Why the COVID-19 vaccines could be part of a eugenics program

[TheEndHasNoEnd]

Amazing thread, bookmarked

What im very concerned tho is if they release something that will be harmful for people who havent taken the vaxx before the mass depopulation. There would be 0 benefit for them to keep the questioners alive.

 

[sytyl]

schizo shit, nothing will happen (as always)

just one example of schizos using shit out of context to push their claims:
> A month later, Gates said in a TED Talk that new vaccines “could reduce population.”

he's referring to higher health standards/healthcare resulting in people having less kids because more will survive, a trend seen in any country that gets richer

the vaccines are more or less safe and this whole thing is a cash grab ploy by big pharma

 

[autistic_tendencies]

schizo shit, nothing will happen (as always)

just one example of schizos using shit out of context to push their claims:
> A month later, Gates said in a TED Talk that new vaccines “could reduce population.”

he's referring to higher health standards/healthcare resulting in people having less kids because more will survive, a trend seen in any country that gets richer

the vaccines are more or less safe and this whole thing is a cash grab ploy by big pharma

elites already have all the money they want there’s a deeper agenda they want dominion over our mind bodies and DNA

 

[sytyl]

elites already have all the money they want there’s a deeper agenda they want dominion over our mind bodies and DNA

or the more plausible answer of the world being chaotic

 

[sytyl]

What's more worrying btw is the fact that people aren't getting out in the traditional means (i.e. packed classrooms, packed trains/buses/elevators etc.) which slows the spread of other flus and viruses - cba to explain but people will get btfo in winter if things do fully open once again.

Nothing short of [redacted] being nuked after being forced to pay reparations is an acceptable outcome ngl.

 

[Gargantuan]

schizo shit, nothing will happen (as always)

just one example of schizos using shit out of context to push their claims:
> A month later, Gates said in a TED Talk that new vaccines “could reduce population.”

he's referring to higher health standards/healthcare resulting in people having less kids because more will survive, a trend seen in any country that gets richer

Just cherrypick 1 detail from the thread and claim it's schizo in its entirety.

Yes, if we are to believe Gates, who is a tech guy, btw. (So first you have to ask yourself, what does a tech guy, who doesn't have ANY medical background or qualifications whatsoever, doing pushing vaccines so much??) reducing the population is done under the guise of higher child mortality rates in 3rd world countries aka if a woman bears let's say 5 kids, 3 might die within the first year of being born so she will still have 2 kids at the end of the day etc.

And even if you want to buy into that, it would still be extremely foolish to deny depopulation, because this is definitely on the agenda.
They are adamant about bringing the world's population down.

the vaccines are more or less safe and this whole thing is a cash grab ploy by big pharma

There is an abundance of publicly available evidence which shows that countless people have been injured, sterilised, killed etc. by vaccines, regardless of whether it's intentional or unintentional.

In the US, they have this special court, called the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, that deals with vaccine-related injuries.
And the burden of proof to show that you've been injured by a vaccine in this court is, unsurprisingly, extremely high.
To get a payout/compensation from this court, you have to go to extreme lengths. In fact, most people don't even have the money to go to this court and win a case against these vaccine companies.
So the number of people who are able to go to that court and win, are only a fraction of the people who have actually been injured by vaccines.

But be that as it may, this court has paid out BILLIONS of dollars to people who have been injured by vaccines:

The VICP also applies to claims for injuries suffered before 1988; there were 4,264 of these claims of which 1,189 were compensated with awards totaling $903 million.[5] As of October 2019, $4.2 Billion in compensation (not including attorneys fees and costs) has been awarded

Mainstream source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Vaccine_Injury_Compensation_Program

And ALL of these payouts were given to people who had been injured by non-mRNA vaccines, the type of vaccines that are regarded as relatively safe, generally speaking.
If traditional vaccines that were developed over the course of 5-10 years, resulting in $4.2 billion in compensation, due to vaccine-related injuries, by a court, how can we possibly trust an unproven type of vaccine, that was developed in 6 months? As @MoeZart had pointed out, earlier in this thread.

