Why Height Is Everything

google sultan kosen and look at his face

that mf married to a decent look girl
This guy?
Ad 119087782

She looks like shit jfl
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: oldcelloser, TheEndHasNoEnd, HighIQcel and 3 others
  • So Sad
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 2658, Good_Little_Goy and Deleted member 7866
not gonna read that huge POST by the way
why bro is high effort

if u dn rd just read the second study in the 1st section and the tweets
 
Im less manlet than i thought i was LOL ok im happy
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member and Deleted member 7866
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: sandcelmuttcel and St. Wristcel
Short women are indeed very "heightist". Doesn't make sense cuz by their standards they are genetically inferior too.
We all should bully short women for being femlets and only go for tall robust womeb
 
  • JFL
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: HighIQcel, sandcelmuttcel, Deleted member 5393 and 2 others
Ik
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 7866
3 inches of bone are destroying my life.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member, PubertyMaxxer and Deleted member 7866
1601581054831


OP = stupid fuck
 
  • +1
  • So Sad
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member, Germania, 5'8manlet and 1 other person
@personalityinkwell why u jfl react

we all know dickpill is bullshit
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: oldcelloser, Squirtoutmabooty, Deleted member 5522 and 3 others
So if height alone is everything, that would mean someone who is 5'10 with a peanut skull and narrow shoulders can get leg lengthening and become 6'2 with lifts right? Doesn't matter if his proportions look comical now right.
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: oldcelloser, sandcelmuttcel and Deleted member 7866
@youngmaxxing

1601581236229


she's an ugly fuck

this thread = sped iq
 
So if height alone is everything, that would mean someone who is 5'10 with a peanut skull and narrow shoulders can get leg lengthening and become 6'2 with lifts right? Doesn't matter if his proportions look comical now right.
Height n frame
 
incels.is copy and paste

good thread tho
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 7866
incels.is copy and paste

good thread tho
wasn't from incels.is actually

 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6403
Benefits become insignificant past 5'10".


This is false, there is a huge difference between 5 foot 10 and 6 foot 2 or taller but only when you're in real life.
For online dating, you need to fill out your frame with 30 lbs of muscle mass to look good enough to mog shorter muscular guys.
I know about that because in real life, I get checked out by hot 8/10 18 year old women who should be way out of my league in looks but that is because in my country (Canada), the average female height is 5 foot 4 so at 6 foot 4 I am a full foot taller than the average woman.
I have noticed that I mog even guys who are 5 foot 10 and muscular but only when the woman is actively searching for a very tall guy.

So, I don't get checked out often, because most women aren't looking specifically for my type since I am skinny and I look like I'm 18 even though I'm 22. The only women who check me out are much younger than me, but the benefit of that is that the ones who check me out are often the hottest girls in my class. Meanwhile, the average or below average girls want nothing to do with me.
And on the rare occasion where I see a tall girl, they always check me out because guys like me who are tall, white and healthy are actually very rare where I live since most tall guys are either fat or not white.

When I will be very muscular and ripped though, I will truly be even more attractive than right now, and I should be able to attract the average women too by that point so it'll be much easier to get laid.

The problem with my look however is that it doesn't work for online dating, because when girls see my picture, they don't know what my true height is, maybe I should write it on my first picture to make sure they see it, because most of the time, girls don't read the bio, so I get mogged by muscular manlets that I would easily mog in real life.

Also, most people on this forum have told me that I look average but with a great lower third, this just proves the point of your post, height is one of the strongest halos, and it's even more important than how your face looks if the girls are specifically looking for a very tall guy.
Even when I looked my worst, back before I got my double jaw surgery done, even back then, I was still getting attention from young women but I didn't realize it at the time because I was so insecure about my looks.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Renaissance.Chad, Looks234, Deleted member 39 and 4 others
This is false, there is a huge difference between 5 foot 10 and 6 foot 2 or taller but only when you're in real life.
For online dating, you need to fill out your frame with 30 lbs of muscle mass to look good enough to mog shorter muscular guys.
I know about that because in real life, I get checked out by hot 8/10 18 year old women who should be way out of my league in looks but that is because in my country (Canada), the average female height is 5 foot 4 so at 6 foot 4 I am a full foot taller than the average woman.
I have noticed that I mog even guys who are 5 foot 10 and muscular but only when the woman is actively searching for a very tall guy.

