scholar consensus where they pick the "credible" sources, if you refuse this you deny the resurection
no this is why we have the Chruch
 
,,Saar muhammad have sex saar"
Yup he raped Aisha when she was 9 years old :yes:
Screenshot 2026 05 09 at 92050AM

,,saar not prophets saar"
David & Issacs are simply Patriarchs. Thats all; you can look it up
,,saar marrying children ok if no pregnant saar"
Lets take Issac for example, his marriage w/ Rebekah was never said consummated
But yk what was said? He had to marry her to reinforce the fact that the promised land was tied back to Canaan
it was purely for Abrahams covenant you fucking retard I don't see an issue with this at all :lul:
Give me a logical reason political marriages are wrong if both parties are happy in life, no issues, & no consummation
Not a single thing you said is true
David & Issacs are simply Patriarchs. Thats all
 
Last edited:
  • Love it
Reactions: Lyndon
  • Love it
Reactions: Lyndon
i wouldnt even try to make a historical argument for it, it would just be a TAG extrapolation into a reductio of opposing paradigms to show where they're incoherent
Typing Keyboard GIF
 
  • JFL
Reactions: coastal
Can a Christian please answer this for me no ill intent I genuinely want to know
ok
god impregnated Mary to give birth to himself?
no, the Father sent the Holy Spirit conceded the child, who is the Son Jesus Chris. one God, one essence, but 3 persons of the trinity

Why couldn’t he just make Jesus how he made Adam with no father or mother
Or does he have to use another in the birth of christ
because that's what the ancient Hebrew prophesies revealed by God were, and God doesnt contradict Himself. he doesnt have to do anything, He's God

If that’s true doesn’t that make god not all powerful as he is relying on Mary
He didnt rely on her

Well if Jesus was also in the womb was he not getting sustenance from his mother?
Would that mean Jesus Relied on Mary
the human nature did, but God's providence wouldnt allow for something to go wrong. since God is outside of time (since He created it and therefore cant be bound by His creation) he knows all that will happen
 
  • +1
Reactions: Lyndon
nah this all lowkey has meaning :02Woop:

look into what a Transcendental Argument for God is, pretty cool stuff. i promise im not tryna use big worlds to seem smart ik im retarded. just the only way i could explain it well lol
 
  • +1
Reactions: Lyndon
SARAH WAS 90 WHEN ABRAHAM WAS 100
-GENESIS 17:17


ABRAHAM WAS 100 WHEN ISAAC WAS BORN, SARAH WAS 90
-GENESIS 21:5


SARAH DIED AT 127 WHEN REBEKAH BORN
-GENESIS 23:1-2


ISAAC WAS 40 WHEN HE MARRIED REBEKAH
-GENESIS 25:20


SARAH WAS 90 WHEN ISAAC WAS BORN
ISAAC WAS 37 WHEN SARAH DIED
ISAAC WAS 40 WHEN HE MARRIED REBEKAH
GENESIS 25:20


REBEKAH BORN WHEN
SARAH DIED
GENESIS 23:1-2




40 - 37 = 3

Literally what is this supposed to prove? Do you really think everyone who doesn't menstruate is a child? Did your apebrain forget diseases like POCS and old age exist?



Such a inferior christcuck skull, keep coping harder faggot

This is actually funny because you are unable to do simple math
I don't know why is it so hard for your brain to let it function buddy.
And i'm gonna list all your errors so you don't get too desperate to try and reply again.

1) You got that one right
2) You got that one right too dude!

3) Here is when your braincells stopped working for some reason, Genesis 23:1-2 never mentions Rebekah being born and thats how I know you haven't readed a single verse of the Bible bro, not even Genesis, you establish a causal relation that doesn't even exist in the first place.

4), 5) and so on don't follow after that. Also could you tell us why did you ignore:
If you are going to be some type of dawah boy try harder bro, they won't even let you join ISIS if you keep being this retarded.

Genesis 24:19–20​

“When she had finished giving him a drink, she said, ‘I will draw water for your camels also, until they have finished drinking.’
So she quickly emptied her jar into the trough and ran again to the well to draw water, and drew for all his camels.”

And talking about

Quran — Surah 65:4 (At-Talaq)​

“And those who no longer expect menstruation among your women — if you doubt, then their waiting period is three months, and [also for] those who have not yet menstruated. And for those who are pregnant, their term is until they give birth. And whoever fears Allah — He will make for him of his matter ease.”