So this blind faith that most people seem to have in vaccines is really quite dangerous because those of us who actually think critically and learn from history, don't wanna risk getting injured from an unproven type of vaccine, whose manufacturers can't even be sued, due to the fact that Gates has achieved full indemnity.

 

[lutte]

What's more worrying btw is the fact that people aren't getting out in the traditional means (i.e. packed classrooms, packed trains/buses/elevators etc.) which slows the spread of other flus and viruses - cba to explain but people will get btfo in winter if things do fully open once again.

Nothing short of [redacted] being nuked after being forced to pay reparations is an acceptable outcome ngl.

ade and their immune systems being fucked by the vaccine

 

[sytyl]

Just cherrypick 1 detail from the thread and claim it's schizo in its entirety.

Yes, if we are to believe Gates, who is a tech guy, btw. (So first you have to ask yourself, what does a tech guy, who doesn't have ANY medical background or qualifications whatsoever, doing pushing vaccines so much??) reducing the population is done under the guise of higher child mortality rates in 3rd world countries aka if a woman bears let's say 5 kids, 3 might die within the first year of being born so she will still have 2 kids at the end of the day etc.

And even if you want to buy into that, it would still be extremely foolish to deny depopulation, because this is definitely on the agenda.
They are adamant about bringing the world's population down.

There is an abundance of publicly available evidence which shows that countless people have been injured, sterilised, killed etc. by vaccines, regardless of whether it's intentional or unintentional.

In the US, they have this special court, called the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, that deals with vaccine-related injuries.
And the burden of proof to show that you've been injured by a vaccine in this court is, unsurprisingly, extremely high.
To get a payout/compensation from this court, you have to go to extreme lengths. In fact, most people don't even have the money to go to this court and win a case against these vaccine companies.
So the number of people who are able to go to that court and win, are only a fraction of the people who have actually been injured by vaccines.

But be that as it may, this court has paid out BILLIONS of dollars to people who have been injured by vaccines:

Mainstream source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Vaccine_Injury_Compensation_Program

And ALL of these payouts were given to people who had been injured by non-mRNA vaccines, the type of vaccines that are regarded as relatively safe, generally speaking.
If traditional vaccines that were developed over the course of 5-10 years, resulting in $4.2 billion in compensation, due to vaccine-related injuries, by a court, how can we possibly trust an unproven type of vaccine, that was developed in 6 months? As @MoeZart had pointed out, earlier in this thread.

So this blind faith that most people seem to have in vaccines is really quite dangerous because those of us who actually think critically and learn from history, don't wanna risk getting injured from an unproven type of vaccine, whose manufacturers can't even be sued, due to the fact that Gates has achieved full indemnity.

fair enough
what's the solution to all this then besides a nuke aimed at some places

 

[Gargantuan]

fair enough
what's the solution to all this then besides a nuke aimed at some places

Sadly, we can never fully know what they have in store for us.

But let's say, a worst-case scenario does unfold like the one I described in the OP. Maybe, just maybe, if they decide to go ahead with mass-scale depopulation (which, in this scenario, will be done through vaccination), they might actually leave the ones who refuse to take the vaccine alone, in the long term

Maybe it sounds unrealistic, but it could be a feasible option. Because in the future, AI will obviously play a massive role in society, we will probably get to transhumanism as well so the elite won't have to rely on us anymore, as much as they used to, in the past.

And if we're largely disposable by then, they might just leave us alone. Especially given the fact that those who refuse to take the vaccine will be the minority anyway.

But this is just a theory, not backed up by anything.

 

[lutte]

Sadly, we can never fully know what they have in store for us.

But let's say, a worst-case scenario does unfold like the one I described in the OP. Maybe, just maybe, if they decide to go ahead with mass-scale depopulation (which, in this scenario, will be done through vaccination), they might actually leave the ones who refuse to take the vaccine alone, in the long term

Maybe it sounds unrealistic, but it could be a feasible option. Because in the future, AI will obviously play a massive role in society, we will probably get to transhumanism as well so the elite won't have to rely on us anymore, as much as they used to, in the past.

