why the nuclear family dynamic is the major cultural shift that has led to inceldom (revolutionary theory)

Magical Apple

Magical Apple

Wisest
Joined
Dec 29, 2021
Posts
6,246
Reputation
6,479
This is why the why standards for men are so high and birth rates are so damn low. In a nuclear family, the pressures of having children is enormous. You need to make a ridiculous amount of money and at least one parent (usually the woman) has to stay home and live a very isolated life to take care of children. This is one reason modern women are so selective and expect so much from men. The costs of raising kids in the modern world are ridiculous and there is no one to help. If a woman has a family with a man he damn well needs to be able to provide. This basically confines the group of men elligible for marriage to very motivated, capable and high performing men. The average dude simply is not good enough to cut it.

The other problem is a shift to "love" as oppose to family being the reason for marriage. Now people marry for love as oppose to practicality. This means stuff like appearance is now extremely important. Romantic love is very superficial and thus people now marry for very superficial reasons. These types of marriages are also very tenuous and stressful. If one relationship goes bad, everything suffers. Being a housewife in the modern world is also very lonely and shitty. Basically no woman wants to be stuck alone in a house raising some bad behaved kids who are bored out of their minds.

This is the real cause behind extreme female hypergamy. In asia, the financial pressures are just too much for most men and they cannot marry. In the west, the same thing has happened but the idea of romance has made looks a huge factor as well. The result is declining birth rates and very unequal and unhappy societies.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Lihito, Elvisandreaa, Deleted member 17217 and 1 other person
cope

we gave women rights and education now they're in the working force accruing money so they can escape the claws of beta males and rent Chads
 
  • +1
Reactions: 5'8manlet, FrameMogger, Elvisandreaa and 1 other person
1649122597872
 
  • JFL
Reactions: AlexBrown84
cope

we gave women rights and education now they're in the working force accruing money so they can escape the claws of beta males and rent Chads
yes and women cope with education
they think education can be used to bargain for LTR with chad
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Lihito and 6ft4
cope

we gave women rights and education now they're in the working force accruing money so they can escape the claws of beta males and rent Chads
womens rights and education arose because of the nuclear family. In a nuclear family a woman needs to be educated and make money otherwise the family will literally not survive.
 
womens rights and education arose because of the nuclear family. In a nuclear family a woman needs to be educated and make money otherwise the family will literally not survive.
That makes literally no sense. You're connecting dots that aren't there. The woman did not need to get an education and work because a man could work and easily afford homes and a middle class lifestyle with the woman staying at home.

Feminism was a corporate initiative to get more foids in the workplace to keep wages low and competitive and make people work more lol
 
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: Deleted member 13787, stamaster21, Lihito and 1 other person
That makes literally no sense. You're connecting dots that aren't there. The woman did not need to get an education and work because a man could work and easily afford homes and a middle class lifestyle with the woman staying at home.

Feminism was a corporate initiative to get more foids in the workplace to keep wages low and competitive and make people work more lol
You are fucking crazy if you think an average man can work alone and easily afford a home and a middle class lifestyle these days and throughout most of history. This was only possible in the 50s and 60s america due to unprecedented levels of prosperity.
 
You are fucking crazy if you think an average man can work alone and easily afford a home and a middle class lifestyle these days and throughout most of history. This was only possible in the 50s and 60s america due to unprecedented levels of prosperity.
You do realize citing 2 decades actually proves me right?? That it's possible and doable? I'm pretty sure this was the case during the 1970s as well

jfl do you think bitches were enrolling in shitty Psychology degree courses in the 1800s to join the workplace or getting prepared to be a homemaker housewife?? You fucking idiot, do you seriously believe this when this whole feminist both genders work thing has only been a recent thing while for the overwhelming majority of human history it;s been the man at work with the woman at home
 
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: Deleted member 13787, Lihito and Deleted member 17217
You do realize citing 2 decades actually proves me right?? That it's possible and doable? I'm pretty sure this was the case during the 1970s as well

jfl do you think bitches were enrolling in shitty Psychology degree courses in the 1800s to join the workplace or getting prepared to be a homemaker housewife?? You fucking idiot, do you seriously believe this when this whole feminist both genders work thing has only been a recent thing while for the overwhelming majority of human history it;s been the man at work with the woman at home
No you fucking moron. Women used to work to maintain the household and men would work to provide. The difference was that a household traditionally was provided for by at least 3 or 4 men, not one.

During the 50s it changed to ONE man providing for an entire household and ONE woman taking care of an entire household. Being a 50s housewife was depressing and shitty af because unlike before, women were completely alone doing this job.
 
Asians live in multigenerational households. So that's an extended family situation, not nuclear.

