why do normies in face vs height debates allow "tall, average looking" to be used as an example but saying " average height and handsome" isnt

Dondraper75

Dondraper75

Luminary
Joined
Oct 27, 2024
Posts
6,178
Reputation
7,676
ive noticed this a ton where normies who overrate height use extreme examples to give an unfair advantage to height by saying "oh 6'2 mid dude will pull more than 5'3 and handsome" which is true but for some reason anytime you use "oh 5'9 and handsome" they refuse to allow it because "oh they're average height brooo thats not an issue ofc they wont have an issue" its frustrating asf for people to allow height to beat face in these arguments they make it unbalanced and unfair
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 141098, Pandora and proxyy
The face won't be able to be clearly rated, unlike the height, hence the uncertainty.
 
ive noticed this a ton where normies who overrate height use extreme examples to give an unfair advantage to height by saying "oh 6'2 mid dude will pull more than 5'3 and handsome" which is true but for some reason anytime you use "oh 5'9 and handsome" they refuse to allow it because "oh they're average height brooo thats not an issue ofc they wont have an issue" its frustrating asf for people to allow height to beat face in these arguments they make it unbalanced and unfair
normies are retards thats why
 
face > hight > muscle
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 141098

Similar threads

jjvfan
Replies
9
Views
67
truebludgemaxxer
truebludgemaxxer
ohslash
Replies
1
Views
28
eiko
eiko
mr007
Replies
20
Views
94
mr007
mr007
.𝐏𝐍𝐄𝐔𝐌𝐀𝐓.
Replies
27
Views
150
huecomundoda2
huecomundoda2

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top