D
Deleted member 14699
Kraken
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2021
- Posts
- 8,941
- Reputation
- 6,501
Imagine a monkey without hair...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Nogoogle a chimp without hair legit looks like a short white dude
What’s funny is that they have more arcadic homid dna than blacks. Sub Saharan Africans are the most pure humans these people are the real animals. What kind of civilzied person goes into continents looting genociding and stealing that shit sounds ape like to me.
facts i was gonna share this
Man. I'm ethnic. I did this because I wanted yo trollYou whites are the real apes
View attachment 1250922
View attachment 1250923
Whites have more arcadic dna than blacks so your the ones that primitive
My lips are like niggas
There is no humans more animalistic and barbaric than the white race. They've committed more atrocities than anything else that's walked this planet.What’s funny is that they have more arcadic homid dna than blacks. Sub Saharan Africans are the most pure humans these people are the real animals. What kind of civilzied person goes into continents looting genociding and stealing that shit sounds ape like to me.
i wouldn't call them monkeys i dont think they are the same as me they are probably just homo erectusImagine a monkey without hair...
Wouldn’t that mean the Caucasians are more ape like since your race committed the most genocides and started to world wars. Your whole history in Europe is was a war torn hellhole for thousands of years while Africa was one of the safest places on earth compared to the rest of the world so who’s the real dumbed down human?i wouldn't call them monkeys i dont think they are the same as me they are probably just homo erectus
View attachment 1251024
so a dumbed down more aggressive type of human sounds familiar doesn't it?
View attachment 1251030
Cope@RetardSubhuman belongs in a zoo i agree he's on suicide watch now 100%
It’s cope because whites should be the last people calling others monkeysim all for racism but these threads all end up the same
call me when you want me to ruin your wife and daughter together with my bbc, white cuck@RetardSubhuman belongs in a zoo i agree he's on suicide watch now 100%
>RetardSubhumancall me when you want me to ruin your wife and daughter together with my bbc, white cuck
you, you fucking are. warfare evolved man, it's not beautiful but it is what it is, the arms race and other militaristic ends helped the revolutionization and evolution of many industries. being low IQ, low EQ, low achievement and low impulse control makes you more ape-like. Being low impulse symbolizes ape-like behavior, not a organized effort of domination.Wouldn’t that mean the Caucasians are more ape like since your race committed the most genocides and started to world wars. Your whole history in Europe is was a war torn hellhole for thousands of years while Africa was one of the safest places on earth compared to the rest of the world so who’s the real dumbed down human?
How are we low impulse control when you couldn’t control the millions on millions of people who died in world war 1-2 or the anlgo wars. In Africa before Europeans nothing as savage as the shit in Europe was ever seen in Africa. After the Ethiopians beat the Italians they forgave you guys and spared some of the surviving soldiers.you, you fucking are. warfare evolved man, it's not beautiful but it is what it is, the arms race and other militaristic ends helped the revolutionization and evolution of many industries. being low IQ, low EQ, low achievement and low impulse control makes you more ape-like. Being low impulse symbolizes ape-like behavior, not a organized effort of domination.
just mention the only country to not be colonized by europeans in africa theory cope moreEthiopians beat the Italians
I’m using them as an example on how they could had killed all of the surviving soldiers but no they let them go. Ethiopia was the only country in the world not to be conquered by Europeans. North Africa and south east Asia fell to Europeansjust mention the only country to not be colonized by europeans in africa theory cope more
Lets be honest Africans or any other people wouldve done the same shit to the world if they had the extreme warfare and technological superiority as the Europeans didHow are we low impulse control when you couldn’t control the millions on millions of people who died in world war 1-2 or the anlgo wars. In Africa before Europeans nothing as savage as the shit in Europe was ever seen in Africa. After the Ethiopians beat the Italians they forgave you guys and spared some of the surviving soldiers.
What makes humans different from animals is our intellect and empathy you guys seem to lack empathy for others which is an animal trait. Before rome and Greece you Anglo fuckers were living horribly it took the Romans to give you guys civilization and they still looked down on you guys as savages, and honestly they were completely right. If anything your the apes not us you look more like apes than blacks.
