WHY DO GAY PORN SEARCHES GO DOWN SIGNIFICANTLY DURING RAMADAN? [MUSLIMCELS GTFIH]

[81xa]

kys

We both know that you are a closeted faggot now bend the knee

 

[81xa]

Faggot go to afghanistan and say ts

"Religion of peace"

 

[ethnicwarrior]

We both know that you are a closeted faggot now bend the knee
View attachment 5209244

Dnr one molecule
Iqlet

 

[81xa]

Dnr one molecule
Iqlet

Clearly this thread hit a nerve i knew you were gay "ethnicwarrior" this thread was made exactly for you

 

[Shrek2OnDvD]

These "ordinary muslims" you refer to are likely westernised muslims, like muslim women who dont wear a hijab, they are not real muslims. They don't even follow the practices of their own religion.

The true muslims are the jihadists in the middle east, they follow islam properly and slay the nonbelievers. Because these people identify themselves with islam which is morally flawed I dislike all of them.

hmmm so if they’re not isis they’re not muslim? and according to what standard? the prophet himself signed multiple treaties with non muslims, offered protection to christians and told believers to avoid disrespecting other faiths. their is a hadith where the prophet said “the best way is not one extreme nor is it the other extreme, but rather the middle way”

by your logic 99% of muslims aren’t real believers because they aren’t going around cutting heads off?

the vast majority of muslims condemn extremism. even my mom who is a religious woman makes fun of the niqab, and men with those super long unkempt jihadi beards. most muslims look down on those types as khawarij

 

[أحمد]

What's the name of the site used to get statistics?

 

[ethnicwarrior]

"Religion of peace"
View attachment 5209246

We both know that you are a closeted faggot now bend the knee

5'6
But as a sub3 halfbreed you shouldnt be talking

Oohhh ohh look how violent this guy is please help me oohhh ohh religion of peace

 

[81xa]

hmmm so if they’re not isis they’re not muslim? and according to what standard? the prophet himself signed multiple treaties with non muslims, offered protection to christians and told believers to avoid disrespecting other faiths. their is a hadith where the prophet said “the best way is not one extreme nor is it the other extreme, but rather the middle way”

by your logic 99% of muslims aren’t real believers because they aren’t going around cutting heads off?

the vast majority of muslims condemn extremism. even my mom who is a religious woman makes fun of the niqab, and men with those super long unkempt jihadi beards. most muslims look down on those types as khawarij

Surah 9:5: "Then kill the disbelievers (non-Muslims) wherever you find them, capture them and besiege them, and lie in wait for them in each and every ambush"

Don't try to paint muhammad as a peaceful man, there are countless verses that prove otherwise, he was known to invade and conquer lands, forcing people to pay jizya or be slaughtered

If you do not follow the practices of your religion, you are not a true follower of that religion. Is a "christian" who doesnt believe in Jesus Christ a true christian? Of course he isnt.

 

[ethnicwarrior]

Clearly this thread hit a nerve i knew you were gay "ethnicwarrior" this thread was made exactly for you
View attachment 5209247

Fym?

 

[ethnicwarrior]

Surah 9:5: "Then kill the disbelievers (non-Muslims) wherever you find them, capture them and besiege them, and lie in wait for them in each and every ambush"

Don't try to paint muhammad as a peaceful man, there are countless verses that prove otherwise, he was known to invade and conquer lands.

If you do not follow the practices of your religion, you are not a true follower of that religion. Is a "christian" who doesnt believe in Jesus Christ a true christian? Of course he isnt.

Ohhhh sarrr me. Doo crusades

 

[Loganazim]

B-but bro... they said what the prophet did doesn't represent Islam!!