So, I don't get checked out often, because most women aren't looking specifically for my type since I am skinny and I look like I'm 18 even though I'm 22. The only women who check me out are much younger than me, but the benefit of that is that the ones who check me out are often the hottest girls in my class. Meanwhile, the average or below average girls want nothing to do with me.
And on the rare occasion where I see a tall girl, they always check me out because guys like me who are tall, white and healthy are actually very rare where I live since most tall guys are either fat or not white.

When I will be very muscular and ripped though, I will truly be even more attractive than right now, and I should be able to attract the average women too by that point so it'll be much easier to get laid.

The problem with my look however is that it doesn't work for online dating, because when girls see my picture, they don't know what my true height is, maybe I should write it on my first picture to make sure they see it, because most of the time, girls don't read the bio, so I get mogged by muscular manlets that I would easily mog in real life.

Also, most people on this forum have told me that I look average but with a great lower third, this just proves the point of your post, height is one of the strongest halos, and it's even more important than how your face looks if the girls are specifically looking for a very tall guy.
Even when I looked my worst, back before I got my double jaw surgery done, even back then, I was still getting attention from young women but I didn't realize it at the time because I was so insecure about my looks.
I copy and pasted a lot of statements from here


I dont necessarily agree with all of them, I'll read the rest of your post now
 
  • +1
Reactions: randomuser2407
Summary 6ft
Dn rd
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member and Deleted member 7866
This is false, there is a huge difference between 5 foot 10 and 6 foot 2 or taller but only when you're in real life.
For online dating, you need to fill out your frame with 30 lbs of muscle mass to look good enough to mog shorter muscular guys.
I know about that because in real life, I get checked out by hot 8/10 18 year old women who should be way out of my league in looks but that is because in my country (Canada), the average female height is 5 foot 4 so at 6 foot 4 I am a full foot taller than the average woman.
I have noticed that I mog even guys who are 5 foot 10 and muscular but only when the woman is actively searching for a very tall guy.

So, I don't get checked out often, because most women aren't looking specifically for my type since I am skinny and I look like I'm 18 even though I'm 22. The only women who check me out are much younger than me, but the benefit of that is that the ones who check me out are often the hottest girls in my class. Meanwhile, the average or below average girls want nothing to do with me.
And on the rare occasion where I see a tall girl, they always check me out because guys like me who are tall, white and healthy are actually very rare where I live since most tall guys are either fat or not white.

When I will be very muscular and ripped though, I will truly be even more attractive than right now, and I should be able to attract the average women too by that point so it'll be much easier to get laid.

The problem with my look however is that it doesn't work for online dating, because when girls see my picture, they don't know what my true height is, maybe I should write it on my first picture to make sure they see it, because most of the time, girls don't read the bio, so I get mogged by muscular manlets that I would easily mog in real life.

Also, most people on this forum have told me that I look average but with a great lower third, this just proves the point of your post, height is one of the strongest halos, and it's even more important than how your face looks if the girls are specifically looking for a very tall guy.
Even when I looked my worst, back before I got my double jaw surgery done, even back then, I was still getting attention from young women but I didn't realize it at the time because I was so insecure about my looks.
U are below average and have confirmed autism, ur posts are always incoherent ramblings
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: WadlowMaxxing, Looks234, johncruz12345 and 5 others
You need to tag germania so he can debunk your thread with his flawless logic.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 7866
This is false, there is a huge difference between 5 foot 10 and 6 foot 2 or taller but only when you're in real life.
For online dating, you need to fill out your frame with 30 lbs of muscle mass to look good enough to mog shorter muscular guys.
I know about that because in real life, I get checked out by hot 8/10 18 year old women who should be way out of my league in looks but that is because in my country (Canada), the average female height is 5 foot 4 so at 6 foot 4 I am a full foot taller than the average woman.
I have noticed that I mog even guys who are 5 foot 10 and muscular but only when the woman is actively searching for a very tall guy.

So, I don't get checked out often, because most women aren't looking specifically for my type since I am skinny and I look like I'm 18 even though I'm 22. The only women who check me out are much younger than me, but the benefit of that is that the ones who check me out are often the hottest girls in my class. Meanwhile, the average or below average girls want nothing to do with me.
And on the rare occasion where I see a tall girl, they always check me out because guys like me who are tall, white and healthy are actually very rare where I live since most tall guys are either fat or not white.

When I will be very muscular and ripped though, I will truly be even more attractive than right now, and I should be able to attract the average women too by that point so it'll be much easier to get laid.

The problem with my look however is that it doesn't work for online dating, because when girls see my picture, they don't know what my true height is, maybe I should write it on my first picture to make sure they see it, because most of the time, girls don't read the bio, so I get mogged by muscular manlets that I would easily mog in real life.

