Why FWHR is dead

[Bitchwhipper2]

FWHR is a cope measurement because it crams multiple completely independent measurements (eyebrow setness, nose length, pilthrum, and lip thickness) in to one number, when ideally every measurent should be taken on it own.

The ratios that took its place and actually matter are ESR, Midface ratio, and facial thirds.

All of these ratios mog FWHR to dirt due to them relying on one or 2 features at most per number. Whereas FWHR depended on 4

 

[NZb6Air]

org niggas cope all day on water shit like this just to give a nigga wiht 5 skeletal deficiencies highmtn/low htn/mid appeal cause he got a fresh haircut

 

[Bitchwhipper2]

ratios are cope

Yeah bro, ratio are cope

 

[ItsOverLawg]

Yeah bro, ratio are cope
View attachment 3108888

ian somerhalder with his fucked up ipd and midface mogs chico to the ends of universe
they're cope unless they're really bad like Adriana Lima's ex husband

 

[ItsOverLawg]

View attachment 3108890

Me after seeing mirror everyday.

same tbh

 

[Bitchwhipper2]

ian somerhalder with his fucked up ipd and midface mogs chico to the ends of universe
they're cope unless they're really bad like Adriana Lima's ex husband

One or 2 ratios being slightly off wont wont stop you from being unattractive when the rest are good

 

[xnj]

i disagree. you measure your fwhr by measuring your bizygomatic width and divide it if by the distance from the top of your lips to the middle of your eyebrows (only thing is that i have also heard to measure it to your naseon instead, however all diagrams show mid eyebrows, so we just stick ot that). those are just points on ones body and are independent of any other ratios, and measurements you stated above. setness of eyebrows may play a role, but then again, if we go by how everyone measures it, then that point is where your face ends vertically, and higher set eyebrows will give an impression of a narrower fwhr.

 

[ItsOverLawg]

One or 2 ratios being slightly off wont wont stop you from being unattractive when the rest are good

but then over-obessing over them wont help either tbh

 

[castizo]

u can keep it too tbh

no bro u ruined it

 

[ItsOverLawg]

M

Mogs in mumbai maybe

alright sean o trist whatever u say sean o trist

 

[Bitchwhipper2]

i disagree. you measure your fwhr by measuring your bizygomatic width and divide it if by the distance from the top of your lips to the middle of your eyebrows (only thing is that i have also heard to measure it to your naseon instead, however all diagrams show mid eyebrows, so we just stick ot that). those are just points on ones body and are independent of any other ratios, and measurements you stated above. setness of eyebrows may play a role, but then again, if we go by how everyone measures it, then that point is where your face ends vertically, and higher set eyebrows will give an impression of a narrower fwhr.

Disagree.

Low set eyebrows give the impression of low set eyebrows.

The look of short midface with high set eyebrows is way different to the look of a long midface with low set eyebrows.

To much possible variation within the same ratio for it to be relevant

 

[Bitchwhipper2]

but then over-obessing over them wont help either tbh

I get what you mean. But at the same time I like figuring out what makes a face look bad. And nearly everytime it can be fixed through improving ratios

 

[ItsOverLawg]

I get what you mean. But at the same time I like figuring out what makes a face look bad. And nearly everytime it can be fixed through improving ratios

i need to get my lower eyelids retracted

 

[NZb6Air]

i need to get my lower eyelids retracted

nigga opinionated like that when you probably need infras and not eyelid retraction, botched incoming

 

[xnj]

Disagree.

Low set eyebrows give the impression of low set eyebrows.

The look of short midface with high set eyebrows is way different to the look of a long midface with low set eyebrows.

To much possible variation within the same ratio for it to be relevant

setness of eyebrows are not what determines how ur midface looks, but it is the fwhr. people have long midfaces with ideal/compact fwhr, and vice versa, and their faces look completely different. for instance a fwhr of 2 is what stops a 0.9 midface from looking like a horse, all other factors put aside.

 

[ItsOverLawg]

fuck is you saying my nigger

on skibidi

 

[Bitchwhipper2]

setness of eyebrows are not what determines how ur midface looks, but it is the fwhr. people have long midfaces with ideal/compact fwhr, and vice versa, and their faces look completely different. for instance a fwhr of 2 is what stops a 0.9 midface from looking like a horse, all other factors put aside.

No, not at all.

If you have a 0.9 midface and fwhr at 2, your ESR is fucked.

I believe ironically that someone with a smaller midface ratio would actually benefit from a lower "fwhr". But I would rather just say narrower cheekbones

 

[toolateforme]

Midface ratio < eme angle

 

[xnj]

No, not at all.

If you have a 0.9 midface and fwhr at 2, your ESR is fucked.

I believe ironically that someone with a smaller midface ratio would actually benefit from a lower "fwhr". But I would rather just say narrower cheekbones

ok, 2 may have been a stretch, but something lower, around ideal, can definitely change that without fucking up your esr.

 

[grungymallard97]

Yeah bro, ratio are cope
View attachment 3108888

Am I bugging or does chico look worse here then I last remember

 

[caiolindo]

FWHR is a cope measurement because it crams multiple completely independent measurements (eyebrow setness, nose length, pilthrum, and lip thickness) in to one number, when ideally every measurent should be taken on it own.

The ratios that took its place and actually matter are ESR, Midface ratio, and facial thirds.

All of these ratios mog FWHR to dirt due to them relying on one or 2 features at most per number. Whereas FWHR depended on 4

disagree, but yeah, we have another important midface ratios

 

[Bitchwhipper2]

ok, 2 may have been a stretch, but something lower, around ideal, can definitely change that without fucking up your esr.

