Guide Why Height Is Everything

Deleted member 7866

Deleted member 7866

YUNK Money the Walking Dildo
Joined
Jun 16, 2020
Posts
15,320
Reputation
25,088
I will prefix this post by saying that it's over and it never begin.

WIth that out of the way, let's start.


WHY HEIGHT IS EVERYTHING, BY YOUNGMAXXING.

Table of Contents


1st, Height Impact in Dating
2nd, Height Impact in Life
3rd, What Women Think of Short Men


Let's begin.


Height, as anyone with half a brain knows, is everything.

All credits to incel.wiki :

Stulp et al (2013) used a sample of 5782 North American speed-daters making 128,104 choices to determine preferences for partner height and how height influenced the formation of a match. They found that women were most likely to choose a speed-dater 25 cm taller than themselves, whereas men were most likely to choose women only 7 cm shorter than themselves. As a consequence, matches were most likely at an intermediate height difference (19 cm) that differed significantly from the preferred height difference of both sexes.

Their data can be further analyzed to provide data about women's height cutoffs, the benefit of each inch of height for a man, and the degree of competition each man faces based on his height.

1) Cutoffs:

Their findings demonstrated the cutoffs at which women consider a man too short or too tall:

90% of women will reject a man who is 5'4" based solely on his height.
65% of women will reject a man who is 5'7" based solely on his height.
50% of women will reject a man who is 5'8" based solely on his height.
14% of women will reject a man who is 5'10" based solely on his height.
1.5% of women will reject a man who is 6' based solely on his height.
Past 6'2", women begin to increase rejections of men for being too tall.
30% of women believe there is no such thing as a man being "too tall."
Over 94% of women will reject a man solely for him being too short.

Read through this. This is one of the thousand studies that prove height is everything for women.

2) Every Inch Counts:

Further analysis of their data demonstrates the importance of every inch of height for men, as two inches of height gain for a man can be found to have the following results:

A man in the 5'4-5'6" range will have more than double the potential number of female partners with 2" height gain.
A 5'4" man will have 2.3 times as many potential female partners by gaining 2" height.
A 5'7" man will have 1.86 times as many potential female partners by gaining 2" height.
Benefits become insignificant past 5'10".
Below 5'1" a 2" height gain also makes an insignificant difference, as even after 2" gain, a man at this height is still "too short" for most women to consider.

Brutal stuff.

3) Competition:

Because the few women who are willing to date a shorter men are also generally willing to date a taller man as well, the competition for women willing to date shorter men becomes extremely high. This means:

A 5' man must "beat" over 12 men (most of whom will be taller) to get a girl accepting of his height.
A 5'4" man will have to "beat" over 7 other men (most of whom will be taller) to get a girl accepting of his height.
5'10 to 6'4" men have the least competition as the demand for these men outpaces their supply, and statistically overall women must compete for these men rather than vice versa.

Men who are short must endlessly jester and compete for woman, as well as being able to beat up other men.

Alright, we have analyzed this study enough. Let us continue to the next. Again, all credits to the brocels at incel.wiki.

Stulp et al. (2013) conducted another study regarding the preferences for height in a romantic partner of (N = 693) mainly ethnic Dutch and German university students. The were asked a series of questions regarding their preferences in regards to the height of a potential partner, which was broken in three categories, minimally acceptable, ideal and maximally acceptable.

There was also queried as to their current relationship status, and if they were currently in a relationship, their partners height. Finally they were asked to indicate their level of satisfaction with their own height, on a 100 point scale.

It was found that an individual's height correlated significantly with preferred height in both sexes, with the taller men generally preferring much shorter women and the shorter women preferring much taller men. Shorter men and taller women both tended to prefer smaller height differences.

The researchers analyzed the data of the participants in relationships and found that women were most satisfied with their partner's heights when they were 8.24 inches (20.93 cm) taller them themselves, with men being the most satisfied with a partner 3.25 inches shorter (8.26 cm). Partner height was much more important for explaining partner satisfaction for women then men, by more then four times the variance.

It was also discovered that there was a curvilinear relation with men's heights and their self-reported satisfaction with their height, with the men that were 6' 4.5 inches tall (193.73 cm) being the most satisfied with their heights.

