Why should we have given rights to blacks?

[BadLuck7892]

Obviously blacks want rights.

From a White standpoint, however, what incentive do we have to give blacks rights?

Blacks will always hate us no matter what. Shouldn't we have continued withholding rights from blacks (thus rendering blacks powerless to act on any anti-White beliefs)?

 

[gimmedatacc]

because white retards think empowering hostile shitskinned savages in white societies is the moral thing to do.

 

[BadLuck7892]

because white retards think empowering hostile shitskinned savages in white societies is the moral thing to do.

you speak an unfortunate truth

 

[ascendingalways]

The Jews shouldn't have even brought them over here. Biggest scam ever.

 

[Jewgymmaxx]

shouldve never taken their rights to begin with; once you do that you cant give em back and we did and now theyre savage apes

 

[WAGMI2 Gandy Heaven]

Obviously blacks want rights.

From a White standpoint, however, what incentive do we have to give blacks rights?

Blacks will always hate us no matter what. Shouldn't we have continued withholding rights from blacks (thus rendering blacks powerless to act on any anti-White beliefs)?

only jews gave rights to blacks

 

[Latinolooksmaxxer]

bbc halo

 

[BadLuck7892]

I'm confident we could bring Jim Crow back.

It would be a lot harder than enacting Jim Crow the first time around though. Because for more than 60 years now, blacks are used to getting a free pass to act like apes.

 

[̃Star]

Why do you dislike black people? Is this hatred of yours rational or irrational?

 

[DarkTriadBeliever]

Jfl if you think you had a choice, you lost the civil war, be grateful You still have your rights

 

[BadLuck7892]

Why do you dislike black people? Is this hatred of yours rational or irrational?

Rational.

I dislike blacks because of how they treat my people.

When blacks had no rights, they treated us well.

Once they were given rights, they began treating our people poorly.

The solution is obvious.

 

[BadLuck7892]

Jfl if you think you had a choice, you lost the civil war, be grateful You still have your rights

The Civil War was the 1860s.

I have no problem with the fact black slaves were freed.

My gripe is from the 1960s. You see, after the Civil War, we enacted Jim Crow to ensure blacks would be kept in line. Jim Crow got repealed in 1964.

When I say I'd like to revoke black rights, I mean a return to Jim Crow; not a return to slavery.

 

[DarkTriadBeliever]

The Civil War was the 1860s.

I have no problem with the fact black slaves were freed.

My gripe is from the 1960s. You see, after the Civil War, we enacted Jim Crow to ensure blacks would be kept in line. Jim Crow got repealed in 1964.

When I say I'd like to revoke black rights, I mean a return to Jim Crow; not a return to slavery.

Jfl if you think you can do this without winning a war, more so if you even have a say in what laws pass

 

[̃Star]

Rational.

I dislike blacks because of how they treat my people.

When blacks had no rights, they treated us well.

Once they were given rights, they began treating our people poorly.

The solution is obvious.

You’re saying Black people only behaved “well” when they had no rights, and that giving them rights made them treat White people poorly so the answer is to take their rights away again.

But if someone only acts peacefully when they’re powerless, that’s not real peace it’s control. It’s also possible what you see as “poor treatment” is just a reaction to past abuse.

If giving people rights leads to pushback, maybe the real problem is how they were treated before they had them.

 

[Aladin]

Obviously blacks want rights.

From a White standpoint, however, what incentive do we have to give blacks rights?

Blacks will always hate us no matter what. Shouldn't we have continued withholding rights from blacks (thus rendering blacks powerless to act on any anti-White beliefs)?

 

[Aladin]

It’s also possible what you see as “poor treatment” is just a reaction to past abuse.

It’s a response to indoctrination retard.

 

[BadLuck7892]

Jfl if you think you can do this without winning a war, more so if you even have a say in what laws pass

We never should have ended Jim Crow. Then we wouldn't be in this position (needing to win a war in order to return to the natural order where Whites are protected from blacks)

If blacks would just fucking behave, we wouldn't want Jim Crow back.

