A
Acee
Wait, hold up. Nah, I still don't give a fuck
- Joined
- May 1, 2022
- Posts
- 2,507
- Reputation
- 3,581
Sick top hair in your pfp
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
wtf are you talking about? It's over if you need to read plato or whatever.''Your'' (which isn`t even yours) could be improved by smart exposure.
Fuck I want to kiss you no homowtf are you talking about? It's over if you need to read plato or whatever.
Morality doesn't exist. I don't need or want any ethical framework.
Only on cheek.Fuck I want to kiss you no homo![]()
Jesus you think I fucking ask you I`m a 6'3 Germanic beast I would rape you so hard and you don`t have a fucking sayOnly on cheek.![]()
Oh no!Jesus you think I fucking ask you I`m a 6'3 Germanic beast I would rape you so hard and you don`t have a fucking say![]()
Larped tbh, I`m Japanese.Oh no!
What are you actually?Larped tbh, I`m Japanese.
Iranian ngl.What are you actually?
Unironically wholesomea momentary period of joy for the killer is nowhere near worth as much as the whole life of another person, youre taking away decades of life fullfilment from them
that being said even if you would get more pleasure, AKA more utility it would still be amoral
utilitarianism just doesnt work in real life, maybe in an abstract world




















You are making a lot of assumptions here.How can you measure which positive is larger? You can't, that's just an opinion.
Also ending a life or causing someone to cease any further experiences is a net zero because it results in null for them. Null everything. Nothingness is neither good or bad.
From what religion? Maybe he just reincarnates. Maybe he goes to limbo.You are making a lot of assumptions here.
What if Heaven and Hell are real and you killed a bad person and force them to go to Hell for eternity but if you hadn't killed them and they lived, maybe they could've redeemed themselves in life through noble acts and later died of natural causes and went to Heaven?
You know nothing about eugenic ideologies, do these look like "NT Chads" to you?Keep thinking they wouldn't have viewed you as worthless.
View attachment 1712685
didn't know you posted. overYou ignored me.
Larped anyway.didn't know you posted. over
I know more about Nazism than you. I know they didn't require you to be blue eyed 6 feet tall mogger but they did kill thousands of aspies like YOU.You know nothing about eugenic ideologies, do these look like "NT Chads" to you?
View attachment 1712793
I have monopoly on mew mew avis.Larped anyway.
The whole crux of your argument for why murder isn't wrong seems to be based on the atheist religion's belief that there is no afterlife and all consciousness, memories and experiences will cease to be...but you don't know that for sure. It's just your belief.From what religion? Maybe he just reincarnates. Maybe he goes to limbo.
I don't consider fairytails tbh.
I watched it as a ten years old or some shit, you barely watched 5 episdoes.I have monopoly on mew mew avis.
Atheism is the lack of belief in god. It's in the name A (without). theism (belief in god).The whole crux of your argument for why murder isn't wrong seems to be based on the atheist religion's belief that there is no afterlife and all consciousness, memories and experiences will cease to be...but you don't know that for sure. It's just your belief.
Copyright bitch.I watched it as a ten years old or some shit, you barely watched 5 episdoes.
Entirely false, almost all the great minds including Hitler wouldn't be considered very NT by todays standards.I know more about Nazism than you. I know they didn't require you to be blue eyed 6 feet tall mogger but they did kill thousands of aspies like YOU.
but i do exist and im coming for ur assTbh, my happiness>other people's happiness.
I can only prove I exist with certainty, everyone else can't be 100% proven to exist. I am therefore more real and thus superior fundamentally

Net negative due to the fact your taking away another humans experience and potential to grow/ contributions to society also loved ones would feel displeased also tipping the scale making it bad.Suppose I hypothetically killed someone, what would the results of said action be?
1. I get pleasure from acting out my impulses
2. person dies
Now consequence one is a net positive because I experience pleasure.
Consequence two is a net positive because death is neither good or bad, it's the the ending of any experiences for them all together, good and bad, and it results in less people to suck up resources.
It is logicThis is a typical normie argument.
muh what if said thing happened to you? bet you wouldn't like it huh?
Fuck off, use logic not appeals to emotion
But also emotionally benefits me. Also their family members gain long term benefits in the form of inheritance.It is logic
Why is murder bad? Because it emotionally hurts others. Jesus you're a fucking retard
duh, everything is permitted if you don't believe in anything, that also makes you a threat to societal order.
From a utilitarianism perspective the person you kill and everyone who cares about them lose far more then you gainBut also emotionally benefits me. Also their family members gain long term benefits in the form of inheritance.
I explained why they benefit. They gain wealth which lasts while they momentarily feel bad.From a utilitarianism perspective the person you kill and everyone who cares about them lose far more then you gain
From deontology the act of murder is just wrong
Questioning the most basic morals is classic abused dog midwit behaviour
You're too autistic to understand human emotion ggI explained why they benefit. They gain wealth which lasts while they momentarily feel bad.
What are you talking about? Submitting to the established order of things is literally the definition of a midwit. A midwit doesn't try to invalidate a societal norm.
You're a faggotThis is a typical normie argument.
muh what if said thing happened to you? bet you wouldn't like it huh?
Fuck off, use logic not appeals to emotion
Good to know you have no argument. I win.You're too autistic to understand human emotion gg
My argument is that your argument is wrong because you can't comprehend that someone you love dying is far far worse than getting some inheritance money lolGood to know you have no argument. I win.
Oh no!You're a faggot
I know how people react to their relatives dying. They get sad for a day or two and forget. I've seen it before several times.My argument is that your argument is wrong because you can't comprehend that someone you love dying is far far worse than getting some inheritance money lol
I'm done
By that logic, how can you measure which positive is larger? You said in an earlier comment that your happiness matters more than everyone else's. By whose standard, though? You don't get to be the sole determinant of whose feelings are more valid.How can you measure which positive is larger? You can't, that's just an opinion.
Also ending a life or causing someone to cease any further experiences is a net zero because it results in null for them. Null everything. Nothingness is neither good or bad.
Because I know I exist while others existence isn't 100%. I am superior fundamentally.By that logic, how can you measure which positive is larger? You said in an earlier comment that your happiness matters more than everyone else's. By whose standard, though? You don't get to be the sole determinant of whose feelings are more valid.
In a scenario with a group of people, if the percentage of people disadvantaged and hurt outweighs the person/people not hurt, the hurt peoples' feelings objectively matter more.
Have fun telling that to a judgeBecause I know I exist while others existence isn't 100%. I am superior fundamentally.
not an argument.Have fun telling that to a judge
Cause you don't wanna argue. You wanna be right and not have your perspective changed through a debate, and your response to other rebuttals proves that.not an argument.
Okay bro, keep making fallacious arguments.Cause you don't wanna argue. You wanna be right and not have your perspective changed through a debate, and your response to other rebuttals proves that.
This is an insanely good argument and unique take.You are making a lot of assumptions here.
What if Heaven and Hell are real and you killed a bad person and force them to go to Hell for eternity but if you hadn't killed them and they lived, maybe they could've redeemed themselves in life through noble acts and later died of natural causes and went to Heaven?
Arguably, we shouldn't legally be able to kill others precisely because we DON'T KNOW what happens after death.
I know.It's only wrong because the state says it is. Morality has no basis in nature or evolution and is an artificial man made concept that was created in order to create more stable societies which in itself is an artificial man made creation. Natural human living is being a hunter gatherer apart of a small tribe filled with probably 30 people at most.
Absolutely.I think most humans have the capacity to commit murder
true. Based GodWell our all knowing creator, the Lord, did not deem it wrong (except for murdering Israelites).