I'm pretty sure you take Ibn Kathir and Al-Tabari as scholars that knew what they were talking about, because they say childs count too.
And if you are sunni you are terribly fucked with this one son...

“The same for the young, who have not reached the years of menstruation. Their `Iddah is three months like those in menopause.” - Ibn Kathir - Tafsir 65:4 (Tafsir al-Qur’an al-‘Azim)


“Those who have not menstruated refers to those who have not yet reached menstruation, meaning the young girls.” - Al-Tabari - Tafsir 65:4 (Jāmiʿ al-Bayān ʿan Taʾwīl Āy al-Qurʾān)



BRO TAKE UR ISIS / AL-QAEDA ASS OUT OF HERE SON JFL
 
  • +1
Reactions: Ultimate Subhuman™
Check what I replied to him LOL
I saw. Good job. Unfortunately muslims are too retarded and won’t check any sources aside from their gay book that a demon dictated to their schizo prophet. I mostly ignore them now, they never listen. Probably too fucked up by inbreeding
 
  • Love it
Reactions: Lyndon
I saw. Good job. Unfortunately muslims are too retarded and won’t check any sources aside from their gay book that a demon dictated to their schizo prophet. I mostly ignore them now, they never listen. Probably too fucked up by inbreeding

They are braindead
Poor guys
This one thinks he is some kind of terrorist, what a loser JFL
 
  • +1
Reactions: CloudyCuck
They are braindead
Poor guys
This one thinks he is some kind of terrorist, what a loser JFL
They all have to resort to killing or terrorism cause everyone would just leave their cult otherwise :lul:

IMG 2805
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Lyndon
nah this all lowkey has meaning :02Woop:

look into what a Transcendental Argument for God is, pretty cool stuff. i promise im not tryna use big worlds to seem smart ik im retarded. just the only way i could explain it well lol
i know TAG big bruh

but it has nun to do with resurection
 
Doesn’t matter she didn’t had sex with josef
 
  • +1
Reactions: Lyndon
i am not muslim big bro

can you defend christianity without bringing others ?
Do I need to remind you of the title of your thread?

"Why do Christians accuse others of paedophilia when marry got pregnant at 12 years old"

I thought the most important part here was "Why do Christians accuse others...".

It's reasonable to bring up Islam, as many Christians bash Muhammad because of Aisha.

It's not about defending Christianity (which I'll gladly do).

It's about directly engaging with your question.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Lyndon
actually criteria for aisha's marriage was her ability to memorize things and teach people, 3 years of marriage and nothing happened until then also she was engaged prior to marrying the prophet there ya go. No point in causing religious wars on here
The only space between Islam and Christianity is war...

You (if you're muslim) deny Christ is God.

I don't need to feign some common ground where there is none.

No hate in my heart, but our worldviews are at odds...
 
  • +1
Reactions: Lyndon
Because they've been influenced by jewish mass media.

That's why divorce and fornication is so rampant, young women are meant to marry :RainbowDaijoubu:
 
3) Here is when your braincells stopped working for some reason, Genesis 23:1-2 never mentions Rebekah being born and thats how I know you haven't readed a single verse of the Bible bro, not even Genesis, you establish a causal relation that doesn't even exist in the first place.

4), 5) and so on don't follow after that. Also could you tell us why did you ignore:
If you are going to be some type of dawah boy try harder bro, they won't even let you join ISIS if you keep being this retarded.
Genesis 25:20 And Isaac was forty years old when he married Rebekah daughter of Bethuel the Aramean from Paddan Aram and sister of Laban the Aramean.

Book of Jasher, Chapter 24 40-45 And the young woman was of very comely appearance, she was a virgin, and Rebecca was ten years old in those days. And Bethuel and Laban and his children made a feast on that night, and Eliezer and his men came and ate and drank and rejoiced there on that night. And Eliezer rose up in the morning, he and the men that were with him, and he called to the whole household of Bethuel, saying, Send me away that I may go to my master; and they rose up and sent away Rebecca and her nurse Deborah, the daughter of Uz, and they gave her silver and gold, men servants and maid servants, and they blessed her. And they sent Eliezer away with his men; and the servants took Rebecca, and he went and returned to his master to the land of Canaan. And Isaac took Rebecca and she became his wife, and he brought her into the tent. And Isaac was forty years old when he took Rebecca, the daughter of his uncle Bethuel, for a wife

According to the Book of Jasher, Chapter 24, Rebekah was 10 years old when Isaac took her as his wife. It is important to note that the Book of Jasher is mentioned in 2 Samuel 1:18 as part of the Bible, but Christians later removed it. If you deny this, it implies that some books were lost, and your Bible is not an complete scripture.