Nobody said that. What Prophet does called a Sunnah which is good. The thing that guy showed is Da’if (not authentic), most authentic ones are called Sahih for example “Sahih Al Bukhari”

 

[Loganazim]

We both know that you are a closeted faggot now bend the knee
View attachment 5209244

U just showed that Algeria isn’t Muslim at its people claim to be nothing else
Funny thing I don’t have to search retarded studies like that to show how European countries are gay cuz I can just show bunch of irl videos
Btw u prolly call LGBT a Jewish propaganda since u are Jbw piller but u believe in Google which owned by Jews too saddddd

 

[Loganazim]

hmmm so if they’re not isis they’re not muslim? and according to what standard? the prophet himself signed multiple treaties with non muslims, offered protection to christians and told believers to avoid disrespecting other faiths. their is a hadith where the prophet said “the best way is not one extreme nor is it the other extreme, but rather the middle way”

by your logic 99% of muslims aren’t real believers because they aren’t going around cutting heads off?

the vast majority of muslims condemn extremism. even my mom who is a religious woman makes fun of the niqab, and men with those super long unkempt jihadi beards. most muslims look down on those types as khawarij

ISIS is founded by Jews. ISIS attacked almost every part of the world including Muslim countries but never Israel. Gaytanyahu could have make it less obvious but this time he failed lmao

 

[ICL]

Nobody said that. What Prophet does called a Sunnah which is good. The thing that guy showed is Da’if (not authentic), most authentic ones are called Sahih for example “Sahih Al Bukhari”

None of the hadiths are authentic, argued by Ignaz Golder, a proponent of islam as well.

 

[g4rlic]

This is the funniest shit

 

[Shrek2OnDvD]

Surah 9:5: "Then kill the disbelievers (non-Muslims) wherever you find them, capture them and besiege them, and lie in wait for them in each and every ambush"

Don't try to paint muhammad as a peaceful man, there are countless verses that prove otherwise, he was known to invade and conquer lands, forcing people to pay jizya or be slaughtered

If you do not follow the practices of your religion, you are not a true follower of that religion. Is a "christian" who doesnt believe in Jesus Christ a true christian? Of course he isnt.

an argument muslims make is those verses apply to active declarations of war at the time when muslims were fighting the polytheists. even the founder of the muslim brotherhood said these verses only applied to the pagans

How could you not fight a people who have broken their oaths, who tried to drive the Messenger out, who attacked you first? Do you fear them? It is God you should fear if you are true believers - Quran 9:13

Or literally in 9:7

so long as they are steadfast with you, be steadfast with them. Indeed Allah loves the Godwary.

Or literally 9:12

But if they break their pledges after their having made a treaty and revile your religion, then fight the leaders of unfaith—indeed, they have no [commitment to] pledges,—maybe they will desist.

Never said Muhammad was perfect nor am I defending every action or saying of his

Believing in Jesus is an essential to being a Christian just like believing in Allah is essential to being a Muslim. A Muslim is a servant of God. That is all. Killing or murder is not a prerequisite for faith

 

[Loganazim]

Surah 9:5: "Then kill the disbelievers (non-Muslims) wherever you find them, capture them and besiege them, and lie in wait for them in each and every ambush"

Lmao why are you changing verses literally to just win the argument
Real verse:
But once the Sacred Months have passed, kill the polytheists ˹who violated their treaties˺ wherever you find them,1 capture them, besiege them, and lie in wait for them on every way. But if they repent, perform prayers, and pay alms-tax, then set them free. Indeed, Allah is All-Forgiving, Most Merciful.
KILL THE PAGANS WHO VIOLATED THE TREATIES

 

[Loganazim]

forcing people to pay jizya or be slaughtered

niggas be crying about hypergamy but when Islam tax high status-rich people it’s something not normal
Jizya is 1-2% of your income
Nigger in Sweden people give 63% of their income to the government

 

[Loganazim]

None of the hadiths are authentic

Sunnah means habit/tradition so it doesn’t exactly depends on hadith but yeah most hadith tells us about most Sunnahs of the Prophet but NOT all of them.

argued by Ignaz Golder, a proponent of islam as well.

who tf…
“Hungarian Jewish”
Did u really read his works or you believe him cuz his words match your beliefs but he just looks smarter so u can mention his name everytime when you speak

 

[ICL]

Sunnah means habit/tradition so it doesn’t exactly depends on hadith but yeah most hadith tells us about most Sunnahs of the Prophet but NOT all of them.

Possible

“Hungarian Jewish”

Genetic fallacy

Did u really read his works or you believe him cuz his words match your beliefs but he just looks smarter so u can mention his name everytime when you speak

Ad hominem


I'm not required to answer your question

 

[Loganazim]

there was no “ad hominem” my friend we chill

Ad hominem


I'm not required to answer your question

 

[ICL]

there was no “ad hominem” my friend we chill

It was

You focused on me instead of my argument

Did u really read his works or you believe him cuz his words match your beliefs but he just looks smarter so u can mention his name everytime when you spea

^^
Explain how you're focused on the substance, and not the articulator.

