so edgy bro
apparently nobody in the scientific establishment is aware of basic biochem, but people like sverige are
youre strawmanning hard because no one who takes himself seriously argues that all protein sources are equally bioavailable.
no i didnt, i meant to say i debunked 2 micronutrients being completely non bioavailable
In some way they might be, but that's another discussion
TL;DR for antinutrients is that in moderation + cooking/processing + overall adequate vitamin intake are enough to effectively eliminate their harmful effects. Otherwise i can address each one:
can be almost entirely destroyed with cooking and reduced with other processing methods
a meme, it doesn't matter if you have a balanced diet
the reduction of bioavailability in zinc disappears in balanced diets:
academic.oup.com
I will! Its healthier than eating meat, so far nothing points to it being unhealthy
?
Never lose your pills and powders.You can easily get enough beta carotene regardless of bioavailability, none of the studies which he linked prove anything he's saying.
"It has a conversion rate of 20:1!!!" so what? theres like 200% your DV mcg in 50g of carrots. Its also less bioavailable the larger the doses of intake become. Children can convert it just fine at way better ratios than what he's claiming:
"Our recently completed efficacy study in schoolchildren used intrinsically labeled spinach and Golden Rice as compared with β-carotene in oil capsules consumed by children with marginal to normal vitamin A status and used 0.5 mg retinyl acetate as a reference dose. Due to limitations of obtaining blood samples from children, we gave the reference dose at breakfast and the study dose of rice, spinach, or the β-carotene capsule at lunch. Fasting blood samples were collected at 1, 3, 7, 14, and 21 d. Our results showed that the conversion factor of Golden Rice β-carotene was 2.3:1 and of spinach β-carotene was 7.5:1 by weight. The positive control, the β-carotene in the oil capsule, showed a conversion factor of 2.0:1 by weight (26)."
"By using various techniques, we now understand that b-carotene is converted enzymatically and excentrically into vitamin A, not only in the small intestine but also by other tissues in which the absorbed b-carotene converts to vitamin A. The conversion efficiency of b-carotene to vitamin A is inversely related to the dose. The efficacy of plant foods rich in b-carotene, such as natural (spinach, carrots, spirulina), hybrid(high–b-carotene yellow maize), and bioengineered (Golden Rice) foods, in providing vitamin A has shown that these are effective sources of vitamin A."
You can get vit. D2 and its not toxic or anything, not sure what his source for that is. Its in fortified foods and in supplements
"The main conclusions are: (i) ergocalciferol (vitamin D2), the form mostly used in supplements and fortified foods, is apparently absorbed with similar efficiency to cholecalciferol (vitamin D3, the main dietary form)"
You cant change your genetic code through diet, so there's 0 chance your scenario would even make a difference if it were real
Edgy ahhhh life experience jfl I know how cringe it soundsso edgy bro
Come on dude, do you not see how retarded your fad diet is?
why exactly is processing bad?
someone's out of arguments
Ethnic hood kids****
I always laugh so hard at this "argument"so edgy bro
i was a normal kid.......... played with animals but never harmed them because I'm not a psychopathic cringelord who will burn in hell for eternity
also, female psychopaths wouldn't exist if T affected empathy
nope just tired of repeating myself to retards lol, you are going to stop sometimes anyway you probably are cheating yourself, and crave animal products alot
but you never had to repeat yourself, i disproved the two sverige videos you posted from the get gonope just tired of repeating myself to retards lol, you are going to stop sometimes anyway you probably are cheating yourself, and crave animal products alot
but you didnt, you just say stuff, lets just go with it, its all bs but lets assume youre right.
i just say stuff? what about you? what have you done to prove any of the things youre saying
these are overestimates from before we were able to diagnose the defect biochemically, the true frequency is 33% lower
Wrong, the mutation in the gene associated with SLOS is recessive and being a carrier hasn't been proven or observed to cause any negative effects on cholesterol synthesis.
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
these people's lives are ruined on any diet, they're disabled mentally, a vegan diet isnt going to be a cause factor.
as i mentioned above, veganism doesnt necessarily cause any of them
Theyre usually on the lower end, but you can have high cholesterol on a vegan diet. You can increase your intake in fat, proteins and carbs so you can be assured your body has the ability to synthesize it.
I’m like the ultimate Aryan jfl
thanks for taking your time to write all of this, im gonna be honest with you, im not good with studies and its not that i dont understand them but more so that i dont care / dont believe in them.i just say stuff? what about you? what have you done to prove any of the things youre saying
and youre wrong, i back my statements up with links to studies and wherever i haven't, its usually due to it being undisputed knowledge
tell me, what have i said that needs any kind of proof not already provided?
these are overestimates from before we were able to diagnose the defect biochemically, the true frequency is 33% lower
also its "1 out of 100" for europeans, who have the highest frequency - other populations carry it way less often
source:
Wrong, the mutation in the gene associated with SLOS is recessive and being a carrier hasn't been proven or observed to cause any negative effects on cholesterol synthesis.
source:
Mutational spectrum of Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome - PubMed
Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome (SLOS; OMIM #270400) is an autosomal recessive malformation syndrome characterized by a large spectrum of morphogenic and congenital anomalies. SLOS is caused by mutations in the DHCR7 gene, which encodes 7-dehydrocholesterol reductase, the enzyme that catalyzes the...
You would need to be a carrier for both alleles, which means an extremely small incidence, roughly between 1 in 60 000 to 100 000 in europeans, less in others. (see src above for incidence numbers)
Dietary cholesterol doesnt influence serum cholesterol levels significantly... Its synthesized by the organism, and excess of it in the diet can only reduce natural synthesis. Beyond that the only way a vegan diet affects your cholesterol is decreasing LDL which is harmful anyways. You will be able to synthesize enough of it overall if you eat enough macros
"We confirm from the review of the literature on epidemiological data, meta-analysis, and clinical interventions where dietary cholesterol challenges were utilized that there is not a direct correlation between cholesterol intake and blood cholesterol. This lack of correlation is mainly due to the compensatory mechanisms exerted by the organism to manage excess dietary cholesterol, including decreases in cholesterol absorption and down-regulation of cholesterol synthesis."
these people's lives are ruined on any diet, they're disabled mentally, a vegan diet isnt going to be a cause factor.
but sure, its a rare exception im willing to make, albeit any sane medical professional will recommend a diet high in saturated fat
as i mentioned above, veganism doesnt necessarily cause any of them
Theyre usually on the lower end, but you can have high cholesterol on a vegan diet. You can increase your intake in fat, proteins and carbs so you can be assured your body has the ability to synthesize it.
because of morality yeah, there's no rationalization for killing animals if you believe killing humans is immoral
but i dont. How would you convince someone like me, what do you think about me?
i would have a debate on the morality of animal slaughter and how its immoral to a degree similar to murder, and i believe its a necessary logical extension of moral beliefs about humans