And if we're largely disposable by then, they might just leave us alone. Especially given the fact that those who refuse to take the vaccine will be the minority anyway.

But this is just a theory, not backed up by anything.

@sytyl is a nwo tech giant ceo dont mind him tbh

 

[sytyl]

@sytyl is a nwo tech giant ceo dont mind him tbh

nothing will happen go- err, guy

 

[lutte]

nothing will happen go- err, guy

I can't agree that nothing will happpen tbh

 

[autistic_tendencies]

Sadly, we can never fully know what they have in store for us.

But let's say, a worst-case scenario does unfold like the one I described in the OP. Maybe, just maybe, if they decide to go ahead with mass-scale depopulation (which, in this scenario, will be done through vaccination), they might actually leave the ones who refuse to take the vaccine alone, in the long term

Maybe it sounds unrealistic, but it could be a feasible option. Because in the future, AI will obviously play a massive role in society, we will probably get to transhumanism as well so the elite won't have to rely on us anymore, as much as they used to, in the past.

And if we're largely disposable by then, they might just leave us alone. Especially given the fact that those who refuse to take the vaccine will be the minority anyway.

But this is just a theory, not backed up by anything.

The unvaccinated will be relegated to the savage reservations like in brave new world

 

[Gargantuan]

The unvaccinated will be relegated to the savage reservations like in brave new world

Heard it's a great book. I'm planning to read it this summer.

 

[hebbewem]

The one pushes the vaccine most is dems in power and those would take it would most likely be dems . Why would dems intentionaly ruin the power they have

 

[Gargantuan]

The one pushes the vaccine most is dems in power and those would take it would most likely be dems . Why would dems intentionaly ruin the power they have

Doesn't really make much of a difference because, at the end of the day, democrats and republicans are two sides of the same coin who are both backed by the same elitist circles.

 

[Deleted member 9890]

Introduction:

What is eugenics?

It's also worth noting that the German/National Socialist eugenics program was inspired by the American one and the former is more widely referred to as 'a race purity program' where they forcibly sterilized members of the Jewish community and maybe other groups of people as well. The Americans were doing it before the Germans/Nazis were doing it.

So now what we've established the context regarding the history of eugenics, let's delve into the concept of compulsory sterilization:

Spoiler: Context

In 1907, Indiana passed the first eugenics-based compulsory sterilization law in the world. Thirty U.S. states would soon follow their lead.[80][81] Although the law was overturned by the Indiana Supreme Court in 1921,[82] the U.S. Supreme Court, in Buck v. Bell, upheld the constitutionality of the Virginia Sterilization Act of 1924, allowing for the compulsory sterilization of patients of state mental institutions in 1927.[83]

A 1937 Fortune magazine poll found that 2/3 of respondents supported eugenic sterilization of "mental defectives", 63% supported sterilization of criminals, and only 15% opposed both.[88][89]

So 30 states were actively engaging in forced/compulsory sterilization, at the beginning of the previous century, and 30 years later, amongst those who were polled at the time, over 60% supported it.


Fast forward to post WW2 and the latter part of the 20th century, did anything change?

Now, taking into consideration the fact that there is now widespread support for compulsory vaccinations, you really have to look at what went on in the past, up until the 1970s, where people were being TRICKED into believing they were receiving a mere shot/vaccination against some sort of disease when they were actually being STERILIZED.

Personally, I see a lot of parallels here and I think it would be wise to take those into consideration, in case you haven't taken the vaccine (yet) or are still sitting on the fence.

What has changed? What makes you think they're not doing these type of things now?
View attachment 1192115

But it doesn't stop there, they didn't just enforce compulsory sterilization, also had programs for EUTHANASIA in place:

Gas chambers, deliberately poisoning people ALL going on in the 20th century. Not in Germany, but in the United States.

Now, with the eugenics movement, it gets really interesting in how it ties in with those who, in this day and age, are pushing for mandatory vaccines.

Who is pushing for vaccines?

I'm sure some of you are familiar with the Rockefeller family, and its subsequent organisation, given the fact that they are one of the richest, as well as one of the most powerful families in the United States.