Not to mention there are multiple other prophets marrying children
Genesis 24:19–20
Literally doesn't matter, could have different reasons and interpretations, like getting help from others, the bible is severly corrupted

Quran — Surah 65:4 (At-Talaq)​


I'm pretty sure you take Ibn Kathir and Al-Tabari as scholars that knew what they were talking about, because they say childs count too.
And if you are sunni you are terribly fucked with this one son...

“The same for the young, who have not reached the years of menstruation. Their `Iddah is three months like those in menopause.” - Ibn Kathir - Tafsir 65:4 (Tafsir al-Qur’an al-‘Azim)

“Those who have not menstruated refers to those who have not yet reached menstruation, meaning the young girls.” - Al-Tabari - Tafsir 65:4 (Jāmiʿ al-Bayān ʿan Taʾwīl Āy al-Qurʾān)
Ibn Kathir is shia LOLLLL, shias are even worse then jews, get the fuck out with your stupif ass shit

Also al tabari doesn't give out a fact, he reports what other such as kathir say, not to mention he isn't as accepted as other scholats lmao, most scholars use other tagsierd since the word used in the verse was nisa meaning adult women,


Just lol, keep trying harder faggot, there's a reason Christians get beheadef every day, all this effort to debunk rebeccah, but forgets the 20 different prophets who married children,jflll:lul::lul::lul:


Keep praying to your queer skydaddy that rapes minors for fun
 
Genesis 25:20 And Isaac was forty years old when he married Rebekah daughter of Bethuel the Aramean from Paddan Aram and sister of Laban the Aramean.

Book of Jasher, Chapter 24 40-45 And the young woman was of very comely appearance, she was a virgin, and Rebecca was ten years old in those days. And Bethuel and Laban and his children made a feast on that night, and Eliezer and his men came and ate and drank and rejoiced there on that night. And Eliezer rose up in the morning, he and the men that were with him, and he called to the whole household of Bethuel, saying, Send me away that I may go to my master; and they rose up and sent away Rebecca and her nurse Deborah, the daughter of Uz, and they gave her silver and gold, men servants and maid servants, and they blessed her. And they sent Eliezer away with his men; and the servants took Rebecca, and he went and returned to his master to the land of Canaan. And Isaac took Rebecca and she became his wife, and he brought her into the tent. And Isaac was forty years old when he took Rebecca, the daughter of his uncle Bethuel, for a wife

According to the Book of Jasher, Chapter 24, Rebekah was 10 years old when Isaac took her as his wife. It is important to note that the Book of Jasher is mentioned in 2 Samuel 1:18 as part of the Bible, but Christians later removed it. If you deny this, it implies that some books were lost, and your Bible is not an complete scripture.

Not to mention there are multiple other prophets marrying children

Literally doesn't matter, could have different reasons and interpretations, like getting help from others, the bible is severly corrupted


Ibn Kathir is shia LOLLLL, shias are even worse then jews, get the fuck out with your stupif ass shit

Also al tabari doesn't give out a fact, he reports what other such as kathir say, not to mention he isn't as accepted as other scholats lmao, most scholars use other tagsierd since the word used in the verse was nisa meaning adult women,


Just lol, keep trying harder faggot, there's a reason Christians get beheadef every day, all this effort to debunk rebeccah, but forgets the 20 different prophets who married children,jflll:lul::lul::lul:


Keep praying to your queer skydaddy that rapes minors for fun

Aint no no no no way that you actually said what I think you said son...

First you don't have any copy of the Book of Jasher because it's lost so it would be pretty difficult for you to actually know if it's stated that she was 10 years old and I want you to notice how you changed your argument from "3 years old" to "10 years old"... you are kinda evading the question itself. Also If you knew what the Bible is, you wouldn't even make the argument in the first place, the Christians at the time didn't have any copy of the "Book of Jasher", how are they supposed to state that book in the Bible dummy?

You are making an argument not actually based on the Bible but you rather would based it on "The Book of Jasher" that didn't even make it to today's era, how could you be this stupid.... Christians did not “remove” Jasher from the Bible because it was never part of the recognized Jewish canon nor the mainstream Christian canon in the first place. Mentioning whatever book does not automatically make it Scripture aside from that Paul quotes pagan poets in the New Testament, but that does not make those poems part of the Bible either.