 

[BadLuck7892]

You’re saying Black people only behaved “well” when they had no rights, and that giving them rights made them treat White people poorly so the answer is to take their rights away again.

But if someone only acts peacefully when they’re powerless, that’s not real peace it’s control. It’s also possible what you see as “poor treatment” is just a reaction to past abuse.

If giving people rights leads to pushback, maybe the real problem is how they were treated before they had them.

American history was pretty fucked up toward blacks, I fully admit.

Blacks treating our people poorly as payback for the actions of long-dead Whites, however, doesn't solve anything. All it does is make us hate blacks back.

 

[̃Star]

It’s a response to indoctrination retard.

If it were just indoctrination, the resentment wouldn’t line up so clearly with real historical abuse. You can’t dismiss generational trauma and systemic inequality as brainwashing without ignoring the facts that caused the backlash in the first place. People don’t just imagine injustice—they react to it. If you’re going to reply to me be logical ffs.

 

[Aladin]

If it were just indoctrination, the resentment wouldn’t line up so clearly with real historical abuse. You can’t dismiss generational trauma and systemic inequality as brainwashing without ignoring the facts that caused the backlash in the first place. People don’t just imagine injustice—they react to it. If you’re going to reply to me be logical ffs.

most whites were not slave owners. On top of that it was whites who fought for the freedoms of blacks from being slaves.

Most black children in schools never think of this.

 

[DarkTriadBeliever]

We never should have ended Jim Crow. Then we wouldn't be in this position (needing to win a war in order to return to the natural order where Whites are protected from blacks)

If blacks would just fucking behave, we wouldn't want Jim Crow back.

Who is "we" Jfl if you think any Whites own the country/ever have


You'll do as you're told you goyslave

 

[̃Star]

American history was pretty fucked up toward blacks, I fully admit.

Blacks treating our people poorly as payback for the actions of long-dead Whites, however, doesn't solve anything. All it does is make us hate blacks back.

I agree that holding hatred toward people who are long dead doesn’t accomplish much. But most Black people today aren’t looking for revenge — they’re responding to systems and attitudes that didn’t die with the people who created them. If any amount of pushback makes you hate an entire group, that says more about your own bias than about their actions.

 

[DarkTriadBeliever]

most whites were not slave owners. On top of that it was whites who fought for the freedoms of blacks from being slaves.

Most black children in schools never think of this.

Yea, you'll fight whoever Jews tell you to, whether it's 9/11 and the arabs, or current day Iran. 0 consciousness to begin with

 

[̃Star]

most whites were not slave owners. On top of that it was whites who fought for the freedoms of blacks from being slaves.

Most black children in schools never think of this.

True, most Whites didn’t own slaves but they still lived in and benefited from a system built on it. And yes, some Whites did fight to end slavery, but that doesn’t erase the generations of damage that followed: segregation, redlining, mass incarceration.

A few people doing the right thing doesn’t cancel out a system doing the wrong thing. Most Black kids aren’t being taught to hate they’re being taught history, some people just get uncomfortable when that history isn’t flattering.

 

[DarkTriadBeliever]

You’re saying Black people only behaved “well” when they had no rights, and that giving them rights made them treat White people poorly so the answer is to take their rights away again.

But if someone only acts peacefully when they’re powerless, that’s not real peace it’s control. It’s also possible what you see as “poor treatment” is just a reaction to past abuse.

If giving people rights leads to pushback, maybe the real problem is how they were treated before they had them.

This is how they think

They punch a guy and then when they get punched back it's "I punched you because I knew you'd punch me"

 

[̃Star]

This is how they think

They punch a guy and then when they get punched back it's "I punched you because I knew you'd punch me"

Exactly. The cycle doesn’t start with the reaction it starts with the original imbalance. Recognizing that isn’t about blaming everyone alive today, it’s about understanding where the tension actually comes from.

