why east asians are not better than whites at creating technologies, wealth and civilizations despite having a higher iq

I wouldn't hate. It's only a good thing if we become less of fetish and normalized by the general population. It gets old quick if ur only fucking with alt weeb girls. (I have mommy issues and I want a older woman)
I am bagging mlif rn , wish me luck she big booty latina 😚
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: pardocel, Cheesyrumble and Deleted member 28418
Because Industrial Revolution was made by Satan
 
  • +1
Reactions: incel194012940 and Deleted member 28418
As a Viet, I think I can answer that question.

The main Asian traits are risk aversion and social awareness. Generally, when an asian man tries to do something, his first and foremost goal is to increase his social status. Money, political power, intellectual achievement... are all for gains of social status. That's why Asian communities have more socialistist and communist characteristics. Asian societies, therefore, are more strict and orderly.

On the other hand, the traits of the White race are curiosity and individualism. From what I observe, when white men do something, they just want to satisfy their curiosity and they care less about what other people would think. That's why Western societies are more free and open. The good thing about the Western psychology is that they will be more creative, risk-taking and innovative. But on the other hand, western people are also more crazy and degenerate.
 
  • +1
  • Ugh..
Reactions: LampPostPrime, incel194012940 and Deleted member 28418
  • JFL
Reactions: pardocel and Deleted member 27066
For 90 percent of modern history China has been more innovative than Europe till the last 160 years just look how fast
the Chinese are catching up to the west despite the ccp being a regressive government lmao
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 16369, pardocel, Cheesyrumble and 1 other person
in 1992 china had the same conomy as india:

then they started to copy many things from whites like the economic system and many other things and became rich, before this also the chinese (also japan and korea) had lost some wars against whites because they had worse technology
let's start by differentiatiating the brain of whites and east asians, whites and east asians evolved in a very different way, east asians somehow evolved to have less affective empathy (and more cognitive empathy) than whites and whites have too much affective empathy:
"Northwest Europeans and East Asians are similar in having high levels of empathy but differ in the relative importance of cognitive empathy versus affective empathy. Affective empathy is much more key to prosocial behavior among Northwest Europeans than among East Asians."
"When Siu and Shek (2005) studied empathy in a Chinese sample ranging from 18 to 29 years of age, they found that the participants made little distinction between cognitive empathy and affective (emotional) empathy. These two components seemed to be weakly differentiated from each other. The authors attributed this finding to "cultural differences" "Chinese people might not perceive the items from the two dimensions as too different in nature." The authors went on to note that "there are still debates concerning the boundaries of emotional and cognitive processes underlying empathy" and that "the causal relationships between cognitive and emotional processing underlying empathy are not simple or unidirectional."
In short, the Chinese participants could see things from another person's perspective and understand how that person felt. There is much less indication, however, that they involuntarily experienced the feelings of other people, especially feelings of distress. This is not to say they were incapable of such emotion transference, but rather that it seems limited in scope, perhaps being confined to family members and not extended to strangers."
"- When viewing a person suffering physical pain, British subjects report greater negative affect than do East Asian subjects.
- When viewing a person suffering social pain, British subjects show greater empathic concern but lower empathic accuracy than do East Asian subjects.
- British subjects report greater empathic concern, but lower empathic accuracy than do Chinese subjects. Emotional expressivity predicts British but not Chinese empathic concern.
- Empathic concern explains differences between the two groups in donating, a measure of prosocial behavior.
- American subjects, more so than Japanese subjects, feel more affective empathy for one friend over another when the two friends are engaged in an intense disagreement."
there are 2 types of empathy:
cognitive empathy: the ability to imagine how another person feels without involuntarily making that feeling one's own
affective (emotional) empathy: you not only understand how others feel but also transfer those feelings to yourself, i.e., there is a greater tendency to feel the other person's pain.
For instance, sociopaths have a low affective empathy and high cognitive empathy. Wouldn't this eventually destroy social order in east asian societies?
east asians have managed to offset this by having this gene called DRD4, it basically lowers your individualism and increases your social conformity:
Testing Japanese and European Canadian undergraduates (n = 784), we succeeded in replicating these previous findings: the Canadian students were more independent, whereas the Japanese students were more interdependent."
how did whites evolve:
whites evolved to have high individualism, decreased conformism and high affective empathy to offset the last 2, if east asians had the same personality as whites they would be 100 times more technologically advanced than whites. There is a problem with whites, THEY HAVE TOO MUCH EMPATHY, that is why they let non-whites into their countries, gave rights to blacks and are cucks to fucking everyone, the whites in looksmax are not like this because they have high neuroticism like hitler (hitler had autism as i explain below) did due to having autism (high neuroticism makes you more racist and misogynist and is caused by having autism)
how to fix whites:
whites were not always like this but the behavioral sink ruined them:
https://incels.is/threads/why-the-b...universe-25-mice-experiment-on-humans.458598/
if we want to fix whites we need to give whites high neuroticism to become like hitler:
by the way the jews are not evil, they just have much more empathy than normal whites and more iq because of having more individualism and less conformism