 

[Loganazim]

I'm not required to answer your question

Dude
Ur not required to answer me in any case since ur not forced to. It would be something logical to say if I used some violence against u to answer me or if there was rules saying u have to answer. Free choice over here.
You either answer or not. Others just move on.

It was

You focused on me instead of my argument

Yeah because you do matter in this case since you mentioned him. If u have read his books then I will listen to you if not then I’m not taking seriously ts. Even tho u can lie but u can enlighten me why would I consider his opinions rather than Arab/Persian scientists who know Arabic naturally (which is really required to understand Qur’an and hadith) plus from WHO and WHERE he learned Islam.

 

[ICL]

Dude
Ur not required to answer me in any case since ur not forced to. It would be something logical to say if I used some violence against u to answer me or if there was rules saying u have to answer. Free choice over here.
You either answer or not. Others just move on.

Right

Yeah because you do matter in this case since you mentioned him. If u have read his books then I will listen to you if not then I’m not taking seriously ts. Even tho u can lie but u can enlighten me why would I consider his opinions rather than Arab/Persian scientists who know Arabic naturally (which is really required to understand Qur’an and hadith) plus from WHO and WHERE he learned Islam.

Why would I matter in this discussion?

Again you're focusing on me instead of my substance, that is ad hominem by definition.

My argument does not change whether I read his works or not.

Ignaz had genuine passion towards Islam. You can't call him biased and ignoring what he said, you can do the same with muslim scholars as well.

 

[81xa]

an argument muslims make is those verses apply to active declarations of war at the time when muslims were fighting the polytheists. even the founder of the muslim brotherhood said these verses only applied to the pagans

How could you not fight a people who have broken their oaths, who tried to drive the Messenger out, who attacked you first? Do you fear them? It is God you should fear if you are true believers - Quran 9:13

Or literally in 9:7


Or literally 9:12



Never said Muhammad was perfect nor am I defending every action or saying of his

Believing in Jesus is an essential to being a Christian just like believing in Allah is essential to being a Muslim. A Muslim is a servant of God. That is all. Killing or murder is not a prerequisite for faith

Lmao why are you changing verses literally to just win the argument
Real verse:
But once the Sacred Months have passed, kill the polytheists ˹who violated their treaties˺ wherever you find them,1 capture them, besiege them, and lie in wait for them on every way. But if they repent, perform prayers, and pay alms-tax, then set them free. Indeed, Allah is All-Forgiving, Most Merciful.
KILL THE PAGANS WHO VIOLATED THE TREATIES

The escape clause is "repent, perform prayers, and pay alms-tax." That means the only way a polytheist avoids being killed is by converting to Islam. Convert or die. That is in the verse you just corrected me with

And actually makes the argument worse, because now it is not just a military response to aggression since its a conversion ultimatum

9:29, which applies to Christians and Jews specifically, people who never violated any treaty: "Fight those who do not believe in Allah or the Last Day, nor comply with what Allah and His Messenger have forbidden, nor embrace the religion of truth from among the People of the Book, until they pay the tax, willingly submitting, fully humbled."

 

[Loganazim]

Why would I matter in this discussion?

Because you’re a discussant and part of this discussion. “The Socratic Method”.

My argument does not change whether I read his works or not.

This is how we know you haven’t.
It does tho, why would you consider someone’s opinion if he hasn’t experienced it?
The discussions about Hadith’s relevance were and are going for centuries which even determines the domestic policy of States (Iran and Saudi Arabia as an example)
So It IS something u should first read, explore about and then built a view.

Ignaz had genuine passion towards Islam. You can't call him biased and ignoring what he said, you can do the same with muslim scholars as well.

Well I never said he was biased and I never ignored what he said
As I said, you can enlighten me and I’m here to listen.

 

[ICL]

This is how we know you haven’t.
It does tho, why would you consider someone’s opinion if he hasn’t experienced it?

Pretty hasty generalization don't you think

He experienced what?

We need an unbiased medium, you cannot appeal to accomplishments here.