Also, most people on this forum have told me that I look average but with a great lower third, this just proves the point of your post, height is one of the strongest halos, and it's even more important than how your face looks if the girls are specifically looking for a very tall guy.
Even when I looked my worst, back before I got my double jaw surgery done, even back then, I was still getting attention from young women but I didn't realize it at the time because I was so insecure about my looks.
Read all now, your story is very interesting tbh and confirms the heightpill for me

Do you get social benefits that you wouldn't get if you weren't tall?
 
You need to tag germania so he can debunk your thread with his flawless logic.
Ofc boyo, I would love to

@Germania
 
I copy and pasted a lot of statements from here


I dont necessarily agree with all of them, I'll read the rest of your post now
Everything that I said comes from my own experiences, I don't get as much attention as a Chad, but just because of my amazing height, I can date girls who look above average or greater in the face even though I have a normie face. That is one important benefit of being really tall, and some women will look specifically for a really tall guy and never settle for less than that, I know because I have met such girls and they preferred me than the muscular guys who were hotter but shorter than me.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Looks234, Deleted member 6908, Deleted member 5393 and 1 other person
Everything that I said comes from my own experiences, I don't get as much attention as a Chad, but just because of my amazing height, I can date girls who look above average or greater in the face even though I have a normie face. That is one important benefit of being really tall, and some women will look specifically for a really tall guy and never settle for less than that, I know because I have met such girls and they preferred me than the muscular guys who were hotter but shorter than me.
Height is everything
 

Attachments

  • 120578324_373849586970099_1668131749389056794_n.jpg
    120578324_373849586970099_1668131749389056794_n.jpg
    49.1 KB · Views: 99
  • 120542384_322607425685340_839062176357181889_n.jpg
    120542384_322607425685340_839062176357181889_n.jpg
    96.2 KB · Views: 93
  • shirtless.PNG
    shirtless.PNG
    454.8 KB · Views: 128
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 7866
  • JFL
Reactions: TheEndHasNoEnd, Deleted member 7866 and Deleted member 5393
I will prefix this post by saying that it's over and it never begin.

WIth that out of the way, let's start.


WHY HEIGHT IS EVERYTHING, BY YOUNGMAXXING.

Table of Contents


1st, Height Impact in Dating
2nd, Height Impact in Life
3rd, What Women Think of Short Men


Let's begin.


Height, as anyone with half a brain knows, is everything.

All credits to incel.wiki :

Stulp et al (2013) used a sample of 5782 North American speed-daters making 128,104 choices to determine preferences for partner height and how height influenced the formation of a match. They found that women were most likely to choose a speed-dater 25 cm taller than themselves, whereas men were most likely to choose women only 7 cm shorter than themselves. As a consequence, matches were most likely at an intermediate height difference (19 cm) that differed significantly from the preferred height difference of both sexes.

Their data can be further analyzed to provide data about women's height cutoffs, the benefit of each inch of height for a man, and the degree of competition each man faces based on his height.

1) Cutoffs:

Their findings demonstrated the cutoffs at which women consider a man too short or too tall:

90% of women will reject a man who is 5'4" based solely on his height.
65% of women will reject a man who is 5'7" based solely on his height.
50% of women will reject a man who is 5'8" based solely on his height.
14% of women will reject a man who is 5'10" based solely on his height.
1.5% of women will reject a man who is 6' based solely on his height.
Past 6'2", women begin to increase rejections of men for being too tall.
30% of women believe there is no such thing as a man being "too tall."
Over 94% of women will reject a man solely for him being too short.

Read through this. This is one of the thousand studies that prove height is everything for women.

2) Every Inch Counts:

Further analysis of their data demonstrates the importance of every inch of height for men, as two inches of height gain for a man can be found to have the following results:

A man in the 5'4-5'6" range will have more than double the potential number of female partners with 2" height gain.
A 5'4" man will have 2.3 times as many potential female partners by gaining 2" height.
A 5'7" man will have 1.86 times as many potential female partners by gaining 2" height.
Benefits become insignificant past 5'10".
Below 5'1" a 2" height gain also makes an insignificant difference, as even after 2" gain, a man at this height is still "too short" for most women to consider.

Brutal stuff.

3) Competition:

Because the few women who are willing to date a shorter men are also generally willing to date a taller man as well, the competition for women willing to date shorter men becomes extremely high. This means:

A 5' man must "beat" over 12 men (most of whom will be taller) to get a girl accepting of his height.
A 5'4" man will have to "beat" over 7 other men (most of whom will be taller) to get a girl accepting of his height.
5'10 to 6'4" men have the least competition as the demand for these men outpaces their supply, and statistically overall women must compete for these men rather than vice versa.

