World Population in 2100

Chadeep

Chadeep

Mumbai Slum Dweller
Joined
Feb 29, 2020
Posts
38,606
Reputation
104,652
Screenshot 2024 07 22 13 18 31 73 f9ee0578fe1cc94de7482bd41accb329
Screenshot 2024 07 22 13 18 58 32 f9ee0578fe1cc94de7482bd41accb329
 
  • Hmm...
  • JFL
Reactions: 14vic, 5'7 zoomer and Imretarded?
Such things can't be predicted so far in the future.

Jfl if you think fucking nigeria can have 800 million people without instant mass starvation
 
  • +1
Reactions: iblamechico, LongForgotten, Deleted member 65576 and 7 others
Such things can't be predicted so far in the future.

Jfl if you think fucking nigeria can have 800 million people without instant mass starvation
I'm surprised by Jewrope even Existing with similar level of population. Maybe Ahmed and Fatima keeping it stagnant.
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: StacyRepellent, Deleted member 65576, MoggerGaston and 4 others
Yeah Asia is dying out
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Sub5kang
I'm surprised by Jewrope even Existing with similar level of population. Maybe Ahmed and Fatima keeping it stagnant.
who knows. Birth rates can increase. sub 2 birth rates in the west are a very new thing and they're from the horrid housing and rent prices.

I highly doubt South korea will stay below 1 child per woman for example. That's perfect breeding ground for extremism and reform.

What i find ridiculous is Africa with four billion people. This is the same continent that imports most of it's food. We're also running low on top soil and phosphorus reserves (fertilizer). Jfl at people thinking we can sustain several billion extra people.
 
  • +1
Reactions: ReadBooksEveryday and Chadeep
who knows. Birth rates can increase. sub 2 birth rates in the west are a very new thing and they're from the horrid housing and rent prices.

I highly doubt South korea will stay below 1 child per woman for example. That's perfect breeding ground for extremism and reform.

What i find ridiculous is Africa with four billion people. This is the same continent that imports most of it's food. We're also running low on top soil and phosphorus reserves (fertilizer). Jfl at people thinking we can sustain several billion extra people.
African would be owned by China by 2100. They are literally buying them for pennies.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: StacyRepellent, ReadBooksEveryday and Imretarded?
African would be owned by China by 2100. They are literally buying them for pennies.
that debt trap shit is just africans scamming chinese.

Black people will just refuse to pay back or give up control of ports:blackpill::blackpill::blackpill:
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 61703, Sub5kang and Chadeep
who knows. Birth rates can increase. sub 2 birth rates in the west are a very new thing and they're from the horrid housing and rent prices.

I highly doubt South korea will stay below 1 child per woman for example. That's perfect breeding ground for extremism and reform.

What i find ridiculous is Africa with four billion people. This is the same continent that imports most of it's food. We're also running low on top soil and phosphorus reserves (fertilizer). Jfl at people thinking we can sustain several billion extra people.
Birth Rates is correlated to how rich a Country is. Low Income countries produce more kids than High Income countries. I think it has to do with rising costs of raising a Child. In India Average Villager has 10 kids meanwhile Urban Rich people at Max have 2.
 
  • +1
Reactions: StacyRepellent and Imretarded?
Such things can't be predicted so far in the future.

Jfl if you think fucking nigeria can have 800 million people without instant mass starvation
>believing in Malthusian decline when America, and the West at large, give infinity aid to the continent of their future doctors, nurses, lawyers, engineers and astronauts.
 
Last edited:
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Imretarded?
Europe has 100 million too many people in those charts
 
  • +1
Reactions: Chadeep
China will also drop much more than that, to around 700-500 million based on current trends, and the numbers go lower every year
 
  • +1
Reactions: SubhumanForever and Chadeep
Birth Rates is correlated to how rich a Country is. Low Income countries produce more kids than High Income countries. I think it has to do with rising costs of raising a Child. In India Average Villager has 10 kids meanwhile Urban Rich people at Max have 2.
yeah but it's not a causal relationship.

Main reason is the fact women aren't objects no more. I think woman's natural inclination is to have 2-3 kids while in patriarchal societies, they're basically raped by their husband and end up with 5-6 kids. That's the birth rate in America prior to sexual revolution in 60s.

What drags birth rates down below replacement rate is capitalist exploitation in the housing market and wages. you said yourself that cost of having a kid is a big one.