Thus, it was found that women and men disagreed on the 'ideal' height difference between partners in heterosexual relationships. Women desired taller men much more then men desired shorter women, women were far more restrictive with their minimum height requirements, and there existed a greater consensus among women as to the preferred height of a male partner. Lastly, it was shown that shorter women had some of the strongest preferences for very tall men, thus further limiting the partnership options for short men.

Quotes:

Men were most satisfied when their partner was slightly shorter than themselves, whereas women were most satisfied when their partner was much taller than themselves.
Women were much more restrictive in their range of acceptable heights compared to men. That is, women were more likely to rule out certain heights as completely unacceptable.
The increased satisfaction with their own height among taller men is also in line with studies indicating that tall men have higher self-esteem, display less jealousy towards other men, and display higher levels of subjective well-being.

In essence, tall is good, short is bad.

Have you taken the HeightandDatingPill?

Not yet?

TIme for the most brutal of all.

Mueller & Muzur (2001) examined survey data derived from surviving graduates of the class of 1950 of the United States Military Academy at West Point, that provided family and marriage information. These data were merged with measures of academic, career, athletic and social performance while at the academy.

In the 1950s West Point followed the practice of assigning cadets to companies according to their height; so they could present a uniform presence on the parade grounds, thus data pertaining to the cadet's heights could be discovered, with the Academy sorting cadets into 12 separate groups, depending on their heights. The 'facial dominance' of the cadets was also measured and collected, judging by yearbook photos.

It was found that taller cadets subsequently had a greater number of marriages, a younger second wife if remarried after a divorce, and an overall greater number of children. The researchers found no evidence that the cadets being subsequently married to more fertile women explained this discrepancy.

It was also found that cadet's heights had no effect on their future economic success (a finding that the researchers noted was unusual), therefore, the greater economic success that taller men generally experience didn't explain their greater reproductive success.

Other studies have also confirmed these findings (Pawlowski et al. 2000). There is also evidence that taller men are more likely to have long term mating partners and to have more partners than shorter men (Nettle, 2002).

Quotes:

Taller men had more reproductive opportunities (more marriages, younger second wives) and used them to have more children than shorter men. The chances of survival into adulthood of taller men’s children were not lower.
The positive effect of height on reproductive performance was not mediated by men’s social status, i.e., their military rank, or by the measures of academic, athletic, and military talent which helped in gaining high status.
Thus, selection seemingly follows most closely a “horse race” model, with a few winners taking most of the prize, measured in fitness differentials. Discerning no fitness disadvantage to tallness, we are left with the possibility of unconstrained directional sexual selection in favor of ever increasing male height within the observed phenotype range.

You will, in essence, never breed. All because of a few inch of height.

Now, let's begin the 2nd section - Height Impact in Life.

BodyLogicMD, a network of physician-owned medical practices, performed a survey of 1,105 Americans using Amazon's Mechanical Turk platform. Their goal was to explore emotional impacts of height, including implications for romantic prospects and self-esteem.

Evidence is discussed showing that increased male height provides professional advantages, including higher pay and better odds of career advancement, and an edge in matters of romance. Disadvantages of increased height are described by their review as including higher rates of medical issues like cancers and blood clots.

Primary findings of their survey on height's impact were:

Both men and women said the ideal male height is 6' tall (i.e. Taller than 82.1% of men in America).
Taller men reported they felt they were funnier, more desirable, more confident, more attractive, and more satisfied with their sex lives than shorter men.
As an example, 69.2% of taller men felt they were attractive to potential partners, compared to 51.8% of shorter men.
Short height was associated with feelings of being less masculine—48% of men under 5'5" felt less masculine due to their height.
Taller men were significantly more likely to feel they were successful in their careers and make the salaries they deserved.
In investigating perspectives on height enhancement surgeries, which are usually reserved to cases of medical deformity and carry risks of limb loss, permanent disability, and death:

60% of men overall wished they were taller.
21.1% of men under 5'9" had actively researched ways to become taller.
23.9% of men under 5'9" said they would surgically alter their height if possible to become taller.
On average, men wanting to be taller would pay 30.9% of their life savings to do so.
The study also confirmed that men were far more flexible about the heights of their potential partners than women. Women were 9.3x more likely to wish their partner was taller than to wish he was shorter. Specifically, 36.2% of women wished their partner was taller than he was, while only 3.9% of women wished their partner was shorter than he was.