 

[DarkTriadBeliever]

Exactly. The cycle doesn’t start with the reaction it starts with the original imbalance. Recognizing that isn’t about blaming everyone alive today, it’s about understanding where the tension actually comes from.

Nothings ever going to change, I've seen it irl, the cycle of ignorance is one that never ends

 

[Aladin]

Yea, you'll fight whoever Jews tell you to, whether it's 9/11 and the arabs, or current day Iran. 0 consciousness to begin with

I’m not fighting Muslims. 0 iq post.

 

[̃Star]

Nothings ever going to change, I've seen it irl, the cycle of ignorance is one that never ends

I get where you’re coming from—cycles like this do feel endless, especially when you see the same patterns play out over and over. But nothing changes overnight. Progress is slow, messy, and often invisible while it’s happening. Hopefully people will realize that the superior race is the human race.

 

[Aladin]

True, most Whites didn’t own slaves but they still lived in and benefited from a system built on it. And yes, some Whites did fight to end slavery, but that doesn’t erase the generations of damage that followed: segregation, redlining, mass incarceration.

A few people doing the right thing doesn’t cancel out a system doing the wrong thing. Most Black kids aren’t being taught to hate they’re being taught history, some people just get uncomfortable when that history isn’t flattering.

Mass incarceration is due to crime.

Segregation isn’t bad. It’s called freedom of association.

 

[DarkTriadBeliever]

I’m not fighting Muslims. 0 iq post.

as I said, you'll fight for and against anyone you're told to

whether it's blacks, arabs, or the Vietnamese

But it seems you can't comprehend what i'm saying



Wait a minute, you're that user who wants to fuck underaged girls

 

[bourgeoizyzz]

I get where you’re coming from—cycles like this do feel endless, especially when you see the same patterns play out over and over. But nothing changes overnight. Progress is slow, messy, and often invisible while it’s happening. Hopefully people will realize that the superior race is the human race.

nah kid

nothing ever happens

 

[DarkTriadBeliever]

I get where you’re coming from—cycles like this do feel endless, especially when you see the same patterns play out over and over. But nothing changes overnight. Progress is slow, messy, and often invisible while it’s happening. Hopefully people will realize that the superior race is the human race.

Sounds like a fantasy to me, maybe if aliens invade then earth would become united

 

[Aladin]

as I said, you'll fight for and against anyone you're told to

whether it's blacks, arabs, or the Vietnamese

Once again I’m not fighting blacks or Arabs or Vietnamese.

 

[DarkTriadBeliever]

Once again I’m not fighting blacks or Arabs or Vietnamese.

Stay away from parks

 

[̃Star]

Mass incarceration is due to crime.

Segregation isn’t bad. It’s called freedom of association.

Mass incarceration doesn’t exist in a vacuum. Crime rates don’t explain why Black people get harsher sentences for the same offenses or why entire communities were targeted by policies like the “War on Drugs”.

That’s systemic.

As for segregation being “freedom of association”—forced segregation wasn’t people freely choosing who to associate with.

It was codified in law to keep people apart based on race, with one side holding all the power.

There’s a difference between choosing your friends and having the law tell someone they can’t live in your neighborhood or attend your school.

Calling that freedom is just rewriting history to make oppression sound like personal preference jfl.

nah kid

nothing ever happens

It’s exactly that kind of attitude that guarantees nothing changes. If people actually wanted progress, they’d be willing to fight for it or at least advocate for something better. But most are too closed off to even try coexisting—they'd rather stay stuck than question their own views.

Sounds like a fantasy to me, maybe if aliens invade then earth would become united

Even if aliens invaded us I’m sure humans would still hate each other over superficial things.

 

[Aladin]

Stay away from parks

Epstein wasn’t a pedo he was an ephebophile. Killing people is worse than ephebophilia.