I get what you mean. But what my thread boils down to is that I dont believe in ideas such as "wide", "long" or "short" because I just look at the features themselves and compare them to the rest.

I dont believe a feature being too small can be compensated another being *extra*. That just throws harmony off imo

 

[Bitchwhipper2]

disagree, but yeah, we have another important midface ratios

I believe fwhr could be useful if it was measured from mouth opening to pupil

 

[hunkymonkey69]

Disagree.

Low set eyebrows give the impression of low set eyebrows.

The look of short midface with high set eyebrows is way different to the look of a long midface with low set eyebrows.

To much possible variation within the same ratio for it to be relevant

so would low set brows look bad on compact midface?

 

[xnj]

I get what you mean. But what my thread boils down to is that I dont believe in ideas such as "wide", "long" or "short" because I just look at the features themselves and compare them to the rest.

I dont believe a feature being too small can be compensated another being *extra*. That just throws harmony off imo

all depends ngl, features are very interdependent

 

[Bitchwhipper2]

so would low set brows look bad on compact midface?

What im saying is that lowset brows are low set brows

Doesnt matter how compact your midface is

 

[hunkymonkey69]

What im saying is that lowset brows are low set brows

Doesnt matter how compact your midface is

i have high brows on compact midface should i still get low brows or would i look like i have sfs

 

[Bitchwhipper2]

i have high brows on compact midface should i still get low brows or would i look like i have sfs

Nigga are you retarded? I'm it doesnt fucking matter

 

[hunkymonkey69]

Nigga are you retarded? I'm it doesnt fucking matter

fuck billie eilish i raped her

 

[chaddyboi66]

How to properly measure facial ratios in mm

How to measure facial ratios on your phone You will need only 3 things, a ruler, a phone and a face, this thread will be short and simple, but really helpful. Download the Image Meter app (It doesn't have to be the Pro version) After that you will measure your philtrum, the region between your...

looksmax.org

org needs to stop overrating (Obliterating subhuman in ratings section)

I saw @maxxmclooks ask for ratings a couple times and consistently users were rating him HTN and even sometimes Chadlite. (Deformed FF character maybe and his base is shit since it's full of unfixable failos) This is absurd when he's actually LTN. In this thread, I will prove his subhumanity...

looksmax.org

Analysing forum “chads” (MEGA THREAD)

ANALYSING FORUM CHADS - Theory :feelshah: Introduction I’m back guys with my second thread of this new arc that I’m on. This section clearly needs revival so here I am with todays thread, where we will be analysing popular forum chads to see if they really are really “chads” or not. This...

looksmax.org

Bass guide LEAKED, ultra thread GTFIH

My apologies for not doing jawad's method yet even tho i said that i would do it today, im still trying to get the text out of the deleted channels that were removed. Hes such an idiot tho, he copied most of it off of here. :lul::lul: Here is Bass's method to make up for it, this dude if you...

looksmax.org

Ending the surgery cope (RATIOCELS DO NOT ENTER)

Disclaimer: I'm not against surgery or denying that it'll make you look better. The point of this thread is to get across the point that for most niggas on here its a major cope to think surgeries will ascend them from LTN to HTN+. I also wont be discussing pheno because the effect it has on...

looksmax.org

 

[cannotbeasked]

I get what you mean. But what my thread boils down to is that I dont believe in ideas such as "wide", "long" or "short" because I just look at the features themselves and compare them to the rest.

I dont believe a feature being too small can be compensated another being *extra*. That just throws harmony off imo

You think .95 mid face with 1.8 FWHR horse like Chico? Or Syrian terrorist? Yes or no agree? Ideal

?

 

[sportsmogger]

ian somerhalder with his fucked up ipd and midface mogs chico to the ends of universe
they're cope unless they're really bad like Adriana Lima's ex husband

Yet he has other ratios that help his ipd and midface ratio lol

 

[Bitchwhipper2]

You think .95 mid face with 1.8 FWHR horse like Chico? Or Syrian terrorist? Yes or no agree? Ideal

?

Average midface ratio paired with average eyespace ratio is ideal.

 

[Alexanderr]

FWHR is a cope measurement because it crams multiple completely independent measurements (eyebrow setness, nose length, pilthrum, and lip thickness) in to one number, when ideally every measurent should be taken on it own.

The ratios that took its place and actually matter are ESR, Midface ratio, and facial thirds.

All of these ratios mog FWHR to dirt due to them relying on one or 2 features at most per number. Whereas FWHR depended on 4

I haven't heard about the FWHR in a minute. In general, feels like the average user on this forum is less well-versed with the ratios of the face, or facial anatomy than before.

 

[rgvmogger07]

the dude who wrote this has <1.7 fwhr

 

[Bitchwhipper2]

the dude who wrote this has <1.7 fwhr

Youre iq is dead if you believe this is the reason i came to this conclusion.

I dont need a ratio to know my face length is a failo.

Im just explaining why fwhr is a flawed ratio. Infact Fwhr's shittyness if anything benefits me as I have low set eyebrows and a thick upper lip

 

[robtical]

i think best method is zygos divided by nasion to bottom of nose

 

[PrinceofDarkness]

Yeah bro, ratio are cope
View attachment 3108888

prime example why harmony mogs bones sometimes.
Harmony = ratios

 

[mvp2v1]

FWHR is a cope measurement because it crams multiple completely independent measurements (eyebrow setness, nose length, pilthrum, and lip thickness) in to one number, when ideally every measurent should be taken on it own.

The ratios that took its place and actually matter are ESR, Midface ratio, and facial thirds.

All of these ratios mog FWHR to dirt due to them relying on one or 2 features at most per number. Whereas FWHR depended on 4

I think it’s all about whether your soft tissues are being stretched to their genetic potential by bone.