We should strengthen worker rights, get our buying power back. I'd rather go further and democratize the workplace and decomodify housing
 
  • +1
Reactions: borismonster and Chadeep
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: StacyRepellent and Imretarded?
>believing in Malthusian decline when America, and the West at large, give infinity aid to the continent of their future doctors, nurses, lawyers, engineers and astronauts.
The west doesn't have infinite resources dumbass. Those places are the ones that are suffering from top soil erosion because they're working at far above sustainable agricultural output.
 
The west doesn't have infinite resources dumbass. Those places are the ones that are suffering from top soil erosion because they're working at far above sustainable agricultural output.
If the West declines, it will be because of incompetence, occurring far before the West ever runs out of resources.
> Those places are the ones that are suffering from top soil erosion because they're working at far above sustainable agricultural output.
Muh traditional agriculture.
If the powers that be want to, with the least resource expenditure, sustain a demographic, then they will engineer a cheaper, quicker albeit less healthy manner of doing so (vertical farms, MRNA food, GMO etc, the output of this is effectively infinite and limited only by will).
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Imretarded?
If the West declines, it will be because of incompetence, occurring far before the West ever runs out of resources.
> Those places are the ones that are suffering from top soil erosion because they're working at far above sustainable agricultural output.
Muh traditional agriculture.
If the powers that be want to, with the least resource expenditure, sustain a demographic, then they will engineer a cheaper, quicker albeit less healthy manner of doing so (vertical farms, MRNA food, GMO etc, the output of this is effectively infinite and limited only by will).
You don't know what you're talking about.

You can't engineer yourself out every problem. You NEED phosphorus and other minerals to farm properly. You can't GMO and hydroponics farming your way out of a lack of enough crucial minerals for plants to grow.

'yeah bro just GMO crops to not need phosphorus in their chemistry'
 
You don't know what you're talking about.

You can't engineer yourself out every problem. You NEED phosphorus and other minerals to farm properly. You can't GMO and hydroponics farming your way out of a lack of enough crucial minerals for plants to grow.

'yeah bro just GMO crops to not need phosphorus in their chemistry'
You are short sighted, so I will keep this brief.
What part of 'they will engineer a cheaper, quicker, albeit less healthy manner of doing so', don't you understand?'
The operative term is 'they will engineer'.

If not vertical farms, MRNA food, GMO, some combination of them, then something new entirely will be used to keep the masses, their cattle, just above sustenance.

For example, DARPA is currently experimenting with 'microbial food' out of 'thin air'.
The resources for this over a long enough period of innovation will be minute compared to traditional farming.
Again, the aim isn't to create healthy independent demographic but provide the masses, the bare minimum for sustenance.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Imretarded?
You are short sighted, so I will keep this brief.
What part of 'they will engineer a cheaper, quicker, albeit less healthy manner of doing so', don't you understand?'
The operative term is 'they will engineer'.

If not vertical farms, MRNA food, GMO, some combination of them, then something new entirely will be used to keep the masses, their cattle, just above sustenance.

For example, DARPA is currently experimenting with 'microbial food' out of 'thin air'.
The resources for this over a long enough period of innovation will be minute compared to traditional farming.
Again, the aim isn't to create healthy independent demographic but provide the masses, the bare minimum for sustenance.
Food out of air. Unserious midwit thinking science can do anything. You're looking at magic, not a practical thing that can happen.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 80684
DISGUSTING
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 67581 and Imretarded?
Food out of air. Unserious midwit thinking science can do anything. You're looking at magic, not a practical thing that can happen.
The argument isn't the viability of that specific innovation, but that humanity may very well innovate processes beyond your realm of comprehension, to create alternative means of demographic sustenance, with low resources.
You led your original post saying 'Such things [population group] can't be predicted so far in the future' and yet you practice absolutism regarding present day agriculture and the capacity to innovate.
You are being inconsistent.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 80684
3 BILLION EXTRA NIGGERS?

THE WORLD IS DONE FOR
 
  • JFL
Reactions: 8uAte and Chadeep
fl if you think fucking nigeria can have 800 million people without instant mass starvation
they have raw milk and raw meat with tons of sunlight and fresh air

they'll be good
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Chadeep and Imretarded?

Similar threads

asdvek
Replies
18
Views
475
underatedgreycel
underatedgreycel
Spur der Verwüstung
  • Poll
Replies
39
Views
750
CD34
CD34
StuntmanMike
Replies
1
Views
50
DirtyBlonde
DirtyBlonde
AuraMaxxing
Replies
29
Views
433
scout1
scout1
I
Replies
6
Views
131
klip11
klip11

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top