 

[Aladin]

Mass incarceration doesn’t exist in a vacuum. Crime rates don’t explain why Black people get harsher sentences for the same offenses or why entire communities were targeted by policies like the “War on Drugs”.

Blacks get harsher sentences because their lawyers suck.

 

[DarkTriadBeliever]

Even if aliens invaded us I’m sure humans would still hate each other over superficial things.

Of course, even if racism didn't exist, classism would easily replace it

There's always someone with more than you, and someone with less

 

[̃Star]

Blacks get harsher sentences because their lawyers suck.

That’s not a defense—it’s part of the problem. Poor legal representation is tied to systemic inequality. If one group consistently ends up with worse lawyers and worse outcomes, the issue isn’t just the lawyers—it’s the system that creates and sustains that gap. Unequal access to justice is still injustice.

Of course, even if racism didn't exist, classism would easily replace it

There's always someone with more than you, and someone with less

You're right—classism would still be a major issue even without racism. The problem is, in practice, they often overlap. Race and class get used to divide people who should be fighting the same systems. That’s why real change means addressing both—otherwise the cycle just continues under a different label.

 

[Aladin]

That’s not a defense—it’s part of the problem. Poor legal representation is tied to systemic inequality. If one group consistently ends up with worse lawyers and worse outcomes, the issue isn’t just the lawyers—it’s the system that creates and sustains that gap. Unequal access to justice is still injustice.

No one is entitled to the best lawyers, that is life.

 

[̃Star]

No one is entitled to the best lawyers, that is life.

Sure, no one’s entitled to the best lawyers but equal justice under the law is supposed to be a basic right.

If legal outcomes depend more on money than facts, then the system isn't delivering justice—it's just favoring the privileged. Saying “that’s life” doesn’t make it fair. It just accepts the problem instead of fixing it.

 

[Aladin]

Sure, no one’s entitled to the best lawyers but equal justice under the law is supposed to be a basic right.

If legal outcomes depend more on money than facts, then the system isn't delivering justice—it's just favoring the privileged. Saying “that’s life” doesn’t make it fair. It just accepts the problem instead of fixing it.

It’s supposed to be a right but it’s not possible.

 

[̃Star]

It’s supposed to be a right but it’s not possible.

Just because something isn’t perfect doesn’t mean it’s not worth striving for. “It’s not possible” is how people justify keeping broken systems in place.

We don’t scrap the idea of justice because it’s hard—we improve it because the alternative is giving up entirely.

The state of .org erodes more and more

 

[Aladin]

Just because something isn’t perfect doesn’t mean it’s not worth striving for. “It’s not possible” is how people justify keeping broken systems in place.

We don’t scrap the idea of justice because it’s hard—we improve it because the alternative is giving up entirely.

The state of .org erodes more and more

How do we improve it?

 

[User28823]

the day blacks were given rights was the day jews took control of the west

 

[̃Star]

How do we improve it?

Start with equal funding for public defenders, end mandatory minimums, eliminate cash bail for non-violent offenses, and hold prosecutors accountable for misconduct.

That’s a baseline. It won’t fix everything overnight, but it moves the system closer to fairness instead of just accepting inequality as normal.

 

[blacktrustfund]

Start with equal funding for public defenders, end mandatory minimums, eliminate cash bail for non-violent offenses, and hold prosecutors accountable for misconduct.

That’s a baseline. It won’t fix everything overnight, but it moves the system closer to fairness instead of just accepting inequality as normal.

mirin intelligence

 

[isis_Bleach]

Above all things it is necessary to save one's life. I am for the whites, because I am white; I have no other reason, yet that is reason good enough. How was it possible to grant liberty to the Africans, to men without any kind of civilization, who did not even know what a colony meant, or that there was such a place as France?

 

[StalinCel]

Goyim of all the world should unite against jews and foids. Racism/racialism is jewish