Men who are short must endlessly jester and compete for woman, as well as being able to beat up other men.

Alright, we have analyzed this study enough. Let us continue to the next. Again, all credits to the brocels at incel.wiki.

Stulp et al. (2013) conducted another study regarding the preferences for height in a romantic partner of (N = 693) mainly ethnic Dutch and German university students. The were asked a series of questions regarding their preferences in regards to the height of a potential partner, which was broken in three categories, minimally acceptable, ideal and maximally acceptable.

There was also queried as to their current relationship status, and if they were currently in a relationship, their partners height. Finally they were asked to indicate their level of satisfaction with their own height, on a 100 point scale.

It was found that an individual's height correlated significantly with preferred height in both sexes, with the taller men generally preferring much shorter women and the shorter women preferring much taller men. Shorter men and taller women both tended to prefer smaller height differences.

The researchers analyzed the data of the participants in relationships and found that women were most satisfied with their partner's heights when they were 8.24 inches (20.93 cm) taller them themselves, with men being the most satisfied with a partner 3.25 inches shorter (8.26 cm). Partner height was much more important for explaining partner satisfaction for women then men, by more then four times the variance.

It was also discovered that there was a curvilinear relation with men's heights and their self-reported satisfaction with their height, with the men that were 6' 4.5 inches tall (193.73 cm) being the most satisfied with their heights.

Thus, it was found that women and men disagreed on the 'ideal' height difference between partners in heterosexual relationships. Women desired taller men much more then men desired shorter women, women were far more restrictive with their minimum height requirements, and there existed a greater consensus among women as to the preferred height of a male partner. Lastly, it was shown that shorter women had some of the strongest preferences for very tall men, thus further limiting the partnership options for short men.

Quotes:

Men were most satisfied when their partner was slightly shorter than themselves, whereas women were most satisfied when their partner was much taller than themselves.
Women were much more restrictive in their range of acceptable heights compared to men. That is, women were more likely to rule out certain heights as completely unacceptable.
The increased satisfaction with their own height among taller men is also in line with studies indicating that tall men have higher self-esteem, display less jealousy towards other men, and display higher levels of subjective well-being.

In essence, tall is good, short is bad.

Have you taken the HeightandDatingPill?

Not yet?

TIme for the most brutal of all.

Mueller & Muzur (2001) examined survey data derived from surviving graduates of the class of 1950 of the United States Military Academy at West Point, that provided family and marriage information. These data were merged with measures of academic, career, athletic and social performance while at the academy.

In the 1950s West Point followed the practice of assigning cadets to companies according to their height; so they could present a uniform presence on the parade grounds, thus data pertaining to the cadet's heights could be discovered, with the Academy sorting cadets into 12 separate groups, depending on their heights. The 'facial dominance' of the cadets was also measured and collected, judging by yearbook photos.

It was found that taller cadets subsequently had a greater number of marriages, a younger second wife if remarried after a divorce, and an overall greater number of children. The researchers found no evidence that the cadets being subsequently married to more fertile women explained this discrepancy.

It was also found that cadet's heights had no effect on their future economic success (a finding that the researchers noted was unusual), therefore, the greater economic success that taller men generally experience didn't explain their greater reproductive success.

Other studies have also confirmed these findings (Pawlowski et al. 2000). There is also evidence that taller men are more likely to have long term mating partners and to have more partners than shorter men (Nettle, 2002).

Quotes:

Taller men had more reproductive opportunities (more marriages, younger second wives) and used them to have more children than shorter men. The chances of survival into adulthood of taller men’s children were not lower.
The positive effect of height on reproductive performance was not mediated by men’s social status, i.e., their military rank, or by the measures of academic, athletic, and military talent which helped in gaining high status.
Thus, selection seemingly follows most closely a “horse race” model, with a few winners taking most of the prize, measured in fitness differentials. Discerning no fitness disadvantage to tallness, we are left with the possibility of unconstrained directional sexual selection in favor of ever increasing male height within the observed phenotype range.

You will, in essence, never breed. All because of a few inch of height.

Now, let's begin the 2nd section - Height Impact in Life.

BodyLogicMD, a network of physician-owned medical practices, performed a survey of 1,105 Americans using Amazon's Mechanical Turk platform. Their goal was to explore emotional impacts of height, including implications for romantic prospects and self-esteem.