Let's get their take and history on eugenics:

So the Rockefellers not only funded American eugenics they also funded German/Nazi eugenics, and they knew the Nazis were sterilizing people in Germany, yet continued to fund them.

How does this tie into prominent figures, in this day and age, pushing for the vaccine?
Let's take a look at the most famous of them all, Bill Gates:

So there you have it, inspired by the 2 most prominent financiers of eugenics, in America as well as in Nazi Germany (in the case of the Rockefellers).

But that's not all. His dad, Bill Gates Sr., sat on the board of Planned Parenthood, an offshoot of the eugenics program.
Let's see what Wikipedia has to say about Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood:

Fun fact:


Now back to Bill Gates Sr.:

There you have it, there's the link.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the son of Robert F. Kennedy and the nephew of former U.S. President John F. Kennedy, has an interesting article on his website about the fact that Bill Gates has achieved FULL INDEMNITY on his vaccine which means that Gates and co. will enjoy full immunity from any liability, should their vaccine injure or worse, kill people.

Here’s Why Bill Gates Wants Indemnity … Are You Willing to Take the Risk?

Why are the world's top vaccine promoters, like Paul Offit and Peter Hotez, frantically warning us about the unique and frightening dangers inherent in developing a coronavirus vaccine?
 On Feb 4th 2020, when there were only 11 active CV cases in the USA, the U.S. quietly pushed through Federal...

childrenshealthdefense.org

Vaccines don't injure or kill people, you say?






Regarding that TED Talk:
4:40

Let's take a closer look at what the Georgia Guidestones are trying to tell us, with regard to the world's population?
View attachment 1192546
Now, if we are to believe this, 6.5 BILLION people will be on the chopping block, sooner or later. Most will take the vaccine, Gates says that population control can be achieved through vaccinations, go figure...

Source: https://www.transcend.org/tms/2020/...win-win-for-pharma-and-mandatory-vaccination/ -> All can be verified

All previous articles are cited from Wikipedia, the no.1 Kosher approved encyclopedia, so you can't use the argument of alternative media being used here:

Margaret Sanger - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Bill Gates Sr. - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Eugenics in the United States - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Rockefeller Foundation - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Bill Gates - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Not saying all of this is gospel truth, but the probability that most of this is legit, is pretty high, given all of the evidence. At the end of the day, it's just my opinion and what I believe to be true when looking at the bigger picture. There's more than meets the eye, usually.

At last, I'll leave you guys with this video:


Some eerie similarities with today's covid vaccine!

inb4 dnr, muh essay, muh tinfoil hat, muh conspiracy etc.

Tagging users who might be interested: @kjsbdfiusdf @Chadlite Rutherford @OOGABOOGA @Lmao @lutte @Yellow_fever_cel @Adriana Lima @curryslayerordeath @TsarTsar444

very high iq if not already BoB it should be

 

[AsGoodAsItGets]

Introduction:

What is eugenics?

It's also worth noting that the German/National Socialist eugenics program was inspired by the American one and the former is more widely referred to as 'a race purity program' where they forcibly sterilized members of the Jewish community and maybe other groups of people as well. The Americans were doing it before the Germans/Nazis were doing it.

So now what we've established the context regarding the history of eugenics, let's delve into the concept of compulsory sterilization:

Spoiler: Context

In 1907, Indiana passed the first eugenics-based compulsory sterilization law in the world. Thirty U.S. states would soon follow their lead.[80][81] Although the law was overturned by the Indiana Supreme Court in 1921,[82] the U.S. Supreme Court, in Buck v. Bell, upheld the constitutionality of the Virginia Sterilization Act of 1924, allowing for the compulsory sterilization of patients of state mental institutions in 1927.[83]

A 1937 Fortune magazine poll found that 2/3 of respondents supported eugenic sterilization of "mental defectives", 63% supported sterilization of criminals, and only 15% opposed both.[88][89]

So 30 states were actively engaging in forced/compulsory sterilization, at the beginning of the previous century, and 30 years later, amongst those who were polled at the time, over 60% supported it.