To calculate your own height percentile, use the following calculator: https://tall.life/height-percentile-calculator-age-country/

Quotes:

At all heights, men were considerably less picky about the stature of their potential lovers.
More than three-quarters of short, average, and tall men said they'd give dating someone taller a try.

Started off with brutal one. This also relates to height, but it has some correlation with your life quality - it's absolutely brutal to be short. Many would rather die to be tall then live another day short, keek.

www.forbes.com/sites/traversmark/2020/04/16/your-height-has-a-big-impact-on-your-salary-new-research-seeks-to-understand-why/amp/


Brutality above, by a normie paper as well.

Here's some more I found :


Archived CNN article.


amp.theatlantic.com/amp/article/393518/
www.livescience.com/amp/5552-taller-people-earn-money.html

All good reading. And backs my earlier point.


Now let's get to the final and most BRUTAL of all - what do women think of short men?

This is what women, and society, thinks of them.






https://mobile.twitter.com/Diamond_London/status/554752344009998337
https://mobile.twitter.com/jg9325/status/530990917986316288
https://mobile.twitter.com/Randd3rz_/status/490617087593684992
https://mobile.twitter.com/JeremyCandelas/status/491741384194273280
https://mobile.twitter.com/deathcab420/status/383763328054464513


It's over.
 
Deleted member 7866

Deleted member 7866

YUNK Money the Walking Dildo
Joined
Jun 16, 2020
Posts
15,320
Reputation
25,088
@Truthmirrorcoper @Newone @balding17yomanletcel
 
Deleted member 4438

Deleted member 4438

I will be with you from dusk till dawn.
Joined
Dec 21, 2019
Posts
20,737
Reputation
28,286
Face is for Sex

Height and Frame for everything else, like getting respect from man, attracting woman, being a protector

but height will never make up for lack of face

Face is everything
 
Deleted member 7866

Deleted member 7866

YUNK Money the Walking Dildo
Joined
Jun 16, 2020
Posts
15,320
Reputation
25,088
Face is for Sex

Height and Frame for everything else, like getting respect from man, attracting woman, being a protector

but height will never make up for lack of face

Face is everything
Indeed, manlet chad will have no friends but girls will still like him tbh, but read the post
 
D

Deleted member 4430

Zephir
Joined
Dec 20, 2019
Posts
41,844
Reputation
103,856
indeed actually kys if ur less then 6 feet
jeff-seid-2.jpg
 
Deleted member 7866

Deleted member 7866

YUNK Money the Walking Dildo
Joined
Jun 16, 2020
Posts
15,320
Reputation
25,088
6'2 with one lay. I know a chad irl that has over a thousand lays half of which with top tier Stacy models from all over the world while being 5'9.

No height for your face son
Indeed but height is also important for dating and more important for friends, it will be hard to be the AMOG of your friend group if short
 
Deleted member 4438

Deleted member 4438

I will be with you from dusk till dawn.
Joined
Dec 21, 2019
Posts
20,737
Reputation
28,286
Indeed, manlet chad will have no friends but girls will still like him tbh, but read the post
manlet chad will get beaten up and disrespected on a daily basis

if he talks back even once he will get fisted until he becomes a obedient pussy, but woman will still love him


meanwhile 6'3 ogre will spit on 5'10 guys and they wont do shit against him

but he will rope after 0 likes on tinder after 24 hours
 
D

Deleted member 8699

Zephir
Joined
Jul 28, 2020
Posts
4,349
Reputation
7,187
I will prefix this post by saying that it's over and it never begin.

WIth that out of the way, let's start.


WHY HEIGHT IS EVERYTHING, BY YOUNGMAXXING.

Table of Contents


1st, Height Impact in Dating
2nd, Height Impact in Life
3rd, What Women Think of Short Men


Let's begin.


Height, as anyone with half a brain knows, is everything.

