suturesplitter
Iron
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2026
- Posts
- 76
- Reputation
- 25
From what I am aware smaller doses (e.g 3IU ED for 12 months) is superior to higher doses (e.g 6IU ed for 6 months). So why is the 2nd option more common?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
nobody is that rich: and i am talking in comparison, the same rules apply. why wouldnt a lower dose for a longer period be superior6ius is not high dosage
10+ for 12 months mogs
hgh isnt even that expensive assuming you are a teenager with a job. and if you are doing hgh for height doing 3 ius is like nothing. 10+ or just do cope like cjc/ipa insteadnobody is that rich: and i am talking in comparison, the same rules apply. why wouldnt a lower dose for a longer period be superior
nobody is that rich: and i am talking in comparison, the same rules apply. why wouldnt a lower dose for a longer period be superior
“Why wouldn’t i get the same results of high dose rhGH when i exogenously lower my own GH/IGF-1 levels with 3 fucking units?”nobody is that rich: and i am talking in comparison, the same rules apply. why wouldnt a lower dose for a longer period be superior
hgh isnt even that expensive assuming you are a teenager with a job. and if you are doing hgh for height doing 3 ius is like nothing. 10+ or just do cope like cjc/ipa instead
you right, thanks“Why wouldn’t i get the same results of high dose rhGH when i exogenously lower my own GH/IGF-1 levels with 3 fucking units?”
“Why wouldn’t i get the same results of 1g testosterone short cycles on my 50mg testosterone perma-blast?”