SpectrumAesthetics3
Bronze
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2025
- Posts
- 271
- Reputation
- 394
^Im convinced it is because of this
Because no one cares to explain why the mechanism in the comment below would not apply to our faces with this protocol
Post in thread '(PICS) Definitively documenting years of bonesmashing changes + Protocol | All denial ends here tbh'
If this is even the best theory for why changes happen for people out there
IT IS BC OF THE HAMMER
THATS IT
If I was trying to normalize bonesmashing in society, I would have to invent some sort of similar tool in functionality (if not better tailored to this purpose) that looks nothing like a hammer and that looks fancy and looks like an aesthetics tool like a microneedler or steel ice globes for face do
Because it is the stigma of the hammer that gets people
The fact that you just think of it being used for construction, for nails, to remove nails so u can take down the poster on ur wall from when u were 12 that is no longer age appropriate, or to hit nails
Since are people saying “haha you think that the dense collagenous scar tissue matrix theory applies to hitting your spots a few times per day a few sets each pretty hard”?
Or are they saying-
“Incels hitting themselves with a hammer haha”
“Imagine hitting yourself with a hammer”
“If you hit yourself with a hammer ur actually a complete and utter retard”
“Imagine thinking you can grow bone by hitting yourself with a hammer”
^(well it’s probably scar tissue not bone but) these are such worthless replies
It’s like saying “imagine thinking lifting up a heavy object for a few reps will make your muscles tear down and grow back bigger LOL”
You can attack anything ad hominem like this by framing it in a way that seems ridiculous without ever addressing the thing itself; see politicianmaxxers , etc.
When you think ur emotional reaction to an idea serves as an argument, lol
Or strawmanning time requirements out of nowhere like “hitting for (x crazy # of hrs) per day” for some reason, then not responding to a reasonable reply I gave @Grievous , which I always give to reasonable people, and sometimes even to brash dogmatic ones like this depending on the day
And saying theoretical gains is retarded
Thread '(PICS) Definitively documenting years of bonesmashing changes + Protocol | All denial ends here tbh'
https://looksmax.org/threads/pics-d...es-protocol-all-denial-ends-here-tbh.1912092/
^Ive still seen no one compellingly show how my changes are anything besides bonesmashing in these comments or elsewhere; I’m open to hearing out anyone
But the domain dependence and limitations of the normie mind never cease to amaze. The types to write comments related to the hammer and not even the thing itself. To be so limited that you can’t see past the associations of a hardware tool that you already had. To be close minded enough to not look into an emerging method because it “seems crazy”
But most people are made to be sheep, standard issue minds and abstraction capability, standard issue low grade capacity for applying the right mental heuristics to a given situation and avoiding fallacious thinking. Which we all do to an extent btw. More meta awareness just means more and more fallacious ways of thinking transcended
Anyways, I’m happy no longer having a cuck lower 3rd
@powerliftercoco
@BananaBandit
@Seeyenar
@maxx92765
@CheeseTouch
Last edited:
