Why the COVID-19 vaccines could be part of a eugenics program

[Gargantuan]

What is eugenics?

Spoiler: Context

Eugenics, the set of beliefs and practices which aims at improving the genetic quality of the human population,[2][3] played a significant role in the history and culture of the United States during the Progressive Era, from the late 19th century until US involvement in World War II.[4]

Eugenics was practiced in the United States many years before eugenics programs in Nazi Germany,[5] which were largely inspired by the previous American work.[6][7][8] Stefan Kühl has documented the consensus between Nazi race policies and those of eugenicists in other countries, including the United States, and points out that eugenicists understood Nazi policies and measures as the realization of their goals and demands.[9]

While ostensibly about improving genetic quality, it has been argued that eugenics was more about preserving the position of the dominant groups in the population. Progressive-era US eugenics is now generally associated with racist and nativist elements, as the movement was to some extent a reaction to a change in emigration from Europe, rather than scientific genetics.[10]

It is also worth noting that the German/National Socialist eugenics program was inspired by the American one and the former is more widely referred to as 'a race purity program' where they forcibly sterilized members of the Jewish community and maybe other groups of people as well. The Americans were doing it before the Germans were doing it.

The history of sterilization in the United States
So now what we've established the context regarding the history of eugenics, let's delve into the concept of compulsory sterilization:

Spoiler: Context

In 1907, Indiana passed the first eugenics-based compulsory sterilization law in the world. Thirty U.S. states would soon follow their lead.[80][81] Although the law was overturned by the Indiana Supreme Court in 1921,[82] the U.S. Supreme Court, in Buck v. Bell, upheld the constitutionality of the Virginia Sterilization Act of 1924, allowing for the compulsory sterilization of patients of state mental institutions in 1927.[83]

A 1937 Fortune magazine poll found that 2/3 of respondents supported eugenic sterilization of "mental defectives", 63% supported sterilization of criminals, and only 15% opposed both.[88][89]

So 30 states were actively engaging in forced/compulsory sterilization, at the beginning of the previous century, and 30 years later, amongst those who were polled at the time, over 60% supported it.

Post-WW2 eugenics in the United States
Fast forward to the latter part of the 20th century, did anything change?

Spoiler: Context

After World War II, Dr. Clarence Gamble revived the eugenics movement in the United States through sterilization. Gamble supported the eugenics movement throughout his life. He worked as a researcher at Harvard Medical school and was well-off financially, as the inheritor of the Procter and Gamble fortune. Gamble, a proponent of birth control, contributed to the founding of public birth control clinics. These were the first public clinics in the United States. Until the 1960s and 1970s, Gamble's ideal form of eugenics, sterilization, was seen in various cases. Doctors told mothers that their daughters needed shots, but they were actually sterilizing them. Hispanic women were often sterilized due to the fact that they could not read the consent forms that doctors had given them. Poorer white people, African Americans, and Native American people were also targeted for forced sterilization.[94]

Now, taking into consideration the fact that there is now widespread support for compulsory vaccinations, you really have to look at what went on in the past, up until the 1970s, where people were being TRICKED into believing they were receiving a mere shot/vaccination against some sort of disease when they were actually being STERILIZED.

Personally, I see a lot of parallels here and I think it would be wise to take those into consideration, in case you haven't taken the vaccine (yet) or are still sitting on the fence.

What has changed? What makes you think they're not doing these types of things now?

Euthanasia as a byproduct of eugenics
They didn't just enforce compulsory sterilization, also had programs for EUTHANASIA in place:

Spoiler: Context

Edwin Black wrote that one of the methods that was suggested to get rid of "defective germ-plasm in the human population" was euthanasia.[7] A 1911 Carnegie Institute report explored eighteen methods for removing defective genetic attributes, and method number eight was euthanasia.[7] The most commonly suggested method of euthanasia was to set up local gas chambers.[7] However, many in the eugenics movement did not believe that Americans were ready to implement a large-scale euthanasia program, so many doctors had to find clever ways of subtly implementing eugenic euthanasia in various medical institutions.[7] For example, a mental institution in Lincoln, Illinois fed its incoming patients milk infected with tuberculosis (reasoning that genetically fit individuals would be resistant), resulting in 30–40% annual death rates.[7] Other doctors practiced euthanasia through various forms of lethal neglect.[7]

All of this was going on in the 20th century. Not in Germany, but in the United States.

Now, with the eugenics movement, it gets really interesting in how it ties in with those who, in this day and age, are pushing for mandatory vaccines.

Who is pushing for vaccines?
I'm sure some of you are familiar with the Rockefeller family, and its subsequent organisation, given the fact that they are one of the richest, as well as one of the most powerful families in the United States.

What is their take on eugenics?

Spoiler: Context

Beginning in 1930, the Rockefeller Foundation provided financial support to the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute of Anthropology, Human Heredity, and Eugenics,[25] which later inspired and conducted eugenics experiments in the Third Reich.

The Rockefeller Foundation funded Nazi racial studies even after it was clear that this research was being used to rationalize the demonizing of Jews and other groups. Up until 1939, the Rockefeller Foundation was funding research used to support Nazi racial science studies at the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute of Anthropology, Human Heredity, and Eugenics (KWIA.) Reports submitted to Rockefeller did not hide what these studies were being used to justify. Still, Rockefeller continued the funding and refrained from criticizing this research so closely derived from Nazi ideology. The Rockefeller Foundation did not alert "the world to the nature of German science and the racist folly" that German anthropology promulgated. Rockefeller funded for years after the passage of the 1935 Nuremberg racial laws.[26]

The Rockefeller Foundation, along with the Carnegie Institution, was the primary financier for the Eugenics Record Office, until 1939. [27]

So the Rockefellers not only funded American eugenics they also funded the German eugenics program, and they were fully aware of the fact that the Germans were sterilizing people in Germany, yet continued to fund them.

Who is the key figure in pushing vaccines, in this day and age?
How does this tie into the most prominent figures, in this day and age, who are pushing for vaccines, on an industrial scale?
Let's take a look at the most famous of them all, Bill Gates:

Spoiler: Context

Gates studied the work of Andrew Carnegie and John D. Rockefeller, and donated some of his Microsoft stock in 1994 to create the "William H. Gates Foundation".Gates has credited the generosity and extensive philanthropy of David Rockefeller as a major influence. Gates and his father met with Rockefeller several times, and their charity work is partly modeled on the Rockefeller family's philanthropic focus,

So there you have it, inspired by the 2 most prominent financiers of eugenics, in America as well as in Nazi Germany (in the case of the Rockefellers).

But that's not all. His dad, Bill Gates Sr., sat on the board of Planned Parenthood, an offshoot of the eugenics program.
Let's see what Wikipedia has to say about Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood:

Sanger's eugenics policies included an exclusionary immigration policy, free access to birth control methods, and full family planning autonomy for the able-minded, as well as compulsory segregation or sterilization for the "profoundly retarded".[119][120]

Fun fact:

She was supported by one of the most racist authors in America in the 1920s, the Klansman[126][127] Lothrop Stoddard, who was a founding member of the Board of Directors of Sanger's American Birth Control League.[128][129][130]

Now back to Bill Gates Sr.:

Gates served on the boards of numerous organizations in the Pacific Northwest, including the Greater Seattle Chamber of Commerce,[14] King County United Way and Planned Parenthood.[1][15][16]

There you have it, there's the link.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the son of Robert F. Kennedy and the nephew of former U.S. President John F. Kennedy, has an interesting article on his website about the fact that Bill Gates has achieved FULL INDEMNITY on his vaccine which means that Gates and co. will enjoy full immunity from any liability, should their vaccine injure or worse, kill people.

Here’s Why Bill Gates Wants Indemnity … Are You Willing to Take the Risk?

Why are the world's top vaccine promoters, like Paul Offit and Peter Hotez, frantically warning us about the unique and frightening dangers inherent in developing a coronavirus vaccine?
 On Feb 4th 2020, when there were only 11 active CV cases in the USA, the U.S. quietly pushed through Federal...

childrenshealthdefense.org

In this video footage, Offit, Hotez and even Anthony Fauci (in an unguarded moment), warn that any new coronavirus vaccine could trigger lethal immune reactions “vaccine enhancement” when vaccinated people come in contact with the wild virus. Instead of proceeding with caution, Fauci has made the reckless choice to fast track vaccines, partially funded by Gates, without critical animal studies before moving into human clinical trials that could provide early warning of runaway immune response.

Gates (in the video) is so worried about the danger of adverse events that he says vaccines shouldn’t be distributed until governments agree to indemnity against lawsuits. On February 4, 2020, according to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) website, there were only 11 active CV cases in the USA, yet the U.S. quietly pushed through Federal regulations giving coronavirus vaccine makers full immunity from liability.