my theory on Elliot Rodger:
https://incels.is/threads/why-hapa-...tive-empathy-explained-using-an-study.461116/

@looksmaxxed

BASED THREAD!!!😊
3325973 image
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 28418
Iq is cope.
 
  • +1
  • Ugh..
Reactions: XtrovertNTnormalfag, Deleted member 16369 and Deleted member 28418
It's arguable if East Asians truly have a higher IQ. They cheat a lot. East Asian governments most likely fake their test results to give the impression they are superior in some fundamental way. Plus, scientists commonly group some light-skinned non-Whites (like Semites) with Whites for thinking they belong in the same category. Our average IQ is brought down by their presence because they have a different average than ours.

In short, Europeans are the smartest. Chinks/gooks manage a close second.
Keep coping

the west is falling
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 28418
Taiwan was very poor before it got westernized
Cause Taiwan was being ran by Abo tier islanders till East Asians moved their dumb ass and within 40 years made into a industrial rich country
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 16369, Deleted member 25938, Cheesyrumble and 1 other person
Keep coping

the west is falling
90 percent of the "west" are unsustainable welfare Euro states propped by US hegemony lol

The Euro Union would fall off if the US wasn't their because most of the former soviets east of Poland contribute nothing but immigrants and sucking up US aid
 
Last edited:
forgot to add this:

"One might think that cognitive empathy would be worse than affective empathy as a basis for prosocial behavior. For instance, sociopaths are usually high in cognitive empathy: they know how another person feels in a given situation, but they use this knowledge to exploit and control that person. Wouldn't their resulting success eventually destroy social order? East Asian societies may have avoided this outcome through their low level of individualism and their correspondingly high level of social conformity. Kitayama et al. (2014) makes this point when discussing certain alleles of a gene, DRD4, that are associated with risk seeking and heavy drinking in the United States but not in East Asia. These alleles seem to increase the desire to emulate one's peers, and such emulation is more likely to favor dysfunctional behavior in the United States than in East Asia

These alleles seem to explain the weaker individualism and stronger social conformity of East Asians."
https://evoandproud.blogspot.com/2020/03/affective-empathy-double-edged-sword.html
 
  • +1
Reactions: LampPostPrime
Who cares? Nothing would be possible without the Arabs and Indians achieving mathematical achievements and spreading numerical knowledge to Europe. Europe was a backwater compared to the Middle East for centuries. They created civilization while cumskins lived in caves. Different eras have different superpowers.

Keep jerking off to the last 300 years. Cause that is a very short amount of time compared to all of history. Things are evening out
Pure Indians and Arabs were white, they were almost another race compared to the subhumans in these countries now
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 16369
eliott is an overused example, there's like 2 hapa psychos at most, others are just in the background.
 
