skibidimaster69
Destined roider
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2024
- Posts
- 662
- Reputation
- 580
I understand that teenagers who lack knowledge always resort to SARMs as their PED of choice because they’re quite effective with ‘less risk than steroids’ wrong. Yes SARMs are effective but I don’t get where they are deemed as safer than steroids, I’m going to use the most basic PED/steroid as my comparison, testosterone. Testosterone undoubtedly yields more results compared to any SARM, and it is also less dangerous/risky. Testosterone literally yields more results for less risk. Your body already knows that testosterone is, the recovery process is much easier and so is your probability of fully recovering your testosterone levels and fertility, and you keep significantly more muscle after your cycle. SARMs yield less results compared to testosterone, have more risk, lower chance of reaching back to hormonal baseline levels after cycle and you keep less gains assuming you return back to natural. Oh and they’re much more expensive than test
The only situation I see SARMs somewhat useful is if your pairing it with a testosterone base, even then, there’s other compounds that are superior.
The only situation I see SARMs somewhat useful is if your pairing it with a testosterone base, even then, there’s other compounds that are superior.