Why i think @clavicular's surgery can not be an improvement

Whirr22222

Whirr22222

Silver
Joined
Apr 16, 2024
Posts
613
Reputation
580
The sole reason is that most / nearly all implants look dogshit. The semi decent results are for people with syndrome tier cheekbones infras, etc. He does not have this, therefore it wont be an improvement. Especially due to the fact hes going for a full face of implants. I think he should just do LF1, BSSO, Genio & MAYBE some cheek implants. And for the trimax, less advancement that he is planning.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: browncurrycel, Newday*V3 and greycel
How do you know all implants look like shit?
Where is this opinion coming from?
 
How do you know all implants look like shit?
Where is this opinion coming from?
Because of what i said in the thread. Look up any implants on google and they are barely an improvement, usually look uncanny. No where near the return that osteotomy gives.
 
  • +1
Reactions: greycel
Because of what i said in the thread. Look up any implants on google and they are barely an improvement, usually look uncanny. No where near the return that osteotomy gives.
But if you have an osteotomy like Bimax, then you'll need advancement of say the infras and zygos.
Also the good results are likely kept hidden
 
But if you have an osteotomy like Bimax, then you'll need advancement of say the infras and zygos.
Also the good results are likely kept hidden
He doesnt need a trimax that is advanced enough to warrant implants imo
 
  • +1
Reactions: greycel

Similar threads

Whirr22222
Replies
13
Views
174
lurking truecel
lurking truecel
menas
Replies
181
Views
12K
chadintraining
chadintraining
D
Replies
28
Views
15K
realshit
realshit

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top