Why would anyone take SARMs

[skibidimaster69]

I understand that teenagers who lack knowledge always resort to SARMs as their PED of choice because they’re quite effective with ‘less risk than steroids’ wrong. Yes SARMs are effective but I don’t get where they are deemed as safer than steroids, I’m going to use the most basic PED/steroid as my comparison, testosterone. Testosterone undoubtedly yields more results compared to any SARM, and it is also less dangerous/risky. Testosterone literally yields more results for less risk. Your body already knows that testosterone is, the recovery process is much easier and so is your probability of fully recovering your testosterone levels and fertility, and you keep significantly more muscle after your cycle. SARMs yield less results compared to testosterone, have more risk, lower chance of reaching back to hormonal baseline levels after cycle and you keep less gains assuming you return back to natural. Oh and they’re much more expensive than test

The only situation I see SARMs somewhat useful is if your pairing it with a testosterone base, even then, there’s other compounds that are superior.

 

[skibidimaster69]

Testosterone > SARMs
In every single way

 

[iamnotgrayipromise]

I understand that teenagers who lack knowledge always resort to SARMs as their PED of choice because they’re quite effective with ‘less risk than steroids’ wrong. Yes SARMs are effective but I don’t get where they are deemed as safer than steroids, I’m going to use the most basic PED/steroid as my comparison, testosterone. Testosterone undoubtedly yields more results compared to any SARM, and it is also less dangerous/risky. Testosterone literally yields more results for less risk. Your body already knows that testosterone is, the recovery process is much easier and so is your probability of fully recovering your testosterone levels and fertility, and you keep significantly more muscle after your cycle. SARMs yield less results compared to testosterone, have more risk, lower chance of reaching back to hormonal baseline levels after cycle and you keep less gains assuming you return back to natural. Oh and they’re much more expensive than test

The only situation I see SARMs somewhat useful is if your pairing it with a testosterone base, even then, there’s other compounds that are superior.

sarms legal, test not legal, teen broke no money and stupid, wants quick result

 

[skibidimaster69]

sarms legal, test not legal, teen broke no money and stupid, wants quick result

I don’t think SARMs are legal, rep me boyo

 

[iamnotgrayipromise]

I don’t think SARMs are legal, rep me boyo

thats what i heard, in my country every steroid is legal so idk, heard about it from someone

 

[skibidimaster69]

thats what i heard, in my country every steroid is legal so idk, heard about it from someone

Yea kinda depends

 

[ghost!]

also SARMS like ostarine are safer and easier to do and hide

 

[boxing-cel]

They’re too scared to pin

Some SARMs are good

 

[skibidimaster69]

also SARMS like ostarine are safer and easier to do and hide

Yea ostarine is safer because it does fucking nothing

 

[skibidimaster69]

They’re too scared to pin

Some SARMs are good

Not near as good as test

 

[boxing-cel]

Not near as good as test

Different use case sir

 

[skibidimaster69]

Different use case sir

Enlighten me

 

[ghost!]

Yea ostarine is safer because it does fucking nothing

it’s a good way to get into pharma

it does a little bit with basically no risk

 

[boxing-cel]

Enlighten me

Fat loss
Hair loss prevention
GH stimulation

 

[skibidimaster69]

Fat loss
Hair loss prevention
GH stimulation

Sarms dont give you more gh, if I’m right it has the same risk for hair loss as test and steroids and test are superior for fat loss

 

[skibidimaster69]

it’s a good way to get into pharma

it does a little bit with basically no risk

Yea you’re right, I wouldn’t deem it worth it though

 

[boxing-cel]

Sarms dont give you more gh, if I’m right it has the same risk for hair loss as test and steroids and test are superior for fat loss

MK677

 

[skibidimaster69]

MK677

Not to sound like a faggot but Mk isn’t a sarm, it’s always grouped with sarms though, don’t even know where that came from, it’s not androgenic or suppressive at all but I do 100% get your point, I’ve made previous threads about how I think Mk is underrated

 

[boxing-cel]

Not to sound like a faggot but Mk isn’t a sarm, it’s always grouped with sarms though, don’t even know where that came from, it’s not androgenic or suppressive at all but I do 100% get your point, I’ve made previous threads about how I think Mk is underrated

I know what you mean but yeah. I just lump RU, MK etc with SARMs

 

[skibidimaster69]

I know what you mean but yeah. I just lump RU, MK etc with SARMs

Yea people often do I don’t blame them, mk is definitely underrated, not for hypertrophy tho it’s ass

 

[Bitchwhipper2]

Sarms are just oral steroids but less toxic honestly.

Time and place

 

[boxing-cel]

Yea people often do I don’t blame them, mk is definitely underrated, not for hypertrophy tho it’s ass

Yeah lol

 

[skibidimaster69]

Sarms are just oral steroids but less toxic honestly.

Time and place

Less toxic? Debatable

 

[Bitchwhipper2]

Less toxic? Debatable

The molecular structure of oral steroids make them inherently more toxic.