You haven't even been able to answer anything and you rather ducked like a good boy... have some self respect and move on terrorist wannabe.

Also SHIAS CRITIZED IBN KATHIR, HOW IS HE GOING TO BE SHIA SILLY? HE WAS IBN-TAYMIYYAH'S STUDENT. YOU DONT EVEN KNOW ISLAM.

Ahlus-Sunnah wal Jama'ah "The Re-Formers of Islam: The Mas'ud Questions". Ibn Kathir is a scholar of Ahl al-Sunna who was of the Shafi'i school (according to the first volume of his main work, Tafsir al-Qur'an al-'Azim, 1.2), while Ibn Taymiya was a scholar whose fiqh remained in the general framework of the Hanbali school.


Get lost fr JFL
 
First you don't have any copy of the Book of Jasher because it's lost so it would be pretty difficult for you to actually know if it's stated that she was 10 years old and I want you to notice how you changed your argument from "3 years old" to "10 years old"... you are kinda evading the question itself. Also If you knew what the Bible is, you wouldn't even make the argument in the first place, the Christians at the time didn't have any copy of the "Book of Jasher", how are they supposed to state that book in the Bible dummy?
The Book of Jasher is referenced in the Bible as a source of information, which shows it was an existing historical source at that time, not to mention that some of has been been recovered, yes i changed the argument, due to the fact that you're not accepting the bible unless it explicitly states something

Normally since the bible doesn't mention her age, we use tradituon and follow it in chronological order, which means rebeccah was born after sarahs death



Not to mention that there arz million other verses on the bible condoning pedophilia

You are making an argument not actually based on the Bible but you rather would based it on "The Book of Jasher" that didn't even make it to today's era, how could you be this stupid.... Christians did not “remove” Jasher from the Bible because it was never part of the recognized Jewish canon nor the mainstream Christian canon in the first place. Mentioning whatever book does not automatically make it Scripture aside from that Paul quotes pagan poets in the New Testament, but that does not make those poems part of the Bible either.
Yes im making it on the book of jasher a source for information mentioned in the bible, the same way you're using scholars noone follows
Not to mention that your own skygod queer daddy who got nailed to death, doesn't even mention that he's god in the Bible, so once again, if anything other then tje buble is false why are hou following the idea that jesus is god?

Lmao

OING TO BE SHIA SILLY? HE WAS IBN-TAYMIYYAH'S STUDENT. YOU DONT EVEN KNOW ISLAM.

Ahlus-Sunnah wal Jama'ah "The Re-Formers of Islam: The Mas'ud Questions". Ibn Kathir is a scholar of Ahl al-Sunna who was of the Shafi'i school (according to the first volume of his main work, Tafsir al-Qur'an al-'Azim, 1.2), while Ibn Taymiya was a scholar whose fiqh remained in the general framework of the Hanbali school.
He's a sufi for fucks sake, they're the same as shias, they hold same ideologies, dance in mosques and pray to graves, every major sect classified them as nonbelievers


Keep coping christcuck, islam is the most increasing religiok in the world, its going ti overthrow Christianity in 20yzars
 
Last edited:
I don't even know why this is a concern since no major religion gives a specific age of consent. It's a pretty modern concept. Especially the ages of consent we have now. In 19th-century America, the age of consent was 10 and even 7 in Delaware. Child porn wasn't even illegal until the late 1970s.

Oh, and all religions are bullshit anyway. But I was talking about it in the context of religion; arguments about the age of consent in scripture are basically irrelevant because they're a secular concept.
 
Genuine question brehs
mmmh
she was still virgin till she gave birth.
Imagine though you marry.
One time you are a priceless virgin. Next your pussy is blown out by child birth and its over for you. You never even got to have sex.
Straight up wide roastie shit.
Makes sense she never had children again as josef was to disgusted by it
 

Similar threads

Stalker
Replies
29
Views
196
Mr.Blitzkrieg
Mr.Blitzkrieg
anondude
Replies
27
Views
142
808080808
808080808
anondude
Replies
6
Views
49
nocajebudala
nocajebudala
Sens
Replies
0
Views
34
Sens
Sens
Donnie Darko333
Replies
2
Views
38
Unkownslayer4786287
Unkownslayer4786287

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
Sponsored
Stake.us
America's #1 Social Casino
Slots, Poker & More
Join Now →