Fast forward to post WW2 and the latter part of the 20th century, did anything change?

Now, taking into consideration the fact that there is now widespread support for compulsory vaccinations, you really have to look at what went on in the past, up until the 1970s, where people were being TRICKED into believing they were receiving a mere shot/vaccination against some sort of disease when they were actually being STERILIZED.

Personally, I see a lot of parallels here and I think it would be wise to take those into consideration, in case you haven't taken the vaccine (yet) or are still sitting on the fence.

What has changed? What makes you think they're not doing these type of things now?
View attachment 1192115

But it doesn't stop there, they didn't just enforce compulsory sterilization, also had programs for EUTHANASIA in place:

Gas chambers, deliberately poisoning people ALL going on in the 20th century. Not in Germany, but in the United States.

Now, with the eugenics movement, it gets really interesting in how it ties in with those who, in this day and age, are pushing for mandatory vaccines.

Who is pushing for vaccines?

I'm sure some of you are familiar with the Rockefeller family, and its subsequent organisation, given the fact that they are one of the richest, as well as one of the most powerful families in the United States.

Let's get their take and history on eugenics:

So the Rockefellers not only funded American eugenics they also funded German/Nazi eugenics, and they knew the Nazis were sterilizing people in Germany, yet continued to fund them.

How does this tie into prominent figures, in this day and age, pushing for the vaccine?
Let's take a look at the most famous of them all, Bill Gates:

So there you have it, inspired by the 2 most prominent financiers of eugenics, in America as well as in Nazi Germany (in the case of the Rockefellers).

But that's not all. His dad, Bill Gates Sr., sat on the board of Planned Parenthood, an offshoot of the eugenics program.
Let's see what Wikipedia has to say about Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood:

Fun fact:


Now back to Bill Gates Sr.:

There you have it, there's the link.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the son of Robert F. Kennedy and the nephew of former U.S. President John F. Kennedy, has an interesting article on his website about the fact that Bill Gates has achieved FULL INDEMNITY on his vaccine which means that Gates and co. will enjoy full immunity from any liability, should their vaccine injure or worse, kill people.

Here’s Why Bill Gates Wants Indemnity … Are You Willing to Take the Risk?

Why are the world's top vaccine promoters, like Paul Offit and Peter Hotez, frantically warning us about the unique and frightening dangers inherent in developing a coronavirus vaccine?
 On Feb 4th 2020, when there were only 11 active CV cases in the USA, the U.S. quietly pushed through Federal...

childrenshealthdefense.org

Vaccines don't injure or kill people, you say?






Regarding that TED Talk:
4:40

Let's take a closer look at what the Georgia Guidestones are trying to tell us, with regard to the world's population?
View attachment 1192546
Now, if we are to believe this, 6.5 BILLION people will be on the chopping block, sooner or later. Most will take the vaccine, Gates says that population control can be achieved through vaccinations, go figure...

Source: https://www.transcend.org/tms/2020/...win-win-for-pharma-and-mandatory-vaccination/ -> All can be verified

All previous articles are cited from Wikipedia, the no.1 Kosher approved encyclopedia, so you can't use the argument of alternative media being used here:

Margaret Sanger - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Bill Gates Sr. - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Eugenics in the United States - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Rockefeller Foundation - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Bill Gates - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Not saying all of this is gospel truth, but the probability that most of this is legit, is pretty high, given all of the evidence. At the end of the day, it's just my opinion and what I believe to be true when looking at the bigger picture. There's more than meets the eye, usually.

At last, I'll leave you guys with this video:


Some eerie similarities with today's covid vaccine!

inb4 dnr, muh essay, muh tinfoil hat, muh conspiracy etc.

Tagging users who might be interested: @kjsbdfiusdf @Chadlite Rutherford @OOGABOOGA @Lmao @lutte @Yellow_fever_cel @Adriana Lima @curryslayerordeath @TsarTsar444

Smart person. Ive stayed away from the vacc so far too.

 

[Deleted member 10987]

Fuck golems

 

[Lars2210]

Tldr

I took finasteride. I fear nothing

 

[Deleted member 5189]

@portuguesecel Hi.