Evidence is discussed showing that increased male height provides professional advantages, including higher pay and better odds of career advancement, and an edge in matters of romance. Disadvantages of increased height are described by their review as including higher rates of medical issues like cancers and blood clots.

Primary findings of their survey on height's impact were:

Both men and women said the ideal male height is 6' tall (i.e. Taller than 82.1% of men in America).
Taller men reported they felt they were funnier, more desirable, more confident, more attractive, and more satisfied with their sex lives than shorter men.
As an example, 69.2% of taller men felt they were attractive to potential partners, compared to 51.8% of shorter men.
Short height was associated with feelings of being less masculine—48% of men under 5'5" felt less masculine due to their height.
Taller men were significantly more likely to feel they were successful in their careers and make the salaries they deserved.
In investigating perspectives on height enhancement surgeries, which are usually reserved to cases of medical deformity and carry risks of limb loss, permanent disability, and death:

60% of men overall wished they were taller.
21.1% of men under 5'9" had actively researched ways to become taller.
23.9% of men under 5'9" said they would surgically alter their height if possible to become taller.
On average, men wanting to be taller would pay 30.9% of their life savings to do so.
The study also confirmed that men were far more flexible about the heights of their potential partners than women. Women were 9.3x more likely to wish their partner was taller than to wish he was shorter. Specifically, 36.2% of women wished their partner was taller than he was, while only 3.9% of women wished their partner was shorter than he was.

To calculate your own height percentile, use the following calculator: https://tall.life/height-percentile-calculator-age-country/

Quotes:

At all heights, men were considerably less picky about the stature of their potential lovers.
More than three-quarters of short, average, and tall men said they'd give dating someone taller a try.

Started off with brutal one. This also relates to height, but it has some correlation with your life quality - it's absolutely brutal to be short. Many would rather die to be tall then live another day short, keek.

www.forbes.com/sites/traversmark/2020/04/16/your-height-has-a-big-impact-on-your-salary-new-research-seeks-to-understand-why/amp/


Brutality above, by a normie paper as well.

Here's some more I found :


Archived CNN article.


amp.theatlantic.com/amp/article/393518/
www.livescience.com/amp/5552-taller-people-earn-money.html

All good reading. And backs my earlier point.


Now let's get to the final and most BRUTAL of all - what do women think of short men?

This is what women, and society, thinks of them.






https://mobile.twitter.com/Diamond_London/status/554752344009998337
https://mobile.twitter.com/jg9325/status/530990917986316288
https://mobile.twitter.com/Randd3rz_/status/490617087593684992
https://mobile.twitter.com/JeremyCandelas/status/491741384194273280
https://mobile.twitter.com/deathcab420/status/383763328054464513


It's over.



I thank god i'm decently tall for my race but still it's over blown focus more on the face
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 7866
That photo was heavily edited by me, using photoshop and Luminar 4, it's very unnatural, I should have used more accurate photos in my rating thread, the ones I show to people now are more accurate.
Stop lying u look like an asexual IT worker in that full body pic
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Good_Little_Goy, TheEndHasNoEnd and Deleted member 7866
I thank god i'm decently tall for my race but still it's over blown focus more on the face
Face is important for girls but socially height matters more
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 39 and reptiles
looks autistic af but pretty average
This 18 year old girl that I consider to be 8/10 checked me out in college during the whole class every time that I sat next to her. I missed the opportunity to make her my girlfriend because I was brainwashed by mgtow at the time.
 

Attachments

  • 53056290_323268711881731_5476579463347920499_n.jpg
    53056290_323268711881731_5476579463347920499_n.jpg
    93.1 KB · Views: 131
  • Photo333.PNG
    Photo333.PNG
    703.8 KB · Views: 135
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: sandcelmuttcel, Deleted member 5393 and Deleted member 7866
This 18 year old girl that I consider to be 8/10 checked me out in college during the whole class every time that I sat next to her. I missed the opportunity to make her my girlfriend because I was brainwashed by mgtow at the time.
wtf bro fuck mgtow

she is so cute i would literally kill to date her tbh
 
  • +1
Reactions: Renaissance.Chad and wasted

Similar threads

HighTierSubhuman
Replies
10
Views
167
looksmaxxing223
looksmaxxing223
Toad
Replies
23
Views
377
134applesauce456
134applesauce456
baburam
Replies
13
Views
489
baburam
baburam
Arthur schopenhauer
Replies
14
Views
336
metacognitivist
metacognitivist

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top