Would you rather be a Healthy Sub5 or an Ill and disabled Chad?

Who would you rather be?

  • Healthmaxxed Sub5

    Votes: 7 77.8%
  • Ill and disabled Chad

    Votes: 2 22.2%

  • Total voters
    9
PubertyMaxxer

PubertyMaxxer

Face, Height, Frame, Dick
Joined
Oct 15, 2019
Posts
14,995
Reputation
19,031
Would you prefer to be a below average height dicklet framelet Super Healthy Sub5 with Good Brain Health also without any disabilities and strong immune system and health

Or

Above average height Macropenis Wide Shoulder-narrow hips Extremely Ill Chad with multiple disabilities (vision, gait and hearing problems etc) with fucked up Brain Health and IQ who gets sick all the time
 
  • +1
Reactions: Torycel and logicalpill850
not even a question
 
Would you prefer to be a below average height dicklet framelet Super Healthy Sub5 with Good Brain Health also without any disabilities and strong immune system and health

Or

Above average height Macropenis Wide Shoulder-narrow hips Extremely Ill Chad with multiple disabilities (vision, gait and hearing problems etc) with fucked up Brain Health and IQ who gets sick all the time
there is no ill chad
ideal facial ratios are a byproduct of health and optimal development
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: 100%nt, zharupodrugu, PubertyMaxxer and 1 other person
there is no ill chad
ideal facial ratios are a byproduct of health and optimal development
Ideal facial ratios are about micrometers of bone. Don't think a 120 degree gonial angle, 3,0 PFL to PFH or 2,50 Chin to philtrum ratio makes you any "healthier" than having a 130 degree gonial angle, 2,0 PFL to PFH and 2,0 chin to philtrum ratio
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Aroon
Ideal facial ratios are about micrometers of bone. Don't think a 120 degree gonial angle, 3,0 PFL to PFH or 2,50 Chin to philtrum ratio makes you any "healthier" than having a 130 degree gonial angle, 2,0 PFL to PFH and 2,0 chin to philtrum ratio
it does tho, more proportional ratios=higher perceived health
reason why we wanna reproduce with attractive people, cause we perceive them as healthy and fertile
 
  • +1
Reactions: zharupodrugu
Ideal facial ratios are about micrometers of bone. Don't think a 120 degree gonial angle, 3,0 PFL to PFH or 2,50 Chin to philtrum ratio makes you any "healthier" than having a 130 degree gonial angle, 2,0 PFL to PFH and 2,0 chin to philtrum ratio
There is a correlation. And nontheless it's also about health indicators. Healthy hair, good skin, thick eyebrows and so on which you can't be attractive without. So there is almost no way an attractive person could be like that
 
Ideal facial ratios are about micrometers of bone. Don't think a 120 degree gonial angle, 3,0 PFL to PFH or 2,50 Chin to philtrum ratio makes you any "healthier" than having a 130 degree gonial angle, 2,0 PFL to PFH and 2,0 chin to philtrum ratio
gait instantly gonna ruin chad's face. Even if u've been crippled as an adult give it a year or two and it gonna turn him into subhuman.

Chad is the worst option. He will suffer and he wont retain his looks for long



Theres a movie about crippled rich chad and hes roping in the end.
1765652233320


Severly autistic chad. Hes basically disabled and cant enjoy his looks
1765652543396
 
  • +1
Reactions: PubertyMaxxer

Similar threads

emirtbp
Replies
16
Views
1K
htb_gooner
htb_gooner
Nodesbitch
Replies
30
Views
2K
aabb123
aabb123
TheoryChad
Replies
15
Views
3K
the_nextDavidLaid
the_nextDavidLaid
chadintraining
Replies
17
Views
446
childishkillah
childishkillah

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top