Vaccines don't injure or kill people, you say?

Promising his share of $450 million of $1.2 billion to eradicate polio, Gates took control of India’s National Technical Advisory Group on Immunization (NTAGI), which mandated up to 50 doses (Table 1) of polio vaccines through overlapping immunization programs to children before the age of five. Indian doctors blame the Gates campaign for a devastating non-polio acute flaccid paralysis (NPAFP) epidemic that paralyzed 490,000 children beyond expected rates between 2000 and 2017. In 2017, the Indian government dialed back Gates’ vaccine regimen and asked Gates and his vaccine policies to leave India. NPAFP rates dropped precipitously.

In 2017, the World Health Organization (WHO) reluctantly admitted that the global explosion in polio is predominantly vaccine strain. The most frightening epidemics in Congo, Afghanistan, and the Philippines, are all linked to vaccines. In fact, by 2018, 70% of global polio cases were vaccine strain.

In 2009, the Gates Foundation funded tests of experimental HPV vaccines, developed by Glaxo Smith Kline (GSK) and Merck, on 23,000 young girls in remote Indian provinces. Approximately 1,200 suffered severe side effects, including autoimmune and fertility disorders. Seven died. Indian government investigations charged that Gates-funded researchers committed pervasive ethical violations: pressuring vulnerable village girls into the trial, bullying parents, forging consent forms, and refusing medical care to the injured girls. The case is now in the country’s Supreme Court.

In 2010, the Gates Foundation funded a phase 3 trial of GSK’s experimental malaria vaccine, killing 151 African infants and causing serious adverse effects, including paralysis, seizure, and febrile convulsions, to 1,048 of the 5,949 children.

During Gates’ 2002 MenAfriVac campaign in Sub-Saharan Africa, Gates’ operatives forcibly vaccinated thousands of African children against meningitis. Approximately 50 of the 500 children vaccinated developed paralysis. South African newspapers complained, “We are guinea pigs for the drug makers.” Nelson Mandela’s former senior economist, Professor Patrick Bond, describes Gates’ philanthropic practices as “ruthless and immoral.”

A 2017 study (Morgenson et. al. 2017) showed that WHO’s popular DTP vaccine is killing more African children than the diseases it prevents. DTP-vaccinated girls suffered 10x the death rate of children who had not yet received the vaccine. WHO has refused to recall the lethal vaccine, which it forces upon tens of millions of African children annually.

In 2010, when Gates committed $10 billion to the WHO, he said “We must make this the decade of vaccines.” A month later, Gates said in a TED Talk that new vaccines “could reduce population.” And, four years later, in 2014, Kenya’s Catholic Doctors Association accused the WHO of chemically sterilizing millions of unwilling Kenyan women with a “tetanus” vaccine campaign. Independent labs found a sterility formula in every vaccine tested. After denying the charges, WHO finally admitted it had been developing the sterility vaccines for over a decade. Similar accusations came from Tanzania, Nicaragua, Mexico, and the Philippines.

Regarding that TED Talk:

(4:40)

Let's take a closer look at what the Georgia Guidestones are trying to tell us, regarding the world's population:

Now, if we are to believe this, 6.5 BILLION people will be on the chopping block, sooner or later. Most will take the vaccine, Gates says that population control can be achieved through vaccinations, go figure...

Source: https://www.transcend.org/tms/2020/...win-win-for-pharma-and-mandatory-vaccination/ -> All can be verified

All previous articles are cited from Wikipedia, the no.1 Kosher approved encyclopedia, so you can't use the argument of alternative media being used here:

Margaret Sanger - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Bill Gates Sr. - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Eugenics in the United States - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Rockefeller Foundation - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Bill Gates - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

I'm not saying all of this is gospel truth, but the probability that most of this is legit, is pretty high, given all of the evidence. At the end of the day, it's just my opinion and what I believe to be true when looking at the bigger picture. There's more than meets the eye, usually.

At last, I'll leave you guys with this video:


Some eerie similarities with today's COVID vaccine!

