Discussion Would you rather be a Healthy Sub5 or an Ill and disabled Chad?

Who would you rather be?

  • Healthmaxxed Sub5

    Votes: 7 63.6%
  • Ill and disabled Chad

    Votes: 4 36.4%

  • Total voters
    11
PubertyMaxxer

PubertyMaxxer

Face, Height, Frame, Dick
Joined
Oct 15, 2019
Posts
15,094
Reputation
19,129
Would you prefer to be a below average height dicklet framelet Super Healthy Sub5 with Good Brain Health also without any disabilities and strong immune system and health

Or

Above average height Macropenis Wide Shoulder-narrow hips Extremely Ill Chad with multiple disabilities (vision, gait and hearing problems etc) with fucked up Brain Health and IQ who gets sick all the time
 
logicalpill850

logicalpill850

I wanna see Gengar circumcized
Joined
Oct 19, 2025
Posts
2,145
Reputation
2,328
not even a question
 
jester

jester

Luminary
Joined
Nov 15, 2025
Posts
4,824
Reputation
4,912
Would you prefer to be a below average height dicklet framelet Super Healthy Sub5 with Good Brain Health also without any disabilities and strong immune system and health

Or

Above average height Macropenis Wide Shoulder-narrow hips Extremely Ill Chad with multiple disabilities (vision, gait and hearing problems etc) with fucked up Brain Health and IQ who gets sick all the time
there is no ill chad
ideal facial ratios are a byproduct of health and optimal development
 
PubertyMaxxer

PubertyMaxxer

Face, Height, Frame, Dick
Joined
Oct 15, 2019
Posts
15,094
Reputation
19,129
there is no ill chad
ideal facial ratios are a byproduct of health and optimal development
Ideal facial ratios are about micrometers of bone. Don't think a 120 degree gonial angle, 3,0 PFL to PFH or 2,50 Chin to philtrum ratio makes you any "healthier" than having a 130 degree gonial angle, 2,0 PFL to PFH and 2,0 chin to philtrum ratio
 
jester

jester

Luminary
Joined
Nov 15, 2025
Posts
4,824
Reputation
4,912
Ideal facial ratios are about micrometers of bone. Don't think a 120 degree gonial angle, 3,0 PFL to PFH or 2,50 Chin to philtrum ratio makes you any "healthier" than having a 130 degree gonial angle, 2,0 PFL to PFH and 2,0 chin to philtrum ratio
it does tho, more proportional ratios=higher perceived health
reason why we wanna reproduce with attractive people, cause we perceive them as healthy and fertile
 
D

Deleted member 159597

I like longs walks on the beach, Yoga, and Niggers
Joined
Jun 4, 2025
Posts
4,233
Reputation
6,354
Ideal facial ratios are about micrometers of bone. Don't think a 120 degree gonial angle, 3,0 PFL to PFH or 2,50 Chin to philtrum ratio makes you any "healthier" than having a 130 degree gonial angle, 2,0 PFL to PFH and 2,0 chin to philtrum ratio
There is a correlation. And nontheless it's also about health indicators. Healthy hair, good skin, thick eyebrows and so on which you can't be attractive without. So there is almost no way an attractive person could be like that
 
Z

zharupodrugu

Luminary
Joined
Jun 24, 2022
Posts
6,036
Reputation
6,848
Ideal facial ratios are about micrometers of bone. Don't think a 120 degree gonial angle, 3,0 PFL to PFH or 2,50 Chin to philtrum ratio makes you any "healthier" than having a 130 degree gonial angle, 2,0 PFL to PFH and 2,0 chin to philtrum ratio
gait instantly gonna ruin chad's face. Even if u've been crippled as an adult give it a year or two and it gonna turn him into subhuman.

Chad is the worst option. He will suffer and he wont retain his looks for long



Theres a movie about crippled rich chad and hes roping in the end.
1765652233320


Severly autistic chad. Hes basically disabled and cant enjoy his looks
1765652543396
 

Similar threads

A
Replies
3
Views
35
AbelMakkonenTesfa
AbelMakkonenTesfa
ascendmaxx28
Replies
4
Views
50
fgfr3
F
HowtoCCWRotation
Replies
5
Views
58
valugoatluvscience
valugoatluvscience
goodgenetic01
Replies
8
Views
74
Detective
Detective
hopelessromanticc
Replies
9
Views
82
medialcanthus
medialcanthus

Users who are viewing this thread

Top