i tried to research what would happen if the roles were reversed (east asian father and white female) because i wanted to create the ideal race, but the results were worse:
View attachment 2148055
then i was thinking other things about black females and white males children and saw that the genes of the father are a little bit more dominant than the ones of the mother, but that doesn't matter because in evolution the male always goes for the most neotenous female and that drives evolution:
lighter eyes are actually more common on men: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23601698/

as for skin color: ''However, in some populations such as in Italy, Poland, Ireland, Spain and Portugal men are found to have fairer complexions, and this has been ascribed as a cause to increased melanoma risk in men.[85][86] Similarly, studies done in the late 19th Century/early 20th Century in Europe also conflicted with the notion at least in regards to Northern Europeans. The studies found that in England women tend to have darker hair, eyes, and skin complexation than men, and in particular women darken in relation to men during puberty.[87] A study in Germany during this period showed that German men were more likely to have lighter skin, blond hair, and lighter eyes, while German women had darker hair, eyes and skin tone on average.[88]''

you mostly think darker features are masculine because of bbc propaganda from the last 50 years, stop it, it's cucked.
 
lighter eyes are actually more common on men: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23601698/

as for skin color: ''However, in some populations such as in Italy, Poland, Ireland, Spain and Portugal men are found to have fairer complexions, and this has been ascribed as a cause to increased melanoma risk in men.[85][86] Similarly, studies done in the late 19th Century/early 20th Century in Europe also conflicted with the notion at least in regards to Northern Europeans. The studies found that in England women tend to have darker hair, eyes, and skin complexation than men, and in particular women darken in relation to men during puberty.[87] A study in Germany during this period showed that German men were more likely to have lighter skin, blond hair, and lighter eyes, while German women had darker hair, eyes and skin tone on average.[88]''

you mostly think darker features are masculine because of bbc propaganda from the last 50 years, stop it, it's cucked.
"late 19th Century/early 20th Century", yeah, sure i will trust a study made 100 or 200 years ago:

Screenshot 2023 04 08 125119
https://www.independent.co.uk/life-...e-black-genetic-roots-dna-study-a8308301.html
https://www.mdpi.com/2624-8611/4/2/27
 
Last edited:
lighter eyes are actually more common on men: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23601698/

as for skin color: ''However, in some populations such as in Italy, Poland, Ireland, Spain and Portugal men are found to have fairer complexions, and this has been ascribed as a cause to increased melanoma risk in men.[85][86] Similarly, studies done in the late 19th Century/early 20th Century in Europe also conflicted with the notion at least in regards to Northern Europeans. The studies found that in England women tend to have darker hair, eyes, and skin complexation than men, and in particular women darken in relation to men during puberty.[87] A study in Germany during this period showed that German men were more likely to have lighter skin, blond hair, and lighter eyes, while German women had darker hair, eyes and skin tone on average.[88]''

you mostly think darker features are masculine because of bbc propaganda from the last 50 years, stop it, it's cucked.
peter frost says that women have lighter eyes than men, i prefer to believe him:

 
I wouldn't hate. It's only a good thing if we become less of fetish and normalized by the general population. It gets old quick if ur only fucking with alt weeb girls. (I have mommy issues and I want a older woman)
Give some of those alt weeb girls you're tired of to me. I've never had a single friend and I want to feel the touch of a woman.
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Cheesyrumble and Deleted member 28418
nah i got 30ish, i got mommy issue
Sometimes I think that the reason I like younger looking girls is because I've fantasized about having a little sister I could rape since I was like literally in elementary school. Never had mommy or daddy issues thankfully.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: LampPostPrime
peter frost says that women have lighter eyes than men, i prefer to believe him:


Peter Frost loves to duke the idea of european men being lighter skinned, along with all the proof for it.

Let's see what he said before:

https://europepmc.org/article/med/17326100

"Human skin‐color sexual dimorphism: a test of the sexual selection hypothesis

Peter Frost
American journal of physical anthropology 133 (1), 779-780, 2007
Women have lighter skin than men do across a wide range of populations, even on the unexposed skin of the upper inner arm, possibly because of sexual selection by men for lighter-skinned women. If this hypothesis is true, human skin color should become more sexually dimorphic with increasing distance from the equator, since sexual selection for lighter skin in women would be less constrained by natural selection for darker skin in both sexes. Yet when Madrigal and Kelly (2006) analyzed skin reflectance data from 53 different samples, they found that the most dimorphic human populations were actually those of medium skin color at medium latitudes."