Tagging users who might be interested: @kjsbdfiusdf @Chadlite Rutherford @OOGABOOGA @Lmao @lutte @Yellow_fever_cel @Adriana Lima @curryslayerordeath @TsarTsar444

 

[Deleted member 6403]

Good thread

 

[Deleted member 2403]

good

 

[Deleted member 2632]

Well the problem with eugenics is people of the past were trying to pick a superior race to continue to exist and get rid of inferior races ( Good blood vs bad blood )

This was based on the race of people who were able to build the best civilizations, in terms of science, engineering, architecture, technology, mathematics, medicine, as well as physical attributes

But this vaccine program seems to be distributed randomly and indiscriminately

I would like to know if the vaccine has different effects on people of different races, purposely designed this way

 

[lutte]

Tagging some more who might be interested @Wallenberg @AlexAP @SkaryMullis

 

[OOGABOOGA]

Dnr but I will papa

 

[LipstickAlley]

Dnrd

oh shit ur a mod

 

[Gargantuan]

Tagging some more who might be interested @Wallenberg @AlexAP @SkaryMullis

This could get interesting

Spoiler

If they'll actually bother reading the whole thing

 

[lutte]

Dnrd

oh shit ur a mod

The good dutch mod unlike the other one who I won’t tag

 

[Gargantuan]

The good dutch mod unlike the other one who I won’t tag

@Alexand thoughts?

 

[Deleted member 13021]

Tagging some more who might be interested @Wallenberg @AlexAP @SkaryMullis

Following OP train of thought, if i survive the vaccine I'm a genetically superior individual, right?

 

[AlexAP]

This could get interesting
View attachment 1192588

Spoiler

If they'll actually bother reading the whole thing

Read all.

I'm praying to Gandy now.

 

[AlexAP]

Vaccines don't injure or kill people, you say?

Billions of people got vaccinated and didn't die. So, yeah, they're pretty safe.

Let's take a closer look at what the Georgia Guidestones are trying to tell us, with regard to the world's population?
View attachment 1192546
Now, if we are to believe this, 6.5 BILLION people will be on the chopping block, sooner or later. Most will take the vaccine, Gates says that population control can be achieved through vaccinations, go figure...

Source: https://www.transcend.org/tms/2020/...win-win-for-pharma-and-mandatory-vaccination/ -> All can be verified

What has Bill Gates to do with the Georgia Guidestones? And do you think Bill Gates has the power to mandate vaccinations? The governments are doing it.

 

[AlexAP]

Gas chambers, deliberately poisoning people ALL going on in the 20th century. Not in Germany, but in the United States.

 

[gamma]

Tldr??
What will happen if I take the vaccine?

 

[AlexAP]

What will happen if I take the vaccine?

According to OP, there is a good possibility that you die.

 

[gamma]

According to OP, there is a good possibility that you die.

Yeah someone is dead from that but the possibilities are low like 0.01%
How much are the possibilities of death?

 

[Jagged0]

According to OP, there is a good possibility that you die.

Yeah someone is dead from that but the possibilities are low like 0.01%
How much are the possibilities of death?

Low my parents are both alive

 

[Gargantuan]

Billions of people got vaccinated and didn't die. So, yeah, they're pretty safe.

Why don't they research 2 groups of people: vaccinated ones, and non-vaccinated ones, over a prolonged period of time, side by side and see how they measure up in terms of susceptibility with regard to cancer, other diseases, overall health etc.? This has never been done before, yet it would prove a lot.

And just because they didn't die, that doesn't mean that the overall situation improves, per se. In the examples that I listed, the vaccines had a detrimental effect, for example.

I also have to add that I'm not anti-vax, per se. I think the idea of injecting a weakened version of a virus into your body so that your immune system knows how to respond properly in case you actually get the virus, is probably not a bad thing.

I am, however, anti-mrna because literally nobody knows if these type of vaccines are even safe. Also, as I pointed out in the OP, the fact that you cant sue the vaccine company, in case you get injured, given the fact that they've achieved full indemnity, highly alarming, to say the least.

What has Bill Gates to do with the Georgia Guidestones? And do you think Bill Gates has the power to mandate vaccinations? The governments are doing it.

Well, it doesn't necessarily relate to him, but it could be used as a blueprint for what's to come. Gates isn't the only one advocating for population control, btw:

This isn't some made-up quote, you can look it up and see that it's legit.

 

[AlexAP]

Yeah someone is dead from that but the possibilities are low like 0.01%
How much are the possibilities of death?

Low my parents are both alive

I don't think it's dangerous either. I already got the vaccine on wednesday.