Africa had many great civilizations south of the Sahara and our kings and leaders were a lot more empathetic and loving than any cold heated European cope harder bro
They had the chance to do so ( Mali empire) they were one of the strongest empires in the world at that time. They did have some harsh slavery and they did conquer others but nothing on the level of Europeans. In the old world the safest place to be would be in Africa due to the fact that genocides and killing on a mass scale didn’t exist in Africa before Europeans.Lets be honest Africans or any other people wouldve done the same shit to the world if they had the extreme warfare and technological superiority as the Europeans did
You can't compare the Mali Empires strength to the British/French/Spanish etc during the colonial era and it's a completly differently timeline, they might have been strong but they didn't have absolutely superior warfare and knowledge to be able to conquer the world as the EuropeansThey had the chance to do so ( Mali empire) they were one of the strongest empires in the world at that time. They did have some harsh slavery and they did conquer others but nothing on the level of Europeans. In the old world the safest place to be would be in Africa due to the fact that genocides and killing on a mass scale didn’t exist in Africa before Europeans.
these people wanna be so proud of looting gennocide and millions of deaths but then in the same breath call black people inherently violent
You can't compare the Mali Empires strength to the British/French/Spanish etc during the colonial era and it's a completly differently timeline, they might have been strong but they didn't have absolutely superior warfare and knowledge to be able to conquer the world as the Europeans
The Mali empire had the ability to conquer parts of Europe during its peak. They were as strong as the northern African societies why do you think Northern Africans rarely tried to conquer sub Saharan kingdoms. North Africans conquered Spain and parts of Southern Europe the Mali empire would had easily done the same.You can't compare the Mali Empires strength to the British/French/Spanish etc during the colonial era and it's a completly differently timeline, they might have been strong but they didn't have absolutely superior warfare and knowledge to be able to conquer the world as the Europeans
No they couldn’t conquer the world but they could had been a threat to many civilizations. The kingdom of kush even beat the Romans many times to the point where the Romans had to sign a peace treaty with kush.I Am 5 PSL HTN
You could theorize but they still do not compare how easy the European colonial powers could do it, it wouldve never happend. Give them firepower to combat their enemies with primal technology and a huge fleet and it would be realisticThe Mali empire had the ability to conquer Europe during its peak. They were as strong as the northern African societies why do you think Northern Africans rarely tried to conquer sub Saharan kingdoms. North Africans conquered Spain and parts of Southern Europe the Mali empire would had easily done the same.
the kanem bornu empire ruled through northern Nigeria through today’s Algeria. Africans could had easily done with the Europeans done but they didn’t
Your showing me Zulu army’s here’s some real African armies and soldiersYou could theorize but they still do not compare how easy the European colonial powers could do it, it wouldve never happend. Give them firepower to combat their enemies with primal technology and a huge fleet and it would be realistic
View attachment 1251190vsView attachment 1251191View attachment 1251192
View attachment 1251194View attachment 1251197vsView attachment 1251195View attachment 1251196
An European colonization makes more sense, due to better interests, profits, the industrial revolution and it could be done easier with their warfare superiority and easy transportationYour showing me Zulu army’s here’s some real African armies and soldiers
View attachment 1251211View attachment 1251213
View attachment 1251214
View attachment 1251218
View attachment 1251220View attachment 1251221
It was easy tho it took 500 years to conquer west and East African kingdoms
I mean they were able to control Algeria and Eurocentist label North Africans as “Caucasian” meaning that Algerians are the same race as Europeans. So what makes you think they couldn’t just conquer parts of Eastern Europe.An European colonization makes more sense, due to better interests, profits, the industrial revolution and it could be done easier with their warfare superiority and easy transportation
Seems way more realistic in comparision to an African empire coming and conquering Europe with a full blown war in the middle ages just lol
In the middle age sub Saharan Africa was far ahead of Europe in Science military and more progressive laws besides rome and Greece there’s no other ancient civilizations from Europe that could had rival the likes in North Africa the Middle East and AsiaAn European colonization makes more sense, due to better interests, profits, the industrial revolution and it could be done easier with their warfare superiority and easy transportation
Seems way more realistic in comparision to an African empire coming and conquering Europe with a full blown war in the middle ages just lol
Perhaps they could, I am not denying your theory, what I am saying it would not be nowhere as easy for the Mali Empire as the colonial powers and they had less reasons so how can those two be compared. You argue that Africans have more empathy than Europeans because they didnt randomly ride across the globe to battle Europeans(less warfare superiority gap) with no major interestsI mean they were able to control Algeria and Eurocentist label North Africans as “Caucasian” meaning that Algerians are the same race as Europeans. So what makes you think they couldn’t just conquer parts of Eastern Europe.