Because you’re a discussant and part of this discussion. “The Socratic Method”.

You said you're not gonna listen to me if I haven't read his works.

Justify how the state of me reading his work affects my argument which you would refuse to elaborate on.

The discussions about Hadith’s relevance were and are going for centuries which even determines the domestic policy of States (Iran and Saudi Arabia as an example)

So?

Relevance =/= truth.

So It IS something u should first read, explore about and then built a view.

I've built my view already, long ago, even when I was a mudslime myself.

Well I never said he was biased and I never ignored what he said

Explain why you pointed out "he's a jewish hungarian tho" and the fact that "he didn't experience it".

Clearly you would only mention these if you believe he's biased. Mention an excuse that would prove otherwise.

As I said, you can enlighten me and I’m here to listen.

I'm more focused on your integrity and sincerity now, we have shifted the goalposts.

 

[Loganazim]

The escape clause is "repent, perform prayers, and pay alms-tax." That means the only way a polytheist avoids being killed is by converting to Islam. Convert or die. That is in the verse you just corrected me with

It’s funny I have to correct you again. I wanna let you know that I’m not here to prove that Islam is a peaceful religion but it’s a FAIR religion. Now, read carefully and pay attention:
But once the Sacred Months have passed, kill the polytheists ˹who violated their treaties˺ wherever you find them,1 capture them, besiege them, and lie in wait for them on every way. But if they repent, perform prayers, and pay alms-tax, then set them free. Indeed, Allah is All-Forgiving, Most Merciful.

I made it really obvious so you can understand what the verse actually says.
“who violated their treaties”
means there was peace between both communities. Which couldn’t exist if one of the communities was violent.
However, the peace was BROKEN.
The main thing is that it wasn’t broken by the community of Islam.
So now when the peace is broken, the TRUST can’t be restored. The only way now is to continue what was started by the PEACEBREAKERS.
And here we see the justice of Islam. When it again says:
But if they REPENT, PERFORM PRAYERS, AND PAY ALM-TAX, THEN SET THEM FREE. Indeed, Allah is All-Forgiving, Most Merciful.
So the interpretation here is that Muslims are actually giving the pagans chance to stay alive by joining the community. Even though they started this war themselves.
It’s fair.

 

[Loganazim]

Pretty hasty generalization don't you think

He experienced what?

I was referring to you actually
Generalization? It’s not something that u just read somewhere “India is shit” and u don’t fly to India cuz it’s really obvious India is shit. As I said, the discussion is going for centuries so you have to be really educated here and I wanted to know how educated u were.

You said you're not gonna listen to me if I haven't read his works.

Justify how the state of me reading his work affects my argument which you would refuse to elaborate on.

U know what I noticed u ignore the whole message of my post where I put a logical chain between the words.

Knowing that u followed his ideas without reading his books will show how biased u are. U are already known as a JBW piller and anti-islamist so basically Ignaz’s ideas are just doing you a favor to make your beliefs stronger. So basically it would be a waste of time? But I still don’t know how biased you are it’s just an assumption.

And here’s me:
I’m not Muslim and not for JBW neither JBE. I don’t hate anyone and I’m open for any opinions.
You wouldn’t discuss yourself in my place but you would discuss a guy like me. It’s obvious. Because why would discuss someone who’s biased?

I've built my view already, long ago, even when I was a mudslime myself.

Albanian or Bosnian? Just curious

Explain why you pointed out "he's a jewish hungarian tho" and the fact that "he didn't experience it".

Clearly you would only mention these if you believe he's biased. Mention an excuse that would prove otherwise.

I'm more focused on your integrity and sincerity now, we have shifted the goalposts.

I was joking about his ethnicity. It could play a huge role though.
I’m sincere kinda tired though.

 

[ICL]

e discussion is going for centuries so you have to be really educated here and I wanted to know how educated u were.

Well now you know

U know what I noticed u ignore the whole message of my post where I put a logical chain between the words.

Fallacies between the chains tho

Knowing that u followed his ideas without reading his books will show how biased u are. U are already known as a JBW piller and anti-islamist so basically Ignaz’s ideas are just doing you a favor to make your beliefs stronger. So basically it would be a waste of time? But I still don’t know how biased you are it’s just an assumption.