 

[CtrlAltDelete]

over for me i am double vaccinated

 

[Reckless Turtle]

Mass sterilization is ideal. That isn't the case with the vaccine though. It's too heavily mass-produced by multiple pharmaceutical companies for there to not be whistleblowers.

 

[oldcelloser]

i am uber vaccinated and have had 10 booster shots because ive HAD the shit flu and it was a breeze, for me and everyone i know
funny how all the ppl i see on mainstream media having trouble with this shit are obese/ overweight
like nigga can you fukin not shove processed food in your mouth and fookin RUN for 30 min A DAY
THATS LITERALLY ALL IT TAKES for normies to not be fukin FAT

im never taking the vaccine and neither should you
you should rather risk getting the disease because its just a fucking FLU
it happened before in 2003 and nobody got hysteria like today
i just dont trust that we will have long term side effects but i will see, i guess

 

[oldcelloser]

Low my parents are both alive

why do you have / are worshipping a prostitute on your avi?

 

[Lihito]

What is eugenics?

It is also worth noting that the German/National Socialist eugenics program was inspired by the American one and the former is more widely referred to as 'a race purity program' where they forcibly sterilized members of the Jewish community and maybe other groups of people as well. The Americans were doing it before the Germans were doing it.

The history of sterilization in the United States
So now what we've established the context regarding the history of eugenics, let's delve into the concept of compulsory sterilization:

Spoiler: Context

In 1907, Indiana passed the first eugenics-based compulsory sterilization law in the world. Thirty U.S. states would soon follow their lead.[80][81] Although the law was overturned by the Indiana Supreme Court in 1921,[82] the U.S. Supreme Court, in Buck v. Bell, upheld the constitutionality of the Virginia Sterilization Act of 1924, allowing for the compulsory sterilization of patients of state mental institutions in 1927.[83]

A 1937 Fortune magazine poll found that 2/3 of respondents supported eugenic sterilization of "mental defectives", 63% supported sterilization of criminals, and only 15% opposed both.[88][89]

So 30 states were actively engaging in forced/compulsory sterilization, at the beginning of the previous century, and 30 years later, amongst those who were polled at the time, over 60% supported it.

Post-WW2 eugenics in the United States
Fast forward to the latter part of the 20th century, did anything change?

Now, taking into consideration the fact that there is now widespread support for compulsory vaccinations, you really have to look at what went on in the past, up until the 1970s, where people were being TRICKED into believing they were receiving a mere shot/vaccination against some sort of disease when they were actually being STERILIZED.

Personally, I see a lot of parallels here and I think it would be wise to take those into consideration, in case you haven't taken the vaccine (yet) or are still sitting on the fence.

What has changed? What makes you think they're not doing these types of things now?
View attachment 1192115

Euthanasia as a byproduct of eugenics
They didn't just enforce compulsory sterilization, also had programs for EUTHANASIA in place:

All of this was going on in the 20th century. Not in Germany, but in the United States.

Now, with the eugenics movement, it gets really interesting in how it ties in with those who, in this day and age, are pushing for mandatory vaccines.

Who is pushing for vaccines?
I'm sure some of you are familiar with the Rockefeller family, and its subsequent organisation, given the fact that they are one of the richest, as well as one of the most powerful families in the United States.

What is their take on eugenics?

So the Rockefellers not only funded American eugenics they also funded the German eugenics program, and they were fully aware of the fact that the Germans were sterilizing people in Germany, yet continued to fund them.

Who is the key figure in pushing vaccines, in this day and age?
How does this tie into the most prominent figures, in this day and age, who are pushing for vaccines, on an industrial scale?
Let's take a look at the most famous of them all, Bill Gates:

So there you have it, inspired by the 2 most prominent financiers of eugenics, in America as well as in Nazi Germany (in the case of the Rockefellers).