All credits to incel.wiki :

Stulp et al (2013) used a sample of 5782 North American speed-daters making 128,104 choices to determine preferences for partner height and how height influenced the formation of a match. They found that women were most likely to choose a speed-dater 25 cm taller than themselves, whereas men were most likely to choose women only 7 cm shorter than themselves. As a consequence, matches were most likely at an intermediate height difference (19 cm) that differed significantly from the preferred height difference of both sexes.

Their data can be further analyzed to provide data about women's height cutoffs, the benefit of each inch of height for a man, and the degree of competition each man faces based on his height.

1) Cutoffs:

Their findings demonstrated the cutoffs at which women consider a man too short or too tall:

90% of women will reject a man who is 5'4" based solely on his height.
65% of women will reject a man who is 5'7" based solely on his height.
50% of women will reject a man who is 5'8" based solely on his height.
14% of women will reject a man who is 5'10" based solely on his height.
1.5% of women will reject a man who is 6' based solely on his height.
Past 6'2", women begin to increase rejections of men for being too tall.
30% of women believe there is no such thing as a man being "too tall."
Over 94% of women will reject a man solely for him being too short.

Read through this. This is one of the thousand studies that prove height is everything for women.

2) Every Inch Counts:

Further analysis of their data demonstrates the importance of every inch of height for men, as two inches of height gain for a man can be found to have the following results:

A man in the 5'4-5'6" range will have more than double the potential number of female partners with 2" height gain.
A 5'4" man will have 2.3 times as many potential female partners by gaining 2" height.
A 5'7" man will have 1.86 times as many potential female partners by gaining 2" height.
Benefits become insignificant past 5'10".
Below 5'1" a 2" height gain also makes an insignificant difference, as even after 2" gain, a man at this height is still "too short" for most women to consider.

Brutal stuff.

3) Competition:

Because the few women who are willing to date a shorter men are also generally willing to date a taller man as well, the competition for women willing to date shorter men becomes extremely high. This means:

A 5' man must "beat" over 12 men (most of whom will be taller) to get a girl accepting of his height.
A 5'4" man will have to "beat" over 7 other men (most of whom will be taller) to get a girl accepting of his height.
5'10 to 6'4" men have the least competition as the demand for these men outpaces their supply, and statistically overall women must compete for these men rather than vice versa.

Men who are short must endlessly jester and compete for woman, as well as being able to beat up other men.

Alright, we have analyzed this study enough. Let us continue to the next. Again, all credits to the brocels at incel.wiki.

Stulp et al. (2013) conducted another study regarding the preferences for height in a romantic partner of (N = 693) mainly ethnic Dutch and German university students. The were asked a series of questions regarding their preferences in regards to the height of a potential partner, which was broken in three categories, minimally acceptable, ideal and maximally acceptable.

There was also queried as to their current relationship status, and if they were currently in a relationship, their partners height. Finally they were asked to indicate their level of satisfaction with their own height, on a 100 point scale.

It was found that an individual's height correlated significantly with preferred height in both sexes, with the taller men generally preferring much shorter women and the shorter women preferring much taller men. Shorter men and taller women both tended to prefer smaller height differences.

The researchers analyzed the data of the participants in relationships and found that women were most satisfied with their partner's heights when they were 8.24 inches (20.93 cm) taller them themselves, with men being the most satisfied with a partner 3.25 inches shorter (8.26 cm). Partner height was much more important for explaining partner satisfaction for women then men, by more then four times the variance.

It was also discovered that there was a curvilinear relation with men's heights and their self-reported satisfaction with their height, with the men that were 6' 4.5 inches tall (193.73 cm) being the most satisfied with their heights.

Thus, it was found that women and men disagreed on the 'ideal' height difference between partners in heterosexual relationships. Women desired taller men much more then men desired shorter women, women were far more restrictive with their minimum height requirements, and there existed a greater consensus among women as to the preferred height of a male partner. Lastly, it was shown that shorter women had some of the strongest preferences for very tall men, thus further limiting the partnership options for short men.

Quotes:

Men were most satisfied when their partner was slightly shorter than themselves, whereas women were most satisfied when their partner was much taller than themselves.
Women were much more restrictive in their range of acceptable heights compared to men. That is, women were more likely to rule out certain heights as completely unacceptable.
The increased satisfaction with their own height among taller men is also in line with studies indicating that tall men have higher self-esteem, display less jealousy towards other men, and display higher levels of subjective well-being.