colonism wasn’t a few men with guns it was army’s of different Europeans fighting these African kingdoms. The slave trade destroyed these African kingdoms and they didn’t really lose until the mid 18th hundreds and early 20th
all humans are capable of good and evil they want to say that blacks are inherently prone to crime but I’m showing them their people were far worse than blacks. These people wanna be racist so I’m giving them a taste of their own medicine I don’t hate any race.Perhaps they could, I am not denying your theory, what I am saying it would not be nowhere as easy for the Mali Empire as the colonial powers and they had less reasons so how can those two be compared. You argue that Africans have more empathy than Europeans because they didnt randomly ride across the globe to battle Europeans(less warfare superiority gap) with no major interests
If an European and an African had a button to be able to conquer the entire world with one single click do you honestly only think the European would click "because they are inherently evil"
its not like that its iq and iq is inheritable we never all evolved in the same areas and at the same paceWouldn’t that mean the Caucasians are more ape like since your race committed the most genocides and started to world wars. Your whole history in Europe is was a war torn hellhole for thousands of years while Africa was one of the safest places on earth compared to the rest of the world so who’s the real dumbed down human?
is this subhuman retard alt account?Cope
There’s tons of evidence to support the Homo sapients first came out of Africa. Homo erectus was already out of Africa so sub Saharan homo Sapiens didn’t mix. Homo erectus looked similar to blacks due to evolving in the hot west African environment. after leaving Africa the homo erectus started to resemble the neanderthal. The Neanderthal resembles Europeans due to the climate simple as that.its not like that its iq and iq is inheritable we never all evolved in the same areas and at the same pace
View attachment 1251591
homo sapien has a more "white" skull but he was a darkish brown hue due to them being found all around europe asia and the some middle east
View attachment 1251592
its just a bit odd how uncanny homo erectus looks and how his behaviours are like aggression and just a more primitive way of life
View attachment 1251595
this is the modern man and what homo erectus would've looked like but in the end we are all humans but just different
not trying to be racist or anything i just am answering the question i dont really like these threads
they stayed in Africa for 10 thousands years then they spend 40 thousand in Europe and a bit more tbh its just that some evolved differentThere’s tons of evidence to support the Homo sapients first came out of Africa. Homo erectus was already out of Africa so sub Saharan homo Sapiens didn’t mix. Homo erectus looked similar to blacks due to evolving in the hot west African environment environment. after leaving Africa the homo erectus started to resemble the neanderthal. The Neanderthal resembles Europeans due to the climate simple as that.
the homo erectus were pretty smart for early homids able to use tools and some early art from the creature and besides that they are also found to be mixed with Europeans rather than Africans.
The purest homo Sapiens probably would be the Khoisan View attachment 1251903 since they are the oldest human beings to ever exist and early facial reconstructions support early humans looking more mongliod like which can be contributed to the Khoisan
Exactly they developed more Caucasianiod features due to the climate. We homids traded in our body hair for the ability to run faster and sweat. That’s why there’s skin color variation and bone structure variation. If you put a Nigerian man in his family in Europe for 30 thousands years with no mixing by any Europeans his descendants will look really similar to other Europeans.they stayed in Africa for 10 thousands years then they spend 40 thousand in Europe and a bit more tbh its just that some evolved different