 

[Gargantuan]

Tldr??
What will happen if I take the vaccine?

There's a possibility you could get sterilised as a result of it, or worse.

According to OP, there is a good possibility that you die.

I didn't necessarily insinuate this, but yeah, there is always a chance this could happen. We'll have to wait and see, really.

 

[gamma]

I don't think it's dangerous either. I already got the vaccine on wednesday.

My friends got the vaccine and had fever for 2 days
You ok?

 

[Deleted member 4438]

Not one word, i dont care if you are a mod

You can force me to nothing

 

[Deleted member 4438]

My friends got the vaccine and had fever for 2 days
You ok?

i hope they die, painfully, with regrets

 

[AlexAP]

Why don't they research 2 groups of people: vaccinated ones, and non-vaccinated ones, over a prolonged period of time, side by side and see how they measure up in terms of susceptibility with regard to cancer, other diseases, overall health etc.? This has never been done before, yet it would prove a lot.

And just because they didn't die, that doesn't mean that the overall situation improves, per se. In the examples that I listed, the vaccines had a detrimental effect, for example.

The overall health did improve when there were mass vaccinations. Many diseases have been wiped out with vaccines.

Well, it's doesn't necessarily relate to him, but it could be used as a blueprint for what's to come. Gates isn't the only one advocating for population control, btw:
View attachment 1192679
This isn't some made-up quote, you can look it up and see that it's legit.

Quotes don't prove real-life plans and actions. I'm certainly not a fan of the people in power, but I do not believe everything others accused them to do.

There's a possibility you could get sterilised as a result of it, or worse.

I don't think there's any evidence that the vaccine causes infertility.

 

[AlexAP]

My friends got the vaccine and had fever for 2 days
You ok?

Yeah, completely okay.

 

[gamma]

Yeah, completely okay.

Which vaccine did you get?
Pfizer, Astrazeneca...?

 

[Jagged0]

My friends got the vaccine and had fever for 2 days
You ok?

Yeah some people definitely get a fever my plate texted me she felt sick for a few days after the second shot she’s fine now though

 

[AlexAP]

Which vaccine did you get?
Pfizer, Astrazeneca...?

Pfizer

 

[Gargantuan]

The overall health did improve when there were mass vaccinations. Many diseases have been wiped out with vaccines.

Even if that's the case, we're not using these type of vaccines with covid, though. As I said, mrna's supposed safety has never been proven.

An unproven, severely undertested type of vaccine + full indemnity so that the vaccine companies cannot be sued in case of injury could be a disaster waiting to happen, honestly.

Quotes don't prove real-life plans and actions. I'm certainly not a fan of the people in power, but I do not believe everything others accused them to do.

They most certainly do, when they come from the most powerful people, who pull the strings in this world. Both Gates AND the Royal Family are VERY powerful players in this game, not to be underestimated. This isn't your average joe talking, after all.

I don't think there's any evidence that the vaccine causes infertility.

We can't say that yet, but the possibility is out there.

 

[Gargantuan]

Not one word, i dont care if you are a mod

You can force me to nothing

dnrd

 

[lutte]

Yeah someone is dead from that but the possibilities are low like 0.01%
How much are the possibilities of death?

It’s completely unknown it could be 0,0x or it could be 50% only time will tell

Low my parents are both alive

Yeah, completely okay.

The short term effects were never the main concern. The first test will come next flu season when we see if it causes ADE which might already be happening with the delta variant

 

[gamma]

if it causes ADE

What's this?

 

[lutte]

What's this?

Antibody dependent enhancement, when the antibodies help infection instead of prevent it

See the death numbers on page 12, there are more vaccinated deaths than unvaccinated by delta in England
https://assets.publishing.service.g...ants_of_Concern_VOC_Technical_Briefing_16.pdf
@AlexAP @Jagged0

 

[OOGABOOGA]

The bit about indemnity being awarded in February is sooooo sus. Obviously it’s all bullshit but it’s like they don’t even try to hide it because they know people won’t even look.

 

[OOGABOOGA]

Another thing worth noting about the low mortality rates is that this is obviously going to be ongoing. This was the first ever mRNA vax and covid will probably be used to give more and more of them for years to come. The compounded effect may not be many quick deaths, but earlier deaths and reduced fertility would not surprise me at all.

On the bright side we don’t have to worry about getting these dumb city hoes pregnant

 

[TITUS]

On a side note, pissrael has been sterilizing their jewish sheboons for decades already, through "vaccine shots".

