Why is wide fwhr so overrated?

mltn2mtn

mltn2mtn

Late pubertycel
Joined
Nov 10, 2025
Posts
3,948
Reputation
3,231
Muh 2.05+ fwhr is ideal, then why do all actors and models all have relatively low fwhr? The only mogger with a very high fwhr is Jordan.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_3664.png
    IMG_3664.png
    80.3 KB · Views: 0
  • IMG_2681.jpeg
    IMG_2681.jpeg
    22.2 KB · Views: 0
  • IMG_3659.jpeg
    IMG_3659.jpeg
    80.1 KB · Views: 0
  • IMG_3657.jpeg
    IMG_3657.jpeg
    34.1 KB · Views: 0
  • IMG_3601.jpeg
    IMG_3601.jpeg
    23.3 KB · Views: 0
  • IMG_3662.jpeg
    IMG_3662.jpeg
    27.8 KB · Views: 0
  • IMG_3663.jpeg
    IMG_3663.jpeg
    28.1 KB · Views: 0
  • IMG_3666.png
    IMG_3666.png
    158.5 KB · Views: 0
  • IMG_3665.png
    IMG_3665.png
    134.6 KB · Views: 0
idk I’ve seen multiple users on here claim that low fwhr is a death sentence, and 2 fwhr is better than 1.8 when it’s not.
dont focus on one feature. Just have everything else theory.
 
  • Ugh..
Reactions: mltn2mtn
I think 1.9-1.95 is ideal. 2+ seems a bit too compact
 
  • +1
Reactions: mltn2mtn
I feel like you cant really pull off a 2+ fwhr without really good features.
 
  • +1
Reactions: mltn2mtn

Similar threads

J
Replies
5
Views
41
king of india 🥰
king of india 🥰
Sakl
Replies
10
Views
80
softmaxxer30
softmaxxer30
mltn2mtn
Replies
17
Views
99
Sulfuras
Sulfuras
Wiggle_24
Replies
10
Views
99
peterthiel
peterthiel
neveroverbro
Replies
3
Views
44
Seviant_enter
Seviant_enter

Users who are viewing this thread

  • mltn2mtn
  • procencion//
  • narceye
  • GymcellingForLife
  • pflgod
  • orbitlet
  • joe.bartolozzi
  • sziabattya
  • Mystigiri>
  • Slebov3
  • Dravadre
  • ArthurLowery
  • negative
  • trashbinxoxo
  • jjbomb
  • BruddahCool
  • khrome
Back
Top