Both are shit, but really sarms mogs oral anabolics apart from like superdrol

 

[tomacōck]

I don’t think SARMs are legal, rep me boyo

They're grey

 

[tomacōck]

The molecular structure of oral steroids make them inherently more toxic.

Both are shit, but really sarms mogs oral anabolics apart from like superdrol

Anadrol>super?

 

[Bitchwhipper2]

Anadrol>super?

Bloats you and causes gyno + hairloss.

Superdrol is more toxic, but as a looksmaxxer you gotta pick your poison

 

[skibidimaster69]

The molecular structure of oral steroids make them inherently more toxic.

Both are shit, but really sarms mogs oral anabolics apart from like superdrol

I was using testosterone as my comparison

 

[Bitchwhipper2]

I was using testosterone as my comparison

I was using oral steroids as my comparison

Fair misunderstanding

 

[liquid science]

I understand that teenagers who lack knowledge always resort to SARMs as their PED of choice because they’re quite effective with ‘less risk than steroids’ wrong. Yes SARMs are effective but I don’t get where they are deemed as safer than steroids, I’m going to use the most basic PED/steroid as my comparison, testosterone. Testosterone undoubtedly yields more results compared to any SARM, and it is also less dangerous/risky. Testosterone literally yields more results for less risk. Your body already knows that testosterone is, the recovery process is much easier and so is your probability of fully recovering your testosterone levels and fertility, and you keep significantly more muscle after your cycle. SARMs yield less results compared to testosterone, have more risk, lower chance of reaching back to hormonal baseline levels after cycle and you keep less gains assuming you return back to natural. Oh and they’re much more expensive than test

The only situation I see SARMs somewhat useful is if your pairing it with a testosterone base, even then, there’s other compounds that are superior.

I understand that teenagers who lack knowledge always resort to SARMs as their PED of choice because they’re quite effective with ‘less risk than steroids’ wrong. Yes SARMs are effective but I don’t get where they are deemed as safer than steroids, I’m going to use the most basic PED/steroid as my comparison, testosterone. Testosterone undoubtedly yields more results compared to any SARM, and it is also less dangerous/risky. Testosterone literally yields more results for less risk. Your body already knows that testosterone is, the recovery process is much easier and so is your probability of fully recovering your testosterone levels and fertility, and you keep significantly more muscle after your cycle. SARMs yield less results compared to testosterone, have more risk, lower chance of reaching back to hormonal baseline levels after cycle and you keep less gains assuming you return back to natural. Oh and they’re much more expensive than test

The only situation I see SARMs somewhat useful is if your pairing it with a testosterone base, even then, there’s other compounds that are superior.

it depends on the sarm, ac262 for example has a way higher anabolic to androgenic ratio, way safer than test

 

[sub5bhai]

I understand that teenagers who lack knowledge always resort to SARMs as their PED of choice because they’re quite effective with ‘less risk than steroids’ wrong. Yes SARMs are effective but I don’t get where they are deemed as safer than steroids, I’m going to use the most basic PED/steroid as my comparison, testosterone. Testosterone undoubtedly yields more results compared to any SARM, and it is also less dangerous/risky. Testosterone literally yields more results for less risk. Your body already knows that testosterone is, the recovery process is much easier and so is your probability of fully recovering your testosterone levels and fertility, and you keep significantly more muscle after your cycle. SARMs yield less results compared to testosterone, have more risk, lower chance of reaching back to hormonal baseline levels after cycle and you keep less gains assuming you return back to natural. Oh and they’re much more expensive than test

The only situation I see SARMs somewhat useful is if your pairing it with a testosterone base, even then, there’s other compounds that are superior.

they scared of needles

 

[dk14gm]

I understand that teenagers who lack knowledge always resort to SARMs as their PED of choice because they’re quite effective with ‘less risk than steroids’ wrong. Yes SARMs are effective but I don’t get where they are deemed as safer than steroids, I’m going to use the most basic PED/steroid as my comparison, testosterone. Testosterone undoubtedly yields more results compared to any SARM, and it is also less dangerous/risky. Testosterone literally yields more results for less risk. Your body already knows that testosterone is, the recovery process is much easier and so is your probability of fully recovering your testosterone levels and fertility, and you keep significantly more muscle after your cycle. SARMs yield less results compared to testosterone, have more risk, lower chance of reaching back to hormonal baseline levels after cycle and you keep less gains assuming you return back to natural. Oh and they’re much more expensive than test

The only situation I see SARMs somewhat useful is if your pairing it with a testosterone base, even then, there’s other compounds that are superior.

im 16 likley plates are fused and im 180cm and 76kg on a lean bulk and alos have noticable gyno not extremly bad but noticable, Im 1 year and a half in gym and want more muscle and a bit of styrength is test worse and what do u recommend if so what is the worst thing with test that can happen to me

 

[whatisausername]

Testosterone > SARMs
In every single way

Except in clinical use it for anti muscle wasting. Got my grandma on ostarine 3mg and that has gone well lol.