 

[Adriana Lima]

Eugenics was based tho and was the biggest miss-step in human history


edit: good thread ofc vaccine takers on suicide watch

 

[Deleted member 2632]

I don't think it's dangerous either. I already got the vaccine on wednesday.

The mRNA ( usually ) does not kill you outright

Based on previous studies of other mRNA injections ( not a vaccine ) the spike protein led to a decreased immune system response in the ferrets that were injected and killed them all when exposed to the SARS virus

So the purpose of the mRNA is NOT to be a kill shot as that would too obvious but rather to weaken you enough to when exposed to " Corona Virus the Sequel " you will not be able to fight off the virus and die

Also the mRNA has very " sus " not been tested for effects on fertility

 

[AlexAP]

The mRNA ( usually ) does not kill you outright

Based on previous studies of other mRNA injections ( not a vaccine ) the spike protein led to a decreased immune system response in the ferrets that were injected and killed them all when exposed to the SARS virus

So the purpose of the mRNA is NOT to be a kill shot as that would too obvious but rather to weaken you enough to when exposed to " Corona Virus the Sequel " you will not be able to fight off the virus and die

So you think the new variant will kill me. Wanna bet on it? I get money if I survive, you get the satisfaction of being right if I die.

Also the mRNA has very " sus " not been tested for effects on fertility

There's no link between the vaccine and infertility, why should anyone fear it?

 

[Rope'n'Roll]

Golden post

Simply put. Imagine getting an untested vax for an unidentified virus / hoax / rebranded flu from people who constantly push a global depopulation agenda like 'There are too many of you peasants so we cannot overconsume anymore. Time to cull you out'.

And the entire vaxx campaign bears a striking resemblance to a blackmail scheme. 'You either take our vaccine or we ruin your social life and put you on lockdown forever'.

I think that's enough to trigger your self-preservation instincts.

Anyway, Jedem das Seine

And don't forget to secure a clean unjabbed girlfriend:

 

[AcneScars]

Why don't they research 2 groups of people: vaccinated ones, and non-vaccinated ones, over a prolonged period of time, side by side and see how they measure up in terms of susceptibility with regard to cancer, other diseases, overall health etc.? This has never been done before, yet it would prove a lot.

My guy isnt that a randomised controlled trial?

 

[Gargantuan]

My guy isnt that a randomised controlled trial?

Clinical trial, if you will.

Similar to a control group vs a placebo group in research.

 

[AcneScars]

Clinical trial, if you will.

Similar to a control group vs a placebo group in research.

So no double blind studies have been carried out for the Covid vaccine?

 

[Gargantuan]

So no double blind studies have been carried out for the Covid vaccine?

That is correct.

 

[AcneScars]

That is correct.

Wtf how did they just approve the vaccine then?

 

[Gargantuan]

Wtf how did they just approve the vaccine then?

No double blind studies had been performed, the testing phase on animals had been skipped almost entirely, an unproven type of vaccine, full indemnity on behalf of the vaccine manufacturers in case anyone gets injured, countless deaths/injuries already from the vaccine...

But they have our best interests at heart and only want to ensure we are/remain healthy!!

 

[AcneScars]

No double blind studies had been performed, the testing phase on animals had been skipped almost entirely, an unproven type of vaccine, full indemnity on behalf of the vaccine manufacturers in case anyone gets injured, countless deaths/injuries already from the vaccine...

But they have our best interests at heart and only want to ensure we are/remain healthy!!

 

[Deleted member 13511]

 

[Deleted member 7098]

No double blind studies had been performed, the testing phase on animals had been skipped almost entirely, an unproven type of vaccine, full indemnity on behalf of the vaccine manufacturers in case anyone gets injured, countless deaths/injuries already from the vaccine...

But they have our best interests at heart and only want to ensure we are/remain healthy!!

they claim that they were able to cut down the approval time from 5-10 years to 6 months because they did stage 1/2/3 trials all at the same time, which completely defeats the purpose of them besides having a bigger sample size.

you can't measure long term effects in a 6month time window, which is the reason you normally have to go through the different stages ONE AFTER ANOTHER, while still monitoring the previous groups

i'm in the same boat as you, not anti vax, weakened viral particles are fine, from vaccines that have been in use for decades, but a vaccine type that has never been used before being rolled out on a scope like this just gets your bells ringing