"It is perhaps significant that this sex difference seems to disappear or even reverse itself when skin reflectance is close to the physiological maximum, notably in Dutch and Belgian subjects (Leguebe, 1961; van Rijn-Tournel, 1966; Rigters-Aris, 1973)"
 
"late 19th Century/early 20th Century", yeah, sure i will trust a study made 100 or 200 years ago:
Modern day studies say the same thing fool, in europe men are lighter than women.



"Quantitative measures of skin, hair, and eye pigmentation were obtained for 470 individuals recruited in Ireland, Poland, Italy, and Portugal and included in a two-stage genetic association study of pigmentary phenotypes.

Males (M) have consistently lighter pigmentation (lower scored) than females (F) in all four countries."




"Meanwhile, several studies have shown that female hormones promote the production of melanin, the pigment that protects the skin from the sun. Indeed, "estrogen could be the reason why women have a darker skin tone, even when the genotypes of both sexes are the same, meaning that their risk of skin cancer is lower. So much so that skin cancer is much more prevalent in men," explains Bárbara Hernando, fellow researcher at the Melanogen research group and coauthor of the study.

The study included 384 genetic variants and six physical characteristics. The results show that, with the same genetic variability, men tend to have lighter skin pigmentation and a worse response to the effects of ultraviolet rays," Martínez-Cadenas tells us.
 
Last edited:
Modern day studies say the same thing fool, in europe men are lighter than women.



"Quantitative measures of skin, hair, and eye pigmentation were obtained for 470 individuals recruited in Ireland, Poland, Italy, and Portugal and included in a two-stage genetic association study of pigmentary phenotypes.

Males (M) have consistently lighter pigmentation (lower scored) than females (F) in all four countries."




"The study included 384 genetic variants and six physical characteristics. The results show that, with the same genetic variability, men tend to have lighter skin pigmentation and a worse response to the effects of ultraviolet rays," Martínez-Cadenas tells us.
Screenshot 2023 04 12 115008
 

That study tested populations all over the world. Im talking about europeans specifically. They never published their findings on europeans themselves. Multiple published studies will tell you that european men are lighter than their female counterparts.
 
That study tested populations all over the world. Im talking about europeans specifically. They never published their findings on europeans themselves. Multiple published studies will tell you that european men are lighter than their female counterparts.
that is only before puberty, is spanish european enough?:

Screenshot 2023 04 12 115830
 
Last edited:
High IQ thread
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 28418
that is only before puberty, is spanish europeam enough?:

View attachment 2148666

Yeah, spanish is european. Here's what researchers found when they measured the skin of spanish people:




"Meanwhile, several studies have shown that female hormones promote the production of melanin, the pigment that protects the skin from the sun. Indeed, "estrogen could be the reason why women have a darker skin tone, even when the genotypes of both sexes are the same, meaning that their risk of skin cancer is lower. So much so that skin cancer is much more prevalent in men," explains Bárbara Hernando, fellow researcher at the Melanogen research group and coauthor of the study.

The study included 384 genetic variants and six physical characteristics. The results show that, with the same genetic variability, men tend to have lighter skin pigmentation and a worse response to the effects of ultraviolet rays," Martínez-Cadenas tells us.
 
Yeah, spanish is european. Here's what researchers found when they measured the skin of spanish people:




"Meanwhile, several studies have shown that female hormones promote the production of melanin, the pigment that protects the skin from the sun. Indeed, "estrogen could be the reason why women have a darker skin tone, even when the genotypes of both sexes are the same, meaning that their risk of skin cancer is lower. So much so that skin cancer is much more prevalent in men," explains Bárbara Hernando, fellow researcher at the Melanogen research group and coauthor of the study.