Hispanics and blacks have kids despite what you've said. Most of them don't live in nuclear families.

Only whites have the stereotypical nuclear family en masse and it's quickly dying.
 
Asians live in multigenerational households. So that's an extended family situation, not nuclear.

Hispanics and blacks have kids despite what you've said. Most of them don't live in nuclear families.

Only whites have the stereotypical nuclear family en masse and it's quickly dying.
In modern asia typical families consist of two married parents and their unmarried kids.

Blacks come from single parent homes. They have high birthrate but live in horrible poverty.

whites are either single parent homes or families like asians. The difference between whites and asians is that whites tend to leave their parents home even if they are unmarried.

Hispanics are the only ethnicity that has multigenerational households and they have high birth rates and even though they often live in poverty they still live fairly well.
 
  • +1
Reactions: thereallegend
In modern asia typical families consist of two married parents and their unmarried kids.

Blacks come from single parent homes. They have high birthrate but live in horrible poverty.

whites are either single parent homes or families like asians. The difference between whites and asians is that whites tend to leave their parents home even if they are unmarried.

Hispanics are the only ethnicity that has multigenerational households and they have high birth rates and even though they often live in poverty they still live fairly well.
I agree with basically everything you said.

I didn't know multigenerational households are becoming less popular among Asians.

Some Asian family has a mansion near me with multiple generations in it.
 
But what about freedoms and thr America dream
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Magical Apple
No you fucking moron. Women used to work to maintain the household and men would work to provide. The difference was that a household traditionally was provided for by at least 3 or 4 men, not one.
Yeah lmao that simply sounds way too bullshit to be true and even you know that from the 50s to the end of the 70s the male breadwinner could provide easily a solid lifestyle for his kids with a simple job.
 
  • Woah
Reactions: Deleted member 13787
I agree with basically everything you said.

I didn't know multigenerational households are becoming less popular among Asians.

Some Asian family has a mansion near me with multiple generations in it.
they really aren't that common in modern asian cities. Especially in korea and japan. In the US most asians are immigrants who came as a single married couple so the same applies.
 
Yeah lmao that simply sounds way too bullshit to be true and even you know that from the 50s to the end of the 70s the male breadwinner could provide easily a solid lifestyle for his kids with a simple job.
Which throughout most of history was simply not true. Traditionally it took one or two males to provide as well as dozens of other people for support.
 
But what about freedoms and thr America dream
Its pretty horrible actually and is keeping people from wanting to be adults. The american dream defines adulthood as independence which in reality is lonely and terrifying to the average person.
 
Last edited:
Yeah lmao that simply sounds way too bullshit to be true and even you know that from the 50s to the end of the 70s the male breadwinner could provide easily a solid lifestyle for his kids with a simple job.
Im telling folks this my grand father, worked at coca cola company factory in paris part-time, and shared a apartment with hes brother they had enough to spend and save alot, no way in hell you could do that now. You had folks working at target, home-depot and lowes part-time and in 4 years able to buy a house. Most people will not be able to own a home and will rent a apartment till the day they die. The cost of living has risen in comparison to wages.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 15004 and Magical Apple
Im telling folks this my grand father, worked at coca cola company in paris partime, and shared a apartment with hes brother they had enough to spend and save alot, no way in hell you could do that now. You had folks working at target, home-depot and lowes part-time and in 4 years able to buy a house. Most people will not be able to own a home and will rent a apartment till the day they day. The cost of living has risen in comparison to wages.
this tbh.
 
That makes literally no sense. You're connecting dots that aren't there. The woman did not need to get an education and work because a man could work and easily afford homes and a middle class lifestyle with the woman staying at home.

Feminism was a corporate initiative to get more foids in the workplace to keep wages low and competitive and make people work more lol
I agree 100 percent it was corporate ploy to make women enter the workforce to keep wages low and make people work more. Years ago it was unheard of people working 40+ hours a week, most people worked 24-28 hours a week. They had more time for family and to do things, they went on trips camping etc. When women enter the workforce they not only made more money, they started to demand the men make more money to. Currently in the usa, men make on avg 17-23 percent more then women, with black men at the lowest with 17 percent. These women don't just want men making more they , want the perks of the the 1950-1970s being able to have the option to stay home or not work at all, while at the same time having the option to work and their mate make 2x the wage of a average person.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 15004

Similar threads

John Cracovizk
Replies
18
Views
348
mogstars
mogstars
NT Master
Replies
3
Views
192
dehydrated
dehydrated
heightmaxxing
Replies
9
Views
459
OwenGwyther
OwenGwyther
human304
Replies
63
Views
2K
human304
human304

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top