In essence, tall is good, short is bad.

Have you taken the HeightandDatingPill?

Not yet?

TIme for the most brutal of all.

Mueller & Muzur (2001) examined survey data derived from surviving graduates of the class of 1950 of the United States Military Academy at West Point, that provided family and marriage information. These data were merged with measures of academic, career, athletic and social performance while at the academy.

In the 1950s West Point followed the practice of assigning cadets to companies according to their height; so they could present a uniform presence on the parade grounds, thus data pertaining to the cadet's heights could be discovered, with the Academy sorting cadets into 12 separate groups, depending on their heights. The 'facial dominance' of the cadets was also measured and collected, judging by yearbook photos.

It was found that taller cadets subsequently had a greater number of marriages, a younger second wife if remarried after a divorce, and an overall greater number of children. The researchers found no evidence that the cadets being subsequently married to more fertile women explained this discrepancy.

It was also found that cadet's heights had no effect on their future economic success (a finding that the researchers noted was unusual), therefore, the greater economic success that taller men generally experience didn't explain their greater reproductive success.

Other studies have also confirmed these findings (Pawlowski et al. 2000). There is also evidence that taller men are more likely to have long term mating partners and to have more partners than shorter men (Nettle, 2002).

Quotes:

Taller men had more reproductive opportunities (more marriages, younger second wives) and used them to have more children than shorter men. The chances of survival into adulthood of taller men’s children were not lower.
The positive effect of height on reproductive performance was not mediated by men’s social status, i.e., their military rank, or by the measures of academic, athletic, and military talent which helped in gaining high status.
Thus, selection seemingly follows most closely a “horse race” model, with a few winners taking most of the prize, measured in fitness differentials. Discerning no fitness disadvantage to tallness, we are left with the possibility of unconstrained directional sexual selection in favor of ever increasing male height within the observed phenotype range.

You will, in essence, never breed. All because of a few inch of height.

Now, let's begin the 2nd section - Height Impact in Life.

BodyLogicMD, a network of physician-owned medical practices, performed a survey of 1,105 Americans using Amazon's Mechanical Turk platform. Their goal was to explore emotional impacts of height, including implications for romantic prospects and self-esteem.

Evidence is discussed showing that increased male height provides professional advantages, including higher pay and better odds of career advancement, and an edge in matters of romance. Disadvantages of increased height are described by their review as including higher rates of medical issues like cancers and blood clots.

Primary findings of their survey on height's impact were:

Both men and women said the ideal male height is 6' tall (i.e. Taller than 82.1% of men in America).
Taller men reported they felt they were funnier, more desirable, more confident, more attractive, and more satisfied with their sex lives than shorter men.
As an example, 69.2% of taller men felt they were attractive to potential partners, compared to 51.8% of shorter men.
Short height was associated with feelings of being less masculine—48% of men under 5'5" felt less masculine due to their height.
Taller men were significantly more likely to feel they were successful in their careers and make the salaries they deserved.
In investigating perspectives on height enhancement surgeries, which are usually reserved to cases of medical deformity and carry risks of limb loss, permanent disability, and death:

60% of men overall wished they were taller.
21.1% of men under 5'9" had actively researched ways to become taller.
23.9% of men under 5'9" said they would surgically alter their height if possible to become taller.
On average, men wanting to be taller would pay 30.9% of their life savings to do so.
The study also confirmed that men were far more flexible about the heights of their potential partners than women. Women were 9.3x more likely to wish their partner was taller than to wish he was shorter. Specifically, 36.2% of women wished their partner was taller than he was, while only 3.9% of women wished their partner was shorter than he was.

To calculate your own height percentile, use the following calculator: https://tall.life/height-percentile-calculator-age-country/

Quotes:

At all heights, men were considerably less picky about the stature of their potential lovers.
More than three-quarters of short, average, and tall men said they'd give dating someone taller a try.