The study included 384 genetic variants and six physical characteristics. The results show that, with the same genetic variability, men tend to have lighter skin pigmentation and a worse response to the effects of ultraviolet rays," Martínez-Cadenas tells us.
Screenshot 2023 04 12 121217
 


"Sex-specific analyses in this study showed significant differences in the pattern of association with pigmentation and tanning response traits between male and female individuals. Out of all SNPs with significant sex-specific associations, we found significantly more SNPs associated with dark pigmentation or sun protection in female than in male individuals (107 versus 75; P = 2.32 × 10−6), the latter being more commonly associated with light pigmentation and poor sun tolerance – traits highly associated with melanoma predisposition [9] (Fig. 2). The percentage of SNPs associated with both dark eye and dark hair colour in females was higher than in males (72.72 versus 40.74 %, P = 0.025; 78.57 versus 48.28 %, P = 0.018, respectively). This association pattern was also observed for skin colour, but without significance (66.67 versus 41.94 %, P = 0.068)."

Distribution of the SNPs associated with pigmentation and sun sensitivity traits separated by sex.

13293_2016_70_Fig2_HTML.gif
 
Pure Indians and Arabs were white, they were almost another race compared to the subhumans in these countries now
no man, india was always mixed
 
"Sex-specific analyses in this study showed significant differences in the pattern of association with pigmentation and tanning response traits between male and female individuals. Out of all SNPs with significant sex-specific associations, we found significantly more SNPs associated with dark pigmentation or sun protection in female than in male individuals (107 versus 75; P = 2.32 × 10−6), the latter being more commonly associated with light pigmentation and poor sun tolerance – traits highly associated with melanoma predisposition [9] (Fig. 2). The percentage of SNPs associated with both dark eye and dark hair colour in females was higher than in males (72.72 versus 40.74 %, P = 0.025; 78.57 versus 48.28 %, P = 0.018, respectively). This association pattern was also observed for skin colour, but without significance (66.67 versus 41.94 %, P = 0.068)."

Distribution of the SNPs associated with pigmentation and sun sensitivity traits separated by sex.

13293_2016_70_Fig2_HTML.gif
are you gonna tell me that wikipedia is wrong?

Screenshot 2023 04 12 123255
 
  • JFL
Reactions: incel194012940
@cloUder
Screenshot 2023 04 12 123841

women do have darker skin but that is before puberty

women in germany tan more so their skin is darker, that darker skin is not genetic
 
@cloUder
View attachment 2148789

women do have darker skin but that is before puberty

women in germany and england tan more so their skin is darker, that darker skin is not genetic

They tested the underarms of women in recents studies which show the exact same result. That's not tan. And they found women to have darker eyes and hair to boot. Your wikipedia article explicitly states "in some studied populations". Later in the article they tell you that Europeans are not one of those populations. From Spain and Italy to Germany and England, men are more pale than women, with lighter eyes and hair.

Frequencies of eye hair and skin pigmentation types among Icelandic and Dutch
 
They tested the underarms of women in recents studies which show the exact same result. That's not tan. And they found women to have darker eyes and hair to boot. Your wikipedia article explicitly states "in some studied populations". Later in the article they tell you that Europeans are not one of those populations. From Spain and Italy to Germany and England, men are more pale than women, with lighter eyes and hair.

View attachment 2148799
from the same study you are talking about:

Screenshot 2023 04 12 125111

we are talking about how whites were created, not how light is the skin color of white males, if black males have darker skin than black females, we can understand that white skin was created by black men choosing the most neotenous females
 
Last edited:
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 26859
For 90 percent of modern history China has been more innovative than Europe till the last 160 years just look how fast
the Chinese are catching up to the west despite the ccp being a regressive government lmao
catching up?

usa 1st highest wages in the world

china 64th lmao ur literally peasants
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 28418
from the same study you are talking about:

View attachment 2148813

Nothing in this quote that goes against what i said. Read my replies again:

"It is perhaps significant that this sex difference seems to disappear or even reverse itself when skin reflectance is close to the physiological maximum, notably in Dutch and Belgian subjects (Leguebe, 1961; van Rijn-Tournel, 1966; Rigters-Aris, 1973)"

Im only talking about Europeans here. In Europe, men are lighter skinned, and less brown, than women. “Dark men, fair women” is a third world attribute. It occurs primarily at mid-latitudal areas of the globe and becomes less pronounced with distance from the equator, and reverses itself at higher and lower latitudes.
 