I am not biased, and you cannot decree that from me being anti-islamist nor a JBW-piller, which JBWpiller is arguably objective

I've helped mudslimes on this forum, same with ethnics and I do so frequently.

And even if I was extremely, that still doesn't matter, you're way too focused on me, and not my substance. A racist can be correct, an ableist can be correct. I don't want you to say things like "that proves that you are these qualities" and it seems like we have focused on

Notice, if I wasn't this "anti-islamist JBWpiller" you would rather have to debate the substance and not me.

I've read his articles, not his books, and that is not a requirement for me to be biased.

I’m not Muslim and not for JBW neither JBE. I don’t hate anyone and I’m open for any opinions.

Neither am I, I'm not sure if you are trying to achieve moral superiority or being performative.

You showcasing me and your traits is pretty useless to the substance, in my perspective, it looks like you're trying to gain the moral hand to show you're superior near these 10 people lurking in this thread

I was joking about his ethnicity. It could play a huge role though.

In?

Albanian or Bosnian? Just curious

Neither

I’m sincere kinda tired though.

Difficult to conclude when you fabricate (construct) arguments from fallacy

I care more about your input than your output. Which is hard to do when your output is visible and your input isn't.

 

[Loganazim]

And even if I was extremely, that still doesn't matter, you're way too focused on me, and not my substance. A racist can be correct, an ableist can be correct. I don't want you to say things like "that proves that you are these qualities" and it seems like we have focused on

It does matter. Racist and atheists can follow ideas blindly. Yes what they’re saying could POSSIBLY be correct but how do I discuss it with them if they’re following blindly?
Or to make it clearer for you Muslim can be right maybe Allah is real after all BUT he follows it blindly that it’s just painful to discuss it with him. So yeah it does matter and hope it helps to not waste the time in the future in order to avoid freaks

You showcasing me and your traits is pretty useless to the substance, in my perspective, it looks like you're trying to gain the moral hand to show you're superior near these 10 people lurking in this thread

Bro idgaf. We can come back to the main topic already since we made everything clear

In?

Not saying it played a huge role for Ignaz. It was just a separate statement that ethnicity plays a big role in the formation of opinions. Like you wouldn’t be surprised if an Arab hates Jews or a Jew hates Arabs

 

[ICL]

It does matter. Racist and atheists can follow ideas blindly. Yes what they’re saying could POSSIBLY be correct but how do I discuss it with them if they’re following blindly?

Bias does not mean following something blindly

Or to make it clearer for you Muslim can be right maybe Allah is real after all BUT he follows it blindly that it’s just painful to discuss it with him. So yeah it does matter and hope it helps to not waste the time in the future in order to avoid freaks

This is a different analogy

I'm not a freak as I hope you deduced that

This is just a conclusion I have lead myself to. If I was the most ethnic man;

I'd still be a JBW-ist, similar to the anti-islam dilemna.

Which I'm actually not, I'm not an anti-islamist.

Bro idgaf. We can come back to the main topic already since we made everything clear

No

Not saying it played a huge role for Ignaz. It was just a separate statement that ethnicity plays a big role in the formation of opinions. Like you wouldn’t be surprised if an Arab hates Jews or a Jew hates Arabs

I wouldn't really care if an arab hated jews

And Ignaz admired islam, so this is a polar opposite analogy

 

[solohunter99]

whats with muslims wanting to fuck goats, small girls and guys?

Arabs and other MENAoids have always been gay pedos, long before Islam and probably after it too. Check this out :

Richard Francis Burton - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

The "Sotadic Zone" of Burton encompassed the Mediterranean coastlines of Southern Europe and North Africa, the entire region of the Levant, larger areas of the Middle East and Asia, and all of the Americas.
Burton theorised about the existence of a "Sotadic zone" in the closing essay of his English translation of The Arabian Nights(1885–1886).[74][75] He asserted that there exists a geographic-climatic zone in which sodomy and pederasty (sexual intimacy between older men and young pubescent/adolescent boys) are endemic,[74][75] prevalent,[74][75] and celebrated among the indigenous inhabitants and within their cultures.[75]

 

[Revan]

Arabs and other MENAoids have always been gay pedos, long before Islam and probably after it too. Check this out :

View attachment 5210883

muslim