why is there such disparity between some pictures of male models

[Over]

Why is Chico looking narrow, long midfaced, zero angularity here:

(Note this is a pro picture)

And here he looks a lot wider, more square, with a lot more sharp lines:

Basically looks 100x better like a proper PSL8 when in previous picture he looks nothing special.

He seems to be in great distance on both of these pictures, so I doubt its lens distortion.

Then again compare this:

To this wide, square skull:

Angles? Lighting? But how?

 

[Deleted member 5052]

Body fat percentage, lighting, angle and focal length of camera lens. Also this is why having a high psl not always equate to real life attractiveness. Psl only takes into account how someone looks in a picture (which is kinda aspie tbh). Real life attractiveness depends more on height, frame, smile, voice and most importantly how the face looks from a three dimensional point of view

 

[Deleted member 2748]

if all chico had to do to lose most of his facial definition was getting fatter, then i might need to take leanmaxxing more seriously

 

[balding17yomanletcel]

Age diffrrence u nigger

 

[Over]

Body fat percentage, lighting, angle and focal length of camera lens. Also this is why having a high psl not always equate to real life attractiveness. Psl only takes into account how someone looks in a picture (which is kinda aspie tbh). Real life attractiveness depends more on height, frame, smile, voice and most importantly how the face looks from a three dimensional point of view

Yes very high iq

Still it amazes me how I see insanely aesthetic pictures of a X person but in other angle he isnt so good....

And now imagine we have people here taking pictures with their shitty phone and asking for a rating

if all chico had to do to lose most of his facial definition was getting fatter, then i might need to take leanmaxxing more seriously

That's not fat just look at first and second picture, his cheekbone projection, it's insane how good looking he is on second picture and meh on first.

 

[Deleted member 1751]

Why is Chico looking narrow, long midfaced, zero angularity here:
View attachment 416159
(Note this is a pro picture)

And here he looks a lot wider, more square, with a lot more sharp lines:
View attachment 416162

Basically looks 100x better like a proper PSL8 when in previous picture he looks nothing special.

He seems to be in great distance on both of these pictures, so I doubt its lens distortion.

Then again compare this:
View attachment 416169

To this wide, square skull
View attachment 416171

Angles? Lighting? But how?

Lighting, makeup etc