its about education

in east asia they dont teach critical thinking skills, its only stupid memorization

thats why they do so well on international tests, they have very good and broad knowledge but no innovative thinkers
 
Nothing in this quote that goes against what i said. Read my replies again:



Im only talking about Europeans here. In Europe, men are lighter skinned, and less brown, than women. “Dark men, fair women” is a third world attribute. It occurs primarily at mid-latitudal areas of the globe and becomes less pronounced with distance from the equator, and reverses itself at higher and lower latitudes.
we are talking about how whites were created, not how light is the skin color of white males, if black males have darker skin than black females, we can understand that white skin was created by black men choosing the most neotenous females
 
they don't have higher iq. only taiwan and japan are comparable to whites and they have contributed somewhat in technology development, semiconductors, electronics, etc. most of china is 80 iq just like any other shithole 3rd world country with a giant population but garbage output. it's also worth noting that they have issues with sentience, it might be that they do not have much creativity and volition as a result of evolving from ants
China has higher iq than all European countries.

And to OP the reason is obviously colonialism and exploitation
 
we are talking about how whites were created, not how light is the skin color of white males, if black males have darker skin than black females, we can understand that white skin was created by black men choosing the most neotenous females

Nothing out there to suggest your outlandish theory. Europeans = light male + dark female.
 
its about education

in east asia they dont teach critical thinking skills, its only stupid memorization

thats why they do so well on international tests, they have very good and broad knowledge but no innovative thinkers
It’s just a meme. A lot of the best minds in uk and the USA have been of an Asian origin. The rest has to do with just overall development. China is still behind because of the fact that they industrialized way later than European countries and were subject to unfair treaties and war with KMT and Japan.

China has been producing more patents per capita than all countries besides the USA while still being a fairly poor country outside of the costal cities
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 15468
they only submit results from their capital city, white countries submit for the entire country.

also a government website literally says to not trust that IQ study as there was data manipulation and they specifically stated they will not take that iq study seriously

1681318778302




yea bro.. poor people with shit countries are totally smarter than whites
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 15468
they only submit results from their capital city, white countries submit for the entire country.

also a government website literally says to not trust that IQ study as there was data manipulation and they specifically stated they will not take that iq study seriously

View attachment 2148823



yea bro.. poor people with shit countries are totally smarter than whites
China ain’t a poor country. Chinese Americans have consistently higher test scores and iq than whites
 
It’s just a meme. A lot of the best minds in uk and the USA have been of an Asian origin. The rest has to do with just overall development. China is still behind because of the fact that they industrialized way later than European countries and were subject to unfair treaties and war with KMT and Japan.

China has been producing more patents per capita than all countries besides the USA while still being a fairly poor country outside of the costal cities
patents per capita doesnt really translate to innovativeness, china AFAIK has way less strict patent laws than the west

i.e. its about quality not quantity
 
  • Woah
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 26859 and Deleted member 13787
Chinese Americans have consistently higher test scores and iq than whites
obviously because only really wealthy intelligent Chinese can afford and can get visa to go to US
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 15468
It’s just a meme. A lot of the best minds in uk and the USA have been of an Asian origin. The rest has to do with just overall development. China is still behind because of the fact that they industrialized way later than European countries and were subject to unfair treaties and war with KMT and Japan.

China has been producing more patents per capita than all countries besides the USA while still being a fairly poor country outside of the costal cities
but even back in time, when europeans weren‘t dominating globally we had the most innovations, we were the first to properly develop gunpowder warfare, far-range sailing etc.

not even mentioning that 90% of the most impactful scientists are of european origin
 

Similar threads

got.daim
Replies
10
Views
735
unowkn
unowkn
ggg.tv🤫
Replies
9
Views
733
Hardmaxx
H
copercel123
Replies
74
Views
1K
arian-persian
A
got.daim
Replies
30
Views
1K
InanimatePragmatist
InanimatePragmatist
got.daim
Replies
13
Views
778
InanimatePragmatist
InanimatePragmatist

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top