why does 1+1=2?

[Deleted member 18849]

to each their own.

Do you want to become shorter? Mirin if you get limb shorterning surgery with Rosburch or Paley. Torsomax

 

[Deleted member 17791]

Do you want to become shorter? Mirin if you get limb shorterning surgery with Rosburch or Paley. Torsomax

I'd get weird proportions then. It's better to be 5'9 femboy with long legs than be 4'11 with short stubby legs.

 

[Deleted member 18849]

I'd get weird proportions then. It's better to be 5'9 femboy with long legs than be 4'11 with short stubby legs.

Women have on average shorter legs for their body height than men. You could benefit from a 2 inch leg reduction lol.

Add a hip femoral head distance widening surgery with Paley, and you're done.

This reversed.

 

[Deleted member 17791]

Women have on average shorter legs for their body height than men. You could benefit from a 2 inch leg reduction lol.

Add a hip femoral head distance widening surgery with Paley, and you're done.

This reversed.

it's proportions that matter, women have longer legs proportionally. Barbie is 5'9 canonically and she has long legs making up like over half her height, just like me.

 

[Deleted member 18849]

it's proportions that matter, women have longer legs proportionally. Barbie is 5'9 canonically and she has long legs making up like over half her height, just like me.

Nope. Women have proportionally shorter legs on average. This is one of the most common going around the internet myths regarding physical metrics and proportions, simply because of women's lack of balls and dick inseams, heels frauding and clothing.

Men on average have longer legs than women for their body height.

 

[Deleted member 17791]

Nope. Women have proportionally shorter legs on average. This is one of the most going around the internet myths, simply because of women's lack of balls and dick inseams, heels frauding and clothing.

Men on average have longer legs than women for their body height.

I don't want short stubby legs, it's not elegant in the slightest.

 

[wollet2]

 

[wollet2]

Whatever i’m caging. The fact alone that I have to argue that things exist independent of human experience is lowering my IQ as we speak.

You literally think the earth didn’t exist before humans lmfao. That humans are the arbiters of reality. Even though there are rocks older than life has even existed on this planet. The only place on the internet you can make claims this fucking stupid

Arguing semantics about why words are the way they are. Nigga how about you study old english if you want to know why the word rock is rock?

Or did old english not exist because you weren’t alive while it was still spoken.

And why do ONLY the subjective experience of humans matter? Why not other mammals?

youre not approaching the conversation with a similar mindset. youre too angry and trying to prove things

 

[wollet2]

Or you could looksmax and never have to worry about it again

 

[wollet2]

Or you could looksmax and never have to worry about it again

kys

 

[wollet2]

summing and mixing are the exact same thing because no two things are identical

wow. this
i gave the proper attention to this thread now

 

[Member]

Because god said so

 

[Deleted member 115987]

that standard intuition is if you have one apple and you add another you have two apples

but what if you have a bucket of water and a bucket of salt and add them together? then you get 1+1=1

or add fire to fuel you get 1+1=0

or something like this: , 1+1=many?

this is why it is clear math is purely a construct

apples=x
x+x=2x divide all by x 1+1=2
water=y salt=z
y+z=y+z
different symbols

 

[Harold O'brien]

apples=x
x+x=2x divide all by x 1+1=2
water=y salt=z
y+z=y+z
different symbols

i already debunked this one - no two things are really identical. both apples can't be 'x' because they have subtle differences

 

[Deleted member 115987]

i already debunked this one - no two things are really identical. both apples can't be 'x' because they have subtle differences

everythings unique u have to understand the language somehow

 

[Harold O'brien]

everythings unique u have to understand the language somehow

so why didnt we define 1+1=14?

 

[Deleted member 115987]

so why didnt we define 1+1=14?

dk

 

[liberty]

i already debunked this one - no two things are really identical. both apples can't be 'x' because they have subtle differences

two things can be in the same category without being identical

 

[Harold O'brien]

two things can be in the same category without being identical

exactly, but it's also possible for things to change category without obeying basic algebraic axioms

 

[liberty]

exactly, but it's also possible for things to change category without obeying basic algebraic axioms

you mean like the video example in the OP?

 

[Harold O'brien]

you mean like the video example in the OP?

yeah

 

[liberty]

yeah

that's not really addition IMO

addition seems to just be grouping things in your mind, physically merging things into one object isn't an example of addition

 

[Harold O'brien]

that's not really addition IMO

addition seems to just be grouping things in your mind, physically merging things into one object isn't an example of addition

but they only group that way in your mind because you have experienced the behaviour of physical solids. e.g. i have 3 sheep and my neighbour has 4 sheep. when i let them graze in my field there are now 7 sheep.

if sheep were magical gaseous beings i don't think we would interept things the same way mentally.

 

[liberty]

but they only group that way in your mind because you have experienced the behaviour of physical solids. e.g. i have 3 sheep and my neighbour has 4 sheep. when i let them graze in my field there are now 7 sheep.

if sheep were magical gaseous beings i don't think we would interept things the same way mentally.

if we could see where each gaseous creature is we would interpret it that way, its a problem with the senses

but if they mix together then there is nothing to count, the original 7 objects outright disappeared, so the object that had the characteristic of having seven of a particular thing is gone, so you cant say that this object is now contained within your field, much less use math to describe what happened

the error is in using math to describe what happened

 

[goober55]

that standard intuition is if you have one apple and you add another you have two apples

but what if you have a bucket of water and a bucket of salt and add them together? then you get 1+1=1

or add fire to fuel you get 1+1=0

or something like this: , 1+1=many?

this is why it is clear math is purely a construct

because the jews said so

welcome to the real world chud.

 

[Harold O'brien]

if we could see where each gaseous creature is we would interpret it that way, its a problem with the senses

but if they mix together then there is nothing to count, the original 7 objects outright disappeared, so the object that had the characteristic of having seven of a particular thing is gone, so you cant say that this object is now contained within your field, much less use math to describe what happened

the error is in using math to describe what happened

so we would have 4+3=0

 

[liberty]

so we would have 4+3=0

no, because we dont have 4+3 happening

if the gasses mix there is never a group of 4 present in the field, so we cant perform the math operation and group it with the group of 3

 

[Harold O'brien]

no, because we dont have 4+3 happening

if the gasses mix there is never a group of 4 present in the field, so we cant perform the math operation and group it with the group of 3

you are getting the cart before the horse

math follows observation, observation does not follow math. that is the entire point of this thread

 

[liberty]

you are getting the cart before the horse

math follows observation, observation does not follow math. that is the entire point of this thread

i didnt read through, i just saw your latest reply and assumed youre challenging math as a whole by presenting problems written in text where it intuitively doesnt seem to work, and i was just trying to explain whats wrong there

yeah math is a mental construct, like triangles