But that's not all. His dad, Bill Gates Sr., sat on the board of Planned Parenthood, an offshoot of the eugenics program.
Let's see what Wikipedia has to say about Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood:

Fun fact:


Now back to Bill Gates Sr.:

There you have it, there's the link.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the son of Robert F. Kennedy and the nephew of former U.S. President John F. Kennedy, has an interesting article on his website about the fact that Bill Gates has achieved FULL INDEMNITY on his vaccine which means that Gates and co. will enjoy full immunity from any liability, should their vaccine injure or worse, kill people.

Here’s Why Bill Gates Wants Indemnity … Are You Willing to Take the Risk?

Why are the world's top vaccine promoters, like Paul Offit and Peter Hotez, frantically warning us about the unique and frightening dangers inherent in developing a coronavirus vaccine?
 On Feb 4th 2020, when there were only 11 active CV cases in the USA, the U.S. quietly pushed through Federal...

childrenshealthdefense.org

Vaccines don't injure or kill people, you say?







Regarding that TED Talk:

(4:40)

Let's take a closer look at what the Georgia Guidestones are trying to tell us, regarding the world's population:
View attachment 1192546
Now, if we are to believe this, 6.5 BILLION people will be on the chopping block, sooner or later. Most will take the vaccine, Gates says that population control can be achieved through vaccinations, go figure...

Source: https://www.transcend.org/tms/2020/...win-win-for-pharma-and-mandatory-vaccination/ -> All can be verified

All previous articles are cited from Wikipedia, the no.1 Kosher approved encyclopedia, so you can't use the argument of alternative media being used here:

Margaret Sanger - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Bill Gates Sr. - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Eugenics in the United States - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Rockefeller Foundation - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Bill Gates - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

I'm not saying all of this is gospel truth, but the probability that most of this is legit, is pretty high, given all of the evidence. At the end of the day, it's just my opinion and what I believe to be true when looking at the bigger picture. There's more than meets the eye, usually.

At last, I'll leave you guys with this video:


Some eerie similarities with today's COVID vaccine!

Tagging users who might be interested: @kjsbdfiusdf @Chadlite Rutherford @OOGABOOGA @Lmao @lutte @Yellow_fever_cel @Adriana Lima @curryslayerordeath @TsarTsar444

High IQ

Bookmarked

 

[Deleted member 16134]

Well it's about time we had a Eugenetics population control program ain't it

 

[autistic_tendencies]

They wanna get rid of everyone and start fresh with a new robotoid race - reset

 

[Deleted member 2816]

commenting on this thread so that it pushes it in peoples recents to wake up the folk fast asleep

 

[Darkthrone]

Two more seconds before everyone dies of AIDS
Two more seconds before everyone dies of AIDS

 

[BigJimsWornOutTires]

Why don't they research 2 groups of people: vaccinated ones, and non-vaccinated ones, over a prolonged period of time, side by side and see how they measure up in terms of susceptibility with regard to cancer, other diseases, overall health etc.? This has never been done before, yet it would prove a lot.

And just because they didn't die, that doesn't mean that the overall situation improves, per se. In the examples that I listed, the vaccines had a detrimental effect, for example.

I also have to add that I'm not anti-vax, per se. I think the idea of injecting a weakened version of a virus into your body so that your immune system knows how to respond properly in case you actually get the virus, is probably not a bad thing.

I am, however, anti-mrna because literally nobody knows if these type of vaccines are even safe. Also, as I pointed out in the OP, the fact that you cant sue the vaccine company, in case you get injured, given the fact that they've achieved full indemnity, highly alarming, to say the least.

Well, it doesn't necessarily relate to him, but it could be used as a blueprint for what's to come. Gates isn't the only one advocating for population control, btw:
View attachment 1192679
This isn't some made-up quote, you can look it up and see that it's legit.

i'm anti-bullshit and it all sounds like bullshit.

 

[Lygodactylus]

Bla bla bla not a word

 

[MoggerGaston]

I am almost the only un-vaccinated person at my university. They boast about having 99.7% vaccination rates among students+employees. Must be brutal for them to have badboys like me ruin their perfect 100% score.

 

[NickerNationalist88]

Good thread OP

 

[GandyIsNormie]

Bump

 

[GandyIsNormie]

Bump