Meteor21
Luminary
- Joined
- May 18, 2022
- Posts
- 8,264
- Reputation
- 9,587
Give me a fucking break, the left wing ones attending feminist rallies aren't getting laid either.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
It's a lot of incels too, a lot of SJWs are autistic incelsNo incel is going to feminist stuff… that’s cucked normies not cels
That’s the fucking opposite of autismIt's a lot of incels too, a lot of SJWs are autistic incels
Bro what? They're the ones that created microaggressions and "enthusiastic consent" cause they can't read social cuesThat’s the fucking opposite of autism
True words. If foids would give socially awkward men a chance (or if foids would step up and make the move when a socially awkward guy she's attracted to isn't reading her clues), inceldom among autistic men would be way less common.Foids can't admit they they are part of the problem. Or most of the problem.
I used to be an SJW incel. I'm now an alt right incel.It's a lot of incels too, a lot of SJWs are autistic incels
I have a thread about how I'd much rather get rejected for looks alone than get rejected for some other reason.You have to understand that when interfacing with the world, you have to take part in the social game. Interactions are not based on sincerity/honesty/truth or whatever you think they should be based on. It's about ensuring that one can get what they want while following the rules of the game(which is mostly done on a subconscious/instinctive level), since breaking the rules can make you a target(if a low value male) or worsen your position (if female/normie male).
For example, if a woman acknowledges that she rejects you for your looks exclusively, she risks breaking the delusion that these cucks have and could suffer violence or just general negative reactions from men who might otherwise be used as potential assets.No woman wants that, so they have to tell you it is YOUR fault to push you further into submission.
havent read it.I have a thread about how I'd much rather get rejected for looks alone than get rejected for some other reason.
Here's my logic:havent read it.
but effectively they’re the same feeling on the part of the rejector manifesting itself differently
Here's the thread by the way: https://looksmax.org/threads/would-...own-based-on-looks-or-something-else.1345652/havent read it.
but effectively they’re the same feeling on the part of the rejector manifesting itself differently
Being rejected due to looks instead of compatability is more brutal imo. Former is more dehumanizing, she doesn't think you're good enoughHere's my logic:
-If a foid rejects me based on looks, that's a lot easier to accept. If the foid doesn't find me attractive, there's really no way we could ever be together (unless I become wealthy/famous).
-On the other hand, if a foid finds me physically attractive, yet rejects me for some other reason, that stings a lot more. Because it's like the foid is saying "Physically, you're my type. It is theoretically possible for us to be together, yet I'm turning you down because xyz quality of yours (totally unrelated to your looks) repulses me."
right, imagine thinking this has nothing to do with autism:Bro what? They're the ones that created microaggressions and "enthusiastic consent" cause they can't read social cues
There are literally autistic modelsautism = automatic incel for life
just be 1 in a million theoryThere are literally autistic models![]()
right, imagine thinking this has nothing to do with autism:
You don't need to be 1 in a million to be a modeljust be 1 in a million theory
1 in 2 millionYou don't need to be 1 in a million to be a model![]()
I guess it depends on where you stand on the looks scale vs social desirability scale.Being rejected due to looks instead of compatability is more brutal imo. Former is more dehumanizing, she doesn't think you're good enough