Started off with brutal one. This also relates to height, but it has some correlation with your life quality - it's absolutely brutal to be short. Many would rather die to be tall then live another day short, keek.

www.forbes.com/sites/traversmark/2020/04/16/your-height-has-a-big-impact-on-your-salary-new-research-seeks-to-understand-why/amp/


Brutality above, by a normie paper as well.

Here's some more I found :


Archived CNN article.


amp.theatlantic.com/amp/article/393518/
www.livescience.com/amp/5552-taller-people-earn-money.html

All good reading. And backs my earlier point.


Now let's get to the final and most BRUTAL of all - what do women think of short men?

This is what women, and society, thinks of them.






https://mobile.twitter.com/Diamond_London/status/554752344009998337
https://mobile.twitter.com/jg9325/status/530990917986316288
https://mobile.twitter.com/Randd3rz_/status/490617087593684992
https://mobile.twitter.com/JeremyCandelas/status/491741384194273280
https://mobile.twitter.com/deathcab420/status/383763328054464513


It's over.

no photons from the screen showing ur essay made contact with my eyeballs
0
water tier thread
but i respeck u cos u r /obhai/ cadet and therefore brother of mine :)
 
Deleted member 7866

Deleted member 7866

YUNK Money the Walking Dildo
Joined
Jun 16, 2020
Posts
15,320
Reputation
25,088
manlet chad will get beaten up and disrespected on a daily basis

if he talks back even once he will get fisted until he becomes a obedient pussy, but woman will still love him


meanwhile 6'3 ogre will spit on 5'10 guys and they wont do shit against him

but he will rope after 0 likes on tinder after 24 hours

@Chad1212 vs @SubhumanCurrycel tbh
 
Baldingman1998

Baldingman1998

Zephir
Joined
Nov 17, 2019
Posts
33,395
Reputation
60,561
Indeed but height is also important for dating and more important for friends, it will be hard to be the AMOG of your friend group if short
Height is important to be considered human. It's like having legs or being Normal. Women don't think of height as an advantage unless you are handsome in the face to begin with. But height becomes more important if you are extremely short (sub5'9-5'8) because then you would seem like a child
 
lutte

lutte

💤
Joined
Jul 17, 2020
Posts
29,413
Reputation
54,384
manlet chad will get beaten up and disrespected on a daily basis

if he talks back even once he will get fisted until he becomes a obedient pussy, but woman will still love him


meanwhile 6'3 ogre will spit on 5'10 guys and they wont do shit against him

but he will rope after 0 likes on tinder after 24 hours
do you live in a fucking serbian ghetto?
 
Deleted member 7866

Deleted member 7866

YUNK Money the Walking Dildo
Joined
Jun 16, 2020
Posts
15,320
Reputation
25,088
Height is important to be considered human. It's like having legs or being Normal. Women don't think of height as an advantage unless you are handsome in the face to begin with. But height becomes more important if you are extremely short (sub5'9-5'8) because then you would seem like a child
Height is important for friends as well as girls
 
wasted

wasted

youngmaxxing - looxpilled
Joined
Jul 25, 2020
Posts
6,077
Reputation
13,984
I mostly hate short women tbh, they are the ones who want 30cm taller men
They are literally producing manlet sons that they find disgusting, or cheat on their short husband

They disgust me so much, luckily i dont interact with ANY short women
Short women are indeed very "heightist". Doesn't make sense cuz by their standards they are genetically inferior too.
 
Deleted member 7866

Deleted member 7866

YUNK Money the Walking Dildo
Joined
Jun 16, 2020
Posts
15,320
Reputation
25,088
no ones respects a 5'7 guy man, trust me

even frame is cope on that height, manlet with muscles or skinny manlet doesnt matter, manlet is manlet
i am short for my age and with average face and notices girls respect me more than guys jfl
 
Deleted member 7866

Deleted member 7866

YUNK Money the Walking Dildo
Joined
Jun 16, 2020
Posts
15,320
Reputation
25,088
Short women are indeed very "heightist". Doesn't make sense cuz by their standards they are genetically inferior too.
indeed, and also about your 6'1 khv post

height and face are equal in dating but height mogs socially
 
Deleted member 7866

Deleted member 7866

YUNK Money the Walking Dildo
Joined
Jun 16, 2020
Posts
15,320
Reputation
25,088
anyone actually read the op?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top